Virtual Library
Start Your Search
J. Ross
Moderator of
-
+
O03 - NSCLC - Targeted Therapies I (ID 113)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Oral Abstract Session
- Track: Medical Oncology
- Presentations: 8
- Moderators:J. Ross, J.C. Yang
- Coordinates: 10/28/2013, 10:30 - 12:00, Bayside Auditorium B, Level 1
-
+
O03.01 - GALAXY-1: Randomized phase II study of docetaxel with or without ganetespib in advanced lung adenocarcinoma: Results in biomarker sub-groups and all adenocarcinoma patients. (ID 1715)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): S.S. Ramalingam, G. Shapiro, V. Hirsh, B. Zaric, T. Ceric, E. Poddubskaya, J. Goldman, T. Ciuleanu, F.R. Khuri, J. Spicer, O. Skrylnik, E. Felip, C. Manegold, Z. Andric, R. Rosell, S. Badovinac, T. Pieters, M.R. Modiano, V.M. Vukovic, I. Yalcin, F. Teofilovici, I. El-Hariry, W. Guo, S.R. Bahcall, G. Goss, D. Fennell
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Ganetespib (G) is a highly potent 2[nd]-generation Hsp90 inhibitor showing synergistic activity with docetaxel (D) in NSCLC xenografts. G has a favorable clinical safety profile and has shown single-agent clinical activity in NSCLC patients with tumors harboring EML4-ALK translocations and KRAS mutations (mKRAS).Methods
We conducted a randomized, international open-label Phase 2 study of D with or without G in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma, one prior systemic therapy, and ECOG PS 0/1. D was given at 75 mg/m[2] on Day 1 of a three-week cycle in both arms. In the combination arm, G was given at 150 mg/m[2] on Days 1 and 15. The co-primary endpoints were PFS in patients with elevated LDH (eLDH) levels, or tumors harboring KRAS mutation. Key secondary endpoints were OS and PFS in all adenocarcinoma patients. Target enrollment was 240 adenocarcinoma patients, including 120 eLDH and 80 mKRAS patients. The study was initiated in all NSCLC patients and amended to include only those with adenocarcinoma histology.Results
Enrollment of 252 adenocarcinoma patients completed in November 2012; enrollment of eLDH (total N=112) and mKRAS (total N= 86) patients completed in May 2013. In all adenocarcinoma patients (N=252), baseline characteristics were balanced between the two arms (median age 60 years, males 56%, PS 0 41% and never-smokers 25%). Median numbers of cycles delivered were 6 and 4 for D+G and D, respectively. Grade 3/4 adverse events for the D+G and D alone arms were: neutropenia 37% vs. 38%; fatigue 6% vs. 3%; anemia 8% vs. 2%; diarrhea 3% vs. 0; fever with neutropenia 11% vs. 2%. A pre-specified analysis was conducted in May 2013. PFS HR for eLDH population (N=76) was 0.88 (90% CI: 0.57, 1.36, p=0.310); OS HR was 0.63 (90% CI: 0.40, 0.99, p=0.046). PFS HR for mKRAS population (N=63) was 0.83 (90% CI: 0.51, 1.37, p=0.271); and OS HR was 0.85 (90% CI: 0.48, 1.50, p=0.313). OS HR in the all adenocarcinoma population was 0.82 (90% CI: 0.62, 1.09, p=0.082), and the PFS HR was 0.84 (90% CI: 0.65, 1.07, p=0.038). For patients that were enrolled >6 months after diagnosis of advanced NSCLC (N=176), a pre-specified stratification factor, the OS HR was 0.61 (90% CI: 0.43, 0.87, p=0.0093), and the PFS HR was 0.61 (90% CI: 0.45, 0.83, p=0.0041). Final data analysis is expected by end of September 2013. Updated PFS and OS results for all populations will be presented at the meeting.Conclusion
Survival improvement was noted in all adenocarcinoma patients with the addition of ganetespib to docetaxel. The maximal benefit was achieved in patients with eLDH and those diagnosed with advanced NSCLC >6 months prior to study entry.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O03.02 - Randomized Phase-3 trial (INSPIRE) of Necitumumab plus Cisplatin-Pemetrexed versus Cisplatin-Pemetrexed Alone as First-Line Therapy in Stage IV Non-Squamous NSCLC (ID 2337)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): L. Paz-Ares, J. Mezger, T. Ciuleanu, J.R. Fischer, J. Von Pawel, M. Provencio, A. Kazarnowicz, G. Losonczy, G. Castro Jr., A. Szczesna, L. Crino, M. Reck, R. Ramlau, E. Ulsperger, C. Schumann, J.E. Miziara, A. Lessa, H. Depenbrock, V. Soldatenkova, B. Balint, F.R. Hirsch, M.A. Socinski
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Necitumumab is a human IgG1 anti-EGFR1 monoclonal antibody that competes for the binding of natural ligands to this receptor and prevents receptor activation. EGFR1 is detectable in approximately 85% of advanced NSCLC tumors. This phase 3 study investigated necitumumab in combination with first-line chemotherapy in advanced non-squamous NSCLC.Methods
Patients with histologically or cytologically proven stage IV non-squamous NSCLC were randomized 1:1 to either Arm A: cisplatin 75mg/m[2] i.v.-pemetrexed 500mg/m[2] i.v. (Cis + PEM) on Day 1+ necitumumab 800mg i.v. on Days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle or Arm B: Cis+PEM alone. Patients received these regimens for up to six cycles. For patients in Arm A with at least stable disease, necitumumab continued until PD or intolerable toxicity. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), safety, and EGFR protein expression level by immunohistochemistry (H-score) utilizing archived tumor tissue based on a mandatory tissue collection. The planned sample size of this study was 947 patients (assuming a hazard ratio [HR] of 0.8 would allow 85% power at 2-sided alpha level of 0.05). After 633 patients, enrollment was stopped (after Feb 2011) following an Independent Data Monitoring Committee (IDMC) recommendation.Results
Between Nov 2009 and Feb 2011 633 patients were randomized (315 Arm A; 318 Arm B). Baseline characteristics were balanced between the arms; 67.0% were male and 33.0% female; ECOG-PS 0/1 94.2 % and PS 2 5.7 %. No difference between treatment arms was observed for OS (median 11.3 vs 11.5 months; HR 1.01 95%-CI [0.84, 1.21]), PFS (median 5.6 vs 5.6 months, HR 0.96 95%-CI [0.80, 1.16]) and ORR (31.1 vs 32.1%; Odds ratio 0.96 95%-CI [0.68, 1.34]). The exploratory analysis in 490 patients assessable for H-score revealed no association between H-score and differences in efficacy between treatment arms (H-score < 200: mOS 8.97 vs 9.72 months, HR 1.07, mPFS 4.90 vs 4.76 months, HR 0.95, ORR 27.1 vs 26.0%; H-score ≥ 200: mOS 15.01 vs 13.34 months, HR 1.03, mPFS 5.59 vs 5.62 months, HR 0.94, ORR 39.6 vs 39.4%). Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) occurring more frequently in Arm A included skin or subcutaneous disorders (14.1 vs 0.3%), thromboembolic events (9.5 vs 6.4%), hypomagnesaemia (7.6 vs 2.2%), asthenia (6.9 vs 1.9%), vomiting (6.6 vs 3.2%), dyspnea (5.3 vs 2.6%) and diarrhea (4.3 vs 2.2%). The frequency of study drug related deaths was 4.9% and 2.9% in Arms A and B, respectively.Conclusion
In this study, the addition of necitumumab did not improve the efficacy outcome over cisplatin plus pemetrexed alone in advanced non-squamous-NSCLC. The EGFR H-score did not seem to predict the efficacy outcomes of necitumumab in combination with cisplatin plus pemetrexed. The addition of necitumumab resulted in a higher frequency of grade ≥ 3 AE (skin reaction, GI, asthenia and other) and an imbalance of grade ≥ 3 thromboembolic events. Further biomarker studies are ongoing.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
With recent successes of targeted therapeutics, there has been increased enthusiasm to enroll patients with NSCLC into phase I trials. Most phase I prognostic indices have been derived from patient populations where NSCLC is underrepresented.Methods
Retrospective review of NSCLC patients enrolled between 2005-2012 at National Cancer Centre Singapore was performed, collating data on demographics, molecular profiles, trial characteristics and clinical outcomes (using RECIST criteria) to identify prognostic factors to improve patient selection.Results
167 patients were treated on 20 phase I trials. Median (range) age 60.7 years (22.7–84.7), 58% male, adenocarcinoma/squamous/NOS/others (75.4%/9.6%/12.6%/2.4%). 13% were at high risk of nutritional deficiency (BMI<18.5), and ECOG 0(21%)/1(77%)/2(2.4%). Median (range) prior chemotherapy was 2 (0-6) and 99% received at least one treatment line. Class of agents include anti-angiogenics (50.3%), signal transduction pathway inhibitors (STPi) 46%. Only 4.2% received cytotoxics alone. 86.2% were on combination regimens, of which two-thirds on combinations of chemotherapy and small molecule. Between 2008-2012, proportion of patient tumors with molecular alterations identified increased from 5.5% to 62.5%, facilitating enrolment into trials designed for a specific genotype (or “matched” trials). 35% and 7.8% of patients participated on trials targeting EGFR and ALK alterations respectively. With a median follow up of 8.7 months, progression free survival was 3.9m (95%CI:3.4–5.8), overall survival (OS) 10.4m (95%CI:8.0–11.7). Among evaluable patients, 24.8% (95%CI:18.2–32.5) had complete/partial response; clinical benefit rate (CBR) 75.8% (95%CI:68.2–82.4). 90-day mortality (90DM) was 15%. Patients participating in “matched” trials had a lower risk of death (HR 0.55 [95%CI:0.38-0.78] p<0.001) compared to those on unselected or “unmatched” trials (median OS 11.9 v 7.6). On univariate analysis, low BMI<18.5, ECOG>0, ≥3 metastatic sites, presence of bone metastasis, low albumin (<35), low Hb (<12), ≥ 3 prior lines of chemotherapy and non-participation in a "matched" trial were significant negative prognostic factors for OS. On multivariate analysis, ECOG, number of metastatic sites, albumin and trial type (targeting EGFR/ALK/others), emerged as independent variables. These factors were used to construct a prognostic nomogram to predict OS at 3, 6 and 12m. Of 12 published prognostic indices, 8 models were validated in our patient cohort, with the highest c-index being 0.66. Pairwise comparison against these 8 (7 tumor agnostic; 1 NSCLC) prognostic indices, found the nomogram to be superior in predicting OS, with a c-index of 0.74.Conclusion
This is the largest analysis of phase I NSCLC patients using individual patient data. Outcome of NSCLC patients in phase I trials is promising with CBR 76% and median OS 10.8m. Our nomogram – comprising of ECOG, albumin, number of metastatic sites, participation in a “matched” trial – is uniquely derived from NSCLC patients and was a better predictor of OS compared to 8 published phase I prognostic scores.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O03.04 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3949)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): B. Besse
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O03.05 - Activity of afatinib in uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations: Findings from three trials of afatinib in EGFR mutation-positive lung cancer (ID 1114)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): J.C. Yang, L.V. Sequist, S.L. Geater, C. Tsai, T.S.K. Mok, M. Schuler, N. Yamamoto, D. Massey, V. Zazulina, Y. Wu
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
EGFR (ErbB1) mutations define a lung cancer subtype with exquisite sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). While in-frame deletion in exon 19 (Del19) and a point mutation (L858R) in exon 21 are the two most common sensitizing EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), approximately 10% of EGFR mutation-positive tumours harbour uncommon mutations. These mutations represent a heterogeneous group of rare molecular alterations (or combinations) within exons 18–21, whose oncogenicity and sensitivity to EGFR TKIs may vary and has not been prospectively studied. Here we present the first prospective data series on activity of afatinib, the irreversible ErbB Family Blocker, in patients with tumours harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations.Methods
This analysis is based on data from EGFR mutation-positive patients included in the LUX-Lung 2 (Phase II), LUX-Lung 3 and LUX-Lung 6 (both Phase III) studies. EGFR mutations were identified prospectively by direct sequencing in LUX-Lung 2 and by central testing with TheraScreen EGFR RGQ PCR kit (TheraScreen29) in LUX-Lung 3 and 6. Patients were classified as having common (Del19 or L858R) or uncommon (all other single or complex) mutations. Uncommon mutations were categorized into three groups: de novo T790M (alone or in combination with other mutations); exon 20 insertions; and other. Objective response rate (ORR), disease control (DCR), duration of response and progression-free survival (PFS) were assessed by independent review.Results
Seventy-five patients (LUX-Lung 2: n=23; LUX-Lung 3: n=26; and LUX-Lung 6: n=26) had uncommon mutations, accounting for 12.5% of all afatinib patients in these studies. The majority of patients received afatinib first line; 13 patients from LUX-Lung 2 received afatinib after chemotherapy. Breakdown into the three groups was T790M: n=14; Exon 20 insertions: n=23; other: n=38 (most frequent types were L861Q: n=12; G719X: n=8; G719X+S768I: n= 5; G719X+L861Q: n=3). Efficacy results for each group are shown below. Further details by mutation status will be presented.Mutation ORR, % (n=) Median duration of response, months (95% confidence interval) DCR (ORR + stable disease), % (n) Median PFS, months (95% confidence interval) Median survival, months (95% confidence interval) De novo T790M alone or in combination with other mutations (n=14) 14.3 (2) Individual response durations: 4.1, 12.4 64.2 (9) 2.9 (1.2−8.3) 14.9 (8.1−24.9) Exon 20 insertions (n=23) 8.7 (2) Individual response durations: 4.2, 10.1 65.2 (15) 2.7 (1.8−4.2) 9.4 (4.1−21.0) Other (n=38) 71.1 (27) 11.1 (4.1, 15.2) 84.2 (32) 10.7 (5.6−14.7) 18.6 (16.4−not estimable) Conclusion
Afatinib was active in lung tumours harbouring uncommon EGFR mutations, such as G719X, L861Q, S768I. Rate and duration of response was comparable with that previously observed in patients with common mutations in these trials. The response rate was low in tumours with de novo T790M mutations and insertions in exon 20 but durable tumour control was achieved in some patients. To date this is the largest analysis of data for prospectively identified patients with uncommon EGFR mutations; treatment options in this heterogeneous group of tumours will be discussed.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O03.06 - First-In-Human Evaluation of CO-1686, an Irreversible, Highly, Selective Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor of Mutations of EGFR (Activating and T790M) (ID 1354)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): J. Soria, L.V. Sequist, S. Gadgeel, J. Goldman, H. Wakelee, A. Varga, P. Fidias, A.J. Wozniak, J.W. Neal, R.C. Doebele, E.B. Garon, S. Jaw-Tsai, L. Caunt, P. Kaur, L. Rolfe, A. Allen, D..R. Camidge
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Efficacy of existing EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in NSCLC is limited by emergence of the T790M mutation in approximately 60% of patients, and significant skin rash and diarrhea, caused by wild-type (WT)-EGFR inhibition. CO-1686 is an oral, covalent TKI that targets common activating EGFR mutations and T790M, while sparing WT-EGFR. Animal models suggest greatest efficacy when plasma concentrations exceed 200ng/ml for >16hrs/day.Methods
This is an ongoing first-in-human dose finding study (3+3) of oral CO-1686 administered continuously in 21-day cycles. To be eligible, patients must have EGFR-mutant NSCLC and prior therapy with an EGFR TKI. All patients must undergo tumor tissue biopsy within 28 days before study drug dosing for central EGFR genotyping. Endpoints include safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy.Results
As of 12 June 2013, 45 patients have been treated with CO-1686. 31/42 (74%) were T790M+; data for three patients is pending. The median age is 58 years, 82% are female, 75% are white, and 73% ECOG 1. The median number of previous therapies was 4 (range: 1- 6), with a median of 1 (range: 1- 4) previous EGFR TKI therapies. Dosing started at 150mg QD and escalated to 900mg QD, 900mg BID and 400mg TID, with a maximum tolerated dose not yet reached. Treatment-related AEs (all grades) occurring in > 5% patients were: fatigue (19%), diarrhea (15%), nausea (14%), anemia (10%), arthralgia (7%), muscle spasms (10%), myalgia (7%), headache (7%). The majority of events were mild or moderate. Unlike other EGFR inhibitors, rash and diarrhea were not commonly seen. This AE profile is consistent with the expected lack of wild type EGFR inhibition with CO-1686. The PFS for T790M+ patients with CO-1686 plasma concentrations > 200ng/mL for > 16 hours was 194 days compared with 72.5 days for those that achieved these concentrations for < 16 hours (Figure 1). At the highest evaluated dose, 900mg BID, four T790M+ patients were evaluable for response; 3 of the 4 achieved PRs, one achieved SD. One patient at a lower dose cohort also achieved a PR. Further safety and efficacy data will be presented at the meeting. Figure 1Conclusion
CO-1686 has demonstrated good tolerability and efficacy against proven T790M+ EGFR mutant NSCLC with a strong suggestion of a dose-response relationship. Additional evaluation of the optimal dose and formulation of CO-1686 are underway to further explore its potential for improved activity and better tolerability over other existing EGFR TKIs.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O03.07 - Investigation of risk factors for developing interstitial lung disease (ILD) and poor prognostic factors for ILD death in Japanese patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): a final analysis of a large-scale erlotinib surveillance study (POLARSTAR) (ID 2208)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): K. Kuwano, S. Kudoh, M. Ando, Y. Ohe, K. Nakagawa, N. Yamazaki, H. Arakawa, Y. Inoue, M. Ebina, M. Kusumoto, A. Gemma, F. Sakai, T. Johkoh, H. Taniguchi, Y. Fukuda, A. Seki, M. Fukuoka
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
A large-scale surveillance study (POLARSTAR) was implemented to investigate erlotinib safety and efficacy in Japanese patients, focusing on the pattern of occurrence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and specific factors that may contribute to the onset of ILD in patients receiving erlotinib. The following risk factors for erlotinib-induced ILD have been previously reported: concurrent/previous ILD (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] =3.2), existing emphysema/chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (HR=1.9) or lung infection (HR=1.6), smoking status (HR=2.2) and ECOG performance status 2–4 (HR=1.4). These were identified as the primary risk factors for ILD by multivariate analysis. The current analysis was carried out to identify factors linked with poor prognosis in terms of ILD-related death within the POLARSTAR surveillance study.Methods
Enrolment of all patients in Japan receiving erlotinib for NSCLC took place between December 2007 and October 2009; the observation period was 12 months. All ILD-like events were assessed by an independent ILD review committee. ILD was defined as all ILD-like events excluding those events deemed non-ILD by the independent ILD review committee. Risk factors for poor prognosis concerning ILD death were analyzed by multivariate analysis using a logistic regression model.Results
A total of 10,708 patients were enrolled by the data cut-off of 12 October 2009, with data available for 9,909 patients. The majority of ILD cases were reported within 4 weeks of receiving erlotinib. Among the 491 patients who experienced ‘ILD-like’ events, 93 could not be evaluated by the independent ILD review committee due to lack of imaging data; the remaining 398 patients were referred to the committee for evaluation. A total of 310 patients had confirmed ILD by the ILD review committee, based on image evaluation or clinical investigation; 125 had died as a result of ILD. These patients were assessed by multivariate analysis. Sixty-two events were deemed non-ILD and 26 events could not be evaluated due to a lack of clear clinical evidence (e.g. ILD could not be distinguished from progression or pneumonitis, or insufficient imaging data were available). The multivariate analysis identified ECOG performance status 2–4 (adjusted odds ratio [OR] =2.45 [95% CI 1.41–4.27]; p=0.0016), <50% remaining normal lung area (OR=3.12 [1.48–6.58]; p=0.0029) and interstitial pneumonia with concomitant honeycomb lung (OR=6.67 [1.35–32.94]; p=0.02) as poor prognostic factors for ILD death. However, pre-existing interstitial pneumonia by grade of severity was not identified as one of these factors. This result could be attributed to practical bias in this surveillance study, such as selection or treatment bias for patients with pre-existing interstitial pneumonia within the condition of careful dosage specified in the erlotinib label.Conclusion
These final data from this large surveillance study in Japanese patients with recurrent and advanced NSCLC provide further information on the risk factors for poor prognosis with ILD, identifying those patients at greatest risk of ILD-related death. Improved awareness of these prognostic factors will help clinicians in monitoring those patients at highest risk.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
O03.08 - DISCUSSANT (ID 3950)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): F. Cappuzzo
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
