Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Myrto Moutafi



Author of

  • +

    P33 - Pathology - Immunotherapy Biomarker (ID 101)

    • Event: WCLC 2020
    • Type: Posters
    • Track: Pathology, Molecular Pathology and Diagnostic Biomarkers
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 1/28/2021, 00:00 - 00:00, ePoster Hall
    • +

      P33.02 - Comparison of PD-L1 Protein Expression Between Primary and Metastatic Lesions in Lung Cancer Patients (ID 3550)

      00:00 - 00:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Myrto Moutafi

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Introduction

      PD-L1 expression assessed by IHC is the central companion diagnostic test for immunotherapy. However, most trials have not stipulated the tissue source used to assess expression. Here we assess PD-L1 expression as performed in the “real world” to determine if sampling sites, histologic subtypes, genders and age groups affect the likelihood of high-level expression.

      Methods

      A retrospective data analysis of the FMI clinical database was conducted on lung cancer cases that were assessed for PD-L1 expression in the context of routine care. All samples were stained with the DAKO 22C3 CDx assay at Foundation Medicine, Inc. (FMI) North Carolina laboratory. PD-L1 expression was evaluated and scored with the Tumor Proportional Score (TPS) methodology; TPS = Number of PD-L1 positive tumor cells / (Total number of PD-L1 positive + PD-L1 negative tumor cells) * 100%. In all tests, two-sided P-values of less than 0.05 were considered significant. Statistical analysis was conducted using Prism 8 software and RStudio version 4.0.1.

      Results

      15,028 samples from 7599 male and 7429 female lung cancer patients, were analyzed. Metastatic lesions were more likely to be PD-L1 high (TPS ≥ 50%) compared with primary lesions (33.8%) vs (28.4%) ;(Odds Ratio [OR] 1.28, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.19-1.37; P<.001). This observation was seen in samples from lymph nodes (OR 1.58,95% CI 1.43-1.74; P<.001), pleural fluid (OR 1.48, 95% CI 1.23-1.78;P<.001), soft tissue (OR 1.3, 95% CI 1.08-1.58;P=.007) and adrenal gland (OR 1.7, 95%CI 1.3-2.22; P<.001) but not with those from liver (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.83-1.16; P=.835), brain (OR 1.00, 95%CI 0.85-1.18; P=.994) and bone (OR 0.83, 95%CI 0.67-1.04; P=.101)​. Metastatic lesions of patients with non-squamous histology were more likely to have TPS ≥ 50% in comparison with primary tumors (OR 1.37, 95% CI 1.27-1.49; P<.001) but this was not the case for patients with squamous histology (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-1.07; P=.208). Female patients had significantly increased rates of high PD-L1 TPS compared to male patients (OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01-1.16; P<.027); but this was driven by the higher TPS of lung squamous cell carcinoma female patients (OR 1.24, 95%CI 1.05-1.47; P=.012).

      Conclusion

      This study demonstrates that PD-L1 expression is associated with the sampling site, histologic type, and gender. Understanding PD-L1 expression distributions may affect trial design and patient care.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.