Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Filippo Guglielmo Maria De Braud
Author of
-
+
MA03 - Clinomics and Genomics (ID 119)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Heather A Wakelee, Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 10:30 - 12:00, Colorado Springs (1994)
-
+
MA03.10 - Prospective Evaluation of a Prognostic Clinico-Molecular Score (DEMo) to Predict Outcome of Advanced NSCLC Patients Treated with Immunotherapy (Now Available) (ID 1378)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): Filippo Guglielmo Maria De Braud
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
We have already reported three different molecular (MSC: plasma miRNA-signature classifier, Boeri, Clin Cancer Res 2019) and clinico-biochemical scores (DiMaio: Di Maio, EJC 2010; EPSILoN: Ann.Onco 2018 supp) able to differently predict prognosis in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (aNSCLC) patients treated with immunotherapy (IO). Exploiting the ability of each test we developed a combined clinico-biological composite score called DEMo (DiMaio EPSILoN MSC). Objective of the study is to prospectively evaluate the prognostic value of DEMo in aNSCLC patients treated with IO.
Method
We enrolled 127 consecutive aNSCLC patients treated with IO in first (n=37) and further-lines (n=90) at Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan. All patients had complete clinico-laboratoristic data necessary for both scores: DiMaio (ECOG-PS, sex, histology, stage, uses of platinum-based therapy at first-line and response to first-line) and EPSILoN (ECOG-PS, Smoke, Liver, LDH, NLRatio). MSC was prospectively evaluated in plasma samples collected prior starting IO and the risk level were assessed. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in strata of MSC/DiMaio/EPSILoN alone or DEMo and overall response rate (ORR), were considered as endpoints. Kaplan Meier were used to generate survival curves and Cox hazard model were employed to perform multivariate analyses.
Result
In multivariate analyses, adjusted for age, sex, pack/year and ECOG-PS, patients with high MSC and high DiMaio and EPSILoN scores reported a lower PFS (MSC: HR 1.72 CI95% 1.06 – 2.77, p=0.027; DiMaio: HR 2.63 CI95% 1.40 – 5.00, p=0.002; EPSILoN: HR 2.17 CI95% 1.16 – 4.16, p=0.014) and OS (MSC: HR 2.17 CI95% 1.29 – 3.70, p=0.003; DiMaio: HR 3.57 CI95% 1.66 – 7.69, p=0.001; EPSILoN: HR 2.50 CI95% 1.15 – 5.26, p=0.020). DEMo stratified patients into four risk groups according to the presence of 3–2–1–0 bad markers (High MSC/DiMaio/EPSILoN or none). Groups had 0%–0%–32.2%–53.3% 1-year PFS (p<0.0001) and 4.4%– 19.4% – 66.9% – 75.4% 1-year OS (p<0.0001). We further compared 0/1 to 2/3 combined groups. At the multivariate Cox model group 2/3 had a mPFS 1.9 vs 9.4 mo compared to group 0/1 (HR 3.70 CI95% 2.08 – 6.67, p<0.0001) and mOS 4.1 vs 22.4 mo (HR 4.76 CI95% 2.56 – 9.10, p<0.0001). Regarding ORR, DEMo group 0/1 had a 3.86 (CI95% 1.76-8.47) fold higher probability to respond compare to 2/3 group (p=0.0007).
Conclusion
DEMo composite biomarker is able to predict better prognosis compared to each single score and can be a useful tool for guiding IO treatment choices. In particular, DEMo allowed a good selection for those patients who are less likely to benefit from IO.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MA07 - Clinical Questions and Potential Blood Markers for Immunotherapy (ID 125)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Immuno-oncology
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:David R Spigel, Roberto Ferrara
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 13:30 - 15:00, Vancouver (2003)
-
+
MA07.03 - A Circulating MicroRNAs-Based Test as Biomarker of Primary and Secondary Resistance in PD-L1 ≥50% NSCLC Treated with Immunotherapy (Now Available) (ID 2495)
13:30 - 15:00 | Author(s): Filippo Guglielmo Maria De Braud
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
PD-L1 represents the only clinically approved biomarker to select patients for immunotherapy. However, about 20-25% of PD-L1≥50% NSCLC patients do not benefit of ICIs treatment. We showed that a plasma microRNA signature classifier (MSC), reflecting the switch towards an immunosuppressive profile of immune cells, identifies NSCLC patients with worse prognosis after ICIs, irrespective from PD-L1 expression. Aim of this trial is to prospectively define the MSC role as biomarker of primary or secondary resistance in PD-L1≥50% NSCLC treated with ICIs.
Method
Fifty consecutive advanced NSCLC patients with PD-L1≥50% treated with ICI as first (n=32) or further line were enrolled. Plasma samples, as well as demographics information, smoking history and ECOG PS were collected before starting ICI treatment. The MSC test identified patients at high (H) risk vs intermediate/low (I/L) risk levels. According to RECIST 1.1 criteria, patients were classified as responders (R), patients with stable disease (SD), and progressors (P). Objective Response Rate (ORR), Progression Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS) in MSC risk level strata at the baseline were considered as endpoints. For 26 R or SD patients with extended follow-up, additive, not mandatory plasma samples were collected and analyzed at the time of revaluations. To determine changes in the risk level during follow-up, we evaluated changes in the probability of having progressive disease after two consecutive MSC tests, considering all possible combinations.
Result
Overall 17 (34%) R, 17 (34%) patients with SD, 11 (22%) P and 5 (10%) not evaluable patients were identified. Considering the baseline blood samples 11 (22%) NSCLC patients were MSC H. ORR was 0% in MSC H vs 45% for other patients (p=0.0090). Median PFS was 2.3 months for MSC H vs 10.9 months for other patients (HR=0.38; 95%CI=0.17-0.84; p=0.0174). Median OS was 2.9 months for MSC H vs 22.0 months for other patients (HR=0.18; 95%CI=0.07-0.47; p=0.0004). Data remained significant adjusting for age, sex, pack-years and ECOG performance status: PFS HR=0.31 (95%CI=0.13-0.73; p=0.0072) and OS HR=0.13 (95%CI=0.04-0.39; p=0.0003). Among the 26 patients with longitudinal evaluation of MSC risk level, all the 12 patients reaching progression during treatment showed an increase in the risk level (Sign-test p-value=0.0039). Conversely, when considering the 14 NSCLC patients still maintaining SD or responding to ICIs at the time of the analysis, the risk level decreased for 9 (64%) of them (Sign-test p-value=0.1655).
Conclusion
These preliminary results suggest that MSC risk level at the baseline and during treatment could help to identify primary or secondary resistance in PD-L1≥50% NSCLC patients treated with ICIs. Ongoing clinical trials are validating these results.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 158)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 09:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P1.01-135 - Salvage Chemotherapy After Immunotherapy Failure in Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients (Now Available) (ID 2490)
09:45 - 18:00 | Author(s): Filippo Guglielmo Maria De Braud
- Abstract
Background
Objective response rate (ORR) to salvage chemotherapy (sCT) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients failing upfront platinum-based doublets is limited (≈5-15%). Recently, unexpected favorable outcomes have been reported for sCT upon progression to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) as compared to historical data, with ORR observed in up to 53% and 27% in Asian and Caucasian patients respectively. Few data are available regarding prior response to ICIs and sCT performance, especially in Caucasian patients.
Method
All consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC who started ICIs at our institution from Apr 2013 to Dec 2018 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients who underwent sCT after progression to ICIs and had at least one radiological response assessment were included. ORR was calculated as the percentage of complete or partial responses according to RECIST 1.1 as best response. Survivals were estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. Correlation was assessed using Spearman’s test.
Result
Out of 283 patients included, 43 received sCT after ICIs. Among them, 29 (67%) had adenocarcinoma and 14 (37%) squamous cell carcinoma. 11 (26%) patients received sCT as second line therapy and 32 (74%) as third or more advanced treatment. sCT regimens included platinum based doublets (14; 32.5%), docetaxel or paclitaxel (20; 46.5%), and other monotherapies such as gemcitabine or vinorelbine (9; 21%). ORR to sCT was 30%. Median progression free survival and overall survival were 3.6 and 8.4 months, respectively. All patients receiving taxanes as sCT had already been treated with platinum based therapy and their ORR to sCT was 40%. ORR to upfront chemotherapy was 50%, while ORR to the last chemotherapeutic regimen prior to ICIs was 35%. ORR to sCT in pretreated patients was non-inferior to that observed in chemo-naïve ones (31% and 27%, respectively). High ORR (25%) was observed even in patients receiving sCT beyond third line. Neither response to ICIs (P=0.36) nor to prior chemotherapeutic regimens (P>0.05) were associated to the likelihood of achieving tumor response to sCT.
Conclusion
We provide further evidence that NSCLC patients progressing to ICIs might still benefit from sCT even if heavily pretreated, regardless of sensitivity to ICIs or previous chemotherapy regimens. Further investigations are needed for uncovering bases of increased sensitivity to genotoxic agents in patients with innate or acquired resistance to ICIs and exploiting optimal treatment sequence.
-
+
P1.04 - Immuno-oncology (ID 164)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Immuno-oncology
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 09:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P1.04-38 - Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy in Elderly Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Now Available) (ID 1383)
09:45 - 18:00 | Author(s): Filippo Guglielmo Maria De Braud
- Abstract
Background
Most trials with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) included only small subgroups of patients (pts) aged ≥65. As NSCLC is often diagnosed in pts aged ≥70, real-world data about efficacy and safety of IO in elderly pts are essential.
Method
We retrospectively collected data about all pts with advanced NSCLC treated with IO at our Institution between April 2013 and March 2019. All ICIs administered for ≥1 cycle were admitted. Pts were stratified for age as follows: <70 year-old (yo), 70-79 yo, ≥80 yo. Chi-square test was used to compare qualitative variables. Survival was estimated with Kaplan-Meier method. Log-rank test was used to compare curves. Multivariate analyses were performed with Cox model.
Result
We reviewed 290 cases, with a median age of 67 (range: 29-89). Pts aged<70, 70-79 and ≥80 yo were 180, 94 and 16, respectively. Two hundred five pts received an anti-PD1, 77 an anti-PDL1, 8 an anti-CTLA4 or a combo-IO. Clinical/pathological variables were uniformly distributed across age classes, except for a higher rate of males (p 0.0228) and squamous histology (p 0.0071) in the intermediate class. Response Rate (RR) was similar across age groups (21.5% vs 22.3% vs 18.8% for pts aged<70 vs 70-79 vs ≥80 yo, respectively; p 0.9470). Median PFS did not differ according to age (2.8 vs 3.5 vs 2.6 mos for pts aged<70 vs 70-79 vs ≥80 yo, respectively; p 0.2020). Similarly, median OS was similar across age classes (9.1 vs 11.3 vs 9.6 mos for pts aged<70 vs 70-79 vs ≥80 yo, respectively; p 0.9144). These results did not change after stratification for sex (p 0.516 for PFS, p 0.5154 for OS) and histology (p 0.9057 for PFS, p 0.1002 for OS). The incidence of toxicity was comparable across subgroups (grade ≥2 adverse events in 35.8% vs 32.7% vs 37.5% for pts aged<70 vs 70-79 vs ≥80 yo, p 0.6493). The only variables influencing outcome at both univariate and multivariate analyses were performance status (p<0.0001 for PFS, p 0.0192 for OS), number of metastatic sites (p 0.0842 for PFS, p 0.0235 for OS) and IO line (p<0.0001 for both PFS and OS), regardless age group.
Conclusion
Advanced age is apparently not associated to a reduced efficacy of IO in our case series. Furthermore, no toxicity concern emerges even among the eldest pts. Therefore, to our opinion ICIs should be considered irrespective of age, provided an optimal PS at baseline. Of note, IO is often the only therapeutic option applicable to these cases considering the toxicity of chemotherapy.
-
+
P2.09 - Pathology (ID 174)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P2.09-05 - Clinical and Biological Characterization of Lung Enteric Adenocarcinoma (Now Available) (ID 1650)
10:15 - 18:15 | Author(s): Filippo Guglielmo Maria De Braud
- Abstract
Background
Lung Enteric Adenocarcinoma (LEA) is a rare and poorly characterized variant of Lung Adenocarcinoma (LA), defined by an intestinal differentiation in ≥50% of tumor and ≥1 colorectal biomarker at Immunohistochemistry.
Method
We retrospectively identified the cases of LEA diagnosed at Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori (INT), Milan, Italy between 01/2013 and 12/2018. Next Generation Sequencing was performed with IonTorrent (ThermoFisher Scientific, Life Technologies) by using the commercial Hot Spot Cancer Panel (HCP) on DNA derived from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissues. ALK and ROS-1 status was assessed with fluorescent in situ hybridization. PD-L1 expression was determined with DAKO22C3 assay. Biological data obtained from our cases were compared with those reported in Tumor Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) for LA, restricting the comparison only to the genes targeted by HCP.
Result
We identified 38 LEA cases. Main clinical and biological characteristics of the two populations are detailed in the table.
Variable/
gene mutation
INT LEA (N=38)
TCGA LA (N=660)
%
%
Gender
Female
34.1
51.9
Male
65.9
47.9
Unknown
0
0.2
Smoking status
Former/current
76.3
78.9
Never
15.8
14.1
Unknown
7.9
7.0
Disease stage
I
2.6
51.6
II
2.6
23.0
III
28.9
16.4
IV
65.9
4.7
Unknown
0
4.3
TP53
52.6
54.1
KRAS
34.2
32.4
STK11
23.7
15.8
CDKN2A
15.8
3.9
APC
7.9
4.8
CTNNB1
7.9
3.8
EGFR
7.9
15.8
KIT
5.3
2.1
PI3KCA
5.3
5.9
SMAD4
5.3
4.1
ATM
2.6
8.9
BRAF
2.6
8.2
FGFR
2.6
0.8
GNAS
2.6
3.8
NRAS
2.6
0.6
PDGFRA
2.6
7.4
RB1
2.6
5.8
SMO
2.6
2.7
Neither ALK nor ROS-1 rearrangements were detected in our case series. PD-L1 was negative in 23 cases, 1-49% in 9 cases, not evaluable in 6 cases. Microsatellite were stable except for 3 cases with low instability and 3 not evaluable cases.
Conclusion
Our series of LEA was small and differed from TCGA LA for a higher proportions of males and metastatic disease. Given these limitations, our LEA genetic profile showed some difference from that of TCGA LA. In particular, LEA showed a higher incidence of STK11, CTNNB1, FGFR, NRAS, KIT and CDKN2A mutations, and a lower incidence of ATM, BRAF, PDGFRA, RB-1 and EGFR mutations. PD-L1 expression, ALK and ROS-1 rearrangements were lower than literature data in LA. Most cases were microsatellite stable. In conclusion, further research is needed to understand the biology of LEA, which seems partially different from common LA.
-
+
PL02 - Presidential Symposium including Top 7 Rated Abstracts (ID 89)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Plenary Session
- Track:
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Giorgio Vittorio Scagliotti, Ramon Rami-Porta
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 08:00 - 10:15, Barcelona (2005)
-
+
PL02.08 - Registrational Results of LIBRETTO-001: A Phase 1/2 Trial of LOXO-292 in Patients with RET Fusion-Positive Lung Cancers (Now Available) (ID 964)
08:00 - 10:15 | Author(s): Filippo Guglielmo Maria De Braud
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
No targeted therapy is currently approved for patients with RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). LOXO-292 is a highly selective RET inhibitor with activity against diverse RET fusions, activating RET mutations and brain metastases. Based on initial data from LIBRETTO-001, LOXO-292 received FDA Breakthrough Designation for the treatment of RET fusion-positive NSCLC in August 2018.
Method
This global phase 1/2 study (87 sites, 16 countries) enrolled patients with advanced RET-altered solid tumors including RET fusion-positive NSCLC (NCT03157128). LOXO-292 was dosed orally in 28-day cycles. The phase 1 portion established the MTD/RP2D (160 mg BID). The phase 2 portion enrolled patients to one of six cohorts based on tumor type, RET alteration, and prior therapies. The primary endpoint was ORR (RECIST 1.1). Secondary endpoints included DoR, CNS ORR, CNS DoR, PFS, OS, safety and PK.
Result
As of 17-June 2019, 253 RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients were treated. The primary analysis set (PAS) for LOXO-292 registration, as defined with the US FDA, consists of the first 105 consecutively enrolled RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients who received prior platinum-based chemotherapy; 58 patients (55%) also received prior anti PD-1/PD-L1 agents. The majority of PAS responders have been followed for ≥6 months from first response. Of the remaining 148 patients, 79 had previously been treated with platinum-based chemotherapy, 55 did not receive prior platinum-based chemotherapy and 14 did not have measurable disease at baseline.
Conclusion
Among PAS patients, the investigator-assessed ORR was 68% (95% CI 58-76%, n=71/105, 2 PRs pending confirmation). Responses did not differ by fusion partner or the type or number of prior therapies, including chemotherapy, anti PD-1/PD-L1 agents and multikinase inhibitors with anti-RET activity. The median DoR was 20.3 months (95% CI 13.8-24.0) with a median follow-up of 8 months; as evidenced by the wide confidence interval, this DoR estimate is not statistically stable due to a low number of events (16 of 69 confirmed responders). The intracranial ORR was 91% (n=10/11: 2 confirmed CRs, 8 confirmed PRs) for patients with measurable brain metastases at baseline.
The ORR in efficacy evaluable treatment naïve RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients was 85% (95% CI 69-95%, n=29/34, 7 PRs pending confirmation). In the safety data set of all 531 patients, 5 treatment-related AEs occurred in ≥15% of patients: dry mouth, diarrhea, hypertension, increased AST and increased ALT. Most AEs were grade 1-2. Only 9 of 531 (1.7%) patients discontinued LOXO-292 for treatment-related AEs.
LOXO-292 had marked antitumor activity in RET fusion-positive NSCLC patients and was well tolerated. These data will form the basis of an FDA NDA submission later this year.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
