Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

P. Taylor



Author of

  • +

    MO09 - Mesothelioma I (ID 120)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track:
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO09.02 - A Randomised Phase II trial of Pegylated Arginine Deiminase in patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 1355)

      16:15 - 17:45  |  Author(s): P. Taylor

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Preclinically, arginine deprivation has shown activity as a novel antimetabolite strategy for MPM patients who are deficient for the rate-limiting enzyme in arginine biosynthesis argininosuccinate synthetase (ASS1). Here, we examine the efficacy and safety of the arginine-lowering agent ADI-PEG20 (Polaris Group, San Diego, US) among patients with MPM.

      Methods
      We performed a multicentre randomised phase II clinical trial, based on patients with good performance status (0 or 1), non-resectable disease, ASS1-deficient MPM, and measurable disease. Patients were randomized 1:2 to receive best supportive care (BSC) or BSC+ADI-PEG20, stratified by: gender, histology (sarcomatoid versus non-sarcomatoid), prior treatment (chemonaive or previous platinum combination therapy), and centre. The primary endpoint, progression-free survival (PFS), is assessed by modified RECIST, and secondary endpoints include overall survival, tumor response rate, and toxicity. Translational endpoints included measurement of plasma arginine, citrulline and ADI-PEG20 antibody levels, assessment of metabolic response by [18F]Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) and ASS1 methylation status using Illumina’s 450K DNA methylation array. The target sample size was estimated to detect a PFS hazard ratio of 0.60. [Trial funded by Cancer Research UK].

      Results
      ASS1 deficiency was detected in 98 of 214 patients (46%) of which 68 were randomized on the trial (44 ADI-PEG20+BSC and 24 BSC alone). 66 patients have progressed so far (42 ADI-PEG20+BSC vs. 24 BSC alone), and 32 patients were alive (23 ADI-PEG20+BSC vs. 9 BSC alone). The hazard ratio for PFS was 0.53 (95%, CI 0.31 to 0.90, p=0.02) with a median PFS of 98 days for patients randomized to ADI-PEG20+BSC compared with 59 days for patients receiving BSC alone. ADI-PEG20 toxicity in patients with MPM has been consistent with previous trials of ADI-PEG20 in melanoma and liver cancer: commonly skin injection site reactions (grade 1-2), infrequent episodes of neutropenia (range: grade 1-4), anaphylactoid reactions (2 patients with grade 3 episodes) and serum sickness (1 patient). The best response by modified RECIST was stable disease. Metabolic responses (in 39 evaluable ADI-treated patients) were as follows: 46% with partial response (18/39), 31% with stable disease (12/39), 15% progressive metabolic disease (6/39) and 8% mixed metabolic response (3/39) by FDG-PET assessment. There was a significant difference between IHC assessed ASS1-negative and ASS1-positive patients and the methylation status of the ASS1 gene (p=0.025).

      Conclusion
      ADI-PEG20 is generally well tolerated and shows evidence of clinically significant activity in patients selected for arginine-dependent MPM demonstrating differential methylation of ASS1. Arginine deprivation may have a role in the future management of MPM either alone or in combination with selected therapies.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.09 - Poster Session 2 - Combined Modality (ID 213)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Combined Modality
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.09-008 - Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCTRT) for locally advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) followed by consolidation Pemetrexed: a phase II study (ID 1545)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): P. Taylor

      • Abstract

      Background
      cCTRT is the current standard treatment for good Performance Status (PS) unresectable locally advanced NSCLC. A phase III study demonstrated that Docetaxel consolidation does not improve overall survival (OS) after cCTRT (Hanna. JCO 2008). The role of consolidation chemotherapy after cCTRT is still investigational and our study was set up to evaluate the role of pemetrexed in this setting. A less toxic consolidation chemotherapy may enable a higher proportion of patients to comply to planned treatment which may improve outcome.

      Methods
      This was a single-institution prospective phase II study. Treatment comprised cisplatin (50 mg/m[2] days 1, 8, 29, 36), etoposide (50 mg/m[2] days 1-5 and 29-33) and concurrent thoracic radiotherapy starting on day 1 chemotherapy (66 Gy in 33 daily fractions; 3D conformal radiotherapy or IMRT) followed by consolidation pemetrexed (500 mg/m[2] on days 71, 92 and 133). The primary endpoint was 1 year OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), 2 yr OS, acute/late toxicity (CTCAE v3.0), compliance to treatment.

      Results
      35 patients were recruited between March 2008 and October 2010. Median age was 61 years (range 42-76). M:F ratio was 23(66%):12(34%). ECOG PS was 0:1 11(31%):24(69%). Histology: squamous 21(60%), adenocarcinoma 8(23%), undifferentiated 4(11%), other 2(6%). Stage: IIB 1(3%), IIIA 19(54%), IIIB 15(43%). All 35(100%) had PETCT staging. All 35 patients received concurrent chemotherapy (dose reduction in 3 patients) and 32 (91%) received the planned 66Gy (range 56-66 Gy). The number of patients who completed pemetrexed were: cycle 1=25 (71%), cycle 2=22 (63%), cycle 3=16 (46%). Radiation parameters: Gross Tumour Volume (GTV) was median 60.2 cm[3] (range 11.4-274.4 cm[3]), V~20Gy ~median 30.4% (range 10.5-35.3%), During the concurrent phase, grade 3/4 toxicity was noted for: neutropenia 17(49%) anaemia 1(3%), thrombocytopenia 1(3%), infection 8(23%), fatigue 6(17%), nausea±vomiting 4(11%), mucositis 3(9%), anorexia 3(9%). During the pemetrexed consolidation phase, the only grade 3/4 toxicities were: infection 5(20%), anaemia 3(12%), neutropenia 2(8%) and fatigue 2(8%). Acute radiotherapy toxicity (<3months): oesophagitis grade 3/4 10(29%) and late toxicity (>3months): pneumonitis grade 3/4 2(7%), oesophageal stricture 2 (7%), pulmonary fibrosis 1(3%). Median follow up was 25months. Median OS was 34months, with 1yr OS 77% (95% CI 60-88%), and 2yr OS 61% (95% CI 37-72%). Median PFS was 22months, with 1yr PFS 62% (95% CI 43-76%) and 2yr 49% (95% CI 31-65%). Of the 14 deaths, causes were, 1 suicide during radiotherapy, 2 treatment-related deaths (1 grade 5 pneumonitis and 1 grade 5 haemoptysis) and 13 due to lung cancer.

      Conclusion
      In an unselected locally advanced NSCLC population, staged with PETCT a median survival of 34 months can be achieved. The study reinforces the challenge of delivering consolidation chemotherapy and suggests that improved staging contributes to improved outcomes. Although there was failure to deliver all planned cycles of consolidation pemetrexed after cCTRT in 54% of patients, these are encouraging results that warrant further investigation.

  • +

    P2.24 - Poster Session 2 - Supportive Care (ID 157)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Supportive Care
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.24-034 - Treatment Beyond Progression in Patients with Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harbouring EGFR Mutations - The Manchester Lung Cancer Group Experience (ID 2431)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): P. Taylor

      • Abstract

      Background
      The presence of EGFR activating mutations in NSCLC and sensitivity of these tumours to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) was first described in 2005. For NSCLC patients harbouring an activating EGFR mutation the treatment of choice is an EGFR TKI which is better tolerated and easier to administer than chemotherapy. However, questions remain about duration of therapy and optimal management on radiological progression.

      Methods
      A retrospective case note review was undertaken with the aim of establishing current practice in prescription and discontinuation of EGFR-TKIs, subsequent therapies and clinical outcomes. We identified consecutive patients from the database of the genetic testing laboratory (from Q4 2009 when routine testing commenced to a cut-off point of February 2013). 171 case- notes were reviewed for demographic and clinical data including survival.

      Results
      Of 171 cases 116 (69%) had received treatment with an EGFR TKI (Gefitinib 79%, Erlotinib 19%, both 2%). The reasons for not receiving treatment included: patient received radical therapy, patient died before oncology assessment and patient preference. 63% of patients were female, 26% never smokers, 44% ex-smokers, 6% current smokers and smoking history was not documented in 23%. 76% of patients had Stage IV disease and performance status was 0-1 in 47%, 2 in 22%, 3 in 7%, 4 in 2% and not documented in 23%. The average length of treatment on EGFR TKI was 10.5 months (range 0.5-40) and 36 (31%) patients were still on treatment at the time of analysis. Disease progression on the EGFR-TKI (PD) had occurred in 82 (71%) of patients and 28 (34%) of these continued EGFR TKI treatment beyond PD. The average length of time on treatment beyond PD was 5.6 months (range 1-16) and TKI treatment was ongoing in 9 of the 28 patients. 25 of the 73 patients (34%) with PD who had stopped EGFR TKI went onto receive a second line systemic treatment: pemetrexed and platinum 60%, gemcitabine and carboplatin 20%, single agent pemetrexed 8%, vinorelbine 8%, gemcitabine 4%. Third line therapy was received by 40% of those who had received 2[nd] line treatment.

      Conclusion
      Patients with EGFR activating mutations often derive a significant clinical benefit and marked reduction in tumour burden with oral EGFR TKI therapy, which results in a reluctance, from both patients and clinicians, to stop therapy at the time of radiological progression if the patient is still experiencing symptomatic improvement. Our results show that treatment beyond disease progression is common (34%) in ‘real –life’ clinical practice with some patients continuing to derive benefit for more than a year beyond the time of disease progression. .