Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

X. Liu



Author of

  • +

    MO12 - Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers III (ID 96)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO12.05 - A new biomarker Heat shock protein 90 alpha as therapeutic monitor and predictor for lung cancer patients (ID 2628)

      10:30 - 12:00  |  Author(s): X. Liu

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Heat shock proteins are a group of proteins termed stress proteins. The family of Hsp90 includes Hsp90α and Hsp90β, but only Hsp90α has been described to be extracellular, and the presence of Hsp90α on cell surface has been shown to correlate with malignancy in cancer patients, especially with the tumor metastasis. However, to the best of our knowledge, no large clinical samples have been reported to verify above standpoint. The aim of the present multicenter clinical study was to evaluate the expression level of Hsp90α in lung cancer patients and whether Hsp90α was monitor and predictor for response to therapy in lung cancer.

      Methods
      A total of 2284 lung cancer patients were enrolled in this study which was randomly assigned into two groups as static and dynamic groups. The static group (2036 samples) consisted of healthy subjects (592 samples), lung cancer (1046 samples), non-cancerous lesions of the lung patients(361 samples ) and other cancer patients(37 samples). Samples of peripheral blood from all subjects were collected in sterile EDTA-K2-coated vials. Whereas the dynamic group included lung cancer patients who received surgical treatment and underwent chemotherapy, with number of above mentioned parts 79 and 169, respectively. For surgical patients, plasma samples were collected at following time points: 3 days before surgery, 3-7 days after surgery and 3 days after clinical efficacy evaluation. Similarly, plasma samples of chemotherapy patients were also collected before treatment, after each chemotherapy cycle until the forth cycle. The concentrations of Hsp90α in plasma were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay.

      Results
      The concentration of Hsp90α in lung cancer patients was significantly higher than in other control groups (P <0.05). The cut-off value was 56.33 ng/mL for diagnosis, with high sensitivity and specificity (72.18% and 78.70%, respectively). Advanced lung cancer (stage III-Ⅳ) patients were with higher Hsp90α levels than the early patients(stage I-II) (251.38 ng/ml vs 111.50ng/ml, P<0.001), no significant relationship was found between non-small cell lung cancer（NSCLC,910 samples）patients and small cell lung cancer （SLCL, 136 samples）patients, and patients with adenocarcinoma(537 samples) and squamouscarcinoma (218 samples). Furthermore, a statistically significant association was observed between pre-operative and post-operative patients in surgical patients group (P<0.01). In chemotherapy patients group, Hsp90α level was correlated significantly with the effect of treatment [concentration of Hsp90α was higher in progressive disease(PD)group than in partial response(PR)/stable disease(SD) group].

      Conclusion
      This study firstly developed large clinical samples and elucidated the role of Hsp90α in the lung cancer patients. The cut-off value of 56.33 ng/mL was recommended to assess the expression level of Hsp90α in lung cancer patients. Hsp90α may be a potential biomarker for therapeutic monitor and prediction for lung cancer.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.11 - Poster Session 1 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 208)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.11-021 - First-line erlotinib versus cisplatin/gemcitabine (GP) in patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): interim analyses from the phase 3, open-label, ENSURE study (ID 1849)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): X. Liu

      • Abstract

      Background
      Erlotinib, an epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine-kinase inhibitor, has proven efficacy in second-/third-line advanced NSCLC, and provides superior first-line efficacy to chemotherapy for patients whose tumors harbor activating EGFR mutations. The phase 3, randomized, open-label ENSURE study evaluated erlotinib vs GP in patients from China, Malaysia and the Philippines with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC.

      Methods
      Patients ≥18 years with histologically or cytologically confirmed stage IIIB/IV EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC and an ECOG PS of 0–2 were randomized 1:1 to receive either erlotinib (oral; 150mg qd until progression/unacceptable toxicity) or GP (G 1250mg/m[2] iv d1 & 8 q3w; P 75mg/m[2] iv d1 q3w for up to 4 cycles). Patients were stratified by EGFR mutation type, PS, gender, and country). Primary endpoint is progression-free survival (PFS) by investigator, with Independent Review Committee (IRC) assessment for sensitivity analysis; other endpoints include objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS), and safety. A pre-planned interim analysis was conducted after 73% of PFS events (cut-off 20 July 2012). An additional exploratory updated analysis (cut-off of 19 November 2012), included all planned PFS events.

      Results
      In total, 217 patients were randomized: 110 to erlotinib and 107 to GP. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Efficacy data by treatment arm for the interim and updated analyses are presented (Table 1). PFS by investigator in EGFR exon 19 deletion and exon 21 L858R mutation subgroups is also presented (Table 1). Erlotinib was better tolerated than GP, with treatment-related serious adverse events (SAEs) occurring in 2.7% vs 10.6% of patients, respectively. The most common grade ≥3 AEs of any cause were neutropenia (25.0%), leukopenia (14.4%) and anemia (12.5%) in the GP arm, and rash in the erlotinib arm (6.4%). At the updated analysis (19 November 2012), erlotinib remained better tolerated than GP, with treatment-related SAEs occurring in 3.6% vs 11.5% of patients, respectively. Median duration of follow-up was 10.3 months and 11.7 months for the GP and erlotinib arms, respectively, at latest cut-off. OS data are not yet mature.

      Efficacy Outcome Interim analysis (cut-off 20 July 2012) Updated analysis (cut-off 19 November 2012)
      E GP E GP
      Investigator-assessed PFS Events, n 35 66 61 87
      Median, months 11.0 5.5 11.0 5.5
      HR (95% CI) 0.34 (0.22–0.51) 0.33 (0.23–0.47)
      log-rank p-value <0.0001 <0.0001
      IRC-assessed PFS Events, n 33 47 51 55
      Median, months 11.0 5.6 11.1 5.7
      HR (95% CI) 0.42 (0.27–0.66) 0.43 (0.29–0.64)
      log-rank p-value 0.0001 <0.0001
      ORR % 62.7 33.6 68.2 39.3
      p-value 0.0001 <0.0001
      Disease control rate (DCR) % 89.1 76.6 91.8 82.2
      p-value 0.015 0.0354
      EGFR exon 19 deletion subgroup PFS Median, months 11.1 4.2 11.1 4.3
      HR (95% CI) 0.20 (0.11–0.37) 0.20 (0.12–0.33)
      EGFR exon 21 L858R subgroup PFS Median, months 8.3 7.1 8.3 5.8
      HR (95% CI) 0.57 (0.31–1.05) 0.54 (0.32–0.90)
      p-value significance level: alpha=0.05

      Conclusion
      These analyses demonstrate that erlotinib provides statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both investigator-assessed and IRC-assessed PFS compared with GP in Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC. Primary efficacy results were also supported by secondary endpoints including ORR and DCR.

  • +

    P2.11 - Poster Session 2 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 209)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.11-003 - How to make the choice in the reuse of EGFR-TKI for advanced NSCLC patients who benefited from prior Gefitinib therapy: the original drug or switching to a second EGFR-TKI? (ID 831)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): X. Liu

      • Abstract

      Background
      For advanced NSCLC patients who benefited from prior EGFR-TKI therapy, the choice of a second TKI therapy has gradually become a new strategy for the treatment. Some investigators recommend that the second therapy should be continued with the original TKI; however, other investigators recommend the administration of another TKI. This study aims to discuss which choice is more reasonable.

      Methods
      In retrospect, patients with advanced NSCLC or with postoperative relapse of advanced NSCLC achieved CR, PR or SD in prior Gefitinib therapy, PFS≥3 months. They received repeated Gefitinib or Erlotinib at an interval of at least one month. The analysis was carried out with respect to efficacy and optimal population of the two groups.

      Results
      A total of 61 patients were enrolled into the study, 30 in Gefitinib group and 31 in Erlotinib group. Baseline characteristics of the two groups were comparable. Among these patients, overall response rate was 16.4% (10/61), disease control rate was 67.2% (41/61), median PFS was 3.5 months (95%CI 3.0-4.0 months), median OS was 8.5 months (95%CI 7.0-11 months). In the comparison between patients treated with Gefitinib and with Erlotinib, no statistical differences were seen for response rate (10% vs 22.6%, P=0.3006), disease control rate (60% vs 74.2%, P=0.2378), median PFS (3.0 vs 3.5 months, P=0.4945), or median OS (8.3 vs 8.5 months, P=0.1408). Multivariate analysis showed that in the initial dose of Gefitinib, PFS≥6 months (HR 0.317, 95%CI 0.102-0.984, P=0.0469). With an interval ≥3 months (HR 0.224，95%CI 0.071-0.713,P=0.0113) between two doses of TKI, the risk of disease progression was reduced; but if with an interval ≥3 months (HR 0.262, 95%CI 0.097-0.705,P=0.0080), the risk of death was reduced.

      Conclusion
      Advanced NSCLC patients who benefited from prior Gefitinib therapy can benefit again either with the original drug Gefitinib or the alternative drug Erlotinib when a second TKI therapy is resumed. Such benefit is related to PFS of initial TKI therapy and time interval between two doses of TKI.

  • +

    P3.10 - Poster Session 3 - Chemotherapy (ID 210)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.10-044 - Overall Survival analysis results of TFINE Study (CTONG 0904): Different Dose Docetaxel plus Cisplatin as First-line Chemotherapy and Then Maintenance Therapy with Single Agent Docetaxel for Advanced non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 2524)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): X. Liu

      • Abstract

      Background
      Docetaxel (75mg/m[2]) has been reported as first-line and maintenance treatment for Western population with advanced NSCLC. Different doses of docetaxel (60mg/m[2]) are currently delivered in Asian population. Pharmacogenomics alterations in taxanes disposition in different ethnic groups may explain this difference. TFINE study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Docetaxel in the maintenance setting, and to identify the preferable dose of docetaxel in Asian population. TFINE study demonstrated significant superiority in tolerability and similar efficacy for dose of 60mg/m2 of Docetaxel versus that of 75mg/m2 in first-line Chinese advanced NSCLC patients. And maintenance treatment with docetaxel significantly prolonged PFS compared with BSC. Here we report Overall Survival (OS) data from TFINE (ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01038661).

      Methods
      Previously untreated patients, aged between 18 and 75 years, histologically or cytologically confirmed advanced NSCLC with PS of 0-1 were included. Patients were initially randomized (R1, 1:1) to receive cisplatin (75mg/m2) plus docetaxel of 75 mg/m2 or 60mg/m2 for 4 cycles. Patients with disease control after the initial treatment were subsequently randomized (R2, 1:2) to best supportive care (BSC) or maintenance docetaxel of 60mg/m2 for up to 6 cycles. Genomic DNA was prospectively collected from all enrolled patients. The primary endpoint was PFS since R2, and the secondary endpoints included ORR, overall survival (OS), and toxicity. OS was defined as the time lasting from R2 to death of any cause. The subgroup analysis about OS included gender, historical category, smoking, ECOG PS. The maintenance treatments of every patient were recorded.

      Results
      This randomized study was undertaken in 15 centers in China. Between Dec 2009 and Aug 2011, a total of 382 patients were enrolled to R1 and 179 patients (46.8%) were enrolled to R2 (61 vs. 118). The median follow-up time for OS was 23.5 months (range 20.5, 28.1 months) for patients receiving BSC and 24.4 months (range 22.6, 25.3 months) for patients receiving maintenance docetaxel of 60mg/m2 for up to 6 cycles. Median OS of BSC group (13.7months, [95%CI:12.0, 15.7]) was not significantly different from that of docetaxel group(12.3months,[95%CI:11.2,14.1]) (p=0.77). No difference was found in the subgroup analysis. Post-discontinuation therapy was given at the discretion of the investigator. Numerically more patients in BSC group (n=35, 57.4%) received second-line treatments, including docetaxel, EGFR-TKI or pemetrexed, than those in maintenance group (n=56, 45.5%), although the difference is statistically insignificant (p=0.13). The failure observation of PFS gains translating into OS gains is partially related to post-progression therapy. Preliminary pharmacogenomics analysis demonstrated the CYP3A5*3C(6986 AG/GG) genotype associated with poor PFS and ABCB1:2677 GG genotype demonstrated less neutropenia in Chinese NSCLC patient treated with Docetaxel/DDP regiment, which did not correlated with OS.

      Conclusion
      Although there is no significant benefit in terms of OS with Docetaxel maintenance treatment, our finding for better tolerability suggest that Decetaxel maintenance treatment could be of some benefit to patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer.