Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Erkan Kaba



Author of

  • +

    EP1.15 - Thymoma/Other Thoracic Malignancies (ID 205)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: E-Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Thymoma/Other Thoracic Malignancies
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 08:00 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      EP1.15-11 - Outcomes of Thymoma and Determinants of Survival: 16 Years Experience of a Tertiary Cancer Center (Now Available) (ID 1065)

      08:00 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Erkan Kaba

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      We aimed with this study to explore the demographics and clinical outcome of patients with thymoma.

      Method

      A total of 203 patients with thymoma (Masaoka stage II-IV) treated from 2002-2018 were included in this retrospective analysis. IBM-SPSS statistical software version 20 for Windows (IBM, NY) was used for analysis. Survival analysis were estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method and compared by the log-rank test. p<0.05 was considered statistically significant. Cox-regression tests used for multivariate analysis.

      Result

      Male:female ratio was 105:98 with median age 49 years (Range 11-77). At presentation, patients with stage II, III and IV disease were 90, 67 and 45, respectively. A total of 123 patients(60,6%) had myasthenia gravis, and 56,1% of these patients had presented with myasthenia related symptoms. Majority of the patients were operated with sternotomy(n=103), and mean hospital stay was 8,34 days (Table 1). A total of 76 patients had received adjuvant radiotherapy, and 31 patients and 35 patients had received adjuvant and neoadjuvant chemotherapy, respectively. At mean follow-up of 218,6 months(95%CI:201,8-235,3), 5-year and 10-year OS rates were 93,8% and 89,2%. 30 patients had recurrence after surgery, and 5-year and 10 year DFS rates were 76,5% and 68,3%. Masaoka-Koga stage(p<0.0001), postoperative hospital stay more than 10 days(p=0,004) and needing neoadjuvant chemotherapy(p=0,003) were significant effects on DFS. Among patients who had given neoadjuvant chemotherapy, comparing cisplatin with etoposide or doxorubicin based combinations did not change DFS(p=0,34) or OS (p=0,48). Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy also have no survival effect on DFS and OS. On univariate analysis, age(p=0.013), Masaoka-Koga stage(p=0.001), postoperative hospital stay more than 10 days(p=0,006) and having recurrence(p=0,013) were significant effects on OS. Stage (p=0,001) and age (p=0.007) retained its prognostic significance on multivariate analysis (Table 2).

      Table1: Patient demographics and summary of the treatment approachs.

      Age n = 203

      <=50

      >50

      111 (% 54,7)

      92 (% 45,3)

      Gender n = 203

      Male

      Female

      105 (% 51,7)

      98 (% 48,3)

      Myasthenia Gravis n = 203

      Yes

      No

      123 (% 60,6)

      80 (% 39,4)

      Acetylcholine Receptors n=123

      Yes

      No

      113 (% 91,87)

      10 (% 8,13)

      Masaoka Stage of Thymoma

      n = 202

      II

      III

      IV

      Unknown

      90 (% 44,3)

      67 (% 33)

      45 (% 22,2)

      1 (% 0,5)

      Pathology n = 203

      Type A

      Type AB

      Type B1

      Type B2

      Type B3

      Mixed

      Micronodular Thymoma

      Unknown

      15 (% 7,4)

      20 (% 9,9)

      40 (% 19,7)

      67 (% 33,0)

      32 (% 15,8)

      25 (% 12,3)

      1 (% 0,5)

      3 (% 1,5)

      Surgery type

      VATS (Thoracoscopic)

      Sternotomy

      Thoracotomy

      RATS

      Inoperable

      54 (% 26,6)

      103 (% 50,7)

      37 (% 18,2)

      5 (% 2,5)

      4 (%2)

      Treatment Modality

      Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

      Adjuvant Chemotherapy

      Adjuvant Radiotherapy

      35 (% 17,6)

      31 (% 15,6)

      76 (% 38,2)

      Table 2: Five-year overall survival and recurrence-free survival estimates in patient subgroups

      5-Year Survival Rate

      OS

      P

      RFS

      P

      Age

      ≤50

      %96,6 +/- 1,9

      0,013

      %77,8 +/- 4,5

      0,510

      >50

      %84,2 +/- 4,7

      %75 +/- 5,4

      Gender

      Male

      %91,5 +/- 3,4

      0,852

      %76,5 +/- 5

      0,687

      Female

      %90,9 +/- 3,3

      %76,5 +/- 4,9

      Masaoka stage

      2

      %96 +/- 2,3

      0,001

      %93,1 +/- 3

      <0,001

      3

      %88,4 +/- 5

      %77,8 +/- 6,4

      4

      %85,4 +/- 6,2

      %42,1 +/- 8,8

      Myasthenia Gravis

      Yes

      %93,1 +/- 2,6

      0,648

      %80 +/- 4

      0,358

      No

      %87,3 +/- 5

      %69,4 +/- 6,7

      Diagnosed before 2008

      Yes

      %97,3 +/- 2,7

      0,544

      %80 +/- 6,8

      0,247

      No

      %89,1 +/- 2,8

      %75,4 +/- 4,1

      Chemotherapy

      No

      Neoadjuvant

      Adjuvant

      %93 +/- 2,4

      %86,9 +/- 7,2 %75 +/- 15,3

      0,74

      %86,4 +/- 3,2

      %47,7 +/- 10

      %21,8 +/- 13,4

      <0,001

      Radiotherapy Type

      No

      Neoadjuvant

      Adjuvant

      %90,3 +/- 3,3

      %50 +/- 3,5 %93,5 +/- 3,2

      0,588

      %79,6 +/- 4,5

      -

      %74,9 +/- 5,5

      0,436

      Time of initiation of adjuvant therapy

      Early

      Late

      %90,9 +/- 8,7

      %89,1 +/- 6,1

      0,867

      %65,3 +/- 14,3

      %72,8 +/- 8,5

      0,853

      Pathology Type

      Type A

      Type AB

      Type B1

      Type B2

      Type B3

      Mixed Hystology

      %88,9 +/- 10

      %100

      %91,8 +/- 4,5

      %93,2 +/- 3,9

      %84,9 +/- 8,5

      %85 +/- 7,7

      0,506

      %83,6 +/- 10,3

      %87,1 +/- 8,6

      %77,4+/- 7,1

      %76,7 +/- 6,3

      %77,8 +/- 9,3

      %57,2 +/- 11,7

      0,538

      Hospitalisation Days

      <10 days

      %95,7 +/- 1,9

      0,006

      %87,1 +/- 3,1

      0,004

      >=10days

      %78,9 +/- 7,2

      %56,9 +/- 8,9

      Recurrence

      Yes

      %88,9 +/- 6

      0,013

      NA

      -

      No

      %91,7 +/- 2,6

      NA

      Conclusion

      Masaoka-Koga clinical stage and age are the important prognostic factors predicting OS. Postoperative hospital stay is related to DFS and OS.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.18 - Treatment of Locoregional Disease - NSCLC (ID 191)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Treatment of Locoregional Disease - NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P2.18-16 - VATS Lobectomy and Chest Wall Resection for NSCLC (ID 1034)

      10:15 - 18:15  |  Author(s): Erkan Kaba

      • Abstract

      Background

      The classic surgical approach in patients with NSCLC invading the chest wall is lobectomy and chest wall resection by thoracotomy in the majority of patients. However, this approach can be performed by video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) or robotic surgery (RATS) as a result of increased experience and technological developments. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of the technique and its results in patients undergoing lung and chest wall resection by means of minimally invasive surgery.

      Method

      The data of patients who underwent anatomical lung resection using VATS or RATS for NSCLC in three academic hospitals between 2013-2018 were prospectively recorded and reviewed retrospectively. Fourteen patients, all but three males with a median age of 62 ± 6.0 years, undergoing lung and chest wall resection were included in the study. Surgical results were evaluated.

      Result

      Neoadjuvant/induction treatment was chemo-radiotherapy in three and chemotherapy in two patients. The preferred surgical technique was RATS in two patients, and multiportal VATS in 10 and uniportal VATS approach in two patients. Upper lobectomy was performed in 11 patients, lower in two patients and upper lobe posterior segmentectomy in one patient. Standard small incision for chest wall resection was performed in four, Hybrid approach in 10 patients. Five patients had one, 6 patients had two, two patients had three and one patient had four ribs resections. Chest wall reconstruction was not necessary in any of the patients. The mean operation time was 96.4 ± 21.8 minutes. Complications were observed in 5 (35.7%) of the patients without mortality. The most common complication was prolonged, >5 days, air leak in four patients (28.6%). Ten patients (71.4%) were classified as T3N0, one patient (7.1%) as T4N0, one patient (7.1%) as T4N1, and two patients (14.1%) as T3N0M1. Surgical margins were reported as tumor-free (R0) in all patients. Adjuvant chemotherapy was given in eight patients (57.1%). The two-year survival rate was 66.8%.

      Conclusion

      Lobectomy and chest wall resection with minimally invasive surgery is a safe and feasible method in patients with NSCLC with chest wall invasion. Compared with thoracotomy, it provides equivalent oncologic outcomes as well as less postoperative pain, smaller incision, and faster recovery.