Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Francesco Ardissone
Author of
-
+
P2.09 - Pathology (ID 174)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P2.09-18 - Lymphocyte Infiltration Pattern and STING Expression Identify Different Prognostic Groups in Early Stage NSCLC (ID 2536)
10:15 - 18:15 | Author(s): Francesco Ardissone
- Abstract
Background
Lymphocyte infiltration has been described has a potential biomarker of lung cancer patients’ survival. Different studies de-convoluted immune cell compartment (i.e. stromal CD8 density) trying to identify clinically relevant immune patterns.
Method
A series of 178 early-stage (IB-IIIA) NSCLC has been retrospectively collected at Department of Oncology, San Luigi Hospital (Orbassano, Italy). From Formalin-Fixed and Paraffine-Embedeed (FFPE) tumor blocks, Tissue Microarrays (TMA) were constructed (4 cores were selected for each case). Lymphocyte infiltration pattern was determined by light-microscopy on Hemathoxylin-Eosin (HE) whole slides. Immunohistochemistry was performed as follow: CD8 (SP57) and STING (D2P2F) antibodies were tested with Ventana Benchmark and PD-L1 (22C3) with Dako Autostainer. Infiltration pattern has been clustered in 4 different categories: brisk-diffuse, non-brisk multifocal, non-brisk focal and none. CD8 was quantified as positivity percentage, PD-L1 through TPS (<1%, 1-49% and ≥50%) and STING taking advantage of H-score. Overall survival (OS) and Progression Free Survival (PFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log-rank test.
Result
Most represented patients had following features: male (119-71%), current or previous smokers (145-82%), stage II (94-53%) and adenocarcinoma histology (119-67%). Distribution of lymphocyte infiltration pattern was: 110 cases with brisk-diffuse (62%), 56 with non-brisk (multi-focal and focal) (31%) and 12 with none pattern (7%). CD8 positivity was distributed in 3 categories: high (66 - 37%), intermediate (75 - 42%) and low (37 -21%) density. For PD-L1 TPS analyses 111 cases (62%) had <1%, 39 cases (22%) 1-49% and 28 cases (16%) >50%. STING high-expressors were 88 (49%) and low-expressors 90 cases (51%). Lastly, were identified 81 samples (45%) with STING positivity at high-density on immune cells (IC) and 97 samples (55%) with low-density. As expected, Brisk-infiltrated samples presented an higher CD8 density (p=0.015). At PFS analyses, STING IC resulted associated (p=0.05) with a worse PFS for high-density patients. At OS analyses, brisk lymphocyte infiltration pattern appeared to have a negative impact (p=0.05) and STING higher-expressors on tumor cells had a worse prognosis (p=0.04).
Conclusion
NSCLC with wider lymphocyte infiltration and expression of immune activation markers (as STING) appeared to be associated with a worse prognosis (PFS and OS). These date need further validation at multivariate analyses.
