Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Songporn Oranratnachai



Author of

  • +

    EP1.14 - Targeted Therapy (ID 204)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: E-Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Targeted Therapy
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 08:00 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      EP1.14-09 - Characterization of Actionable BRAF<sup>V600E</sup> and Co-Mutations in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients (Now Available) (ID 1056)

      08:00 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Songporn Oranratnachai

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Targeting activated-mutations in NSCLC offers unique benefit that outperforms other cancers. Multiplex Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) platform provides opportunity for detection of low-frequency actionable-mutations such as BRAF V600E, which was previously reported in 1-2% of NSCLC and correlated with poorer response to chemotherapy. In this study, we used the NGS platform to determine the prevalence and characteristics of BRAF V600E-mutated NSCLC.

      Method

      Tissue archive of stage I-IV NSCLC from Ramathibodi and Phramongkutklao Hospitals during 2012-2015 was retrieved for DNA extraction. Samples were analyzed by NGS with Lung Cancer Panel 45 Genes on Ion Torrent system. Variants from NGS with coverage of higher than 1000X and ≥3% alternate variant frequency were considered as positive. The cutoff-point was validated by Real- time PCR. Clinical data correlation was analyzed.

      Result

      Of the 159 FFPE-samples, 16 samples (10.1%) with BRAFV600E mutation were identified. The median age was 66.6 years old. Majority of the patients were female (81.3%) and never-smoker (75%). Seven patients had early stage and 9 patients had stage III-IV disease. Co-mutations with BRAFV600E were found in 13 patients. EGFR mutation was the most common co-mutation (62.5%) follow by co-mutation with KRAS (37.5%), MET exon14 splice-site (18.8%), and PIK3CA (6.3%) (Table1). Advanced-stage patients with KRAS and MET exon14 splice-site co-mutations with BRAFV600E had worse survival (10.4, 10.4 months) compared to patients with EGFR co-mutation (41.1 months). Survival of patients with single BRAFV600E is better than patients with other co-mutations (not reach vs 60.5 months) in all stages.

      Table 1: Baseline characteristics of 16 patients with BRAFV600E mutation and their co-mutated gene including palliative treatment in stage IV patients

      Patient ID

      Gender

      Age

      Smoking

      status

      Staging

      Co-mutation

      First line treatment

      Second line treatment

      Current status

      OS

      (mo)

      EGFR

      KRAS

      MET

      PIK3CA

      1

      Female

      62

      Never

      IA

      L858R

      Alive

      2

      Female

      73

      Never

      IA

      Del19, L858R

      G12D

      Alive

      3

      Female

      50

      Never

      IA

      Del19

      G12C, G12D, Q61R

      Alive

      4

      Female

      67

      Never

      IA

      G719S

      G12D

      Alive

      5

      Female

      62

      Never

      IB

      G12S

      Alive

      6

      Female

      67

      Never

      IB

      G719A, del19

      Alive

      7

      Female

      75

      Never

      IIA

      Alive

      8

      Female

      80

      Ex-smoke

      IIIA

      G12D, G13S

      C2888-1G>A*

      Death

      10.4

      9

      Male

      63

      Ex-smoke

      IIIA

      Alive

      10

      Female

      75

      Never

      IV

      C3028G>T*

      Gemcitabine

      -

      Death

      7.9

      11

      Female

      60

      Never

      IV

      Del19

      Carbo/Pac

      Bevacizumab

      Death

      12.6

      12

      Female

      59

      Never

      IV

      L858R

      C3028G>A*

      Carbo/Pem

      Erlotinib

      Death

      48.9

      13

      Female

      89

      Never

      IV

      L858R

      Erlotinib

      Osimertinib

      Death

      60.5

      14

      Male

      74

      Ex-smoke

      IV

      Del19

      G12D, Q61L

      H1047R

      Carbo/Pac

      Gemcitabine

      Death

      27.1

      15

      Female

      58

      Never

      IV

      Carbo/Gem

      Carbo/Gem

      Death

      34.9

      16

      Male

      71

      Current smoke

      IV

      L858R

      Gefitinib

      Carbo/Gem

      Death

      41.1

      Conclusion

      Our data demonstrated high prevalence of BRAF V600E and coexisting-actionable mutations. BRAFV600E-mutated NSCLC are common in female and never-smoker. Co-mutations with other actionable-mutations patients showed worse survival compared to single BRAFV600E patients. Integrating the sensitive multiplex NGS method into the clinical practice will help broaden the opportunity for superior treatment efficacy in the future.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.04 - Immuno-oncology (ID 167)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Immuno-oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P2.04-78 - PD-L1 Expression as a Prognostic Marker for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer in Distinct Mutational Status  (ID 2927)

      10:15 - 18:15  |  Author(s): Songporn Oranratnachai

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is widely used as the predictive biomarker for immunotherapy treatment in NSCLC whereas their role as a prognostic marker is limited.

      Method

      Seventy-nine FFPE tissues (stage I-IV) during 2012-2017 were retrieved for Next Generation Sequencing (NGS) and immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. PD-L1 expression was performed using 22C3 Ab. Positive-PD-L1 was defined by tumor proportion score (TPS) >1%. Targeted mutations and fusion genes were analyzed by Lung Cancer Panel 45 Genes and Targeted RNAscan Panel on NGS, respectively. Variants from NGS with coverage of higher than 1000X, cutoff ≥3% alternate variant frequency were considered positive. The cutoff was validated by Real-time PCR. Clinical data correlation was analyzed.

      Result

      Thirty-one patients (39%) had stage I-II and 48 patients (61%) had stage III-IV disease. Mean age was 62.5 years old. Fifty-one patients (65%) were female and 55 patients (70%) were never-smoker. A majority of the patients (83.6%) were negative-PD-L1. All of the 13 PD-L1 positive patients were in stage III-IV, suggesting the increased likelihood of PD-L1 expression in advanced disease (p = 0.014). No difference in age, sex, smoking status, histological subtypes, and mutational status were seen between PD-L1 positive and negative group.However, PD-L1 negative was associated with a trend toward better survival (Table1). Subgroup analysis in stage IV patients with common EGFR mutations revealed PD-L1 positive status as a significant negative prognostic factor with HR of 3.00 (95% CI: 1.17, 7.73; P-value=0.023), whereas positive-PD-L1 patients with the other mutations showed a trend of worse survival outcome.

      Table 1: Cox regression analysis of prognostic factors associated with overall survival of NSCLC patients

      Prognostic factors

      Follow up time

      (100 person-month)

      Death

      Median survival

      (mo)

      Univariate analysis

      Multivariate analysis

      No.

      Rate (95% CI)

      HR (95% CI)

      p-value

      Adjusted HR (95% CI)

      p-value

      Age

      1.00 (0.98, 1.03)

      0.893

      -

      Sex

      0.250

      Male

      8.71

      18

      2.07 (1.30, 3.28)

      22.8

      1.43 (0.79, 2.59)

      0.243

      -

      Female

      21.14

      28

      1.32 (0.91, 1.92)

      53.9

      1

      -

      PDL1

      0.002

      Negative (<1%)

      28.05

      35

      1.25 (0.90, 1.74)

      53.9

      1

      1

      Positive (≥1%)

      1.80

      11

      6.09 (3.38, 11.00)

      7.1

      3.52 (1.73, 7.16)

      0.001

      1.88 (0.83, 4.22)

      0.128

      Stage

      <0.001

      I-II

      19.20

      6

      0.31 (0.14, 0.70)

      NR

      1

      1

      III-IV

      10.65

      40

      3.76 (2.75, 5.12)

      20.1

      11.09 (4.26, 28.87)

      <0.001

      10.03 (3.67, 27.41)

      <0.001

      Smoking status

      0.011

      Never smoker

      24.04

      28

      1.16 (0.80, 1.69)

      76.2

      1

      1

      Ex-smoker

      4.55

      10

      2.20 (1.18, 4.09)

      20.1

      1.70 (0.82, 3.52)

      0.154

      1.02 (0.47, 2.23)

      0.962

      Current smoker

      1.26

      8

      6.33 (3.17, 12.66)

      8.7

      3.76 (1.68, 8.41)

      0.001

      1.70 (0.74, 3.88)

      0.208

      EGFR

      0.825

      Mutation

      22.99

      35

      1.52 (1.09, 2.12)

      31.9

      0.93 (0.47, 1.83)

      0.824

      -

      No mutation

      6.87

      11

      1.60 (0.89, 2.89)

      33.5

      1

      -

      ALK

      0.869

      Positive

      2.28

      3

      1.32 (0.43, 4.09)

      NR

      1.11 (0.33, 3.78)

      0.867

      -

      Negative

      16.50

      19

      1.15 (0.73, 1.81)

      76.2

      1

      -

      KRAS

      0.051

      Mutation

      13.12

      12

      0.91 (0.52, 1.61)

      NR

      0.53 (0.27, 1.03)

      0.062

      -

      No mutation

      16.73

      34

      2.03 (1.45, 2.84)

      31.1

      1

      -

      Number of co-MT

      0.045

      < 1000

      11.84

      27

      2.28 (1.56, 3.33)

      22.8

      1

      1

      ≥ 1000

      18.02

      19

      1.05 (0.67, 1.65)

      57.6

      0.55 (0.30, 0.99)

      0.047

      1.22 (0.61, 2.41)

      0.574

      Conclusion

      Positive-PD-L1 is significantly associated with advanced disease and a trend toward unfavorable prognosis. The detrimental effect of PD-L1 is significant in stage IV patients with common EGFR mutations. A confirmatory study with a larger sample size would better identify the prognostic benefit of PD-L1 status in vast subsets.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.11 - Screening and Early Detection (ID 178)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Screening and Early Detection
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P2.11-25 - Pre- and Post-Surgery Metabolomic Profiles in Early-Stage NSCLC Patients (ID 2476)

      10:15 - 18:15  |  Author(s): Songporn Oranratnachai

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Finding biomarkers to detect cancer at its early stage is of importance. Since metabolic reprogramming is a hallmark of cancer, oncometabolite is thus a promising target.Progress in cancer metabolomics opens the door for large scale screening of cancer-specific metabolites that could be future applied for subclinical stage detection and novel therapeutic targets.

      Method

      Seventy paired pre- and postoperative plasma samples of early-stage NSCLC patients who had completed curative surgery during 2015-2018 with ≥ 3 months disease free were retrieved. Demographic and Clinical data were collected. All samples were subjected to targeted metabolomics analysis using AbsoluteIDQ® p180 Kit on ESI 5500 LC-MS/MS System equipped with 1260 Series HPLC, according to the manufacturer's instruction.Multivariate analysis including PCA and OPLS-DA were used to identify the difference between pre- vs post-operative sample set. T-test was used to confirmed if the metabolites significantly different among groups at the univariate level (p < 0.05).

      Result

      Of the 70 patients, 31 (44.3%) were male and 39 (55.7%) were female. Median age was 63 years old (23 - 85). Majority of them were never-smokers (64.3%). Adenocarcinoma was the most common histology (91.4%). EGFR mutation was tested in 34 (48.6%) patients, of which, 22(64.7%) of them were positive. Metabolomic analysis revealed tryptophan as the most statistically significant change, together with other amino acids, carnitines, biogenic amines, and lipids (Table1). Besides glutamate, all metabolites increased postoperatively.Metabolites with VIP scores (Variable Importance in Projection) ≥ 1.5, including tryptophan, lysophosphatidylcholine-acyl C16:0, lysophosphatidylcholine-acyl C18:0, and carnitine, were assembled together for a predictive model which will be presented at the congress.

      Table 1: Metabolites with significant difference between pre- and post-surgery in early-stage NSCLC patients

      Metabolite (ng/ml)

      Pre operation (N=70)

      Post operative (N=70)

      Fold change

      p-value

      VIP score

      Mean

      SD

      Mean

      SD

      Amino acid

      Glutamate

      17,449.31

      7,808.80

      10,192.53

      5,294.28

      -0.374

      <0.001

      1.21

      Glutamine

      87,406.56

      22,839.10

      104,994.00

      26,276.52

      0.324

      <0.001

      0.77

      Arginine

      10,869.44

      5,082.21

      16,101.94

      8,220.61

      0.481

      <0.001

      0.79

      Asparagine

      5,023.79

      1,294.80

      7,630.93

      2,343.85

      0.663

      <0.001

      1.34

      Tryptophan

      6,921.41

      1,579.37

      13,189.77

      4,105.45

      0.992

      <0.001

      1.70

      Acrylcarnitine

      carnitine (C0)

      4,680.23

      1,292.54

      7,263.51

      2,136.29

      0.657

      <0.001

      1.50

      Biogenic amine

      Creatinine

      7,262.43

      2,410.21

      10,529.83

      4,070.33

      0.536

      <0.001

      1.14

      Kynurenine

      363.42

      126.06

      571.91

      232.05

      0.723

      <0.001

      0.82

      Sphingolipid

      SM C16:1

      8,837.49

      2,290.28

      10,875.53

      2,970.15

      0.290

      <0.001

      1.33

      SM C20:2

      178.18

      60.77

      205.47

      66.55

      0.304

      0.005

      0.43

      Phosphatidylcholine

      lysoPC a C16:0

      26,863.83

      6,420.81

      45,877.36

      13,732.55

      0.774

      <0.001

      1.67

      lysoPC a C16:1

      740.24

      287.44

      1,256.99

      588.67

      0.842

      <0.001

      1.33

      lysoPC a C17:0

      303.24

      90.78

      521.36

      200.39

      0.853

      <0.001

      1.45

      lysoPC a C18:0

      8,449.64

      2,593.82

      14,854.50

      5,047.03

      0.885

      <0.001

      1.60

      lysoPC a C18:2

      6,818.04

      2,466.61

      11,990.73

      4,760.87

      0.965

      <0.001

      1.37

      Conclusion

      We identified a distinct cluster of significant metabolic biomarkers associated with early-stage NSCLC. Tryptophan is the most significant one that associated with cancer metabolome. These would be potential biomarker profile for early-stage NSCLC detection.Larger cohort is needed to be validated.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.