Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Edward Korn



Author of

  • +

    P1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 158)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 09:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P1.01-12 - Trends in the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Sponsored Lung Cancer Clinical Trials Pre and Post NCI’s National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN) (ID 2645)

      09:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Edward Korn

      • Abstract

      Background

      On March 1, 2014, NCI launched the new NCTN, transforming NCI’s longstanding Cooperative Group Program. The NCTN coordinates and supports cancer clinical trials at more than 3,000 sites across the United States and Canada providing the infrastructure for NCI-funded trials to improve the lives of people with cancer.

      Method

      We reviewed 10 years of lung cancer treatment trials accrual data that included 5 years pre-NCTN trial activations and accruals to these trials between3/1/2009-2/28/2014 and 3/1/2014-2/28/2019 for post-NCTN.More than 3,800 patients were enrolled to lung cancer treatment clinical trials that activated pre-NCTN during the pre-NCTN period, while more than 2,300 were enrolled in the post-NCTN period. Histology identifiers of small cell vs. non-small cell and Phase II vs. Phase II/III or III were sorted.

      Result

      Table 1 Histology and Phase

      Trial Information

      PRE-NCTN

      POST-NCTN

      Number of trials

      19

      23

      Lead disease

      Non-small cell lung cancer

      15

      22

      Small cell lung cancer

      4

      1

      Phase

      Phase II

      13

      11

      Phase III (including II/III)

      6

      12

      Table 2 Trial Status

      PRE-NCTN

      POST-NCTN

      Trial status

      Active

      1

      9

      Closed

      18

      14

      Closed trials

      Completed

      8

      6

      Premature closure

      10

      8

      Among Prematurely Closed Trials

      Reasons for premature closure

      Interim monitoring

      4*

      5

      Drug supply/external information

      1

      Unacceptable toxicity

      2

      Inadequate accrual rate

      4

      2

      While there is a 20% increase in activated trials in post NCTN era, the number of phase III trials has doubled. A decrease in small cell lung cancer clinical trials due to lack of active new drugs is noted. Enrollment of non-whites and females improved in post NCTN era and there was an increase in ethnicity and gender data capture. Additional demographic data will be available to report at the meeting and a discussion of evolving treatment trends.

      Conclusion

      In this era of precision medicine trials, the total treatment trial patient numbers have deceased, however; the screening part of the NCI master protocol trials were excluded from this analysis. ALCHEMIST enrolled patients 3264 patients that were screened but not enrolled in the treatment arms of ALCHEMIST. All the patients screened on ALCHEMIST will be followed for a total of 10-years and their tumor will also undergo genomic analysis. Similarly, LungMap screening trial included 1278 patients that did not get assigned to any treatment protocol.

  • +

    P2.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 159)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P2.01-04 - NCI-NRG Oncology ALK PROTOCOL (NRG-LU003): A Biomarker-Driven Protocol for Previously Treated ALK-Positive Non-Squamous NSCLC Patients      (ID 2021)

      10:15 - 18:15  |  Author(s): Edward Korn

      • Abstract

      Background

      Currently, the 1stgeneration ALK inhibitor crizotinib and 2ndgeneration ALK inhibitors ceritinib, alectinib and brigatinib are FDA-approved for the treatment of advanced ALK-positive NSCLC. The 3rdgeneration ALK inhibitor lorlatinibrecentlyreceived accelerated approval for patients after failure of a 2ndgeneration inhibitor.

      2ndgeneration ALK inhibitors are widely used in crizotinib-resistant patients and have recently replaced crizotinib as first-line therapy for newly diagnosed patients. There is an urgent need to define the optimal therapy for patients who have become resistant to a second-generation ALK inhibitor. Pre-clinical data and small case series suggest that the presence/absence of ALK resistance mutations or the specigic ALK mutation may serve as a critical biomarker to guide selection of therapy, particularly in the setting of relapse on a 2ndgeneration ALK inhibitor when ALK resistance mutations are more common,

      Method

      NRG-LU003 proposes to study ALK-positive non-squamous NSCLC patients who develop resistance to a second-generation ALK inhibitor, in order to establish a treatment algorithm for these patients based on resistance mechanisms.Patients will undergo tissue biopsy along with blood sampling for cfDNA analysis. One of the aims of the study is to establish the concordance between tissue and liquid biopsies; liquid biopsy may replace tissue biopsy after the first 200 patients enrolled, depending on the concordance and in consultation with CDRH/FDA. Treatments will be selected based on preclinical and clinical data demonstrating activity of treatment particular inhibitor against the specific ALK mutation or resistance mechanism identified. If no ALK resistance mutations are identified, patients will be randomized to receive either a next-generation ALK inhibitor they have not previously received or pemetrexed-based therapy with cisplatin or carboplatin.

      Target accrual is 660 patients and primary objective is to assess whether ALK kinase domain mutations (e.g., G1202/C1156/I1171/L1196/V1180/F1174 mutations) associated with drug resistance are predictive of objective response to subsequent ALK inhibitor therapy, to assess whether subsequent pemetrexed based chemotherapy improves objective response compared to ALK inhibitor therapy for patients with no ALK resistance mutations, and to evaluate objective responses of patients with specific genetic alterations (e.g., ALK L1198F, compound mutations, or high-level MET amplification) treated with crizotinib.

      Mutation

      STUDY DRUG

      STUDY DRUG

      STUDY DRUG

      STUDY DRUG

      STUDY DRUG

      STUDY DRUG

      STUDY DRUG

      G1202, G1202del, G1202R

      lorlatinib

      brigatinib

      C1156Y

      lorlatinib

      alectinib

      brigatinib

      I1171

      lorlatinib

      ceritinib

      brigatinib

      L1196, L1196M

      lorlatinib

      ceritinib

      alectinib

      brigatinib

      ensartinib

      V1180

      lorlatinib

      ceritinib

      brigatinib

      F1174

      lorlatinib

      alectinib

      brigatinib

      Compound mutation

      lorlatinib

      ALK L1198F (alone/ in combination with another ALK mutation)

      crizotinib

      MET amplification

      crizotinib

      No ALK-resistance mutations*

      lorlatinib

      ceritinib

      alectinib

      brigatinib

      ensartinib

      Pemetrexed

      +

      Cisplatin or Carboplatin

      Result

      "Section not applicable"

      Conclusion

      This study has been approved and is open for enrollment through the National Clinical Trials Network (NCTN).

      This project is supported by grants U10CA180868 (NRG Oncology Operations), U10CA180822 (NRG Oncology SDMC) from the National Cancer Institute (NCI)