Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Anna Estival



Author of

  • +

    EP1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 150)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: E-Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 08:00 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      EP1.01-37 - Platinum-Based Chemotherapy (CT) Rechallenge in Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients (p): A Single Institution Experience (ID 2689)

      08:00 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Anna Estival

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      No phase III trials have been carried out to prove the value of a platinum-doublet rechallenge in p with NSCLC. Currently, the availability of different effective drugs makes the platinum-based salvage therapy unusual. Moreover, the potential cumulative toxicity related to cisplatin or carboplatin can be an issue. However, retreatment with platinum-based CT could be hypothetically proposed for p with a long time to progression (TTP) from the last platinum treatment, in p with a good performance status, who may be symptomatic and with no formal contraindication to receive such treatment We have retrospectively reviewed experience at our institution of platinum-based chemotherapy rechallenge in stage III and IV NSCLC p

      Method

      A cohort of 376 p with stage III and IV NSCLC treated with first-line platinum doublets from January 2012 to December 2017 were included. We extracted information on clinical and molecular characteristics, as well as treatment details. Time to progression was evaluated by Kaplan-Meier curves and groups were compared using Log-rank test.

      Result

      Overall, 57 p were rechallenged with platinum-based CT (group A). Median age was 57 years (51.5-65) for rechallenged p versus (vs) 62 (56.2-68.8) for the entire cohort (group B)[p=0.001]. Group A include more p with stage III p( 54.4% vs. 30.7%; p=0.001), as well as more p with better ECOG Performance Status (PS) (PS 0 70.2% vs. 44.5%; p=0.001). No differences in gender, smoking status, histology and comorbidities were observed between both groups (20.7% and 29.8% were women and 38.6% and 53.9% were smokers in groups A and B, respectively).

      No differences in molecular profile (EGFR, ALK, ROS1, KRAS, BRAF) were observed. The most common platinum doublet administered in first line setting was cisplatin plus pemetrexed. Group A received more frequently carboplatin plus gemcitabine or vinorelbine. Disease Control Rate (DCR) was 57.9% in p included in group A. No differences in DCR were observed in first line between both groups. Time to progression or death was 9.6 m for gropuo B(5-18.1) vs 20.5 m (14.6-37.3) p <0,001 for p in group A.

      Conclusion

      Rechallenge with platinum-based CT doublets could represent an option for NSCLC p with good PS and no contraindications for such therapy.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    EP1.04 - Immuno-oncology (ID 194)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: E-Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Immuno-oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 08:00 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      EP1.04-25 - Increased PD-L1 Expression in MET Amplified (AMP) Advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients (P) (ID 2764)

      08:00 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Anna Estival

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      MET amp has been reported in a subset of NSCLC p and treatment with crizotinib has proved clinical activity in cases of MET exon 14 alterations and MET amp.. Recently, immunotherapy has emerged as a new approach to treat NSCLC. The development and success of programmed cell death 1 (PD-1)/program death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) checkpoint inhibitors has been correlated with PD-L1 status, particularly in NSCLC p whose tumors express high PD-L1 levels by tumor proportion score (TPS) ⩾ 50%. In this study we have reviewed the PD-L1 status in a cohort of advanced NSCLC p with a METamp.

      Method

      PDL1 expression has been evaluated in a retrospective cohort of NSCLC p with MET amp and wild type for EGFR, KRAS, BRAF mutations and ALK and ROS1 rearrangements. Overall Survival (OS) was evaluated with Kaplan-Meier curves and groups were compared using log-rank test. Clinical and tumor characteristics, as well as treatment details, were evaluated. MET amp was analyzed by FISH, while PD-L1 status was assessed by immunochemistry by SP 263. antiboby

      Result

      A total of 50 p were included, 15 p has high or intermediate Met amp and 35 p had low or negative Met amp. Median age were 66 years old. 39 (78%) p were male, 43 (86%) p were smokers or former smokers, 37 p (74%) were ECOG PS 0-1, 37 p (74%) were stage IV. PD-L1 were negative ( < 1%) in 21 p (42%), positive ( >1%) in 26 p ( 52%). PD-L1 highly positive in 18 p ( 36%). Statistically significant more p had PD-L1 positive ( TPS > 1%) in high or intermediate Met amp p versus low or negative ( 92.9% vs 39.4%; p 0.001). And high or intermediate Met amp p had PD-L1 high expression ( TPS > 50%) than negative or low Met amp p ( 64.3% vs 27.3%; p 0.020). No differences in PD-L1 expression was observed by gender, ECOG PS or smoking status. Median OS was 16.367 m (2.295-30.438). No differences in OS were seen by PD-L1 expression or Met amp status.

      Conclusion

      PD-L1 expression in NSCLC p is positively correlated with MET amp, especially in p with PD-L1 > 50%. Our data suggests that MET amp may play a direct role in up-regulating PD-L1 expression in NSCLC p. Additionally, combination therapy targeting MET and checkpoint inhibition should be considered as a potential therapeutic strategy for NSCLC p with high and intemediate MET amp.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    EP1.16 - Treatment in the Real World - Support, Survivorship, Systems Research (ID 206)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: E-Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Treatment in the Real World - Support, Survivorship, Systems Research
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 08:00 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      EP1.16-17 - Management of Inappropriate Use of Opioids (IUO) in Patients (P) with Lung Cancer (LC) (Now Available) (ID 612)

      08:00 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Anna Estival

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Pain represents one of the main symptoms in patients (p) with lung cancer (LC). Currently, the molecular classification and targeted therapies and immunotherapy for LCp yield a prolonged survival in some p. In this context, analgesia with opioid therapy (OT) requires special caution. The prevalence of IUO LCp is unknown and its assessment is suboptimal. There is no current recommendation to assess IUO risk in cancer p, other than in long cancer survivors with chronic pain. Several scales are validated for the screening of aberrant OT-behaviors. The Addiction Unit (AU) role could be key in the evaluation and minimization of the IUO risk (Fig.1)

      STUDY DESIGN:Prospective study for the evaluation of IUO risk in LCp. P with intermediate/high risk of IUO will be referred to the AU for evaluation and follow-up (Fig.1)

      OBJECTIVES:Determine if screening scales are capable of detecting the risk of IUO in LCp. Reduce the impact of IUO in LCp by assessment and follow-up in the AU.

      VARIABLES: Main: To determine if the Cut down-Annoyed-Guilty-Eye opener (CAGE-AD) and Opioid Risk Tool (ORT) scales are able of detecting the risk of IUO in LCp. Secondary: Determine if the urine and blood drug testing (DT) reinforces the information of such scales. Determine the risk reduction of IUO after the intervention of the AU.

      Method

      ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA (Fig.1)

      SCALES:The MO team will use the following scales for the IUO risk assessment: CAGE-AID, ORT. Visual Analogic Scale (VAS) and Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale (ESAS) will be used for pain evaluation. LABORATORY: DT (urine/ blood ethanol)

      ASSESSMENT OF IUO RISK: Proposed timeline and strategies at the AU are summarized in Fig.1.

      SAMPLE SIZE:Study will include 45 p in a 1-year period.

      Approved by IRB-Hospital Germans Trias in Pujol, Nov, 23th2018 (UIO-pulmon 2018)

      picture1.png

      Result

      Section not applicable

      Conclusion

      Section not applicable

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 158)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 2
    • Now Available
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 09:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P1.01-111 - ATEZO-BRAIN, A Single-Arm Phase II Study of Atezolizumab Combined with Chemotherapy in Stage IV NSCLC Patients with Untreated Brain Metastases (ID 733)

      09:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Anna Estival

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Brain metastases (BM) are a frequent complication in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), have significant impact on quality of life and are associated with poor prognosis. Systemic therapies might be an alternative approach to whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) to avoid cognitive-related adverse events. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) showed intracranial activity in advanced NSCLC patients with BM. However clinical data about efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy in patients with untreated BM are limited and further research in this setting is needed. We hypothesize that addition of ICI to conventional platinum-based chemotherapy may increase intracranial tumor response and provide clinically relevant benefit in terms of PFS, OS and quality of life to the patients with asymptomatic and non-previously treated BM.

      Method

      This is an ongoing multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase 2 study (EUDRACT: 2017-005154-11) to evaluate the efficacy and safety of atezolizumab 1200 mg combined with 4-6 cycles of carboplatin AUC 5 and pemetrexed 500mg/m2 every 3 weeks followed by maintenance with atezolizumab 1200 mg plus pemetrexed 500mg/m2 every 3 weeks in stage IV non-squamous NSCLC patients with untreated synchronous BM. Patients should have multiple and measurable BM, adequate performance status and organic function, do not harbor EGFR or ALK genomic alterations, be treatment naïve and do not have any contraindication to receive immunotherapy. Exclusion criteria consist of active neurological symptoms, dexamethasone dose ≥ 4 mg QD, prior treatment with brain radiotherapy, presence of leptomeningeal carcinomatosis, spinal or hemorrhagic metastases in the central nervous system. Primary endpoints are progression-free survival (PFS) at 12 weeks according to RANO-BM and RECIST v1.1 criteria and safety based on CTCAE v4. Both primary endpoints will be assessed in 40 patients in 15 sites using a Bayesian approach. Patients will undergo tumor assessments by body CT scan and brain MRI at baseline every 6 weeks for the first 12 weeks and thereafter tumor assessments will be performed every 9 weeks until disease progression or loss of clinical benefit. Secondary endpoints: intracranial and systemic objective response rate and duration of response. Exploratory endpoints: to assess neurocognitive function and quality of life; to determine time to neurological deterioration and time to need of salvage brain radiotherapy. Enrollment started on August 2018 and currently 12 patients have been included in the study.

      Result

      Clinical trial in progress

      Conclusion

      Clinical trial in progress

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      P1.01-54 - Somatic Genome Alterations in Lung Cancer Patients Diagnosed with Li Fraumeni Syndrome (Now Available) (ID 1014)

      09:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Anna Estival

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Li-Fraumeni syndrome (LFS) is a rare hereditary condition that consists of TP53 mutations inherited in autosomal dominant manner that confer high risk of developing cancer, including lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). EGFR-mutated LUAD were reported in the context of LFS but there is no systematic description of somatic mutations and characteristics of lung cancer (LC) patients with LFS.

      Method

      We present a retrospective analysis of clinical and molecular characteristics of patients with LFS diagnosed with LC at the Catalan Institute of Oncology from 1999 to 2019. We collected demographical and clinicopathological features, germline and somatic mutational alterations, treatment and progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

      Result

      A total of 7 patients with LC and LFS were identified in the Genetic Counseling Unit database. They were carriers of germline mutations in TP53. Five of them were classified as pathogenic: c.638G>A; p.(Arg213Gln), c.725G>A; p.(Cys242Tyr), c.742C>T; p.(Arg248Trp), c.844C>T; p.(Arg282Trp) and c.1010G>A; p.(Arg337His) and two of them as likely pathogenic: c.374C>T; p.(Thr125Met) and c.473G>A; p.(Arg158His). Six out of 7 patients were female and 5 out of 7 never smoker. Median age at diagnosis was 38 year-old (range: 29-74). Five patients had stage IV at diagnosis and the most common histologic subtype was LUAD (5). Six patients had first grade family history of cancer with a median of 2 family members (range: 1-4) and 2 patients had prior history of cancer. Tumor somatic profile in LC was obtained in 6 patients, consisting on a ROS-1 rearrangement in one patient and EGFR mutations in 5 patients (exon 19 deletion in 3 patients and missense mutations in 2 patients, p.(Gly719Ala) at exon 18 and p.(Leu858Arg) at exon 21) and in 1 patient was unknown. All patients with mutant EGFR received EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) with a median PFS of 29 months (95% CI 0-67). Four had partial response and one a complete response to TKI treatment. At disease progression, one patient had small cell transformation and another acquired EGFR T790M mutation. Median lines of treatment were 4 (range 1-6). Two patients are alive at data cut off. Median OS is 47 months (95% CI 32-62).

      Conclusion

      Patients diagnosed with LC and LFS are enriched with actionable genomic alterations and have an earlier onset of the disease. Clinical outcome of patients with EGFR mutations and LFS did not differ from EGFR mutated LC patients who do not carry TP53 germline mutations.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.05 - Interventional Diagnostic/Pulmonology (ID 168)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Interventional Diagnostics/Pulmonology
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P2.05-12 - Analysis of Biomarkers in Lung Cancer in Spain (ID 854)

      10:15 - 18:15  |  Author(s): Anna Estival

      • Abstract

      Background

      The analysis of biomarkers in lung cancer (LC) is currently one of the most important care needs, given the importance of their presence in the selection of specific treatments. Our objective was to know the implementation degree of these tests in a large cohort of patients in Spain using the Thoracic Tumor Registry (TTR) of the Grupo Español de Cáncer de Pulmón (Spanish Lung Cancer Group).

      Method

      The TTR is an observational cohort multicenter study of the LC in Spain. Information on patients (p) enrolled from August 2016 to December 2018. The study is conducted according to the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the institutional review board of each participating institute. The registry was approved by the Spanish Drug Agency as a non-post-authorization, non-interventional study.

      Result

      A total of 7,872 patients from 58 Spanish sites were enrolled. Analysis of molecular markers considering all the LC stages: A molecular test, the most frequent being the EGFR test, was performed in 4,456 patients (67.5%). The proportion of biomarker evaluation has varied over time, ranging from 57.9% prior to 2012 up to 73.7% in 2017.

      Molecular markers in patients with stage IV. Three thousand four hundred forty-six (3,446) patients (52.2%) had a stage IV on diagnosis. The molecular assessment of some biomarkers reached 81.4% of all the patients, there being differences between Regional Communities in regard to the molecular tests made.

      There was performed some biomarker test in 92% of the 2570 patients with stage IV and adenocarcinoma histology. The analysis of ALK was tested in 79% of the patients, this being in 40% only 2 years ago. ROS was studied in 20% of the cases and EGFR in 92%.

      Conclusion

      Although no national plan exists for molecular biomarker analysis in LC in Spain, the implementation of the biomarkers analysis in all the hospitals that contribute to the TTR is high, as close to the maximum as possible. The increase in the ALK analysis in the last period is relevant. As regional differences exist, it would be of interest to go in depth to study its cause