Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Genevieve C Digby



Author of

  • +

    MA24 - Initiatives to Improve Health in Lung Cancer Patients (ID 354)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Mini Oral Session
    • Track: Advocacy
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • +

      MA24.07 - Impact of Radiologist Recommendations on Timeliness of Lung Cancer Referral: Baseline Data to Guide a Quality Improvement Initiative (Now Available) (ID 828)

      14:30 - 16:00  |  Author(s): Genevieve C Digby

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Lung cancer (LC) diagnostic pathways are typically initiated following suspicious radiographic imaging. In southeastern Ontario, Canada, we identified delays from first thoracic imaging suspicious for LC to referral for evaluation at our regional LC rapid assessment clinic, the Lung Diagnostic Assessment Program (LDAP). Given that delays in diagnosis of LC are associated with worse patient outcomes, we sought to characterize local processes to guide Quality Improvement (QI) initiatives.

      Method

      We retrospectively reviewed all patients referred to the LDAP between January and October 2018. Collected data included dates of: first imaging suspicious for LC, first CT chest (if different from first suspicious imaging), LDAP referral, LDAP assessment, and details regarding Radiologist recommendations in the report. Data are reported as mean days (± standard error); unpaired t-tests were used to assess for significance.

      Result

      Of 558 patients referred to the LDAP, 509 (91.2%) patients had a CT chest performed prior to LDAP referral. Of these, 110 (21.6%) had a CT chest report issuing a specific Radiologist recommendation for LDAP referral. When such a recommendation was made, time from CT chest to LDAP referral was significantly faster than if no recommendation was made (6.9 versus 12.9 days, p=0.017), as was time from CT Chest to LDAP assessment (21.4 versus 25.6 days, p=0.026). Of all patients with a Radiologist recommended LDAP referral, 38 (34.5%) were not assessed in the LDAP for reasons including: patient followed by the LDAP, a Respirologist, or an Oncologist, inpatient status, or patient refusing assessment. Data are presented in Figure 1.

      figure 1.png

      Conclusion

      We identified that a Radiologist recommendation for LDAP referral leads to significantly faster patient referral and assessment for evaluation of suspected LC. A QI initiative is underway, consisting of knowledge sharing and regional standardization of radiologist reporting recommendations for imaging suspicious for LC in order to expedite LDAP referral.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    OA10 - Sophisticated TNM Staging System for Lung Cancer (ID 136)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Oral Session
    • Track: Staging
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • +

      OA10.01 - Impact of Pre-Ordered Staging Tests on Timeliness of Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Staging: A Quality Improvement Initiative (Now Available) (ID 483)

      14:00 - 15:30  |  Author(s): Genevieve C Digby

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Timely care for patients undergoing evaluation for suspected lung cancer (LC) is critical to optimize clinical outcomes and minimize patient anxiety. We identified delays in local LC evaluation pathways and sought to improve the timeliness of care provided by the Lung Diagnostic Assessment Program (LDAP), a rapid assessment clinic. We launched a Quality Improvement (QI) initiative consisting of Standardized Triage Pathways (STP) with pre-ordered staging tests for LDAP-referred patients with a high suspicion of LC and seek to evaluate the impact on timeliness of care.

      Method

      Data were collected retrospectively for all LDAP-referred patients to establish baseline (January - April 2018) and prospectively for improvement (May - October 2018), including: LDAP referral date, triage pathway, pre-ordered tests (PET, CT/MRI brain) including date of completion, and reasons for not completing pre-ordered testing. Mean data are reported, with significance determine by special cause variation using Statistical Process Control (SPC) XbarS charts; unpaired t-tests assess for differences between independent groups.

      Result

      We reviewed 553 consecutive LDAP referrals (185 baseline, 368 post-STP). Compliance with STP and pre-ordered testing for patients with suspicion of LC improved to 100% and 93%, respectively. Post-STP, mean time from referral to PET decreased from 40.5 to 26.0 days, significant by SPC, and was 21.8 days for patients completing pre-ordered testing (p=0.0001). Time from referral to CT/MRI Brain decreased from 35.8 to 19.9 days, significant by SPC, and was 18.5 days for patients completing pre-ordered testing (p=0.0001). While there was a non-significant trend to improvement in time from referral to diagnosis (41.4 to 30.4 days), the improvement was significant for patients completing pre-ordered testing (28.4 days, p =0.0001). Of the 166 (45%) LDAP-referred patients triaged to receive pre-ordered testing, 134 (80.5%) completed pre-ordered tests. Those completing pre-ordered tests experienced more timely care, on average, than those who did not: mean time from referral to PET was 13.9 days faster (p=0.0001), referral to CT/MRI Brain was 15.9 days faster (p=0.0001), and referral to diagnosis was 10.2 days faster (p=0.0004). Main patient barriers to completing pre-ordered testing were preference for physician consultation prior to testing, (10, 31.3%), and barriers regarding travel and cost, (6,18.8%).

      Conclusion

      A standardized triage process with pre-ordered staging tests at the time of LDAP referral is associated with improved time from referral to completion of staging tests and diagnosis. Strategies to improve compliance with pre-ordered testing are ongoing, including collaboration with primary care physicians and nurses to support patients and navigate barriers.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.