Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Brandon Higgs
Author of
-
+
OA04 - Immuno Combinations and the Role of TMB (ID 126)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Immuno-oncology
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Solange Peters, Martin Reck
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 15:15 - 16:45, Copenhagen (1980)
-
+
OA04.07 - Mutations Associated with Sensitivity or Resistance to Immunotherapy in mNSCLC: Analysis from the MYSTIC Trial (Now Available) (ID 901)
15:15 - 16:45 | Author(s): Brandon Higgs
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
In the Phase 3 MYSTIC study (NCT02453282), blood tumour mutational burden, at various thresholds from ≥12 to ≥20 mut/Mb (bTMB≥20), has been associated with improved OS and PFS with first-line durvalumab (D; anti-PD-L1) +/- tremelimumab (T; anti-CTLA-4) versus platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). Specific gene mutations have been associated with resistance (STK11 and KEAP1) or sensitisation (ARID1A) to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. However, the relationship between gene alterations and response to anti-PD-(L)1 ± anti-CTLA-4 are not well characterised. Here we explore associations between mutations and survival outcomes in the MYSTIC patient population.
Method
Circulating tumour DNA from baseline blood specimens was profiled using the GuardantOMNI platform. Samples were available from 1003 patients (89.7% of ITT; 943 mutation-evaluable). Survival outcomes were analysed in patients with (m) or without (wt) non-synonymous somatic mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or ARID1A.
Result
In the mutation-evaluable population, STK11m, KEAP1m, and ARID1Am frequencies were 16%, 18% and 12%, respectively (19%, 20%, and 11% [nonsquamous]; 7%, 13%, and 15% [squamous]). Across treatment arms, patients with STK11m or KEAP1m had a shorter median OS (mOS) than patients with STK11wt (D, 10.3 vs 13.3 mo; D+T, 4.4 vs 11.3 mo; CT, 6.7 vs 13.1 mo) or KEAP1wt (D, 7.6 vs 14.6 mo; D+T, 9.2 vs 11.3 mo; CT, 6.3 vs 13.3 mo) mNSCLC. In the D+T arm, patients with ARID1Am had a longer mOS than patients with ARID1Awt mNSCLC (D, 8.6 vs 13.7 mo; D+T, 23.2 vs 9.8 mo; CT, 10.6 vs 12.4 mo). Additional mutational analyses will be presented.
Conclusion
In these analyses from the MYSTIC study, poorer outcomes were observed across treatment arms in patients with mNSCLC and mutations in STK11 or KEAP1 compared with those without the corresponding mutations. In patients receiving D+T, ARID1Am was associated with survival benefits compared with ARID1wt. These data are exploratory and require further validation.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA07 - Precision Medicine Involves Biology and Patients (ID 132)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Silvia Novello, Fabrice Barlesi
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 11:00 - 12:30, Copenhagen (1980)
-
+
OA07.02 - LKB1 Mutations in Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC): Prognostic Value in the Real World (Now Available) (ID 902)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): Brandon Higgs
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Despite recent advances in treating mNSCLC, many patients fail to respond. Identifying genetic markers may help maximize clinical benefit and avoid unnecessary toxicity. LKB1/STK11 alterations (LKB1m) and co-occurring KRAS mutations/LKB1 loss (KRAS/LKB1) have been associated with poor outcomes in patients treated with immunotherapy (IO). Among chemotherapy-treated patients, however, the prognostic value is less understood. This retrospective study examined LKB1m, KRAS/LKB1 and outcomes in patients with mNSCLC receiving IO (as monotherapy or in combination) or chemotherapy in the real-world setting.
Method
Adult patients with mNSCLC who initiated first line (1L) treatment between Jan 2013 and Jun 2017 and had been profiled with the FoundationOne assay in routine care were enrolled from the Flatiron Health Oncology electronic medical record database. Associations between LKB1m, LKB1/KRAS and overall survival (OS) or progression-free survival (PFS) were evaluated by line of therapy (1L and second line [2L]) according to histology (non-squamous/squamous and non-squamous only) using multivariate Cox proportional hazards models. All analyses were stratified by IO or chemotherapy.
Result
2407 patients (1847 non-squamous) were included; average age was 66.1 years at 1L initiation. 328 (13.6%) patients harbored LKB1m and 157 (6.5%) harbored KRAS/LKB1. Among IO-treated patients in the 2L setting, LKB1m was associated with shorter OS and PFS versus wild type. A similar association was observed in the 1L setting and in the non-squamous only subgroup. In patients receiving chemotherapy, LKB1m was associated with worse outcomes only in the 1L setting. All associations were generally more pronounced among KRAS/LKB1 compared with LKB1m patients.
ConclusionTable. Association between LKB1m and OS or PFS in mNSCLC stratified by IO or chemotherapy and lines of therapy Mutation group LKB1m All mNSCLC Non-Squamous Outcome IO Chemotherapy IO Chemotherapy 1L (n = 270) 2L (n = 670) 1L (n =2,137) 2L (n = 863) 1L (n = 187) 2L (n = 498) 1L (n = 1,687) 2L (n = 683) LKB1m, N (%) 40 (14.8) 111 (16.6) 288 (13.5) 83 (9.6) 38 (20.3) 97 (19.5) 257 (15.2) 75 (11.0) OS Median 341 192 340 350 431 201 356 400 (IQR) (221 – NA) (72 – 523) (284 – 405) (307 – 451) (221 – NA) (73 – 613) (287 – 415) (307 – 453) HR 1.43 1.59 1.40 1.07 1.40 1.67 1.43 1.05 (95% CI) (0.90 – 2.27) (1.25 – 2.03) (1.21 – 1.63) (0.81 – 1.41) (0.84 – 2.32) (1.27 – 2.19) (1.22 – 1.68) (0.78 – 1.42) PFS Median 122 67 136 122 125 68 136 128 (IQR) (83 – 295) (46 – 118) (119 – 146) (97 – 147) (81 – 299) (46 – 114) (122 – 149) (98 – 153) HR 1.43 1.59 1.40 1.07 1.36 1.55 1.38 1.07 (95% CI) (0.90 – 2.27) (1.25 – 2.03) (1.21 – 1.63) (0.81 – 1.41) (0.92 – 2.03) (1.22 – 1.97) (1.20 – 1.59) (0.82 – 1.39) KRAS/LKB1 All mNSCLC Non-squamous IO Chemotherapy IO Chemotherapy 1L (n = 270) 2L (n = 670) 1L (n =2,137) 2L (n = 863) 1L (n = 187) 2L (n = 498) 1L (n = 1,687) 2L (n = 683) KRAS/LKB1, N (%) 17 (6.3) 56 (8.4) 140 (6.6) 42 (4.9) 16 (8.6) 52 (10.4) 133 (7.9) 40 (5.9) OS Median 303 209 356 343 341 230 363 350 (IQR) (222 – NA) (72 – 666) (272 – 450) (254 – 554) (130 – NA) (72 – 666) (284 – 462) (254 – 554) HR 1.46 1.63 1.55 1.27 1.44 1.78 1.61 1.28 (95% CI) (0.74 – 2.86) (1.16 – 2.29) (1.26 – 1.90) (0.87 – 1.84) (0.68 – 3.05) (1.22 – 2.59) (1.29 – 2.00) (0.86 – 1.90) PFS Median 126 67 136 133 174 68 136 133 (IQR) (77 – 291) (46 – 91) (112 – 160) (91 – 190) (72 – 295) (47 – 91) (112 – 160) (91 – 190) HR 1.34 1.81 1.40 1.08 1.34 1.86 1.44 1.05 (95% CI) (0.80 – 2.24) (1.35 – 2.44) (1.16 – 1.68) (0.77 – 1.51) (0.76 – 2.36) (1.35 – 2.57) (1.19 – 1.75) (0.74 – 1.50) Note: Bold text indicates significant results; reference group for LKB1m is LKB1wt; reference group for KRAS/LKB1 is KRASwt/LKB1wt
Median OS and PFS and IQRs are expressed in daysAbbreviations: KRAS mutation/LKB1 loss (KRAS/LKB1), Hazard ratio (HR), Interquartile range (IQR), Confidence interval (CI), Immunotherapy (IO), Overall Survival (OS), Progression-free survival (PFS), Wild type (wt)
LKB1m and LKB1/KRAS were associated with numerically worse OS and PFS in the 1L setting, irrespective of treatment, and in IO-treated patients in the 2L setting. Results of this real-world study support previous clinical findings and suggest unique relevance of these mutations in 1L chemotherapy and for 1L and 2L IO.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
