Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Helena Linardou



Author of

  • +

    MA07 - Clinical Questions and Potential Blood Markers for Immunotherapy (ID 125)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Mini Oral Session
    • Track: Immuno-oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • +

      MA07.07 - Discussant - MA07.05, MA07.06 (Now Available) (ID 3740)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Helena Linardou

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    OA04 - Immuno Combinations and the Role of TMB (ID 126)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Oral Session
    • Track: Immuno-oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • +

      OA04.02 - CheckMate 817: First-Line Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Patients with ECOG PS 2 and Other Special Populations with Advanced NSCLC (Now Available) (ID 1876)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Author(s): Helena Linardou

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Data are limited for immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC and poor performance status or other comorbidities. CheckMate 817 is a multi-cohort, open-label phase 3b/4 study investigating safety and efficacy of flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based low-dose ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC. Here we evaluate this regimen as first-line treatment in special populations (cohort A1) and a reference population (cohort A; previously reported).

      Method

      Patients had previously untreated advanced NSCLC. Cohort A1 (n=198) had ECOG PS 2 or ECOG PS 0–1 with 1 of: asymptomatic untreated brain metastases, hepatic or renal impairment, or HIV. Cohort A (n=391) had ECOG PS 0–1. Patients with known EGFR mutations or ALK translocations sensitive to available targeted therapy were excluded from both cohorts. Nivolumab 240 mg Q2W plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W was administered for two years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Safety and efficacy endpoints were assessed; cohort A1 analyses were exploratory.

      Result

      Cohort A1 patients were grouped as: ECOG PS 2 (n=139) and all other special populations (AOSP; n=59). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between cohorts. Rates of grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar between cohorts; within cohort A1, grade 3–4 TRAEs were numerically higher in AOSP versus the ECOG PS 2 subgroup; TRAEs leading to discontinuation were similar across populations (Table). ORR was 25% in cohort A1 (patients with ECOG PS 2, 20%; AOSP, 37%) and 35% in cohort A. PFS was numerically shorter in cohort A1 than cohort A; high TMB (≥10 mut/Mb) and higher PD-L1 expression (≥1% or ≥50%) were associated with numerically longer PFS in both cohorts (Table).

      table_v3.jpg

      Conclusion

      First-line flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based ipilimumab showed a consistent safety profile in special populations with advanced NSCLC, including those with ECOG PS 2. Patients with either high TMB or higher tumor PD-L1 expression appeared to exhibit improved efficacy.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.16 - Treatment in the Real World - Support, Survivorship, Systems Research (ID 186)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track: Treatment in the Real World - Support, Survivorship, Systems Research
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 09:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P1.16-09 - Post-Progression Outcomes After Pembrolizumab in Patients with NSCLC and High PD-L1 Expression: Real-World Data from a European Cohort (ID 2749)

      09:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Helena Linardou

      • Abstract

      Background

      Real-world data regarding treatment patterns and clinical outcomes after progression on first-line pembrolizumab (pembro) monotherapy among NSCLC patients are lacking.

      Method

      A comprehensive clinicopathological database of 173 consecutive patients with NSCLC and PD-L1>50% treated with first-line pembro in 14 centers in Italy, Spain, Greece and Switzerland was retrospectively created and post-progression patterns and outcomes were recorded. Analysis was performed using the SAS 9.3 software.

      Result

      Main clinicopathological features are summarized in Table 1. Median TPS score for PD-L1 expression was 70%. Median duration of pembro treatment was 6.1 months (range: 0.2-20.8). Thirty patients (17.4%) received pembro despite having non-metastatic disease (stage I-IIIC), as deemed medically inoperable or ineligible for definite chemo-radiotherapy. At data cut-off (10th April 2019), 100 patients (58%) had stopped treatment due to disease progression, 9 (5%) due to toxicity, 3 (2%) for other reasons and 61 (35%) were still on treatment. Best response to pembro was CR, PR, SD and PD in 2%, 34%, 20% and 24% respectively, while in 11.6% death occurred in the absence of documented PD. Among patients who progressed (N=100), in 18 cases pembro was continued beyond progression, as considered to confer clinical benefit. Among patients who discontinued pembro (N=94), 47% received any second-line chemotherapy and 53% received no further treatment. Main chemotherapy regimens were carboplatin with either pemetrexed (16%) or gemcitabine (9%) or paclitaxel (7%), cisplatin-pemetrexed (7%) and gemcitabine monotherapy (9%). Best response to chemotherapy was CR, PR, SD and PD in 2%, 30%, 11% and 32% respectively. After a median follow-up of 11.2 months, median OS was 13.5 months (range: 0.16-25.8+).

      Table 1: Main clinicopathological characteristics of the patient cohort.

      N=173

      %

      COUNTRY OF ORIGIN

      Italy

      98

      56.7

      Greece

      32

      18.5

      Switzerland

      27

      15.6

      Spain

      16

      9.2

      SEX

      Male

      112

      64.7

      Female

      61

      35.3

      AGE Median (Range) yrs

      68 (19-86)

      SMOKING STATUS

      Current

      66

      38.2

      Former

      86

      49.7

      Never

      18

      10.4

      Unknown

      3

      1,7

      PERFORMANCE STATUS

      0

      50

      28.9

      1

      80

      46.2

      2

      41

      23.7

      3

      2

      1.2

      HISTOLOGY

      Adeno

      116

      67.1

      Squamous

      37

      21.4

      Large Cell

      2

      1.2

      Pleiomorphic

      3

      1.7

      Sarcomatoid

      7

      4.0

      Poorly differentiated/

      Undifferentiated

      8

      4.6

      SITE OF METASTASIS

      Bone

      74

      49.7

      Intrapulmonary/Contralateral Lung

      72

      48.3

      Adrenal

      43

      28.9

      Brain

      30

      20.1

      Liver

      23

      15.4

      Other

      63

      36.4

      TNM STAGE AT DIAGNOSIS (AJCCC v.8)

      I

      2

      1.2

      II

      2

      1.2

      III

      26

      15.0

      IV

      142

      82.1

      Unknown

      1

      0.5

      STEROID USE

      Yes

      48

      27.7

      No

      105

      60.7

      Unknown

      20

      11.6

      Conclusion

      Real-world data in a large retrospective cohort, indirectly compared to Keynote 024, suggest that: 1) Due to it’s favorable toxicity profile, pembro is also an option in earlier stages in frail (PS=2 or medically inoperable stage I-III) patients, 2) One in five patients continues pembro beyond progression due to clinical benefit and 3) More than half of patients who progress do not receive any second-line treatment, mainly due to clinical deterioration.