Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Claudio Martin
Moderator of
-
+
MS15 - How to Get Patients to Quit Smoking; Practical Implementation of Evidence-Based Cessation Practices (ID 78)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Mini Symposium
- Track: Prevention and Tobacco Control
- Presentations: 4
- Now Available
- Moderators:Nico Van Zandwijk, Claudio Martin
- Coordinates: 9/10/2019, 11:30 - 13:00, Dublin (1997)
-
+
MS15.01 - The Importance of Cessation and “5as” as a Framework for Cessation (Now Available) (ID 3525)
11:30 - 13:00 | Presenting Author(s): Babalola Faseru
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract
Almost two-thirds of newly diagnosed cancer patients have used or currently use tobacco. Evidence shows that continuous use of tobacco after cancer diagnosis adversely affects treatment outcomes among cancer patients compared to their counterparts who stop using tobacco. These outcomes include recovery, quality of life and survivorship.
According to the United States Department of Health and Human Services clinical practice guideline for treating tobacco use and dependence, 5As include 1) Ask about tobacco use at every visit to identify and document tobacco use status of every patient 2) Advise every tobacco user to stop using tobacco – the message must be clear, strong and personal 3) Assess readiness to quit - implement strategies to motivate those who are not ready with 5Rs [Relevance, Risks, Rewards, Roadblocks and Repetition] 4) Assist those who are ready quit - develop (a) a quit plan using the STAR method [Set a quit date, Tell friends, family and co-workers and ask for their support, Anticipate challenges to the quit attempt, Remove all tobacco products] (b) recommend smoking cessation medication as indicated, provide counseling support and supplemental materials including information about the quitline where available 5) Arrange follow-up for additional support to avoid relapse. The efficacy of the 5As brief intervention recommendations have been described in the clinical practice guidelines. For example, clinicians who work in a setting where tobacco use status are easily captured are three times more likely to provide tobacco treatment to their patients OR 3.1 95% CI (2.2-4.2); physician advice to patients who smoke increases the odds of quitting compared to no physician advice OR 1.3 95% CI (1.1-1.6); and a combination of counseling and medication outperforms counseling alone OR 1.7 95% CI (1.3 - 2.1). This brief smoking cessation intervention approach using the 5As framework is feasible and cost effective. However, gaps in smoking cessation knowledge and practices in cancer care persist and tobacco use treatment remain suboptimal.
During this mini symposium, we will discuss the effectiveness of 5As at various settings, examine other adaptations such as 3As, ABC, ABCD, AAR and identify ways to overcome the multi-level challenges of implementing evidence-based tobacco dependence treatment during cancer care.
References
Karam-Hage M, Cinciripini PM, Gritz ER. Tobacco use and cessation for cancer survivors: an overview for clinicians. CA Cancer J Clin. 2014;64(4):272-290.
Warren GW, Kasza KA, Reid ME, Cummings KM, Marshall JR. Smoking at diagnosis and survival in cancer patients. Int J Cancer. 2013;132(2):401–10.
Gritz ER, Toll BA, Warren GW. Tobacco use in the oncology setting: advancing clinical practice and research. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2014;23:3-9
Parsons A, Daley A, Begh R, Aveyard P. Influence of smoking cessation after diagnosis of early stage lung cancer on prognosis: systematic review of observational studies with meta-analysis. BMJ. 2010;340:b5569
Fiore MC, Jaen CR, Baker TB, et al. Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence: 2008 Update, Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U. S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service; 2008.
Warren GW, Dibaj S, Hutson A, Cummings KM, Dresler C, Marshall JR. Identifying targeted strategies to improve smoking cessation support for cancer patients. J Thorac Oncol 2015;10:1532-1537.
Price SN, Studts JL, Hamann HA. Tobacco Use Assessment and Treatment in Cancer Patients: A Scoping Review of Oncology Care Clinician Adherence to Clinical Practice Guidelines in the U.S. The oncologist. 2019;24(2):229-238
Warren GW, Marshall JR, Cummings KM, Toll B, Gritz ER, Hutson A, et al. Practice patterns and perceptions of thoracic oncology providers on tobacco use and cessation in cancer patients. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:543–548
McRobbie H Bullen C Glover M et al. New Zealand smoking cessation guidelines. N Z Med J . 2008;121(1276):57–70
Gould GS Bittoun R Clarke MJ . A pragmatic guide for smoking cessation counselling and the initiation of nicotine replacement therapy for pregnant Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander smokers. J Smoking Cessation . 2015;10(2):96–105
Vidrine JI Shete S Cao Y et al. Ask-Advise-Connect: a new approach to smoking treatment delivery in health care settings. JAMA Intern Med . 2013;173(6):458–464
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS15.02 - Pharmacotherapy Supports Cessation (Now Available) (ID 3526)
11:30 - 13:00 | Presenting Author(s): Carolyn Dresler
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract
Tobacco Cessation and its pharmcotherapy
It should be acknowledged that smoking cessation is one of the hardest things the patient has ever tried to do. There are two key aspects to tobacco cessation: appropriate pharmacotherapy and behavioral modification. This abstract will address only the pharmacotherapy, but the practitioner must also try to provide or refer to behavioral modication interventions to amplify the effect of the pharmacotherapy.
TYPES OF MEDICATIONS: The most common type of medication for quitting smoking is called ‘nicotine replacement therapy’ or ‘NRT”. NRT that has had regulatory approval comes as a gum, a lozenge, or a transdermal patch, or in a device that you ‘smoke’ like a cigarette’ or a nasal spray. In the United States, the nicotine gum, nicotine lozenge and nicotine patch can be purchased without a doctor’s prescription. The device that is ‘smoked’ (I call an inhaler or inhalator - as it is mostly absorbed by buccal mucosa) and the nasal spray must have a doctor’s prescription.
Varenciline is a pill that is taken once in the morning and once in the evening. This medication requires a doctor’s prescription. This drug does not yet (as of 2019) come in a generic form.
To use varenicline – take 0.5 mg by mouth once in the morning for 3 days. On the fourth day – take 0.5 mg by mouth once in the morning and once in the evening. On the 7th day the person should QUIT SMOKING and use 1 mg by mouth once in the morning and once in the evening. Use varenicline for at least 3 months. A discussion between doctor and patient should occur if a longer term treatment period is needed to maintain cessation.
Bupropion is also taken as a pill once in the morning and once in the evening. This medication should not be taken if there is any risk of a seizure, alcoholism, or anorexia. This drug does come as a generic and requires a doctor’s prescription.
To use bupropion: Take 150 mg by mouth once a AM for 3 days. On the fourth day, take 150 mg by mouth once q AM and a PM. On the 7th day – quit smoking. Use bupropion for at least 3 months. A discussion between doctor and patient should occur if a longer term treatment period is needed to maintain cessation.
NICOTINE REPLACEMENT THERAPY:
Nicotine gum: the labeling on the box states that if more than 25 cigarettes per day are smoked, use the 4 mg dose and if less than 25 cigarettes are smoked per day, use the 2 mg dose. However, one can try either and see which dose works better in relieving or preventing cravings for a cigarette. It is very important to take the nicotine gum frequently! Most people do not take enough of the gum during the day to be effective. Instruct the quitter to use at least 9 pieces in the first days of quitting.
One should SLOWLY taper down. Plan on having the quitter using the gum for at least 3 months! The worst day is the first day, and then the first week. After about 7-10 days, all of the nicotine and its breakdown products are cleared from the system and the body is starting to become normal again. It is probable that the quitter is still having cravings – and the nicotine gum will help prevent them and make the cravings more manageable.
NICOTINE LOZENGE: The nicotine lozenge has a little bit different dosing instruction: if the first cigarette of the day is within 30 minutes after waking up in the morning – use the 4 mg nicotine lozenge. If the first cigarette of the day is had after 30 minutes after getting up – use the 2 mg nicotine lozenge. Again – one can try one and see how it works in relieving cravings without any side effects. If it doesn’t seem to relieve cravings – try the other, higher dose. Follow the same instructions above for the gum. AGAIN – it is important to be sure and use enough lozenges per day – the most common problem is people NOT using enough lozenges per day.
NICOTINE PATCH: The nicotine patch comes in a variety of doses and dosing instructions. Most commonly, people use the 15 mg dose (Nicotrol or generic patch) or the 21 mg patch (Nicoderm, Habitrol or generic). These patches should be put on an area of clean and dry skin. It can be put anywhere on the body, but it is best to put it somewhere on the upper body. Try to put it on a place that is not hairy – so it doesn’t hurt when taken it off! Don’t put it on the hips where one might sit on it, don’t put it under the breast – these places are just common sense places NOT to put the patch. The best place is somewhere on the chest, upper back or arms. It is important to put the new patch on each morning in a DIFFERENT place than the patch before. Some skin redness is common, and it should resolve in the next day or so – but it is important to NOT keep using the same place to put the patch.
After about 8 weeks on the highest dose patch, the quitter should start to ‘step-down’ the dose and use the 14 mg or the 7 mg patch. These decreasing doses are intended to help wean the quitter off of nicotine. Of course, the smaller amount of nicotine will also help with the decreasing cravings and withdrawal symptoms as they get further from the quit date.
Even if there is a slip - the quitter has had even one puff – it doesn't mean failure. If there is a slip, work with the quitter, resolve to ‘get back on the wagon’ and not to have another cigarette. They should learn from the experience about what made that ‘slip’ occur and try and stay away from that temptation again.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS15.03 - Speaking with Patients, Motivational Interviewing Demonstration (Now Available) (ID 3527)
11:30 - 13:00 | Presenting Author(s): Douglas Arenberg
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract
Ongoing tobacco use accounts for significant treatment and disease related morbidity, mortality, and decreased quality of life among patients undergoing cancer treatment. A common misconception is that it is too late to pursue tobacco cessation for individuals with advanced lung cancer. Data from existing studies do not support this, yet support for tobacco cessation services among cancer centers is often lukewarm or frankly lacking. For individuals undergoing active cancer therapy, even brief interventions from their oncologist can have an enormous impact on their willingness, and motivation to make a quit attempt. The purpose of this presentation is to arm lung cancer clinicians with tools to help patient's find internal motivation to make quit attempts, and to support them with counseling, as well as cessation pharmacotherapy. Common misconceptions among both providers and their patients who use tobacco will be presented, along with strategies to undserstand and overcome ambivalence towards tobacco cessation.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS15.04 - Approaching Cessation in the Patient Using Electronic Cigarettes (Now Available) (ID 3528)
11:30 - 13:00 | Presenting Author(s): Carolyn Dresler
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
EP1.04 - Immuno-oncology (ID 194)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: E-Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Immuno-oncology
- Presentations: 3
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 08:00 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
-
+
EP1.04-44 - Exploration of Factors Relating to Paradoxical Immune Response in Patients Treated with Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors for NSCLC (Now Available) (ID 2634)
08:00 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
Although the introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) has yielded substantial benefits in terms of survival in the treatment of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC), the possibility of activation of dormant autoimmune diseases or onset of immune mediated toxicities is a reality. The objective of this study was to explore intrinsic immunological factors associated with poor outcomes.
Method
In a retrospective cohort study of 48 patients, without any prior medical history of autoimmunity, treated for advanced/metastatic NSCLC with ICI´s were assessed. Determination of HLA-A*02011 as well as acute phase reactants and antiphospholipid antibodies was performed. Additionally, evaluation of survival in a time to event manner was conducted using the Kaplan Meier method and Cox regressions
Result
Median follow-up was 27.3 months, of the included patients 26 were male (54%) with a median age of 62 years old and there were no individuals with and ECOG performance score >1. Median overall survival (OS) was reached at 22.47 months. When analyzing the presence of the HLA-A*02011 serotype, 6 patients tested positive (12.5%). Additionally, all presented with borderline or abnormal B2glycoprotein IgM and IgG, 2Bmicroglubulin and elevated C reactive protein. Four patients (66%) experienced reactive lymphadenopathy during treatment and all suffered some form of venous thromboembolism. When analyzing OS, this group of patients had a significantly worse outcome (6.53 vs 22.47 months, HR= 4.47, [95%CI 1.47 – 13.61], p<0.001) compared with their counterparts. Overall response rate for the whole was superior for the HLA-A*02011 positive patients achieving 41.4% and 33%, p<0.001, respectively.
Conclusion
The presence of the HLA-A*02011 could potentially predispose to a paradoxical and pathological activation of the immune system without offering any benefit in terms of tumor control. Larger studies validating these findings are warranted.
-
+
EP1.04-45 - Relevance of Antibiotic Use on Clinical Activity of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Hispanic Patients with Advanced NSCLC (CLICAP-ABs) (Now Available) (ID 2674)
08:00 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
The composition of gut microbiota affects antitumor immune responses, as well as preclinical and clinical outcomes following immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) in cancer. Antibiotics (ATB) alter gut microbiota diversity and composition leading to dysbiosis, which may influence the effectiveness of ICI.
Method
We examined patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 mAb monotherapy alone or in combination in three different countries of Latin America. Those receiving ATB within 30 days of beginning ICI were compared with those who did not. Objective response, progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed.
Result
18 of 140 (13%) NSCLC patients received ATB. The most commonly used ATB were b-lactam or quinolones for pneumonia or urinary tract infections. In NSCLC patients, ATB was associated with 4 cases of primary PD (28.6% versus 31.5%, P=0.818), non-significant decreased PFS (median 2.66 versus 1.94 months, HR 1.63, [95% CI 0.71-3.72], P=0.247) and significantly deleterious OS (median 12.42 versus 2.04 months, HR 2.3, [95% CI 1.08-4.95], P=0.03). In multivariate analyses, the impact of ATB remained significant for OS.
Conclusion
ATB were associated with reduced clinical benefit from ICI in Hispanic patients with NSCLC. Modulation of ATB-related dysbiosis and gut microbiota composition may be a strategy to improve clinical outcomes with ICI.
-
+
EP1.04-46 - Immunotherapy at Any Line Improves Survival in Hispanic Patients with Advanced Metastatic NSCLC Compared to Chemotherapy (Quijote-CLICaP) (Now Available) (ID 2776)
08:00 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
Immunotherapy for NSCLMC offers a significant advantage to chemotherapy in selected cases. This benefit starts to disapear as the patients start two progress and requiere change in medication or even chemotherapy. The objective of this study was to compare survival outcomes of patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC who received immunotherapy at first, second or beyond versus matched patients receiving standard chemotherapy.
Method
A retrospective multicenter international cohort study of 296 patients with unresectable/ metastatic NSCLC treated with immunotherapy either as first, second, third or fourth line was conducted. A matched comparison with a historical cohort of first line chemotherapy was conducted.
Result
Median age was 64 years (Range 34-90) and 40.2% were female patients. 91.2% of patients had an ECOG performance score ≤ 1. Immunotherapy as first line was given to 39 patients (13.7%), second line to 140 (48.8%), and as third line and beyond to 108 (37.6%). Median overall survival was 19.9 months (95% CI 14.5-22.7 months) and progression-free survival was 3.73 months (95% CI 2.8-4.2). Factors associated with increased survival included treatment as first-line (p < 0.001), type of response (p < 0.001) and PD-L1 status (p = 0.0039). Compared with the historical cohort, immunotherapy proved to be superior in terms of OS (p= 0.05) but not PFS (p= 0.2).
Conclusion
Patients who receive immune checkpoint inhibitors as part of their treatment for NSCLC have better OS compared with matched patients treated with standard chemotherapy, regardless of treatment line.
-
+
EP1.15 - Thymoma/Other Thoracic Malignancies (ID 205)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: E-Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Thymoma/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 2
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 08:00 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
-
+
EP1.15-28 - Survival of Thymoma Is Extensive in Latin-American Patients: Results from Over 10 Years of Experience (CLICaP-LATimus) (ID 2936)
08:00 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
Thymomas are a group of rare neoplasm of the anterior mediastinum. Due to their low incidence, large cooperative studies are required to evaluate outcomes. The objective of this study is to present the results and experience in treatment of this pathology in Latin-America.
Method
A retrospective multicenter cohort study was conducted by The Latin-American Consortium for the Investigation of Lung Cancer (CLICaP). Patients with histologically proven thymomas between 1997 and 2018 were included in the analysis. Variables including clinical, pathological and therapeutic outcomes were registered in a centralized manner.
Result
A total of 105 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis was 54 years old (20-84), and with 60% (n = 38) of the included patients were female. Only 11% (n=7) of the patients had an ECOG performance score >1. Twenty-four patients (22.9%, 95%CI 14.8-30.9) presented with pulmonary or distant metastatic involvement with a median of 2 metastatic sites. Furthermore, 21.9 % of patients (n=23, 95%CI 13.9-29.8%) concurrently presented myasthenia gravis. Surgery was performed in 55 patients (52.3%, 95%CI 42.8 – 61.9%), comprising of 15 tumorectomies, 37 thymectomies and 5 biopsies achieving an R0 resection rate of 78% (95%CI 67.3-89.1%). Adjuvant treatment in the form of either chemotherapy, radiotherapy or both was offered to 3(5%), 7(12.7%) and 5(9%) patients, respectively. Disease progression was documented in 10 cases (9%, 95%CI3.9-15.1%) of which 6 (60%) were locoregional, 1 (10%) distant progression and 3 (30%) both locoregional and distant. Median overall survival (OS) was estimated at around 139.5 months (95%CI 86.1-NA). Cox regression indicated that OS was significantly improved by resection (139.5 vs 25.7 months, HR 4.17 [95%CI 12.6-17.8 months]).
Conclusion
Survival in patients with thymomas continues to be very favorable, especially in patients who receive adequate local control. The benefit of adjuvant treatment in this setting remains unclear.
-
+
EP1.15-29 - Real World Characterization and Treatment of Patients with Thymic Carcinoma: Lessons from a Latin-American Study (CLICaP-LATimus) (Now Available) (ID 2921)
08:00 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
Thymic carcinoma is a rare tumor that represents a clinical challenge, especially in resource limited settings. The objective of the present study was to characterize patients who presented this disease in Latin-America.
Method
From 2014 until 2018, a multinational Latin-American cooperative retrospective cohort study was performed. Patients with histologically confirmed thymic carcinoma were included. Clinical, pathological and treatment variables were collected across 7 participating nations.
Result
A total of 31 patients were included. Median age at diagnosis was 58 years old (34-69), 48% (n=15) of individuals were women with all but 2 patients (6.5%) achieving an ECOG performance score <2. All patients debuted with Stage IV disease; 24 patients (66%, [95%CI 62-92%]) as stage IVa and 7 as stage IVb (33%, [95%CI 7-37%]) with a median LDH level of 396.5 U/L (153-1529 U/L) and a median of 2 metastatic sites. 13 (41.9%, [95%CI 25-59%]) patients received preoperatory treatment consisting of chemotherapy (n=8, 42%) and chemoradiotherapy (n=5, 16%). Among these patients only 4 (12.9%) were subjected to surgery, two of which underwent a tumorectomy and 2 a thymectomy. 28 (90%, [95%CI 79.9-100%]) received palliative chemotherapy either with sunitinib (n=7, 25%) or cytotoxic agents. Median overall survival (OS) was reached at 20.2 months (95%CI 19-NA months). Patients who received preoperative treatment had a significantly prolonged OS (17.6 vs 26 months, HR 2.93 [95%CI 1.04-8.27 months], p = 0.03).
Conclusion
Thymic carcinoma constitutes an aggressive disease that is often diagnosed in advanced stages. These results suggest that multimodal treatment can be beneficial even in locally advanced cases. Larger clinical trial validating these conclusions are warranted.
-
+
MA07 - Clinical Questions and Potential Blood Markers for Immunotherapy (ID 125)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Immuno-oncology
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:David R Spigel, Roberto Ferrara
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 13:30 - 15:00, Vancouver (2003)
-
+
MA07.08 - The Role of a Cachexia Grading System in Patients with NSCLC Treated with Immunotherapy: Implications for Response and Survival (Now Available) (ID 2046)
13:30 - 15:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
The association between cancer-induced weight-loss (CIWL) and poor clinical outcomes is well established. However, many of these studies were performed in the chemotherapy era. Meanwhile, current standard of care for NSCLC patients has shifted towards the more efficacious immunotherapy agents (IO). IO has improved survival outcomes, nonetheless clinicians face the challenge of identifying who will derive substantial clinical benefit from these more costly agents. Response to IO is influenced by several patient-related factors, including microbiome, medications, and nutritional status.
Method
In this study we sought to evaluate the effect of cachexia in survival of NSCLC patients undergoing treatment with IO. Included patients had advanced NSCLC (IIIB, IV), who received IO agents in any line of therapy, and had a good performance status. All the patients were evaluated by the nutritionist specialist and were graded according to a previously documented cachexia scale which takes into consideration body mass index (BMI) and weight loss in order to stratify patients into 5 risk categories (0 [pre-cachexia] - 4 [refractory cachexia]). Primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival.
Result
A total of 181 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the analysis. Among these 82 (45%) were classified in the first category (risk grade 0-1 [low risk]), 83 (46%) were classified in the second category (risk grade 2-3[intermediate risk]) and 9% were in the third category (risk grade 4 [high risk]). Patients classified as low-risk had a significantly longer OS compared to those with intermediate or high risk (22.4 months [95%CI: 18.7-26.1] vs. 15.7 [95%CI: 10.8-20.7] vs. 3.9 [0.0-7.8]; p<0.001; Hazard ratio: 1.81 [1.29-2.53]; p<0.001). In the multivariate analysis ORR, hemoglobin and risk category were independent factors associated with OS. Grade of cachexia was also significantly associated with ORR, with low-risk patients having a significantly higher ORR compared to intermediate and high-risk patients (36.6% vs. 17.3% vs. 25%; p=0.021). PFS was also influenced by risk category, with low risk patients having a longer PFS compared with intermediate and high-risk patients.
Conclusion
Cachexia is independently associated with worse OS in NSCLC patients who receive IO, while better nutritional status is related to higher ORR, highlighting a potential role for nutritional assessment in the selection of patients who are candidates for IO. Early assessment of nutritional status in these patients is imperative in order to timely diagnose and treat anorexia-cachexia and improve outcomes.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 158)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 09:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P1.01-133 - Randomized Open-Label Study of Bintrafusp Alfa (M7824) vs Pembrolizumab in Patients with PD-L1 Expressing Advanced 1L NSCLC (Now Available) (ID 741)
09:45 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
Transforming growth factor β (TGF- β) promotes tumor progression via immune- and non–immune-related processes. Bintrafusp alfa* (M7824) is an innovative first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of 2 extracellular domains of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against PD-L1. Targeting these independent and complementary pathways may restore and enhance antitumor responses. An expansion cohort of the NCT02517398 study of patients with advanced NSCLC (n=80) treated with bintrafusp alfa in the second-line setting presented at ESMO 2018 showed an objective response rate of 86% in the subgroup with high PD-L1 tumor expression at the recommended phase 2 dose (1200 mg intravenously [IV] every 2 weeks [Q2W]). Observed data support the hypothesis that bintrafusp alfa may be superior to other PD-(L)1 inhibitors, including pembrolizumab, for the treatment of NSCLC. Based on the promising antitumor activity and manageable safety profile, this study will evaluate bintrafusp alfa treatment in patients with advanced NSCLC in the 1L setting.
Method
Here we present a global, randomized trial comparing bintrafusp alfa vs pembrolizumab in the 1L treatment of patients with metastatic NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression levels. Patients in this study must have a histologically confirmed diagnosis of advanced NSCLC with high PD-L1 expression on tumor cells (defined as either ≥80% by the Dako 73-10 pharmDx kit or ≥50% by the Dako 22C3 pharmDx kit since both assays are expected to select a similar patient population at their respective cut-offs). ECOG performance status must be 0 or 1. Patients must not have received prior systemic treatment for advanced NSCLC. Patients with tumors with actionable mutations (for which targeted therapy is locally approved) are not eligible. Patients will receive 1200 mg Q2W or pembrolizumab 200 mg Q3W as an IV infusion until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or trial withdrawal. Dual primary endpoints are progression-free survival and best overall response; key secondary endpoints include overall survival, duration of response, and safety. Estimated enrollment is 300 patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03631706. *Proposed INN.
© 2019 American Society of Clinical Oncology, Inc. Reused with permission. This abstract was accepted and previously presented at the 2019 ASCO-SITC Clinical Immuno-Oncology Meeting. All rights reserved.
Result
Section not applicable
Conclusion
Section not applicable
-
+
P1.04 - Immuno-oncology (ID 164)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Immuno-oncology
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 09:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P1.04-80 - Immunotherapy-Related Thrombosis: Considerations and Associated Factors in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Patients (ID 2724)
09:45 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
Widespread use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) for the treatment of lung cancer has exposed a large number of patients to these medications, increasing the incidence of rare adverse reactions such as thromboses. The present study elaborates on factors related to the occurrence of these events.
Method
In a retrospective cohort study, a total of 48 patients, 24 who experienced thrombosis and 24 matched controls who underwent evaluation after initiation of ICIs therapy for advanced/metastatic NSCLC, were included. Clinical and pathological as well as serum inflammatory and coagulation markers were evaluated.
Result
Among the 48 patients, 46% (n=26) were female, median age was 62 years old and all patients had an ECOG performance score of < 2. The median overall survival reached by the cohort was 22.47 months. Among patients who developed thrombosis there were 8 cases of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) (33%), 13 pulmonary embolisms in addition to DVT (62.5%) and 1 case of brain venous sinus thrombosis (4.2%). Apart from expected thrombosis markers such as D dimer, differences in inflammatory and immune related markers between patients who experienced thrombosis and those who did not, were observed. Abnormal values were found in the thrombosis group for B2glycoprotein 1 (33% vs 0%, OR= 4.08, [95%CI 1.65 - 12.1], p= 0.005), B2glycoprotein 1 IgG (29.2% vs 0%, OR= 4.64, [95%CI 1.73 – 16.9], p= 0.007), C Reactive protein (83.3% vs 12.5%, OR= 35, [95%CI 7.9 - 213], p< 0.001), B2microglobulin (62.5% vs 8.3%, OR= 14, [95%CI 3.11-103.7], p = 0.002), Prothrombin time (41.7% vs 4.2%, OR= 2.4, [95%CI 1.64 -3.69], p =0.01) and C Coagulation protein (50% vs 16.6%, OR =1.79, [95%CI 1.53 – 2.91], p <0.001).
Conclusion
Abnormalities in antiphospholipid antibodies, C reactive protein, B2microglobulin and coagulation in patients who suffered thrombosis during ICI treatment suggest that this phenomenon could be the result of immune and auto-inflammatory induced intravascular dysfunction.
-
+
P1.04-81 - Characterization of Hispanic Patients Who Experienced Hyperprogression During Treatment for Advanced NSCLC with Immunotherapy (ID 2922)
09:45 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
Immunotherapy related hyperprogression is poorly characterized in Latin American patients. In this study we sought to characterize and identify factors associated with the presentation of hyperporgression after initiation of immunotherapy in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Method
A multicenter international retrospective study on 110 patients was conducted. Clinical variables as well as routine blood studies were recorded before initiation of treatment. Regression analysis was used to find associations. A random forest tree analysis (RFTA) based on continuous and discrete variables was used to subcategorize patients based on occurrence of hyperprogression.
Result
Median age was 64 years (Range 34-90) and 59.8 % were male patients. ECOG performance status was >1 on 8.8% of patients. Median overall survival was 12.7 months (95% CI 9.67-14 months) and progression-free survival of 4.27 months (95% CI 3.97-5.0). 44 hyperprogressors were documented (19.8%, [95%CI 14.5-25.1%]). Median time to progression was approximately 5 weeks after initiation of treatment. Factors associated included albumin and hemoglobin levels (p = 0.046 and 0.037 respectively), presence of CNS (p= 0.0009) and bone metastasis (p = 0.004) and weight loss (p= 0.004). RFTA revealed that a leucocyte count over 5.300 cells/dl was present in all hyperprogressors.
Conclusion
Hyperprogression is a phenomenon after initiation of immunotherapy which is associated with clinical and paraclinical variables. These associations could be used to withhold certain agents and prevent its occurrence in NSCLC treatment.
-
+
P1.14 - Targeted Therapy (ID 182)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Targeted Therapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 09:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P1.14-61 - EGFR Inhibitors Plus Bevacizumab Are Superior Compared to EGFR Inhibitor Monotherapy in Advanced EGFR+ NSCLC Patients with BIM Deletions (ID 2697)
09:45 - 18:00 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
BIM activation is essential for EGFR-TKIs triggered apoptosis in EGFR-mutant Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A 2903-bp germline deletion in intron 2 of the BIM gene results in generation of alternatively spliced isoforms that lack the crucial BH3 domain, impairing the apoptotic response to TKIs and conferring NSCLC cells intrinsic resistance to these medications. Patients with both alterations have poor clinical evolution. The current study aimed to investigate the clinical efficacy and tolerability of EGFR-TKIs plus bevacizumab (Bev) versus EGFR-TKIs alone as first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations and BIM deletions (BIMdel).
Method
A retrospective analysis was conducted. BIMdel was detected using polymerase chain reaction (PCR) analysis and direct sequencing of DNA from tumor and peripheral blood cells (PBCs). We also assessed BIM protein expression by immunohistochemistry and BIM mRNA levels by RT-PCR. Clinical characteristics, overall survival (OS), progression-free-survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR) and treatment-related adverse events were compared in the EGFR-TKIs versus EGFR-TKIs plus Bev groups.
Result
32 patients were included; 16 of them received EGFR-TKIs and 18 received EGFR-TKIs plus Bev. The addition of Bev resulted in a significantly higher ORR compared with TKIs alone (94% vs. 44%, p=0.0014). Median PFS was longer with the use of the combination compared with TKIs alone (11.1 vs. 7.77 months; p < 0.001). Median OS tended to be longer in the EGFR-TKIs plus Bev group than in TKIs alone (30.9 vs. 25.4 months; p = 0.06). EGFR-TKIs plus Bev was associated with more grade >3 hematological and thrombotic adverse events. The expression of BIM by immunohistochemistry did not influence PFS and OS, however when stratifying BIM mRNA levels by the median (≥2.2 vs. <2.1) allowed to find a prognostic trend in favor of those with higher BIM mRNA levels (32.2 vs. 25.2 months respectively; p = 0.058).
Conclusion
EGFR-TKIs plus Bev conferred a significantly higher ORR and PFS in advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutation and BIMdel. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these findings.
-
+
P2.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 159)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P2.01-40 - Normalization of Carcinoembryonic Antigen Levels Is Associated with Survival Improvement in Patients with Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Now Available) (ID 2611)
10:15 - 18:15 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
Serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels are elevated in approximately 65% of the Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with adenocarcinoma histology. Elevated CEA levels are an independent prognostic factor for overall survival (OS) in early and advanced NSCLC stages. Previous reports from our group suggest that the decrease or increase in CEA serum levels is strongly associated with response and progression to systemic treatment. However, determination of CEA levels is not included in standard guidelines, such as National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCNN). The aim of this study is to analyze the progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in NSCLC patients with elevated CEA levels at diagnosis and its association with systemic treatment response.
Method
We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with advanced NSCLC with an elevated serum level baseline of CEA (>20 ng/ml) that received treatment according to international guidelines. The serum CEA levels were measured every two cycles of platinum-based chemotherapy or a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) treatment. The change in serum CEA levels in response to treatment and the association with overall survival and progression free survival was evaluated.
Result
Between March 2004 and February 2018, 748 patients with diagnosis of advanced NSCLC and CEA levels >20 ng/mL were included in the analysis. Median age was 60.2 years old, 631 patients (84.4%) had adenocarcinoma histology. From 338 patients evaluated for EGFR mutations, 139 (31.3%) harbored an EGFR mutation. The median OS was 23.3 months (95% CI 19.4-26.9) in patients who completely normalized CEA vs 10.0 months (95% CI 8.9-11.2) in patients who did not achieved CEA normalization, with a HR 0.48 95% CI (0.35 -0.67) p <0.0001. The median OS was 15.5 months (95% CI 13.4-17.6) in patients who showed a decrease in CEA levels vs 8.8 months (95% CI 7.5-10.1) in those who did not. Reduction in CEA levels was associated with better OS, either in patients treated with TKI or platinum-based chemotherapy.
Conclusion
The normalization or decrease of the serum CEA levels is a biological marker that serves as tool associated with OS. Based on these findings and previous reports, CEA determination should be included in the clinical guidelines for NSCLC as response biomarker. Serum CEA levels should be part of the standard follow-up of NSCLC patients.
-
+
P2.14 - Targeted Therapy (ID 183)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Targeted Therapy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P2.14-59 - Osimertinib in EGFR T790M Advanced NSCLC: Analysis of Uncommon/Complex EGFR Mutations in a Real-World Study (ASTRIS) (ID 1263)
10:15 - 18:15 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
The challenges of treating uncommon/complex EGFR mutations impact treatment decisions in clinical practice. Osimertinib is a third-generation, irreversible, oral EGFR-TKI that potently and selectively inhibits both EGFR-TKI sensitising (EGFRm) and EGFR T790M mutations and has demonstrated efficacy in NSCLC CNS metastases. ASTRIS is an ongoing, international, real-world study of osimertinib in EGFR T790M positive advanced NSCLC (NCT02474355). We report a subset-analysis of patients with uncommon/complex mutations.
Method
Patients with stage IIIB/IV T790M positive NSCLC previously treated with an EGFR-TKI were enrolled and received osimertinib 80 mg once-daily. Progression-free survival (PFS), clinical response and time to treatment discontinuation (TTD) were analysed in both full analysis set (FAS) and patients with uncommon/complex EGFR mutations. Uncommon mutation combinations included: T790M+G719X, T790M+S768I, T790M+ex20ins; complex mutations included T790M+two or more mutation(s).
Result
From 18 September 2015 to 15 October 2018 data cut-off, 3015 patients across 16 countries had received ≥1 dose of osimertinib (FAS), 53(2%) of these patients had uncommon/complex EGFR mutations. Baseline demographics between this patient subset and the FAS were similar (Asian: 55%/69%; female: 57%/64%; median age: 59 [30–80] years/62 [range, 27–92]; WHO performance status 2: 9%/11%, respectively). Baseline EGFR mutation status at enrolment of the FAS is shown in Table 1. Clinical outcomes appeared to be lower in the uncommon/complex mutation subset than in the FAS: response rate (measured in a FAS subset with ≥1 documented response assessment) was 50% [95% CI, 35.2, 64.8] in the uncommon/complex mutation group, and 57% [55.2, 58.9] in the FAS; median PFS was 8.1 [5.4, 10.1] and 11.1 [11.0, 12.0] months; median TTD was 9.0 [6.7, 11.5] and 13.5 [12.6, 13.9] months, respectively. Overall survival data are immature.
Conclusion
Whilst clinical outcomes appeared to be lower in the uncommon/complex mutation subset than the FAS, they were favourable and support use of osimertinib 80mg in this heterogeneous population.
-
+
P2.18 - Treatment of Locoregional Disease - NSCLC (ID 191)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Treatment of Locoregional Disease - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P2.18-01 - A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Controlled Study of Bintrafusp Alfa (M7824) in Unresectable Stage III NSCLC (Now Available) (ID 2200)
10:15 - 18:15 | Author(s): Claudio Martin
- Abstract
Background
The TGF-β pathway promotes tumor immunosuppression, and its inhibition may enhance the antitumor activity of PD-(L)1 monoclonal antibodies and reduce radiation-induced lung fibrosis. Bintrafusp alfa is an innovative first-in-class bifunctional fusion protein composed of the extracellular domain of TGF-βRII (a TGF-β “trap”) fused to a human IgG1 mAb blocking PD-L1. In a phase 1 study, second-line bintrafusp alfa therapy demonstrated promising antitumor activity in advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) (NCT02517398). In preclinical studies, bintrafusp alfa plus radiotherapy showed enhanced antitumor activity compared with radiotherapy alone in mouse models. This study is evaluating the efficacy and safety of bintrafusp alfa with concurrent chemoradiation (cCRT) followed by bintrafusp alfa vs cCRT plus placebo followed by durvalumab in patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC.
Method
This global, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, controlled study of bintrafusp alfa (NCT03840902) includes adults with histologically documented stage III locally advanced, unresectable NSCLC, ECOG performance status ≤1, adequate pulmonary function, and life expectancy ≥12 weeks. Patients with tumors with actionable mutations (EGFR, ALK translocation, ROS-1 rearrangement) are also eligible. Mixed small cell lung cancer and NSCLC histology; pleural effusions greater than minimal, exudative, or cytologically positive; significant acute or chronic infections; prior chemotherapy or immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy for NSCLC; and current use of immunosuppressive medication are exclusion criteria. Patients are randomized to receive either bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg IV every 2 weeks (Q2W) with cCRT for 6 weeks followed by bintrafusp alfa 1200 mg IV Q2W (arm A) or placebo with cCRT for 6 weeks followed by durvalumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W (arm B) until confirmed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or treatment ≤1 year. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival; secondary endpoints include overall survival, safety, lung function assessment, objective response, duration of response, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity. This phase 2 trial was activated on April 2, 2019 and first patient in is anticipated for May 22, 2019. Target enrollment: 350 patients.
Result
Section not applicable
Conclusion
Section not applicable
