Virtual Library
Start Your Search
Isabelle Monnet
Author of
-
+
MA03 - Clinomics and Genomics (ID 119)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Heather A Wakelee, Wilfried Ernst Erich Eberhardt
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 10:30 - 12:00, Colorado Springs (1994)
-
+
MA03.09 - Dramatic Responses to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in MET Exon 14 Skipping Mutation (METex14mut) Non Small Cell Lung Cancers (Now Available) (ID 1621)
10:30 - 12:00 | Author(s): Isabelle Monnet
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
METex14 mutations occur in 2-3% of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLC), with a higher prevalence in patients aged over 70-years-old, non-smokers.and women. Crizotinib, a MET-inhibitor, allows remarkable, but often short, tumor responses. Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors (ICIs) have become pivotal treatments in NSCLC but seem less efficient in non-smokers and in case of oncogenic addiction. We report durable strong responses in four non-smoker women (A, B, C, D) and two smokers (E, F) treated by ICIs in a second-line setting for NSCLC harboring METex14 mut.
Method
We studied the clinical and biological characteristics and the tumor response after ICIs for each patient. The complete DNA sequencing of the tumor was available after the beginning of ICIs (explaining why crizotinib was not proposed in second line). PDL1 expression on tumor cells was evaluated by antibody clone E1L3N (Cell signaling Technology).
Result
Table 1 summarizes patient and tumor characteristics, and the evolution during ICIs : Nivolumab for all patients except E (pembrolizumab). There were neither EGFR, BRAF, KRAS mutations, nor ALK or ROS translocations (except minority KRAS mutation for C). No concurrent MET amplification was found.
Partial or complete response was rapidly (2 months) obtained in five patients, while pseudo-progression was first observed in D. After a grade 3 diarrhea and diabetic ketoacidosis, ICI was stopped in A but the reintroduction one year later did not cause any toxicity. The tolerance was excellent for the 5 other patients. Response was maintained from 16 to 40 months and treatment is ongoing in four patients. C stopped ICI after 26 months (Complete response on PETscan). B had an isolated bone progression after 7 months of ICI which benefited from a local radiotherapy. After almost 2 years of ICI, a multisite progression occurred and crizotinib was proposed.
Conclusion
ICIs should be discussed in the treatment of METex14 mut NSCLC.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MA05 - Update on Clinical Trials and Treatments (ID 123)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Mesothelioma
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Seiki Hasegawa, Enrico Ruffini, Angel Artal
- Coordinates: 9/08/2019, 13:30 - 15:00, Melbourne (1991)
-
+
MA05.05 - Post-Discontinuation Treatments in IFCT-GFPC-0701 MAPS Trial: Real-World Effectiveness of 2nd-Line (2L) Treatments for Mesothelioma (Now Available) (ID 815)
13:30 - 15:00 | Author(s): Isabelle Monnet
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
MAPS phase 3 trial assessing the addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed-cisplatin doublet set a new standard of care in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients, showing 18.8 months median overall survival (OS) with triplet combo. While both arms were well balanced in terms of 2L treatments, the size of the OS benefit from second-line treatments remains controversial.
Method
Long-term survival data were collected in the 342 MAPS patients alive at the end of the first-line (1L) treatments, in both arms. Median OS and 2-year survivals were calculated from the initiation of 2L. Multivariate analysis using Cox model included the stratification variables of the MAPS trial, along with the treatment arm (with or without bevacizumab).
Result
342/442(77.4%) patients received 2L treatment for disease progression after MAPS trial, of which 324 received chemotherapy (CT), 18 palliative radiotherapy (RT), while 100/442 (22.6%) remained untreated. 160/342 patients (46.8%) had a platinum-based doublet CT. 163 patients (47.7%) received a single-drug CT. 172/324 (53.1%) received a pemetrexed-containing regimen (alone or with platinum), 84 (25.9%) a gemcitabine-based CT, 16 (4.9%) vinorelbin alone, 48 (14.8%) gemcitabine alone, while in 12 (3.7%) single-agent bevacizumab was resumed. Median age was lower in patients with doublet CT (64.4 years, IQR 60.2-68.9) vs. single-drug CT patients (66.3 years, IQR 61.5-70.3), patients receiving RT (68.5 years, IQR 63.3-70.5) or untreated patients (67.8 years, IQR 63.4-71) (p=0.007). There were more PS=2 patients (10%) in the untreated group, compared with 0.6%, 1.8% and 5.6% in those receiving doublet, monotherapy or radiotherapy, respectively (p<0.001). A lower proportion of patients receiving 2L doublet CT had sarcomatoid/biphasic MPM (11.2%) compared with 21.5%, 38.9% and 25% in those with single-arm agent, RT or untreated, respectively (p=0.002). When compared with those treated with 2L single-agent, patients with 2L doublet had more frequently objective response (11.9 vs. 3.1%, p=0.005) and disease control (60.3 vs. 34.6%, p<0.0001). From the date of 2L therapy initiation, median OS was 3.2 months, 95%CI [1.7-5.0] for RT vs. 7.0 months 95%CI[5.6-7.8] for single-agent CT, or 12.2 months 95%CI [9.5-14.1] for doublet CT. HRs were adjusted for 1L treatment type (bevacizumab-containing or not), PS, smoking, and histology. Adj.HR (single-agent vs. doublet) was 1.21, 95% CI(0.96-1.53), p=0.11. Adj.HR (monotherapy vs. RT) was 0.39, 95%CI[0.24-0.65], p=0.0003. Adj.HR (combination CT vs. RT) was 0.32 95%CI[0.19-0.54], p<0.0001. 1-year OS was 11.8%, 95%CI [0.0-27.1], 48.7%, 95%CI [39.9-57.5], and 32.9%, 95%CI [25.1-40.6], in patients with RT alone, single agent CT or combination CT, while 2-year OS was 0%, 14.2%, and 20.0% respectively.
Conclusion
Second-line monotherapy only gave a 7-months median OS in MPM patients, comparing unfavorably to 11.9 and 15.9-months median OS with 2nd/3rd-line nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab respectively, in the IFCT-1501 MAPS-2 randomized phase 2 trial. Conversely, 2L platinum-based chemo, in younger fit patients, still gave a 12.2-months median OS, not statistically different from monotherapy in the multivariate analysis, as a consequence of PS influence, although clinically meaningful. Based on these results, immunotherapy might be preferred for 2L/3L MPM patients, while monotherapy CT shows limited survival benefit.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MA14 - The Adequate MTarget Is Still the Issue (ID 140)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Diego Signorelli, Juergen Wolf
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 15:45 - 17:15, Hilton Head (1978)
-
+
MA14.06 - Nintedanib-Docetaxel in 2nd Line Treatment in No Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients, Refractory to First Line Treatment (GFPC02-15) (Now Available) (ID 558)
15:45 - 17:15 | Author(s): Isabelle Monnet
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Second line chemotherapy used in advanced Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) have demonstrated a slight survival benefit in patient refractory to a first line platinum based doublet chemotherapy. In exploratory analysis, Nintedanib in combination with docetaxel have shown interesting result in second line setting for refractory NSCLC patients.
Objective: To assess the efficacy in terms of progression-free survival (PFS) of the nintedanib - docetaxel combination in second-line treatment in refractory no squamous NSCLC (NsqNSCL) patients
Method
This prospective, multicentric open-label phase II trial, included patients with advanced Nsq NSCLC (EGFR, ALK wild-type), PS 0-1, progressing during the first four cycles of cisplatin-based induction chemotherapy. Patients received Nintedanib (200 mg X2 /d d2-d20)- Docetaxel (75 mg/m2 d1-d21) combination until progressive disease or unacceptable toxicity.
The primary endpoint was the PFS rate at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included median PFS, median overall survival (OS), overall response rate (ORR) and tolerability. Based on a A’Hern’s single-stage phase II design trial (sample size determination is based on exact binomial distribution), the Nintedanib-Docetaxel strategy will be rejected if the primary endpoint was below 22/53 patients at the end of study.
Result
The analysis included 53 evaluable patients managed in 21 centers; last patient included at the end of January 2019. Mean age 58.4 years, male 73 %, adenocarcinoma 97.5%, current/former smokers: 42/50 %, PS 0/1: 25%/75%; weight loss >5% : 19%, stage IV: 100% (38% with brain metastasis, median metastasis 2). All patients received for induction chemotherapy, a platin doublet (22% with bevacizumab), number of cycle 1-2/ 3-4: 57%/ 43%.
Interim analysis reviewed by the independent committee conducted as planned, after the 27 first inclusions concluded that there was no sign of unexpected toxicity (adverse events grade 3-4 :22%, grade 5 :0%) or futility (9 patients meet primary end point on 25 evaluable). The results of the final analysis on the whole population (PFS at 12 weeks (primary end point), median PFS, median OS and toxicity) will be presented at the meeting
Academic grant from Boehringer Ingelheim
Conclusion
Section not applicable
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MA21 - Non EGFR/MET Targeted Therapies (ID 153)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Mini Oral Session
- Track: Targeted Therapy
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Benjamin Besse, Michael Thomas
- Coordinates: 9/10/2019, 14:30 - 16:00, Vienna (2016)
-
+
MA21.07 - Circulating Tumor DNA Analysis Depicts Potential Mechanisms of Resistance to BRAF-Targeted Therapies in BRAF+ Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Now Available) (ID 1365)
14:30 - 16:00 | Author(s): Isabelle Monnet
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Oncogenic BRAF-V600 mutations are observed in 1-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Targeted therapies including vemurafenib (V), dabrafenib (D) or combination of dabrafenib plus trametinib (D+T) are associated with favorable outcomes in these patients (pts). The mechanisms of resistance to BRAF-targeted therapies (BRAF-TT) in NSCLC are largely unknown.
Method
We performed genomic profiling of serial circulating-tumor DNA (ctDNA) in a cohort of 79 metastatic BRAF-mutant NSCLC pts (96% V600E, 4% non-V600). BRAFmutational status was ascertained based on local testing. Plasma samples were collected, from 2014-2018 in 27 Hospitals, from pts treated with V (n=34), D (n=2) or D+T (n=23). We collected 41 plasma samples at baseline to BRAF-TT, 40 at progressive disease (PD) and ~200 samples during treatment follow-up, concomitant to routine radiological evaluation. Inivata InVisionSeq™ assay was used to detect the presence of SNVs, indels and CNAs in 36-cancer related genes.
Result
At baseline, 72,5% of BRAF mutations (V600E and non-V600E) were detected in plasma. BRAF-V600E detection in plasma was associated with the presence of liver metastasis, versus BRAF-V600E-negative cases (22% vs. 7%, respectively). Co-occurring molecular alterations at baseline, besides BRAF-V600E, were observed in 18/26 (70%) cases: FGFR2 (1pt), PIK3CA (2pts), ERBB2 (1pt), CTNNB1 (2pts) and IDH1 (2pts). FGFR2, PIK3CA or CTNNB1 alterations were associated with PD as the best response to the subsequent BRAF-TT. TP53 and STK11 mutations were observed in 54% (14/26) and 8% (2/26) of pts, respectively. Complete clearance of BRAF-V600E in plasma at baseline was observed at the first CT-scan evaluation in 42% (3/7) and 82% (9/11) pts treated with V or D+T, respectively. These pts were in complete or partial response, suggesting that monitoring BRAF-V600E levels in plasma on treatment may be a clinically useful marker of tumor response. At PD, a consistent rebound in BRAF-V600E plasma levels was observed in 60% (24/40) pts. Resistance to V was associated with alterations in the MAPK pathway: 1pt (KRAS), 1pt (GNA11), 1pt (NRAS and GNAS) and 1pt (MAP2K1 and NFE2L2). Activating PI3KCA mutations were observed in 4 pts who progressed in <6 months on V treatment. ctDNA analyses at PD under D+T revealed that, similar to what we observed in patients who progressed on V, alterations in KRAS, NRAS, PIK3CA and CTNNB1 are associated with D+T resistance. Prediction of the impact of these alterations, at the protein level, was assessed using in silico structure modeling and will be presented.
Conclusion
ctDNA monitoring might be an informative tool for assessing disease response and resistance in NSCLC pts treated with BRAF-TT. MAPK reactivation remains an important resistance mechanism to BRAFi-monotherapy or to BRAFi and MEKi combination therapy.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA15 - Targeted Agents and Immunotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 152)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Small Cell Lung Cancer/NET
- Presentations: 1
- Now Available
- Moderators:Raffaele Califano, Charles M Rudin
- Coordinates: 9/10/2019, 14:30 - 16:00, Hilton Head (1978)
-
+
OA15.02 - Carboplatin-Etoposide Versus Topotecan as Second-Line Treatment for Sensitive Relapsed Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Phase 3 Trial (Now Available) (ID 546)
14:30 - 16:00 | Presenting Author(s): Isabelle Monnet
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Topotecan is currently the only drug approved in Europe in second line setting for small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). This study investigates whether the doublet carboplatin-Etoposide was superior to topotecan monotherapy as second-line treatment in patients with sensitive relapsed SCLC.
Method
this open-label, multicenter, phase 3 trial randomized patients with SCLC that responded to first-line platin etoposide doublet treatment but showed evidence of disease relapse or progression at least 90 days after completion of the first-line treatment. Enrolled patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive combination chemotherapy (Six cycles of 3-weeks Carboplatin, AUC 5, day 1 and Etoposide 100 mg/Sqm/d 1-3, intra-venous) or oral Topotecan (2.3 mg/Sqm/d 1-5, every 3 weeks). Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), quality of life and tolerance in the intention-to-treat population, (clinical trialgouv: NCT02738346)
Result
178 patients were screened and 164 randomized in 36 centers, with 82 assigned to each treatment group (age: 64.5 ± 7.2 years, men: 72.8%, PS 0/1/>1: 34.7%/56.3%/ 9%. Median PFS was significantly longer in combination chemotherapy group (4.7 months, 95% CI: 3.9-5.5) compare to topotecan group (2.7 months, 95% CI: 2.3-3.2), HR: 0.6, 95% CI 0.4-0.8, p < 0.002. The ORR were significantly more important in the combination chemotherapy than in topotecan arm (ORR 49 % vs 25 %, p < 0,002), but without difference in term of median OS, 7.5 months (95% CI: 5.4-8.7) in combination chemotherapy group versus 7.4 months (95% CI.6.0-9.3) in topotecan arm. Grade 3/4 neutropenia were significantly more common in the topotecan group than in the combination chemotherapy group (35.8% vs 19.7 %, p < 0.001. There is a non-significant trend for more febrile neutropenia in topotecan arm compare to combination arm (13.6 % 6.2 %, p = 0.19, and no difference for grade 3/4 thrombopenia, 35.8 % vs 30.9 %, and anemia, 24.6 % vs 21 %, for topotecan and combination arms, respectively. Two treatment-related deaths occurred in the topotecan arm (febrile neutropenia with sepsis), none in the combination arm. Results of quality of life outcomes will be presented at the meeting.
Conclusion
platin - etoposide re-challenge can be considered as a standard second-line chemotherapy for sensitive relapsed SCLC.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 159)
- Event: WCLC 2019
- Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2019, 10:15 - 18:15, Exhibit Hall
-
+
P2.01-09 - VinMetAtezo: Phase II Trial of Metronomic Oral Vinorelbine with Atezolizumab for Recurrent Stage IV NSCLC (GFPC*04-08) (ID 690)
10:15 - 18:15 | Author(s): Isabelle Monnet
- Abstract
Background
Immunotherapy is recommended as second-line treatment for advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) progressing after a platinum doublet treatment. However, response rates remain low and some patients have rapid progression. Novel concepts of synergic action between immunotherapy and chemotherapy have emerged recently. Metronomic oral vinorelbine (MOV) is defined as low-dose and frequent chemotherapy administration. There is no data of the association of immunotherapy and metronomic chemotherapy. The main objective of this trial was to assess safety and efficacy of this combination of MVO and atezolizumab.
Method
An open label phase 2 trial (NCT 03801304) in two steps.
-First step: a safety run-in phase: 12 patients will be enrolled and will receive atezolizumab in combination with MOV (40 mg/day 3 times a week, every week). After 12 patients have received study treatment and completed at least 1 cycle of study treatment (21 days), enrollment will be interrupted and an independent Data Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) will review the number and percentage of adverse events (AEs). The dose will be considered toxic when Grade ≥ 3 immune-related AEs (>20%) or vinorelbine-related AEs (>20%) occurs. In this case the dose will be decreased to 30 mg, 3 times a week. AEs will be assessed with the same procedure that will be applied to the next 12 patients.
- Second step: phase II design as defined by A’hern. The main outcome is PFS rate at 4 months. Minimal efficacy hypothesis (p1) is set at 55% event-free rate of PFS at 4 months, (p0), which would indicate that the strategy is clearly ineffective, is set at 40% PFS at 4 months. With a 5% alpha risk (unilateral perspective) and a 20% beta risk, the number of assessable subjects is set at 71.
Result
The trial started on 2019 January 24th. 12 patients have been included in 4 centers. The run in step ended at the beginning of April, with no grade 3 or more immune related AEs or vinorelbine related AEs. The DSMB decided to expand the study to the second step, which will start on April, 17th.
Conclusion
Combination of atezolizumab and MOV appears as a feasible association without major toxicities. The phase 2 is ongoing; complementary results on safety and efficacy will be presented at the meeting.
