Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Angel Artal

Moderator of

  • +

    MA05 - Update on Clinical Trials and Treatments (ID 123)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Mini Oral Session
    • Track: Mesothelioma
    • Presentations: 11
    • Now Available
    • +

      MA05.01 - Second or Third Line Anti-PD-1 Therapy After Multimodality Therapy Including Total Pleurectomy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Now Available) (ID 1955)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): loic Lang-Lazdunski  |  Author(s): Yu Zhi Zhang, Sanjay Popat, Mary O'Brien, Jeremy Steele, Tom Newsom-Davis, Arnaud Scherpereel, Hasna Bouchaab, Alexandra Rice, Andrew G Nicholson

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Surgical resection plays an important role in the management of selected patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM). Early experience with anti-PD-1 immunotherapy showed promise in MPM, but it is yet uncertain if it can improve outcomes when tumour relapses following surgical resection, radiotherapy and chemotherapy. We reviewed our experience in patients who received Pembrolizumab or Nivolumab following multimodality therapy.

      Method

      Retrospective study including patients with histologically-proven MPM having completed multimodality therapy and received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy as 2nd or 3rd line treatment. Data were retrieved from a prospective mesothelioma database. Histopathology, BAP1, MTAP and PD-L1 (22C3) immunohistochemistry were performed on surgical specimens and reported by a senior pathologist. All patients had chest computed tomography and positron emission tomography (PET-CT) as part of their normal follow-up. Response evaluation was determined using RECIST 1.1 criteria.

      Result

      16 patients received anti-PD-1 immunotherapy between August 2015 and March 2019. All patients had total pleurectomy/decortication, prophylactic radiotherapy (21Gy/3) and systemic chemotherapy based on pemetrexed and platinum. Median age was 68.5 years, with male predominance (13/16). 56% had epithelioid type, 44% had biphasic type. Median time to starting immunotherapy was 20 months (range 11-42) following surgery. Median ECOG performance status was 0. Twelve patients received Pembrolizumab and 4 received Nivolumab. Median number of cycles of anti-PD-1 therapy received was 5 (range 1-33). Disease control rate at 12 weeks was 56.2% and 7 (43.7%) patients had disease progression. Adverse events were observed in 6 patients (one Grade 3). Eight patients were alive by 1st April 2019. Median OS from starting immunotherapy was 13.5 months. Three patients received treatment for 14 months or more. Five patients started further therapy after discontinuing immunotherapy.

      Conclusion

      In our cohort, second or third-line anti-PD-1 immunotherapy showed efficacy with DCR comparable to non-surgical setting. Further studies are warranted to validate our preliminary findings.

      wclc 2019 figure 1anti pd1.jpg

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.02 - Log Odds of Positive Lymph Nodes Predicts Overall Survival and the Benefit of Postoperative Radiotherapy in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Now Available) (ID 1059)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Yang Wo  |  Author(s): Yuanyong Wang, Tong Lu, Wenjie Jiao

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Nodal categories of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) are mostly adopted from lung cancer staging criteria and the N descriptors in the eighth edition of TNM staging system have not been fully verified. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of the current N descriptors and a novel prognosticator—the log odds of positive lymph nodes (LODDS)—in predicting overall survival (OS) and postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) benefit in MPM.

      Method

      Patients in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database with MPM undergoing surgery and lymph nodes examination were extracted and restaged according to the 8th edition TNM staging system. LODDS was calculated as loge[(positive nodes count+0.5)/(negative nodes count+0.5)]. X-tile software determined the optimal cut-point for LODDS. Log-rank tests along with Cox regression analyses were adopted for survival analyses. Harrell's C-index statistic measured discriminatory ability and prognostic performance.

      Result

      A total of 534 patients were enrolled in this study. N descriptors were unevenly distributed. Most cases were staged as N0 (51.9%) and N1 (47.0%), with only 1.1% staged as N2. The eighth edition N descriptors failed to clarify the survival difference between adjacent categories and were incapable of predicting PORT benefit. The cut-points for LODDS were classified as follows: LODDS1 (≤-2.61), LODDS2 (-2.56≤LODDS≤0.62), and LODDS3 (≥0.87). The median survival of LODDS1 was 23.1 months compared with 17.9 months (HR=1.397, P=0.005) and 13.0 months (HR=2.317, P<0.001) for LODDS2 and LODDS3, respectively. The survival curves stratified by LODDS separated nicely without overlapping and the benefit of PORT was limited to cases with LODDS3 (≥0.87). LODDS also provided better C-index than the conventional N descriptors.

      layout 1.jpg

      Conclusion

      LODDS performs better than N descriptors for predicting survival and benefits of PORT in resected MPM, and it could be considered as a potential parameter to compensate for defects in the 8th AJCC TNM staging for MPM.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.03 - Impact of Time to Surgery on Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Outright Resection for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Now Available) (ID 648)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Chi-Fu Jeffrey Jeffrey Yang  |  Author(s): Soraya Voigt, Vignesh Raman, Oliver K Jawitz, Thomas A D’amico, David Harpole

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      We hypothesized that a longer interval to surgery would be associated with worse overall survival for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

      Method

      The National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with cT1-3N0-1M0 MPM who underwent surgery without induction therapy. Patients with interval of <1 or >180 days were excluded. Patients were grouped into quartiles based on distribution of time intervals to surgery: Q1 (1-30 days), Q2 (31-50 days), Q3 (51-80 days), and Q4 (>80 days). The primary outcome was overall survival. Secondary outcomes were upstaging to pN2 and margin-positive (>R0) resection rate. Survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier and Cox Proportional Hazards methods. Nodal upstaging and >R0 resection rates were modeled with multivariable logistic regression.

      Result

      A total of 812 patients met study criteria. The median interval from diagnosis to surgery was 52 days. The unadjusted median survival for Q1, 2, 3, and 4 was 16, 19, 20, and 27 months, respectively (log-rank p=0.004). In multivariable analysis, increased time to surgery was not associated with worse overall survival (Table 1), and Q4 (>80 days) was independently associated with improved survival compared to Q1. When modeled as a continuous variable, an increased time to surgery was associated with a small but clinically insignificant increase in survival (AHR 0.997; 95%CI 0.995-0.999; p=0.005). In a multivariable regression of factors predicting pathologic upstaging to N2, increased time to surgery was significantly associated with upstaging (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] for Q4 compared to Q1: 2.26; 95%CI 1.04-5.28). In a separate regression of >R0 resection, an increased interval to surgery was not associated with margin-positive resection (AOR 0.70; 95%CI 0.41-1.21).

      Conclusion

      An increasing interval from diagnosis to definitive surgery for MPM was not associated with worse overall survival or margin-positive resection, but was associated with higher likelihood of pathologic nodal upstaging in this analysis.

      Variable

      Adjusted HR

      95% CI

      P value

      Interval (ref:Q1)

      Q2

      Q3

      Q4

      1.07

      0.96

      0.74

      0.84-1.36

      0.76-1.22

      0.58-0.95

      0.61

      0.75

      0.02

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.04 - Discussant - MA05.01, MA05.02, MA05.03 (Now Available) (ID 3733)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Clarissa Baldotto  |  Author(s):

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.05 - Post-Discontinuation Treatments in IFCT-GFPC-0701 MAPS Trial: Real-World Effectiveness of 2nd-Line (2L) Treatments for Mesothelioma (Now Available) (ID 815)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Gerard Zalcman  |  Author(s): Solene Brosseau, Julien Mazieres, Jacques Margery, Laurent Greillier, Clarisse Audigier-Valette, Denis Moro-Sibilot, Olivier Molinier, Romain Corre, Isabelle Monnet, Valérie Gounant, Frédéric Rivière, Radj Gervais, Henri Janicot, Chrystele Locher, Alexandra Langlais, Jean-Jacques Parienti, Franck Morin, Arnaud Scherpereel

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      MAPS phase 3 trial assessing the addition of bevacizumab to pemetrexed-cisplatin doublet set a new standard of care in malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) patients, showing 18.8 months median overall survival (OS) with triplet combo. While both arms were well balanced in terms of 2L treatments, the size of the OS benefit from second-line treatments remains controversial.

      Method

      Long-term survival data were collected in the 342 MAPS patients alive at the end of the first-line (1L) treatments, in both arms. Median OS and 2-year survivals were calculated from the initiation of 2L. Multivariate analysis using Cox model included the stratification variables of the MAPS trial, along with the treatment arm (with or without bevacizumab).

      Result

      342/442(77.4%) patients received 2L treatment for disease progression after MAPS trial, of which 324 received chemotherapy (CT), 18 palliative radiotherapy (RT), while 100/442 (22.6%) remained untreated. 160/342 patients (46.8%) had a platinum-based doublet CT. 163 patients (47.7%) received a single-drug CT. 172/324 (53.1%) received a pemetrexed-containing regimen (alone or with platinum), 84 (25.9%) a gemcitabine-based CT, 16 (4.9%) vinorelbin alone, 48 (14.8%) gemcitabine alone, while in 12 (3.7%) single-agent bevacizumab was resumed. Median age was lower in patients with doublet CT (64.4 years, IQR 60.2-68.9) vs. single-drug CT patients (66.3 years, IQR 61.5-70.3), patients receiving RT (68.5 years, IQR 63.3-70.5) or untreated patients (67.8 years, IQR 63.4-71) (p=0.007). There were more PS=2 patients (10%) in the untreated group, compared with 0.6%, 1.8% and 5.6% in those receiving doublet, monotherapy or radiotherapy, respectively (p<0.001). A lower proportion of patients receiving 2L doublet CT had sarcomatoid/biphasic MPM (11.2%) compared with 21.5%, 38.9% and 25% in those with single-arm agent, RT or untreated, respectively (p=0.002). When compared with those treated with 2L single-agent, patients with 2L doublet had more frequently objective response (11.9 vs. 3.1%, p=0.005) and disease control (60.3 vs. 34.6%, p<0.0001). From the date of 2L therapy initiation, median OS was 3.2 months, 95%CI [1.7-5.0] for RT vs. 7.0 months 95%CI[5.6-7.8] for single-agent CT, or 12.2 months 95%CI [9.5-14.1] for doublet CT. HRs were adjusted for 1L treatment type (bevacizumab-containing or not), PS, smoking, and histology. Adj.HR (single-agent vs. doublet) was 1.21, 95% CI(0.96-1.53), p=0.11. Adj.HR (monotherapy vs. RT) was 0.39, 95%CI[0.24-0.65], p=0.0003. Adj.HR (combination CT vs. RT) was 0.32 95%CI[0.19-0.54], p<0.0001. 1-year OS was 11.8%, 95%CI [0.0-27.1], 48.7%, 95%CI [39.9-57.5], and 32.9%, 95%CI [25.1-40.6], in patients with RT alone, single agent CT or combination CT, while 2-year OS was 0%, 14.2%, and 20.0% respectively.

      Conclusion

      Second-line monotherapy only gave a 7-months median OS in MPM patients, comparing unfavorably to 11.9 and 15.9-months median OS with 2nd/3rd-line nivolumab or nivolumab+ipilimumab respectively, in the IFCT-1501 MAPS-2 randomized phase 2 trial. Conversely, 2L platinum-based chemo, in younger fit patients, still gave a 12.2-months median OS, not statistically different from monotherapy in the multivariate analysis, as a consequence of PS influence, although clinically meaningful. Based on these results, immunotherapy might be preferred for 2L/3L MPM patients, while monotherapy CT shows limited survival benefit.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.07 - Efficacy and Safety of Re-Treatment with Tremelimumab and Durvalumab Within the NIBIT-MESO-1 Study (Now Available) (ID 1867)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Luana Calabro'  |  Author(s): Giulia Rossi, ALDO Morra, Anna Maria Di Giacomo, Giovanni Amato, Claudio Rosati, Ornella Cutaia, Maria Grazia Daffinà, Diana Giannarelli, MICHELE Maio

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Targeting immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) had proven effective in a variety of tumor types. However, primary and secondary resistance to treatment is emerging as a major limitation of ICI therapy, and scattered information is available on the therapeutic efficacy of re-treatment in ICI-resistant subjects. Here we investigated the efficacy and safety of re-treatment with tremelimumab and durvalumab in malignant mesothelioma (MM) patients who developed resistance to these agents in the phase II NIBIT-MESO-1 study (Calabrò L et al, Lancet Resp Med 2018).

      Method

      Patients eligible for re-treatment per the NIBIT-MESO-1 protocol were those who completed 4 dosing cycles of tremelimumab combined with durvalumab, and achieved partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD), followed by progressive disease (PD) during the maintenance with durvalumab or the follow-up phase. Subjects who met the re-treatment criteria received tremelimumab (1 mg/Kg, i.v.) and durvalumab (20 mg/Kg, i.v.) every 4 weeks (Q4W) for 4 doses (re-induction phase), followed by durvalumab (20 mg/Kg, i.v.) Q4W for additional 9 doses (maintenance phase). Objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), per immune-related (ir)-modified RECIST criteria, overall survival (OS), and safety were evaluated. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded according to CTC v4.0.

      Result

      Seventeen (42.5%) of the 40 MM patients enrolled in the NIBIT-MESO-1 study met the criteria for re-treatment and received therapy. Among them 8 (47%) completed the re-induction phase, 7 (41.2.%) went on maintenance phase, and 1 (5%) entered the follow-up phase. As of April 1st 2019, 16/17 patients were discontinued during re-treatment because of PD, and 7 received additional lines of therapy. Seven out of the 17 (41.2%) re-treated subjects had an irSD, while no ir-ORR were observed. At a median follow-up of 35.8 months, median OS of re-treated patients was significantly (p=0.005) higher (25.6 months, 95% CI: 6.1-45.1) as compared to the 23 subjects who were not re-treated (9.9 months, 95% CI: 7.7-12.1). Grade 1-2 irAEs occurred in 6/17 (35%) re-treated patients, were most frequently dermatological and reversible per protocol guideline; no grade 3-4 irAEs were observed.

      Conclusion

      Re-treatment with tremelimumab and durvalumab of MM patients who developed resistance to therapy in the course of the NIBIT-MESO-1 study is clinically effective and safe in a sizeable proportion of re-treated subjects.

      Clinical trial infomation: NCT02588131

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.08 - Discussant - MA05.05, MA05.06, MA05.07 (Now Available) (ID 3734)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): James Spicer

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.09 - Real-World Data of Nivolumab and Pembrolizumab in Chemotherapy Pre-Treated Mesothelioma Patients (Now Available) (ID 1918)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Daphne Dumoulin  |  Author(s): Luca Cantini, Robert anton Belderbos, Darlene Mercieca, Robin Cornelissen, Joachim G.J.V. Aerts

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Both nivolumab and pembrolizumab have shown positive results in phase II studies in patients following chemotherapy in mesothelioma patients. However, these studies were done in a limited number of patients with strict inclusion criteria, while reports show a difference between real life and study setting.

      Method

      In our mesothelioma center, we treated patients that progressed during or after chemotherapy treatment with nivolumab 3mg/kg once every 2 weeks independent of PD-L1 expression or with pembrolizumab 200mg once every 3 weeks when PD-L1 expression was ³1%, both in Early Patient Access programs. All patients were pre-treated with at least one cycle of platinum/folate treatment. CT scan evaluation was done using modified RECIST every 6 weeks.

      Result

      In total, we treated 78 patients with nivolumab and 13 patients with pembrolizumab. Median age of the patients was 71 years (29-85) at start of the checkpoint inhibitor treatment, 80 (88%) were male. Performance status was ECOG 0 in 19 patients, ECOG 1 in 57 patients, ECOG 2 in 9 patients. Data analysis thus far showed 9 partial responses (10%) and 31 patients with stable disease (29%) and therefore a disease control rate of 39% at twelve weeks of treatment. Median progression free survival is 2.4 months and median overall survival 6,3 months. Median duration of response had not been reached yet. These data will be updated for the meeting. Two cases of pseudoprogression were seen on checkpoint inhibition therapy where progression according to modified RECIST was followed by response during continuation of PD-1 therapy. Toxicity was in line with historical data.

      Conclusion

      We believe that this large dataset, using real-world data, can truly give an insight in the clinical benefit of these immune checkpoint inhibitors. In comparison with the published phase I and II trials on nivolumab and pembrolizumab, the response rates appear to be lower in a real-life setting. However, clinically meaningful and durable responses are seen in a population that has no other proven therapy options.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.10 - Pembrolizumab in the Treatment of Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Following Progression After Initial Chemotherapy (Now Available) (ID 2788)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Keith Cengel  |  Author(s): Sharyn I Katz, Leonid Roshkovan, Sally McNulty, Jinjiang Lian, Daniel Aleynick, Melissa Jane Culligan, Joseph Friedberg, Sunil Singhal, Charles B. Simone, Li, Christine Ciunci, Melina E Marmarelis, Evan Alley, Corey Jay Langer

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) therapies have demonstrated clinical benefit in patients (pts) with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) and are now included in the NCCN guidelines as an acceptable treatment option. Herein, we report our initial experience treating pts with MPM in the palliative second line or greater setting.

      Method

      Between January 2016 and November 2018, 74 pts with biopsy proven MPM were treated with pembrolizumab every three weeks until confirmed disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were defined as the time from first pembrolizumab dose to recurrence and death, respectively, or to last contact. Response rates (RR) were measured by a dedicated thoracic radiologist using modified RECIST 1.1 criteria. Adverse events were routinely recorded/scored at each follow up visit. according to CTCAE 4.0 with level of attribution to pembrolizumab.

      Result

      Demographics of the 74 pt cohort are shown in table 1. Twently-nine (39%) of pts experienceda total of 39 grade 1-2 adverse events, possibly or definitely related to therapy (Table 2). There was one grade 4pneumonitis that resulted in new requirement for oxygen, which resolved with steroids; and one patient experienced leukoencephalopathy that resulted in death. The overall response rate (including only partial responses by modified RECIST 1.1) for the entire cohort was 26%. Median progression free survival and overall survival for the entire cohort were 2.8 months and 7.9 months, respectively.

      Table 2: Adverse Events

      CTCAE 4.0 Grade

      AE Description

      1-2

      3-4

      5

      hypothroid

      5

      arthralgias

      8

      colitis

      3

      diarrhea

      2

      lip lesion

      1

      pneumonitis

      2

      1

      SICCA syndrome

      1

      thrombocytopenia

      1

      dermatitis

      1

      hypopigmentation

      1

      nephritis

      1

      fatigue

      1

      abdominal pain

      1

      uveitis

      1

      transaminitis

      1

      elvated alk phos

      1

      leukoencephalopathy

      1

      pruritis

      3

      hypercalcemia

      3

      rash

      2

      Table 1: Demographics

      Age in Years

      median (range)

      Min

      73

      (52-92)

      Gender

      Patients (N=74)

      Female

      29

      39%

      Male

      55

      74%

      Histology

      Epithelial

      58

      78%

      Sarcomatoid

      6

      8%

      Biphasic

      10

      14%

      # of chemotherapy courses

      0

      3

      4%

      1

      42

      57%

      2

      22

      30%

      3-4

      7

      9%

      # of radiotherapy courses

      0

      42

      57%

      1

      30

      41%

      2-3

      6

      8%

      Surgical Resection

      Have EPD

      24

      32%

      Did not have EPD

      50

      68%

      PDL1

      Negative

      21

      28%

      Positive

      12

      16%

      Not Determined

      42

      57%

      Conclusion

      Pembrolizumab in the Tx of MPM was reasonably well tolerated in this large, single institution experience. RR, PFS and OS appear remarkably similar to recent published data from a registry study of off-label use of pembrolizumab in pts with MPM in Switzerland and Australia (include reference). Ongoing studies include analysis of PDL-1 and other potential immunotherapy response biomarkers.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.11 - Safety and Efficacy of Nintedanib in Combination with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Refractory/Relapsing Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Now Available) (ID 2170)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Andreea Varga  |  Author(s): Gerard Zalcman, Carlos Gomez-Roca, Samy Ammari, CAROLINE Caramella, Valérie Gounant, Audrey Rabeau, Xavier Paoletti, Capucine Baldini, Patricia Martin-Romano, Stephane Champiat, Perrine Vuagnat, Jean-Marie Michot, Laura Mezquita, Christophe Massard, Benjamin Besse, Jean Charles Soria, Aurelien Marabelle, David Planchard

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive disease with no standard of care after progression to first line pemetrexed and platinum-based chemotherapy. Combinations between anti-angiogenic agents and immunotherapy are being developed as angiogenesis and immunosuppression influence each other leading to a more powerful anti-tumor response. Both Nintedanib and Pembrolizumab have been investigated as single agents or in different treatment combinations in MPM patients with interesting activity.

      Method

      The PEMBIB trial is a multi-centric open-label non-randomized basket phase 1 trial evaluating the combination of nintedanib with pembrolizumab in multiple tumor types. The safety and activity of the dose escalation part of the study were reported at AACR & ASCO meetings in 2018 with an established DLT defined as grade 3 alanine and/or aspartate aminotransferase elevation (ALT/AST). The recommended phase 2 dose is set at 150 mg BID of nintedanib with 200 mg flat dose of pembrolizumab. We would like to report the safety and activity of one of the expansion cohorts of patients with relapsing/refractory MPM which has now been completed. Eligible MPM patients were 18 years or older with an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, histologically proven MPM that relapsed after at least one line of pemetrexed and platinum-based combination, specific anti-angiogenic eligibility criteria such as no radiographic evidence of cavitary/necrotic or tumors with local invasion of major blood vessels.

      Updated results on the safety profile and efficacy of this anti-angiogenic and anti-PD-1 combination therapy including overall response rate as per RECIST, irRC and mRECIST criteria, disease control rate will be presented at the meeting.

      Result

      The first patient from the MPM cohort was enrolled in July 2017 and the last one in April 2019. Thirty-one eligible MPM patients have been evaluable at the data cut off onJuly 2019, one of them had been enrolled since the dose-escalation part at dose level of 200mg. The age at inclusion was 68 (ranging from 38 to 85), 68% of the patients having an ECOG of 1 and 58% of the histological type was epithelioid. The most frequent adverse events (grades 1, 2 and 3) related to any of the combination drugs were liver enzymes increase, fatigue, decreased appetite, nausea, diarrhea and hypothyroidism. There were two cases of myocarditis, one of grade 3 (pembrolizumab related) and one of grade 5(pembrolizumab and nintedanib related). At the time of the data analysis the efficacy data shows six partial responses (overall response rate of 21%) and seventeen stable disease (disease control rate at 61%.).

      Conclusion

      The combination of Nintedanib with Pembrolizumab shows promising activity in relapsed MPM patients .The toxicity profile appear consistent with previous reports of anti-angiogenic agents and immunotherapy combination.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      MA05.12 - Discussant - MA05.09, MA05.10, MA05.11 (Now Available) (ID 3735)

      13:30 - 15:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Anna K Nowak

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.



Author of

  • +

    MA02 - Miscellaneous Topics in the Management of Early Stage Lung Cancer (ID 116)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Mini Oral Session
    • Track: Treatment of Early Stage/Localized Disease
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • +

      MA02.01 - Reccurrence Pattern After Adjuvant Customized Chemotherapy Based on BRCA Expression Level (SCAT Trial) (Now Available) (ID 2760)

      10:30 - 12:00  |  Author(s): Angel Artal

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      •Postop platinum-based CT improves outcomes in completely resected NSCLC with nodal involvement, (St II-IIIA). Customization is feasible in adjuvant setting (tissue availability) . Analysis of expressionin genes involved in DNA repair could be use to select CT regiment. •BRCA1 plays an important role in DNA repair pathways and functions as a differential regulator of response to cisplatin and antimicrotubuleagents. SCAT trial results found that for low BRCA1 levels subgroup Cis-Gemcitabine was superior to Cis-Docetaxel and in high BRCA1 levels subgroup Docetaxel single agent without platinum achieved similar survival to Cis-Doc. Analysis of recurrence pattern in different subgroups of the trials has been performed

      Method

      From Jun/2007 to May/2013 591 patients were screened and 500 p were included (108 in Control arm treated with Cisplatin-Docetaxel and 392 in Experimental arm treated with Cisplatin-Gemcitabine, Cisplatin-Docetaxel or Docetaxel alone according terciles BRCA1 expression level). With a cut-off September 30th 2018 and a median follow-up of 60 months, recurrence pattern are analysed in each arm and subgroup treatment and comparison are made for incidence of risk of recurrence, single/multiple recurrence, thoracic/extrathoracic and site of metastases (liver, bone, brain)

      Result

      Cumulative recurrence 232/456 evaluable patients (p) (50.8%). Recurrence were seen in 182/354 patients treated in experimental arm and in 50/102 p treated in the control arm (RR 1.04; 0.83-1.30) (p=0.672). Majority of recurrences 159/232 (68.5%) were single site recurrence. Intrathoracic recurrences in 121/232 (52%) while extrathoracic metastatic disease 111/232 (47.8%). No significant differences were seen for single/multiple, intra/extrathoracic recurrences between experimental and control arm. More frequent distant metastatic sites were: bone (42 p), brain (38 p) and liver (11 p) In the experimental group between different treatments no significant differences were found for the overall metastatic rate or for the single/multiple, intrathoracic/extrathoracic recurrences. For specific metastatic sites related to experimental treatment a significant reduction of risk of brain metastases were found in the experimental group with high level BRCA1 treated with Docetaxel single agent (p=0.0016)

      Conclusion

      For NSCLC resected patients with lymph node involvement (Stages II-IIIA) risk of recurrence remains high with cumulative rate > 50%. There were no differences in the Relative Risk (1.04) of recurrence when control and experimental arm are compared. Majority of recurrences were single site (68.5%) and intrathoracic (52%) but distant metastases developed in 47.8% os p. More frequent metastatic site was bone, followed by brain and liver. Brain metastases risk were significant lower for patients with low BRCA1 expression treated with single agent Docetaxel

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    MA22 - Partnering with Patients to Understand Stigma, Disparities and Values Leading to Improved Lung Cancer Care (ID 154)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Mini Oral Session
    • Track: Advocacy
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • +

      MA22.05 - Assessment of Gender Differences in the Psychosocial and Economic Impact on Patients with Stage IV Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (Now Available) (ID 718)

      15:45 - 17:15  |  Author(s): Angel Artal

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Incidence of lung cancer in women is rising overtime reporting evident gender-based differences in epidemiology, biology, and treatment outcome. However, little is known about gender-differences regarding psychological, economic and social aspects. The objectives of this prospective study are to evaluate the psychosocial and economic impact of metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), according to gender. Additionally, to assess the emotional burden and the economic impact of the disease on the primary caregiver from a gender perspective

      Method

      Multicenter, prospective, observational, study of two cohorts of patients with metastatic NSCLC (male and female) in Oncology departments of 20 Spanish hospitals. The following measurement tools were used: the APGAR questionnaire (family functionality: adaptability, partnership, growth, affection, and resolve), the Relationship impact scale, the DUKE-UNC scale (perceived socio-affective support), the patient and the caregiver economic impact scale and the Zarit scale (caregiver burden). All questionnaires were performed at the first visit, repeated 4 months later and following the first and second disease progression.

      Result

      Of the 333 pts included, 104 were females and 229 male, of whom 63% and 97%, respectively, were smokers/ex-smokers (p=0.0001). More women than men (85% vs 70%) had adenocarcinomas . The median overall survival was longer in women but did not reach statistical significance [17.1 vs 11.0 months, HR 0.732 (95% CI 0.534 to 1.005), p=0.0524]. Most families considered themselves functional (high score in APGAR questionnaire) with no changes in their partner relationship and social support was evaluated as optimal for majority of patients. Around a quarter of interviewed patients said their economic situation was a little worse after the lung cancer diagnosis, without remarkable differences by gender. Statistically significant differences were found between both groups regarding the caregiver´s relationship to the patient (more parents were the caregiver in females than in males) (p <0.0001) and the caregiver’s employment situation (more employed caregivers in females) (p<0.0001). Most caregivers of both sexes considered that taking care of their relative did not pose a significant burden. No remarkable differences by gender were found between the different variables across the study.

      Conclusion

      This study provides a preliminary insight into gender-related characteristics in the management of advanced NSCLC and its impact on the emotional, social and economic burden of patients and their caregivers, and recall the high priority of researching in cancer from a gender perspective

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.