Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Solange Peters

Moderator of

  • +

    OA04 - Immuno Combinations and the Role of TMB (ID 126)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Oral Session
    • Track: Immuno-oncology
    • Presentations: 8
    • Now Available
    • +

      OA04.01 - A Phase III Randomized Study of Nivolumab/Ipilimumab vs Nivolumab for Previously Treated Stage IV Squamous Cell Lung Cancer (Now Available) (ID 872)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Presenting Author(s): Lyudmila Bazhenova  |  Author(s): Mary Redman, Scott Gettinger, Fred R. Hirsch, Philip Mack, Lawrence H Schwartz, David R Gandara, Jeffrey D Bradley, Thomas Stinchcombe, Natasha B Leighl, Suresh S Ramalingam, Susan Tavernier, Katherine Minichiello, Karen Kelly, Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou, Roy S. Herbst

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Lung-MAP is a master protocol for patients (pts) with stage IV previously treated SqNSCLC. S1400I enrolled pts who were not eligible for a biomarker-matched sub-study. (Lung-MAP Sub-Study S1400I, NCT02785952)

      Method

      S1400I is phase III randomized trial for immunotherapy-naïve patients with ECOG 0-1 not selected by PD-L1 expression. Pts were assigned 1:1 to nivolumab and ipilimumab (N+I) vs nivolumab (N). N was given at 3 mg/kg q 2w, I was given at 1 mg/kg q 6w. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints: investigator-assessed progression-free survival (IA-PFS), response by RECIST 1.1, and toxicity.

      Result

      From December 18, 2015 to April 23, 2018, 275 pts enrolled and 252 determined eligible (125 N+I and 127 N). Median follow up for patients still alive was 17.4 months. The study was closed for futility at an interim analysis. Baseline characteristics were similar across arms. mOS was 10.0 m (8.0-12.8) and 11.0 m (8.2-13.5) for N+I and N. HR 0.97 (0.71-1.31), p 0.82. mPFS was 3.8 m (2.3-4.2) and 2.9 m (1.8-3.9) for N+I and N. HR 0.84 (0.64-1.09), p 0.19. The response rate was 18% (12-25) in N+I and 17 % (11, 24) in N. Outcomes were similar across TMB subgroups and PD-L1 expression levels. Most AE were low grade. There were 5 grade 5 AE in N+I arm and 1 in N arm. Grade ≥3 treatment-related AEs occurred in 48(39%) of pts on N+I vs 38(31%) on N. irAE reported in 39% of pts on N+I and 34% of patients on N. Drug-related AEs led to discontinuation in 25% of pts on N+I and 16% of pts on N.

      OS and PFS based on TMB and PD-L1

      N+I

      Median in months

      N

      Median in months
      HR p
      OS PD-L1 ≥5 14.1 (5.8-17.5) 12.0 (8.2-19.8) 1.06 (0.58-1.92) 0.86
      OS PD-L1 <5 8.3 (6.0-10.7) 10.3 (6.3-13.5) 1.01 (0.62-1.65) 0.97
      OS TMB ≥10 13.1 (9.3-17.0) 11.4 (8.2-16.1) 0.86 (0.56-1.32) 0.48
      OS TMB <10 7.6 (5.7-10.2) 10.0 (6.3-15.2) 1.08 (0.68-1.71) 0.74
      PFS PD-L1 ≥ 5 3.9 (1.7-7.1) 2.9 (1.8-4.7) 0.65 (0.38-1.08) 0.10
      PFS PD-L1 <5 4.4 (2.1-6.0) 1.6 (1.5-3.0) 0.64 (0.41-1.01) 0.06
      PFS TMB ≥ 10 4.2 (3.4-5.9) 3.4 (1.8-5.3) 0.75 (0.52-1.10) 0.15
      PFS TMB < 10 1.9 (1.5-4.1) 2.7 (1.6-3.3) 0.92 (0.62-1.39) 0.70

      Conclusion

      S1400I failed to show improvement in outcomes with N+I. Study was closed for futility at interim analysis. Toxicities were not different between two arms. Molecular correlates will be presented at the meeting.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      OA04.02 - CheckMate 817: First-Line Nivolumab + Ipilimumab in Patients with ECOG PS 2 and Other Special Populations with Advanced NSCLC (Now Available) (ID 1876)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Presenting Author(s): Fabrice Barlesi  |  Author(s): Clarisse Audigier-Valette, Enriqueta Felip, Tudor-Eliade Ciuleanu, Kevin Jao, Erika Rijavec, Laszlo Urban, Jean-Sébastien Aucoin, Cristina Zannori, Karim Vermaelen, Osvaldo Aren Frontera, Neal Ready, Alessandra Curioni Fontecedro, Helena Linardou, Elena Poddubskaya, Jürgen R. Fischer, Ingrid Iordan, Harry JM Groen, Rathi N Pillai, Sunney Li, Joseph Fiore, Han Chang, Angelic Acevedo, Luis Paz-Ares

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Data are limited for immunotherapy in patients with advanced NSCLC and poor performance status or other comorbidities. CheckMate 817 is a multi-cohort, open-label phase 3b/4 study investigating safety and efficacy of flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based low-dose ipilimumab in advanced NSCLC. Here we evaluate this regimen as first-line treatment in special populations (cohort A1) and a reference population (cohort A; previously reported).

      Method

      Patients had previously untreated advanced NSCLC. Cohort A1 (n=198) had ECOG PS 2 or ECOG PS 0–1 with 1 of: asymptomatic untreated brain metastases, hepatic or renal impairment, or HIV. Cohort A (n=391) had ECOG PS 0–1. Patients with known EGFR mutations or ALK translocations sensitive to available targeted therapy were excluded from both cohorts. Nivolumab 240 mg Q2W plus ipilimumab 1 mg/kg Q6W was administered for two years or until disease progression/unacceptable toxicity. Safety and efficacy endpoints were assessed; cohort A1 analyses were exploratory.

      Result

      Cohort A1 patients were grouped as: ECOG PS 2 (n=139) and all other special populations (AOSP; n=59). Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between cohorts. Rates of grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were similar between cohorts; within cohort A1, grade 3–4 TRAEs were numerically higher in AOSP versus the ECOG PS 2 subgroup; TRAEs leading to discontinuation were similar across populations (Table). ORR was 25% in cohort A1 (patients with ECOG PS 2, 20%; AOSP, 37%) and 35% in cohort A. PFS was numerically shorter in cohort A1 than cohort A; high TMB (≥10 mut/Mb) and higher PD-L1 expression (≥1% or ≥50%) were associated with numerically longer PFS in both cohorts (Table).

      table_v3.jpg

      Conclusion

      First-line flat-dose nivolumab plus weight-based ipilimumab showed a consistent safety profile in special populations with advanced NSCLC, including those with ECOG PS 2. Patients with either high TMB or higher tumor PD-L1 expression appeared to exhibit improved efficacy.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Platinum-based chemotherapy remains 1st line therapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without oncogenic drivers in China. Camrelizumab (SHR-1210, a potent anti‒PD-1 monoclonal antibody) has shown promising activity in multiple malignancies. Here, we report interim analysis results on efficacy and safety of camrelizumab plus carboplatin/pemetrexed as 1st line treatment in Chinese advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC patients with negative oncogenic drivers.

      Method

      In this open-label, randomized, multicenter phase 3 study (SHR-1210-303), patients with advanced/metastatic, non-squamous NSCLC with negative EGFR or ALK were stratified by sex and smoking history (≥ 400/year versus ˂ 400/year) and were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive 4 to 6 cycles of carboplatin (AUC=5) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) with or without camrelizumab (200 mg), followed by pemetrexed with or without camrelizumab as maintenance therapy up to disease progression or intolerable toxicity. Treatment was given every 3 weeks. Crossover to camrelizumab monotherapy was permitted for patients in the chemotherapy arm who had confirmed disease progression. The primary endpoint was PFS per blinded independent central review according to RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included ORR, DCR, DoR and OS. Data of subgroup analysis will be reported. Clinical Trials.gov number: NCT03134872.

      Result

      Between May 12, 2017 and Jun 6, 2018, 419 patients were randomized, among whom 205 received camrelizumab plus chemotherapy and 207 received chemotherapy treatment. After a median follow-up of 11.9 months, median PFS was 11.3 months (95% CI 9.5‒not reached) in camrelizumab plus chemotherapy arm and 8.3 months (95% CI 6.0‒9.7) in chemotherapy arm (HR 0.61 [95% CI 0.46‒0.80], p=0.0002). ORR, DCR, DoR and OS with camrelizumab plus chemotherapy were superior to chemotherapy (Table 1). Grade 3/4 adverse events occurred in 66.8% of patients in camrelizumab plus chemotherapy arm and 51.2% of patients in chemotherapy arm. There were 5 treatment-related deaths in camrelizumab plus chemotherapy arm and 4 in chemotherapy arm.

      Table 1. Responses per blinded independent central review and overall survival in the total study population

      Camrelizumab plus chemotherapy

      (n=205)

      Chemotherapy alone

      (n=207)
      p-value
      Objective response rate 60.0% (53.0‒66.8) 39.1% (32.4‒46.1) p<0.0001
      Disease control rate 87.3% (82.0‒91.6) 74.4% (67.9‒80.2) p=0.0009
      Duration of response (months) 17.6 (11.6‒NR) 9.9 (8.5‒13.8) p=0.0356
      Overall survival (months) NR (17.1‒NR) 20.9 (14.2‒NR) p=0.0272
      Data are shown in % (95% CI) or median (95% CI). NR: not reached.

      Conclusion

      First-line camrelizumab plus chemotherapy shows substantial clinical benefit in patients with advanced/metastatic non-squamous NSCLC with negative EGFR or ALK in terms of PFS, ORR, and OS and acceptable safety profiles. The combination should become novel standard 1st line therapy for this population.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      OA04.04 - Discussant - OA04.01, OA04.02, OA4.03 (Now Available) (ID 3742)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Presenting Author(s): Martin Sebastian

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      OA04.05 - KEYNOTE-021: TMB and Outcomes for Carboplatin and Pemetrexed With or Without Pembrolizumab for Nonsquamous NSCLC (Now Available) (ID 2630)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Presenting Author(s): Corey Jay Langer  |  Author(s): Shirish Gadgeel, Hossein Borghaei, Amita Patnaik, Steven F. Powell, Ryan D Gentzler, James Chih-Hsin Yang, Matthew A. Gubens, Lecia Sequist, Mark Awad, Razvan Cristescu, Deepti Aurora-Garg, Andrew Albright, Andrey Loboda, Julie Kobie, Jared K. Lunceford, Mark Ayers, Gregory M Lubiniecki, Bilal Piperdi, M. Catherine Pietanza, Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      KEYNOTE-021 cohort C was the first study to show antitumor activity for pembrolizumab plus platinum-based chemotherapy in previously untreated advanced nonsquamous NSCLC; the combination significantly improved efficacy vs platinum-based chemotherapy alone in cohort G. We explored the relationship between TMB and outcomes in KEYNOTE-021 cohorts C and G.

      Method

      All patients in cohort C received pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed. Patients in cohort G were randomized 1:1 to pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed or carboplatin and pemetrexed alone. TMB was determined by whole-exome sequencing of tumor and matched normal DNA. Association of TMB (continuous, log10 transformed) with outcomes for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone were assessed using logistic regression for ORR and Cox proportional hazards models for PFS and OS adjusted for ECOG PS; statistical significance was determined at the 0.05 level without multiplicity adjustment. The correlation of TMB (continuous, log10­ transformed) with PD-L1 TPS (square root scale) was assessed in the combined population. The clinical utility of TMB for ORR using a prespecified TMB cutpoint of 175 Mut/exome (~13 Mut/Mb by FoundationOne CDx) was assessed for pembrolizumab + chemotherapy.

      Result

      TMB data were evaluable for 70 patients: 12/24 (50.0%) in cohort C, 32/60 (53.3%) in the cohort G pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy arm, and 26/63 (41.3%) in the cohort G chemotherapy only arm; median age was 65 years (IQR, 57-70) and 61% were female. Baseline characteristics were generally similar in the TMB-evaluable and total populations. TMB as a continuous variable was not significantly associated with ORR, PFS, or OS for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (one-sided P = 0.180, 0.187 and 0.081, respectively) or chemotherapy alone (one-sided P = 0.861, 0.795 and 0.763, respectively). There was no significant correlation between TMB and TPS (r=0.12, P=0.34). ORR (95% CI) in patients treated with pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy was 60.8% (38.5-80.3) in the 23 patients with TMB <175 and 71.4% (47.8-88.7) in the 21 patients with TMB ≥175.

      Conclusion

      In this exploratory analysis, TMB was not significantly associated with efficacy of pembrolizumab plus carboplatin and pemetrexed or carboplatin and pemetrexed alone as first-line therapy for metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. TMB was not significantly correlated with PD-L1 expression. Among pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy-treated patients, ORR was high in both the TMB low and high subgroups. Sample size is a limitation of this study; exploration in larger datasets is required to understand any differential efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy vs chemotherapy alone based on TMB status.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      OA04.06 - Evaluation of TMB in KEYNOTE-189: Pembrolizumab Plus Chemotherapy vs Placebo Plus Chemotherapy for Nonsquamous NSCLC (Now Available) (ID 1936)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Presenting Author(s): Marina Chiara Garassino  |  Author(s): Delvys Rodriguez-Abreu, Shirish Gadgeel, Emilio Esteban, Enriqueta Felip, Giovanna Speranza, Martin Reck, Rina Hui, Michael Boyer, Razvan Cristescu, Deepti Aurora-Garg, Andrew Albright, Andrey Loboda, Julie Kobie, Jared K. Lunceford, Mark Ayers, Gregory M Lubiniecki, Bilal Piperdi, M. Catherine Pietanza, Edward Garon

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      First-line pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy with pemetrexed and platinum significantly improved OS (HR 0.49, P < .001), PFS (HR 0.52, P < .001) and ORR (47.6% vs 18.9%, P < .001) vs placebo plus chemotherapy with pemetrexed and platinum for metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC in the double-blind phase 3 KEYNOTE-189 study (NCT02578680); benefit was observed in all analyzed subgroups, including PD-L1 TPS <1%, 1-49%, and ≥50%. We explored the association of TMB with efficacy in KEYNOTE-189.

      Method

      616 patients were randomized 2:1 to pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy. TMB was determined by whole-exome sequencing of tumor and matched normal DNA. Association of TMB (continuous log10 transformed) with outcomes in each arm was assessed using Cox proportional hazards models (OS, PFS) and logistic regression (ORR); statistical significance was determined at the 0.05 level without multiplicity adjustment. The clinical utility of TMB on outcomes was assessed using prespecified TMB cutpoints of 175 and 150 Mut/exome (~13 and ~10 Mut/Mb by FoundationOne CDx). Data cutoff was 21 Sep 2018.

      Result

      293 (48.3%) treated patients had evaluable TMB data: 207 for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy, 86 for placebo plus chemotherapy. Baseline characteristics and outcomes were generally similar in the TMB-evaluable and total populations. TMB as a continuous variable was not significantly associated with OS, PFS, or ORR for pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy (one-sided P = .174, .075 and .072, respectively) or placebo plus chemotherapy (two-sided P = .856, .055 and .434, respectively). Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy improved OS, PFS, and ORR for TMB ≥175 and <175 (Table). Results were similar for TMB ≥150 and <150.

      Conclusion

      TMB was not significantly associated with efficacy of pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy or placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy for metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC. Pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy had a similar OS benefit in the TMB-high and low subgroups.

      TMB ≥175 TMB <175

      Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy

      n = 100

      Placebo plus Chemotherapy

      n = 34

      Pembrolizumab plus Chemotherapy

      n = 107

      Placebo plus Chemotherapy

      n = 52
      Median OS (95% CI), mo 23.5
      (20.2-NE)
      13.5
      (7.0-NE)
      20.2
      (15.8-NE)
      9.9
      (7.4-19.1)
      HR (95% CI) 0.64 (0.38-1.07) 0.64 (0.42-0.97)
      Median PFS (95% CI), mo 9.2
      (7.6-14.0)
      4.7
      (4.0-5.5)
      9.0
      (6.7-11.1)
      4.8
      (4.5-6.6)
      HR (95% CI) 0.32 (0.21-0.51) 0.51 (0.35-0.74)
      ORR, % (95% CI) 50.0
      (39.8-60.2)
      11.8
      (3.3-27.5)
      40.2
      (30.8-50.1)
      19.2
      (9.6-32.5)

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      OA04.07 - Mutations Associated with Sensitivity or Resistance to Immunotherapy in mNSCLC: Analysis from the MYSTIC Trial (Now Available) (ID 901)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Presenting Author(s): Naiyer A Rizvi  |  Author(s): Byoung Chul Cho, Niels Reinmuth, Ki Hyeong Lee, Alexander Luft, Myung-Ju Ahn, Vassiliki A Papadimitrakopoulou, John Victor Heymach, Urban Scheuring, Brandon Higgs, Jiabu Ye, Michael Kuziora, Song Wu, Feng Liu, Han Si, Solange Peters

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      In the Phase 3 MYSTIC study (NCT02453282), blood tumour mutational burden, at various thresholds from ≥12 to ≥20 mut/Mb (bTMB≥20), has been associated with improved OS and PFS with first-line durvalumab (D; anti-PD-L1) +/- tremelimumab (T; anti-CTLA-4) versus platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). Specific gene mutations have been associated with resistance (STK11 and KEAP1) or sensitisation (ARID1A) to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. However, the relationship between gene alterations and response to anti-PD-(L)1 ± anti-CTLA-4 are not well characterised. Here we explore associations between mutations and survival outcomes in the MYSTIC patient population.

      Method

      Circulating tumour DNA from baseline blood specimens was profiled using the GuardantOMNI platform. Samples were available from 1003 patients (89.7% of ITT; 943 mutation-evaluable). Survival outcomes were analysed in patients with (m) or without (wt) non-synonymous somatic mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or ARID1A.

      Result

      In the mutation-evaluable population, STK11m, KEAP1m, and ARID1Am frequencies were 16%, 18% and 12%, respectively (19%, 20%, and 11% [nonsquamous]; 7%, 13%, and 15% [squamous]). Across treatment arms, patients with STK11m or KEAP1m had a shorter median OS (mOS) than patients with STK11wt (D, 10.3 vs 13.3 mo; D+T, 4.4 vs 11.3 mo; CT, 6.7 vs 13.1 mo) or KEAP1wt (D, 7.6 vs 14.6 mo; D+T, 9.2 vs 11.3 mo; CT, 6.3 vs 13.3 mo) mNSCLC. In the D+T arm, patients with ARID1Am had a longer mOS than patients with ARID1Awt mNSCLC (D, 8.6 vs 13.7 mo; D+T, 23.2 vs 9.8 mo; CT, 10.6 vs 12.4 mo). Additional mutational analyses will be presented.

      Conclusion

      In these analyses from the MYSTIC study, poorer outcomes were observed across treatment arms in patients with mNSCLC and mutations in STK11 or KEAP1 compared with those without the corresponding mutations. In patients receiving D+T, ARID1Am was associated with survival benefits compared with ARID1wt. These data are exploratory and require further validation.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      OA04.08 - Discussant - OA04.05, OA04.06, OA4.07 (Now Available) (ID 3743)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Presenting Author(s): Melissa Johnson

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract not provided

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.



Author of

  • +

    ES22 - Immunotherapy - Discovering New Areas (ID 25)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Educational Session
    • Track: Immuno-oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • +

      ES22.02 - A Milestone in Locally Advanced NSCLC (Now Available) (ID 3276)

      15:45 - 17:15  |  Presenting Author(s): Solange Peters

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract

      Stage III NSCLC encompasses locally advanced tumours with infiltration of locoregional nodes and central thoracic structures and accounts for about a third of newly diagnosed NSCLC[1]. It represents the most advanced stage of NSCLC in which treatment is delivered with curative intent, but eventually more than 60% of patients die from their disease.

      Stage III NSCLC patients must strictly be discussed in a multidisciplinary tumor board, whereat the definition of resectability suffers from a certain heterogeneity across centers. Resectability is usually defined by the degree of invasion of lymph nodes, most often excluding multilevel or bulky N2 and N3 disease as well as invasion of the oesophagus, aorta and myocardium. Controversy exists on the role of surgery in stage III NSCLC since two large randomized trials investigated either induction chemoradiation therapy followed by resection versus radiotherapy[2], or induction chemotherapy followed by resection versus radiotherapy[3]. Both studies failed to demonstrate a difference in survival[2-5], however these treatment strategies are evidence-based and can be pursued in restectable NSCLC[6].

      In the surgical scenario, randomised trials and meta-analyses have consistently shown that either adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy added to surgery results, with a better survival than surgery alone[7,8]. Adding preoperative radiotherapy to chemotherapy in patients with stage IIIA/N2 NSCLC did not improve the clinical outcome in a phase 3 randomised trial[9]. The role of adjuvant radiotherapy in stage IIIA/N2 after neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery has been evaluated in a unique randomized trial with awaited results (Lung ART, NCT00410683).

      Early NSCLC stages offer a theoretical unique curative scenario for the development of immunotherapy startegies, with limited disease volumes, a relative immune system preservation as well as unique oportunities for the investigation and assessment of new biomarkers.

      Perspectives, rational, hopes and ongoing attempts to combine immunotherapy in the surgical setting or alterenatively complementary to chemoradiation will be discussed, with a focus on locally advanced disease.

      References

      1. Detterbeck FC. The eighth edition TNM stage classification for lung cancer: What does it mean on main street? J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2018;155:356-9.

      2. Albain KS, Swann RS, Rusch VW, et al. Radiotherapy plus chemotherapy with or without surgical resection for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase III randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2009;374:379-86.

      3. van Meerbeeck JP, Kramer GW, Van Schil PE, et al. Randomized controlled trial of resection versus radiotherapy after induction chemotherapy in stage IIIA-N2 non-small-cell lung cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst 2007;99:442-50.

      4. O'Rourke N, Roque IFM, Farre Bernado N, Macbeth F. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010:CD002140.

      5. Auperin A, Le Pechoux C, Rolland E, et al. Meta-analysis of concomitant versus sequential radiochemotherapy in locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 2010;28:2181-90.

      6. Postmus PE, Kerr KM, Oudkerk M, et al. Early and locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC): ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 2017;28:iv1-iv21.

      7. Group NM-aC. Preoperative chemotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual participant data. Lancet 2014;383:1561-71.

      8. Group NM-aC, Arriagada R, Auperin A, et al. Adjuvant chemotherapy, with or without postoperative radiotherapy, in operable non-small-cell lung cancer: two meta-analyses of individual patient data. Lancet 2010;375:1267-77.

      9. Pless M, Stupp R, Ris HB, et al. Induction chemoradiation in stage IIIA/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer: a phase 3 randomised trial. Lancet 2015;386:1049-56.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    OA04 - Immuno Combinations and the Role of TMB (ID 126)

    • Event: WCLC 2019
    • Type: Oral Session
    • Track: Immuno-oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • Now Available
    • +

      OA04.07 - Mutations Associated with Sensitivity or Resistance to Immunotherapy in mNSCLC: Analysis from the MYSTIC Trial (Now Available) (ID 901)

      15:15 - 16:45  |  Author(s): Solange Peters

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      In the Phase 3 MYSTIC study (NCT02453282), blood tumour mutational burden, at various thresholds from ≥12 to ≥20 mut/Mb (bTMB≥20), has been associated with improved OS and PFS with first-line durvalumab (D; anti-PD-L1) +/- tremelimumab (T; anti-CTLA-4) versus platinum-based chemotherapy (CT). Specific gene mutations have been associated with resistance (STK11 and KEAP1) or sensitisation (ARID1A) to anti-PD-(L)1 monotherapy. However, the relationship between gene alterations and response to anti-PD-(L)1 ± anti-CTLA-4 are not well characterised. Here we explore associations between mutations and survival outcomes in the MYSTIC patient population.

      Method

      Circulating tumour DNA from baseline blood specimens was profiled using the GuardantOMNI platform. Samples were available from 1003 patients (89.7% of ITT; 943 mutation-evaluable). Survival outcomes were analysed in patients with (m) or without (wt) non-synonymous somatic mutations in STK11, KEAP1, or ARID1A.

      Result

      In the mutation-evaluable population, STK11m, KEAP1m, and ARID1Am frequencies were 16%, 18% and 12%, respectively (19%, 20%, and 11% [nonsquamous]; 7%, 13%, and 15% [squamous]). Across treatment arms, patients with STK11m or KEAP1m had a shorter median OS (mOS) than patients with STK11wt (D, 10.3 vs 13.3 mo; D+T, 4.4 vs 11.3 mo; CT, 6.7 vs 13.1 mo) or KEAP1wt (D, 7.6 vs 14.6 mo; D+T, 9.2 vs 11.3 mo; CT, 6.3 vs 13.3 mo) mNSCLC. In the D+T arm, patients with ARID1Am had a longer mOS than patients with ARID1Awt mNSCLC (D, 8.6 vs 13.7 mo; D+T, 23.2 vs 9.8 mo; CT, 10.6 vs 12.4 mo). Additional mutational analyses will be presented.

      Conclusion

      In these analyses from the MYSTIC study, poorer outcomes were observed across treatment arms in patients with mNSCLC and mutations in STK11 or KEAP1 compared with those without the corresponding mutations. In patients receiving D+T, ARID1Am was associated with survival benefits compared with ARID1wt. These data are exploratory and require further validation.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.