Virtual Library

Start Your Search

David Petrov



Author of

  • +

    P2.16 - Treatment of Early Stage/Localized Disease (Not CME Accredited Session) (ID 965)

    • Event: WCLC 2018
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track:
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/25/2018, 16:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P2.16-20 - Prognostic Utility of PET in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer After Empiric Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) (ID 11292)

      16:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): David Petrov

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Positron emission tomography (PET-CT) is valuable for diagnosing early stage non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the absence of biopsy. Here we investigate the diagnostic, prognostic, and treatment response of PET-CT in NSCLC treated with empiric stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT).

      a9ded1e5ce5d75814730bb4caaf49419 Method

      We retrospectively reviewed 78 empiric lung SBRT cases with pre-treatment PET scans treated to biologic equivalent dose>100 Gy10. We correlated pre and post-treatment standard uptake values (SUV) with local, regional, and distant control. Statistical analysis was conducted via SPSS v20.

      4c3880bb027f159e801041b1021e88e8 Result

      A total of 44 males and 34 females median age 77 were treated to 48 Gy in 4 fractions (n=47) or 50 Gy in 5 fractions (n=31). Lung nodules were 1.6 cm (0.6–4.5 cm) with a median planning target volume of 19.1 cc (3.7-97.4 cc). Median pre-treatment SUV=4.1 (0-20). Of the 43 patients with post-treatment PETs, median SUV = 2.7(0-7.2) or 53%(0-302%) of the pretreatment SUV.

      The median follow-up was 18 months with a 3-year survival of 50% for all patients. Local, regional, and distant control rates at 3 years were 91%, 81%, and 78%, respectively. Relative sisease control for pre-treatment SUV <4.0 compared to >4.0 is shown in Table 1:

      Pre-treatment

      SUV >4 vs < 4

      Hazard Ratio (Confidence Interval)

      P Value

      Local Failure

      5.92 (0.74 – 47.15)

      0.08

      Regional Failure

      6.67 (1.86 – 23.98)

      <0.01

      Distant Failure

      3.28 (1.02 – 10.55)

      0.04

      Overall Progression

      3.62 (1.43 – 9.12)

      <0.01

      There was no difference in tumor size, location, nodule morphology, or prior cancer/smoking history between patients with pre-treatment SUV < 4 (n=40) and > 4 (n=38). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified optimal SUV cutoff values of 6.0, 3.5, and 4.0 to predict local, regional, and distant failure, respectively. Post-SBRT PET scans with SUV reduction >50% demonstrated a 2-year freedom from progression of 89% compared to 57% with SUV reduction <50% (P=0.08).

      8eea62084ca7e541d918e823422bd82e Conclusion

      Our study demonstrates a strong correlation between initial PET avidity and regional/distant recurrence, and a trend with local recurrence. Perhaps patients with pretreatment SUV>4 warrant a mediastinal evaluation or closer vigilance in follow-up, though this warrants prospective investigation.

      6f8b794f3246b0c1e1780bb4d4d5dc53

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.