Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Xuewei Chen



Author of

  • +

    P1.16 - Treatment of Early Stage/Localized Disease (Not CME Accredited Session) (ID 948)

    • Event: WCLC 2018
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track:
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/24/2018, 16:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P1.16-35 - Sleeve Lobectomy Versus Pneumonectomy for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer, a Cumulative Updated Meta-Analysis (ID 13668)

      16:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Xuewei Chen

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Sleeve lobectomy (SL) is an appealing alternative to pneumonectomy (PN) for central or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The purpose of this study was to investigate the benefits of SL versus PN for NSCLC through cumulative meta-analysis.

      a9ded1e5ce5d75814730bb4caaf49419 Method

      A systematic review and cumulative analysis of comparative studies reporting both postoperative and survival outcomes of SL and PN was performed through a comprehensive search of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane library electronic databases from inception to April 2018

      4c3880bb027f159e801041b1021e88e8 Result

      A total of 9153 patients (SL: 3658, PN: 5495) from thirty-two studies were included. Meta-analysis was conducted for hazard ratio (HR), postoperative mortality, postoperative morbidity, local recurrence, and overall survival. PN was inferior to SL in terms of hazard ratio (HR=0.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.59 to 0.75, I2=56%). Lower postoperative mortality was found in SL group (OR=0.45, 95% CI=0.36 to 0.56, I2=0.0%). While SL and PN showed no significant difference in local recurrence (OR=0.86, 95% [CI]=0.69 to 1.07, I2=45.0%) or postoperative morbidity (OR=0.92, 95% [CI]=0.78 to 1.09, I2=29.0%). Moreover, the 1-, and 5-years survival rates (1-yr: OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.93 to 2.5, I2=14.0%) (5-yrs: OR=1.94, 95% CI=1.61 to 2.35, I2=52.0%) and survival in patients with pN0 or pN1 at 5-years (OR=1.79, 95% CI=1.19 to 2.67, I2=3.0%) in the SL group were significantly higher than that in the PN group. As demonstrated in our cumulative meta-analysis, these effects were consistent over the years.

      8eea62084ca7e541d918e823422bd82e Conclusion

      SL could be considered an acceptable alternative to PN for the treatment of NSCLC.

      6f8b794f3246b0c1e1780bb4d4d5dc53

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.