Author of

• 25936

  +

  P1.16 - Treatment of Early Stage/Localized Disease (Not CME Accredited Session) (ID 948)

  • Event: WCLC 2018
  • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
  • Track:
  • Presentations: 1
  • Moderators:
  • Coordinates: 9/24/2018, 16:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall

  • 26735

    +

    P1.16-25 - A Propensity Score Model for Appropriate Treatment Selection (Sublobar Resection vs. SBRT) In Patients With cStage I NSCLC (ID 11246)

    16:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Yusuke Iizuka
    • Abstract
    • Slides

    Background
    

    Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and sublobar resection (SLR) are current treatment options for patients with cStage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are operable, but at high risk for lobectomy. However, optimal selection of the two treatments remains controversial. Purposes of this study are to identify pre-treatment factors affecting treatment decision and to evaluate their impact on outcomes.

    a9ded1e5ce5d75814730bb4caaf49419 Method
    

    We retrospectively reviewed patients who underwent SBRT or SLR for cStage I NSCLC because of medical comorbidity between 2003 and 2009. Patients who were with performance status of 2 or worse, those who had no data on pre-treatment pulmonary function test, or those who had no histological confirmation of NSCLC were excluded. A propensity score (PS) model of treatment decision (0 toward SBRT, and 1 toward SLR) was generated using stepwise logistic regression incorporating pre-treatment factors.

    4c3880bb027f159e801041b1021e88e8 Result
    

    Ninety-two and 65 patients who underwent SBRT and SLR, respectively, were enrolled into this analysis. Median potential follow-up period was 8.6 years. The following factors remained in the PS model after stepwise selection: age, sex, Charlson comorbidity index (CCI), body mass index (BMI), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) and tumor diameter. Old age, male, CCI of 1 or more, underweight BMI and large tumor had coefficients toward SBRT (Table).

    In a cohort with PS of 0.5 or more, overall survival was significantly better in SLR patients than in SBRT patients (79.5% and 47.5% at 5 years, respectively; P = 0.004). In a cohort with PS<0.5, whereas, overall survival was similar between SLR and SBRT (43.3% and 39.7% at 5 years, respectively; P = 0.805).

    Coefficients for propensity score

    Factors		Coefficients
    (Intercept)		(3.95)
    Age	per 10y	-0.53
    Sex	female	0 (ref)
    	male	-0.62
    CCI	0	0 (ref)
    	1	-0.41
    	>=2	-0.97
    BMI	underweight	-0.98
    	normal	0 (ref)
    	overweight	0.44
    FEV1	per 1L	0.84
    Tumor diameter	per 1cm	-0.34

    8eea62084ca7e541d918e823422bd82e Conclusion
    

    The PS model would help appropriate treatment selection for high-risk operable patients. Although patients with PS of 0.5 or more benefit from SLR, SBRT provides comparable outcomes for patients with PS<0.5.

    6f8b794f3246b0c1e1780bb4d4d5dc53

    Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.