Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Michael Kosty



Author of

  • +

    P1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (Not CME Accredited Session) (ID 933)

    • Event: WCLC 2018
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track:
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/24/2018, 16:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P1.01-83 - IMpower150: Impact of Chemotherapy Cycles in 1L Metastatic NSCLC in Patients Treated With Atezolizumab + Bevacizumab (ID 12180)

      16:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Michael Kosty

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      In the randomized Phase III IMpower150 study, atezolizumab (anti–programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1]) + bevacizumab + chemotherapy (Arm B) showed statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvement in both progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) over bevacizumab + chemotherapy (Arm C) in patients with first-line (1L) nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The study protocol allowed investigator choice of 4 or 6 chemotherapy cycles. The objective of this exploratory analysis was to assess the impact of chemotherapy cycles on safety and efficacy outcomes.

      a9ded1e5ce5d75814730bb4caaf49419 Method

      Patients were categorized based on actual chemotherapy cycles received in Arm B. Landmark analysis of PFS was performed to assess the benefit of 4 vs 6 chemotherapy cycles. Sensitivity analyses were performed to adjust the numerically imbalanced baseline factors.

      4c3880bb027f159e801041b1021e88e8 Result

      A total of 356 patients were randomized in Arm B; 188 patients (53%) were planned to receive 4 cycles, and 168 patients (47%) were planned to receive 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Within these 2 groups, 143 (76%) and 98 patients (58%) completed 4 and 6 chemotherapy cycles, respectively. The demographic and baseline disease characteristics were balanced, except for race (Asian vs other), smoking status, and PD-L1 status (TC3 or IC3 vs other). The landmark PFS analysis showed no difference between patients who completed 4 vs 6 cycles (HR 0.83 [95% CI: 0.59, 1.17). The sensitivity analyses, which adjusted for race, smoking status, or PD-L1, showed comparable results (adjusted HRs of 0.80, 0.85, or 0.91, respectively).

      8eea62084ca7e541d918e823422bd82e Conclusion

      In the atezolizumab + bevacizumab + chemotherapy arm, patients who received 4 cycles of chemotherapy appeared to have similar PFS benefit as those who received 6 cycles of chemotherapy. Detailed analyses of varying chemotherapy cycles, safety analyses, and impact on OS will be presented.

      6f8b794f3246b0c1e1780bb4d4d5dc53

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.