Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Vieri Scotti



Author of

  • +

    MA26 - New Therapies and Emerging Data in ALK, EGFR and ROS1 (ID 930)

    • Event: WCLC 2018
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Targeted Therapy
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/26/2018, 13:30 - 15:00, Room 201 BD
    • +

      MA26.02 - Upfront or Sequential Strategy for New Generation Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) Inhibitors: An Italian Retrospective Study.  (ID 12790)

      13:35 - 13:40  |  Author(s): Vieri Scotti

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background

      Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangement confers sensitivity to ALK inhibitors (ALKis) in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Although several drugs provided an impressive outcome benefit, the most effective sequential strategy is still unknown.

      a9ded1e5ce5d75814730bb4caaf49419 Method

      We retrospectively collected 242 ALK-positive advanced NSCLC diagnosed between 2010 and 2018 in 23 Italian institutions (expanded data collection from Gobbini et al. Lung Cancer 2017). 138 patients received exclusively crizotinib as ALKi (not considered for this analysis). 78 patients received crizotinib and a new (second or third) generation ALKis as further treatments (group A). 26 patients performed a new generation ALKi as upfront agent (group B). These groups are larger than those considered in a previous analysis (15 and 8 patients, respectively).

      4c3880bb027f159e801041b1021e88e8 Result

      Study population clinical features and treatments received are summarized in Table 1.

      Group A

      Crizotinib followed by new generation ALKis

      N= 78

      Group B

      Upfront new generation ALKis

      N=26

      Treatments per line n(%)

      Crizotinib

      28(36)

      50(64)

      -

      -

      -

      -

      2(8)

      -

      Alectinib

      -

      11(14)

      18(23)

      5(17)

      7(27)

      -

      -

      -

      Ceritinib

      -

      9(12)

      23(30)

      3(4)

      8(31)

      8(31)

      1(4)

      -

      Brigatinib

      -

      6(8)

      6(8)

      2(3)

      -

      2(8)

      -

      2(8)

      Lorlatinib

      -

      -

      4(5)

      5(6)

      -

      -

      1(4)

      -

      Chemotherapy

      50(64)

      2(3)

      10(13)

      na

      11(42)

      6(23)

      1(4)

      Na

      Clinical features n(%)

      Age (range)

      58 (27-83)

      55 (24-82)

      Male

      37(47)

      10(38)

      p= 0.42

      Female

      41(53)

      16(62)

      Current smoker

      8(10)

      5(19)

      p= 0.23

      Never/former smoker

      70(90)

      21(81)

      ALKi beyond PD

      27(34)

      4(15)

      p= 0.06

      With a median follow-up of 22.6 months (CI 95% 20.09-25.10), 33 patients had died (32%). In group B, the median progression free survival (PFS) for new generation ALKis administered as first (14.0 months, CI 95% 9.52-18.471), second (12.7 months, CI95% 7.22-18.17) or third-line (12.8 months, CI95% 6.24-19.35) was not statistically different (p= 0.522). The median time from the start of crizotinib to the disease progression after the new generation ALKi sequentially performed (group A) was longer than that one detected in group B for the upfront new generation ALKis (29 vs 14 months, HR 2.47 [CI95% 1.35-4.50], p=0.003). This result was confirmed even considering the time lost between the two treatments in group A. The median overall survival (OS) was not reached. The 12-months OS rate was 97% in group A and 84% in group B.

      8eea62084ca7e541d918e823422bd82e Conclusion

      New generation ALKis maintain their efficacy regardless of the treatment setting considered. The sequential strategy seems to provide a substantial benefit, but a longer follow-up and larger samples are needed to clarify the survival impact.

      6f8b794f3246b0c1e1780bb4d4d5dc53

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (Not CME Accredited Session) (ID 933)

    • Event: WCLC 2018
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track:
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/24/2018, 16:45 - 18:00, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P1.01-73 - Preliminary Results of the SENECA (SEcond Line NintEdanib in Non-Small Cell Lung CAncer) Trial: An Italian Experience. (ID 13281)

      16:45 - 18:00  |  Author(s): Vieri Scotti

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Nintedanib is a multi-target small-molecule with anti-angiogenetic activity which confers longer progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) as second-line combination treatment with docetaxel versus standard-of-care, in non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsNSCLC) patients, giving to rapidly progressing patients the greatest survival benefit. Considering the higher tolerability of weekly docetaxel than docetaxel q3wks in the real-life, the SENECA trial, a phase IIb, open label, Italian multicentre study, aims to evaluate whether treatment with nintedanib and docetaxel could be effective and safe as second-line option in nsNSCLC patients with the two different schedules.

      a9ded1e5ce5d75814730bb4caaf49419 Method

      Patients from eighteen Italian oncologic centres, with stage IIIB/IV non-oncogene addicted nsNSCLC patients, progressing after first-line chemotherapy, have been treated with docetaxel (T1: 33 mg/mq on days 1 and 8 in a 21-days cycle; T2: 75 mg/mq q3wks) plus continuous oral nintedanib, with the possibility of maintenance in case of stabilization or response. Primary endpoint was PFS (by investigator’s assessment), while secondary endpoints included OS, safety and quality-of-life. Study stratifies patients into two cohorts according to relapse-timing (within or over 3 months) from end of first-line chemotherapy.

      4c3880bb027f159e801041b1021e88e8 Result

      From January 2016 to data cut-off, on 30th March 2018, 197 patients have been evaluated: 30 were registered as screening failures, mainly for contraindications to nintedanib use. The 167 patients considered in this preliminary analysis had a median age of 63.4 years (range 35-86), were predominantly male (68.9%), smokers or former-smokers (84.4%) and with ECOG-performance status 0 (72.5%). According to investigator’s choice, 82 patients have been treated with T1 docetaxel (49.1%), 85 (50.9%) with T2 docetaxel (median docetaxel treatment 3.5 and 3.7 21-days cycles, respectively). No significant differences in median PFS have been observed between T1 and T2 (3.83 vs 4.32 months, respectively; HR 0.889 [95% IC 0.598-1.321], p-value=0.559). After a median follow-up of 7.28 months (standard deviation=5.55), a trend of similar OS has emerged in both T1 and T2 (6.63 vs 7.91 months, respectively; HR 0.770 [95% IC 0.484-1.225], p-value=0.270). Survival data of relapse-timing cohorts are not yet mature. Commonest toxicities in T1 and T2 were: fatigue (53.6% vs 65.9%, respectively), diarrhea (50.0% vs 47.0%), afebrile neutropenia (13.4% vs 52.9%) and ALT elevation (29.3% vs 20.0%).

      8eea62084ca7e541d918e823422bd82e Conclusion

      The SENECA trial is a real-life Italian experience, whose preliminary results confirm the efficacy and safety of second-line treatment with nintedanib and docetaxel for nsNSCLC patients, regardless from docetaxel schedule, suggesting higher toxicities for docetaxel q3wks.

      6f8b794f3246b0c1e1780bb4d4d5dc53

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P3.17 - Treatment of Locoregional Disease - NSCLC (Not CME Accredited Session) (ID 983)

    • Event: WCLC 2018
    • Type: Poster Viewing in the Exhibit Hall
    • Track:
    • Presentations: 1
    • Moderators:
    • Coordinates: 9/26/2018, 12:00 - 13:30, Exhibit Hall
    • +

      P3.17-09 - Retrospective Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Multimodal Treatment for Locally-Advanced NSCLC in Elderly Patients (ID 13153)

      12:00 - 13:30  |  Author(s): Vieri Scotti

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background

      Locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) is mainly diagnosed in elderly patients. Although multimodality treatments are effective and have demonstrated clinical benefits in terms of OS and DFS, these options are frequently denied to elderly patients.

      a9ded1e5ce5d75814730bb4caaf49419 Method

      This is a single institution retrospective study with an observation period from January 2015 to December 2017. The primary endpoint was to investigate mortality, morbidity and short-term outcomes of pulmonary resection, after induction therapy (IT), for NSCLC elderly patients. The secondary endpoint was to identify risk factors for post-operative complications. Inclusion criteria were as follows: patients who received pre-operative chemotherapy (+/- radiation therapy) and subsequent pulmonary resection. The multimodal treatment was established by a multidisciplinary team. Comparisons between two groups were made: patients <70 years (group A) and patients ³70 years (group B). Categorical variables were analyzed by means of chi-square tests and Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify pre-operative factors associated with overall morbidity. The variables included into the logistic regression model were chosen based on clinical relevance (age, sex, PS, ASA score, mCCI, clinical stage and pneumonectomy).

      4c3880bb027f159e801041b1021e88e8 Result

      In the study, 70 patients (male/female=42/28; adenocarcinoma 58.6% vs squamous-cell carcinoma 33%) underwent pulmonary resection after IT; among these, 26 were aged 70+ (median age 72.5 years [range: 70-80]). No significant differences in baseline characteristics as PFTs, PS, ASA score, number of comorbidities, clinical stages. 66 patients were treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. Chemoradiation therapy was used more frequently in group A (25% vs 3.8%; p=0.02). Surgical procedures were similar in both groups, the percentage of pneumonectomies was comparable (15.9% vs 19.2%), while chest wall resections were more frequent in group A (18.2% vs 3.8%). Pathological stages were comparable between the two groups. In-hospital mortality (2.3% vs 0%) and median hospitalization were not different. The percentage of patients who suffered from any complication (36.4% vs 42.3%, p=0.8) and the complication rate (43.1% vs 69.2%, p=0.06) were higher in group B. In group B there was a significantly higher incidence of atrial fibrillation (p=0.049). Despite these findings, the severity of complications was comparable between the two groups. The multivariable analysis demonstrates the absence of any significant factors associated with overall morbidity.

      8eea62084ca7e541d918e823422bd82e Conclusion

      Lung resection, for LA-NSCLC after IT, can be performed safely in appropriately selected elderly patients. There is a strong need to standardize the preoperative evaluation in order to reach an effective and tailored multimodal treatment for LA-NSCLC elderly patients.

      6f8b794f3246b0c1e1780bb4d4d5dc53

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.