Virtual Library
Start Your Search
S. Cho
Author of
-
+
MA 13 - New Insights of Diagnosis and Update of Treatment (ID 674)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Early Stage NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:S. Ishikura, H. Nakayama
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 15:45 - 17:30, Room 311 + 312
-
+
MA 13.12 - Wedge Resection and Segmentectomy Are Associated with Comparable Outcomes for Patients with Less Than 2cm Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 10162)
15:45 - 17:30 | Author(s): S. Cho
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Sublobar resection is widespread for selected patients with small sized non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Segmentectomy has been considered superior to wedge resection, however well-balanced comparative studies are lacking. We compared oncologic outcomes between wedge resection and segmentectomy for patients with less than 2cm of NSCLC according to parenchymal safety margin
Method:
A retrospective review of a prospective database was performed (2003-2015), excluding patients with poor lung function (FEV~1~ or DLCO <50%), neoadjuvant therapy, previous lobar resection for primary lung cancer, and multiple primary other cancer. Demographic, clinical, and pathological data were reviewed. Overall survival (OS), cancer-specific survival (CSS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and differences compared using log-rank test. Lymph nodes (LN) were evaluated preoperatively by PET/CT and EBUS-FNA if chest CT showed more than 1cm of LN short diameter
Result:
Two hundred nighty-six patients met our selection criteria, including wedge resection (W) in 188 and segmentectomy (S) in 108. There was no difference in smoking history, comorbidity, pulmonary reserve, cell type, and postoperative complication rate. All enrolled patients had clinically negative LN and 3 patients (1 in W, 2 in S) had pathologically node positive LN. The segmentectomy had more likely to have larger tumor (1.26 vs 1.36, p=0.045), more total nodes resected (1 vs 6, p<0.001), more distance of safety margin (median 0.5 vs 1.5, p<0.001). There was no statistical difference in OS (p=0.897), CSS (p=0.844), and RFS (p=0.763) between two groups. Patients were stratified by safety margin into ≤ 5mm in 118 (w101 vs s17), 5~10mm in 65 (w48 vs s17), 11~15mm in 45 (w23 vs s22), 16~20mm in 23 (w9 vs s14), and >20mm in 45 (w7 vs s38). Recurrence was developed in 8 (7%, w5 vs s3), 2 (3%, w2 vs s0), 1 (2%, s1), 0 (0%), 1 (2%, s1) of each safety margin. There was no significant difference of RFS between wedge resection and segmentectomy in each safety margin
Conclusion:
Wedge resection and segmentectomy showed comparable oncologic outcomes for carefully staged less than 2cm NSCLC patients. After thorough preoperative LN evaluation, wedge resection of sufficient safety margin is good surgical option
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.02 - Biology/Pathology (ID 616)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Biology/Pathology
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P2.02-056 - Regulatory Variants in Cancer-Related Pathway Genes Predict Survival of Patients with Surgically Resected Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (ID 8525)
09:30 - 16:00 | Author(s): S. Cho
- Abstract
Background:
We conducted this study to identify genetic variants in cancer-related pathway genes which can predict prognosis of NSCLC patients after surgery, using a comprehensive list of regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) prioritized by RegulomeDB.
Method:
A total of 509 potentially functional SNPs in cancer-related pathway genes selected from RegulomeDB were evaluated. These SNPs were analyzed in a discovery set (n=354), and a replication study was performed in an independent set (n=772). The association of the SNPs with overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were analyzed.
Result:
In the discovery set, 76 SNPs were significantly associated with OS or DFS. Among the 76 SNPs, the association was consistently observed for 5 SNPs (ERCC1 rs2298881C>A, BRCA2 rs3092989G>A, NELFE rs440454C>T, PPP2R4 rs2541164G>A, and LTBP4 rs3786527G>A) in the validation set. In combined analysis, ERCC1 rs2298881C>A, BRCA2 rs3092989, NELFE rs440454C>T, and PPP2R4 rs2541164G>A were significantly associated with OS and DFS (adjusted HR aHR for OS = 1.46, 0.62, 078, and 0.76, respectively; P = 0.003, 0.002, 0.007, and 0.003 respectively; and aHR for DFS = 1.27, 0.69, 0.86, and 0.82, respectively; P = 0.02, 0.002, 0.03, and 0.008, respectively). The LTBP4 rs3786527G>A was significantly associated with better OS (aHR = 0.75; P = 0.003).
Conclusion:
Our results suggest that five SNPs in the cancer-related pathway genes may be useful for the prediction of the prognosis in patients with surgically resected NSCLC.
