Virtual Library
Start Your Search
G.L. Ceresoli
Author of
-
+
MA 11 - Emerging Diagnostic/Biomarkers in NSCLC (ID 668)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:M.I. Abdul Wahid, Martin Reck
- Coordinates: 10/17/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, Room 313 + 314
-
+
MA 11.11 - Italian Nivolumab Expanded Access Program in Non-Squamous NSCLC Patients: Results in Never Smokers and EGFR Positive Patients (ID 8404)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): G.L. Ceresoli
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Nivolumab is the first checkpoint inhibitor approved for the treatment of non-Squamous non small cell lung cancer (non-Sq-NSCLC). Although smoking habits are considered a relevant risk factor related to the onset of lung cancer, previous studies showed that current and former smokers patients (pts) treated with nivolumab may have a greater advantage in terms of clinical benefit than never smokers and EGFR mutated. Nevertheless, to date, no definitive conclusion may be drawn and no data are available from a real world setting. Here we report the data from Italian expanded access program (EAP) in the never smoker pts and EGFR mutated pts.
Method:
Nivolumab was provided upon physicians’ request for pts aged ≥18 years who had relapsed after a minimum of one prior systemic treatment for stage IIIB/stage IV non-Sq-NSCLC. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 2 weeks for <24 months. Pts included in the analysis received ≥1 dose of nivolumab and were monitored for adverse events (AEs) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events.
Result:
Overall, of 1588 patients with non-Sq-NSCLC, smoking history was available for 1430 pts and 305 (21%) were never smokers and, among 1455 pts evaluable for EGFR mutation, 102 (7%) were positive. In the never smoker group, EGFR status was available for 287 pts, with 51 (18%) who harbored an activating EGFR mutation. Among never smokers, with a median follow-up (FU) of 7.0 months (0.1-20.3) and a median of 7 doses (1-38), the best objective response rate (BORR), the disease control rate (DCR) and the median overall survival (OS) were 9%, 42% and 10.0 months (8.1-11.9), respectively. Among all EGFR positive pts, with a median FU of 5.5 months (0.1-21.2) and a median of 6 doses (1-40), the BORR, DCR and median OS were 9%, 30% and 8.3 months (2.2-14.4), respectively. In the never smoker group, EGFR positive pts had 2% ORR, 26% DCR and 5.6 months (3.4-7.8) of median OS. However, it should be considered that these pts had poorer prognostic factors (ECOG performance status, brain metastasis) at baseline.
Conclusion:
These preliminary results represent the first real-life data regarding the efficacy of nivolumab in special subpopulations, including never smokers and EGFR positive pts. These results warrants further studies to evaluate the possible therapeutic options in these pts, also taking into account available alternatives and safety profile.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MA 19 - Mesothelioma: Bench to Bedside (ID 680)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Mesothelioma
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:Dean A Fennell, Hedy Lee Kindler
- Coordinates: 10/18/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, Room 315
-
+
MA 19.03 - Nintedanib + Pemetrexed/Cisplatin in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (MPM): Phase II Biomarker Data from the LUME‑Meso Study (ID 8111)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): G.L. Ceresoli
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Nintedanib is a triple angiokinase inhibitor. LUME-Meso (NCT01907100) is a randomised, Phase II/III study of ≤6 cycles of nintedanib+pemetrexed/cisplatin versus placebo+pemetrexed/cisplatin, followed by nintedanib or placebo maintenance, in chemo-naïve patients with MPM. In Phase II results, nintedanib+pemetrexed/cisplatin improved progression-free survival (PFS) versus control (hazard ratio [HR]=0.54; p=0.010), with a trend for prolonged overall survival (OS; HR=0.77; p=0.319). Benefit was most pronounced in patients with epithelioid tumours. Since no pharmacodynamic/predictive biomarkers are validated for anti-angiogenic therapies, exploratory analyses were conducted to investigate potential associations of plasma-derived angiogenic factors and genomic markers with treatment outcome in the LUME-Meso Phase II epithelioid population.
Method:
Blood samples were collected at baseline and, for patients receiving maintenance, at monotherapy Cycle 3 (C3mono) and end of monotherapy (EoTmono). Analyses focused on 58 angiogenic factors (Human AngiogenesisMAP[®] panel, Myriad RBM) and single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in genes implicated in mesothelioma and/or associated with response to anti-angiogenic therapies in other tumour types (VEGFR1, VEGFR3 and mesothelin). Associations of biomarkers with treatment effect were evaluated by Cox regression and tested for interaction with false discovery rate (FDR) adjustment. Adjusted mean changes in angiogenic factor levels were compared between arms by ANCOVA. Analyses were exploratory, limited by small sample size, and considered hypothesis generating.
Result:
Of 77 patients with epithelioid tumours, angiogenic factor and genomic data were available for 71 and 67 patients, respectively. PFS/OS benefit of nintedanib appeared potentially more pronounced in patients with baseline plasma endoglin level below the median. There were possible weak associations between major homozygous genotypes for two VEGFR3 SNPs (rs307821 G/G and rs307826 A/A), and OS benefit and between VEGFR1 SNP rs9582036 A/A genotype and PFS benefit. Biomarker treatment associations were limited by small subgroup size, especially for low-frequency SNPs, and interaction tests were not significant after FDR adjustment. Regarding pharmacodynamic effects, adjusted mean change in interleukin-8 levels with nintedanib was greater from baseline to C3mono and lower from C3mono until EoTmono, compared with placebo. Nintedanib showed lower adjusted mean changes versus placebo for VEGFR2 from baseline to C3mono, and for VEGFR2 and VEGFR3 from baseline to EoTmono.
Conclusion:
These analyses represent the first biomarker results for nintedanib-treated MPM. While there seemed to be signals for greater PFS and OS improvement in patients with low plasma endoglin and major homozygous VEGFR1/3 genotypes, no biomarkers showed clear significant association with treatment benefit. These findings warrant further evaluation in the Phase III study.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA 02 - Mesothelioma: Challenges For New Treatment (ID 653)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Oral
- Track: Mesothelioma
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:S. Hasegawa, Anna Nowak
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 11:00 - 12:30, F205 + F206 (Annex Hall)
-
+
OA 02.01 - Randomized Phase II Study of Anetumab Ravtansine or Vinorelbine in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 9377)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): G.L. Ceresoli
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Anetumab ravtansine (BAY 94-9343) is a novel fully human anti-mesothelin IgG1 antibody conjugated to the maytansinoid tubulin inhibitor DM4. We report the results of a randomized phase II trial of anetumab ravtansine compared to vinorelbine in patients with advanced malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) who have high mesothelin expression and have progressed on platinum/pemetrexed-based first-line chemotherapy (NCT02610140).
Method:
Patients (≥18 years) with locally advanced or metastatic MPM with progressive disease following first-line treatment with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy, with or without bevacizumab, were eligible. Patients were pre-screened based on obligatory tumor staining for mesothelin as determined by the Ventana MSLN (SP74) immunohistochemistry assay. The primary efficacy endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per central radiologic review using modified RECIST criteria for MPM. Secondary objectives included overall survival, tumor response, and safety. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio to anetumab ravtansine 6.5 mg/kg Q3W IV or vinorelbine 30 mg/m[2] QW IV.
Result:
A total of 166 patients were randomized to anetumab ravtansine and 82 to vinorelbine; 3 and 10 patients, respectively, not receiving treatment were included for efficacy but not safety assessments. The treatment arms were evenly balanced, with 73% male, 64% ECOG performance status 1, 96% epithelioid histology, and a mean 2.5 (±2.4) months since last progression. The median duration of treatment (anetumab vs vinorelbine) was 12.6 weeks (range 3-61) vs 13.0 weeks (range 1-43). Treatment-emergent grade (G) ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were seen in 85 (52.1%) and 53 (73.6%) of patients, respectively. G3/G4 neutropenia (22.2%/16.7%) occurred in the vinorelbine arm whereas corneal epitheliopathy (39.3% all grade, 1.8% G3) was distinct for the anetumab ravtansine arm. Serious AEs (any grade) were similar; 52 (31.9%) vs 25 (34.7%). Treatment-emergent AEs leading to dose modification were 42.9% in the anetumab ravtansine arm and 80.6% in the vinorelbine arm. There was one treatment-related G5 event in each arm. Median PFS was 4.3 months (95% CI:4.1, 5.2) for anetumab ravtansine vs 4.5 months (4.1, 5.8) for vinorelbine; hazard ratio 1.22 (0.85, 1.74), p=0.859. Fourteen (8.4%) patients in the anetumab ravtansine arm had an objective response vs 5 (6.1%) in the vinorelbine arm, with no complete responses. Interim median overall survival was 10.1 mo (7.6, -) vs 11.6 mo (7.7, 12.5), respectively, p-value 0.721.
Conclusion:
In relapsed MPM, anetumab ravtansine was not superior to vinorelbine with respect to PFS.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.01 - Advanced NSCLC (ID 757)
- Event: WCLC 2017
- Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
- Track: Advanced NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 10/16/2017, 09:30 - 16:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B + C)
-
+
P1.01-065 - Treatment Beyond Progression with Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Non-Squamous NSCLC: Results from the Italian Expanded Access Program (ID 9333)
09:30 - 16:00 | Author(s): G.L. Ceresoli
- Abstract
Background:
Because of the novel mechanism of action of immunotherapies like nivolumab, response patterns may differ from other therapies and may provide a rationale for considering treatment beyond progression. Immunotherapy protocols generally allow patients (pts) to continue treatment beyond investigator-assessed progressive disease (PD) as long as there is ongoing clinical benefit. Here we report the analysis of pts treated beyond PD in the Italian nivolumab EAP for pts with non-squamous non small cell lung cancer (Non-Sq-NSCLC).
Method:
Nivolumab was provided upon physicians’ request for pts aged ≥18 years who had relapsed after a minimum of one prior systemic treatment for stage IIIB/stage IV non-Sq-NSCLC. Nivolumab 3 mg/kg was administered intravenously every 2 weeks for <24 months. Pts included in the analysis received ≥1 dose of nivolumab and were monitored for adverse events (AEs) using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events. Patients were allowed to continue treatment beyond initial PD as long as they met the following criteria: investigator-assessed clinical benefit, absence of rapid PD, tolerance of program drug, stable performance status and no delay of an imminent intervention to prevent serious complications of PD.
Result:
In total, 1588 Italian pts with advanced Non-Sq-NSCLC received at least one dose of nivolumab in the EAP across 168 sites and 1056 (66%) had PD. Of those, 274 pts (26%) were treated beyond progression. Before being treated beyond PD, the disease control rates (DCR) was 28%, with 1 complete response (CR), 27 partial responses (PR) and 49 stable diseases (SD). Post PD, 58 of all pts treated beyond PD achieved a non-conventional benefit, meaning a subsequent tumor reduction or stabilization in tumor lesions. With a median follow-up of 10.3 months (0.1-21.9) and a median of 11 (4-44) doses, median overall survival for pts treated beyond PD was 15.5 months (range: 13.1-17.9). Overall, among pts treated beyond PD, 200 discontinued treatment for any reason, with only 11 (5.5%) pts who discontinued treatment due to adverse events, suggesting no increased safety signals.
Conclusion:
As already observed in clinical trials, these preliminary EAP data seem to confirm that a proportion of pts who continued treatment beyond PD demonstrated sustained reductions or stabilization of tumor burden, with an acceptable safety profile. Further investigations are warranted in order to better define and identify pts who can benefit from this treatment strategy.
