Virtual Library

Start Your Search

Valliappan Muthu



Author of

  • +

    P1.03 - Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy (ID 689)

    • Event: WCLC 2017
    • Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
    • Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.03-018 - Effectiveness of Supportive Care Drugs in Lung Cancer Patients Undergoing 1st Line Chemotherapy in a Resource Limited Setting (ID 7895)

      09:30 - 16:00  |  Author(s): Valliappan Muthu

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Lung cancer(LC) chemotherapy is associated with several adverse effects(AEs). Data regarding supportive care medications(SCMs) offered to prevent/treat chemotherapy-related AEs in resource-limited settings and compliance to these therapies is lacking. A prospective observational study was therefore carried out in an attempt to ascertain effectiveness of SCMs in real life setting.

      Method:
      Consecutive patients with newly-diagnosed LC initiated on first-line chemotherapy at a tertiary referral centre in North India (from July 2014-September 2015) were enrolled. Details of chemotherapy-related AEs including incidence, timing of onset, duration and grades were recorded. Compliance with use of mandatory SCMs prescribed after each chemotherapy cycle was assessed by a structured questionnaire. Patients were also instructed to maintain a symptom diary to record various symptoms, frequency of use of need-based SCMs, visits to local health-care providers and hospitalization(if any) during the inter-cycle period.

      Result:
      Of 112 patients enrolled, majority were males(83.9%,n=94), current/ex-smokers(82.1%,n=92), had advanced stage [IIIB=33.9%(n=38), IV=46.4%(n=52)] and of non-small-cell type (NSCLC; 72.3%,n=81). A total of 602 chemotherapy cycles were administered with AEs being reported in 580 cycles(96.3%). Diarrhea was the commonest AE(180 cycles,29.9%) developing after a mean (SD) duration of 3.6(2.5) days and lasting for 4(3.3) days. Vomiting(138 cycles,22.9%) beginning after a mean (SD) of 3.5(2.7) days, lasting for 3.8(3.1) days; and constipation(121 cycles,20.1% mean[SD] onset after 2.9[1.7]days, lasting for mean[SD] of 6.5[6 .1]) were the other common AEs. Grade3/4 AEs occurred in 6.7%(39/580) cycles. Compliance to dexamethasone and proton-pump inhibitors prescribed as part of mandatory SCMs was 98.2% and 98.3% respectively. Need based SCMs were required in 479 of the 580 cycles(82.6%) reporting AEs. Need-based SCMs were effective in relieving most symptoms (100% episodes of pain, cough and epigastric pain). Local physician consultation was sought in 18.1% and 15.8% episodes of vomiting and pain respectively. Proportion of patients with grade 3/4 AEs and requiring hospitalization was highest for mucositis(16.1% grade 3/4 and 9.7% hospitalized); followed by vomiting(10.1% grade3/4 and 8.7% hospitalized) and diarrhea(10.6% grade 3/4 and6.7% hospitalized). Hiccups, despite occurring in only 5 chemotherapy cycles(0.9%) did not improve with need based SCMs in 40%. Anemia was observed in 441(73.3% prevalence) chemotherapy cycles and was treated with blood transfusions, erythropoiesis-stimulating agents and intravenous iron supplementation in 47(10.7%), 30(6.8%) and four(0.9%) cycles respectively.

      Conclusion:
      This study highlights a high prevalence of AEs during LC chemotherapy. However, majority of episodes were grade 1-2 and were controlled with need-based SCMs, without requiring hospitalization or local physician consultation.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.03 - Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy (ID 704)

    • Event: WCLC 2017
    • Type: Poster Session with Presenters Present
    • Track: Chemotherapy/Targeted Therapy
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.03-053 - A Five-Year Audit of EGFR and ALK Testing at a Tertiary Care Centre in North India: More Sensitive Methods Do Make a Difference! (ID 10427)

      09:30 - 16:00  |  Presenting Author(s): Valliappan Muthu

      • Abstract

      Background:
      Detection of targetable driver mutations in NSCLC may depend on the method employed. We carried out an audit to determine whether the EGFR mutation (EGFR-M) and ALK rearrangement (ALK-R) detection rate is dependent upon on the testing method used. We also sought to assess if EGFR-M and ALK-R was associated with baseline demographic characteristics.

      Method:
      Retrospective analysis of NSCLC patients who underwent testing for EGFR-M and ALK-R from January 2012 till May 2017. Methods used for EGFR-M were Real time ARMS PCR and gene sequencing while Break Apart FISH and D5F3 immunohistochemistry(IHC) were used for ALK-R testing.

      Result:
      Of the 599 patients tested for EGFR-M, 541 (90.3%) had interpretable results with an overall prevalence of 21.4%(n=116). Real time ARMS-PCR and gene sequencing yielded 95.9% and 81.9% interpretable results respectively. ALK-R testing was done in 462 patients of whom 431 (93.3%) had interpretable results, of which 8.6%(n=37) were positive. D5F3 IHC and Break Apart FISH yielded 94.7% and 82% interpretable results respectively. Mean age was 59.2 and 54.0 years respectively for EGFR-M and ALK-R patients with 54.3% and 45.1% being females. Mutations in exon 19 were the most common (n=81, 69.8%) followed by exon 21 L858R (n=30, 25.9%). 87/116 (75%) and 19/37 (51.4%) of EGFR-M and ALK-R patients received EGFR-TKIs and crizotinib respectively. Table shows differences in prevalence of EGFR-M and ALK-R prevalence in relation to gender, smoking status, histology and testing method used.

      Table 1 Smoking, gender and histologic profile of the patients tested for EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements
      EGFR-M positive (n=116) ALK-R positive (=37)
      Overall 21.4% 8.6%
      Adenocarcinoma only 23.8% 9.5%
      Females vs. males 37.1% vs. 14.3% 12.5% vs. 6.8%
      Non-smokers vs. smokers 34.6% vs. 11.9% 11.6% vs. 6.5%
      Female non smokers 39.9% 12.4%
      Male non-smokers 26.1% 10.5%
      Male smokers 11.1% 6.3%
      Females with adenocarcinoma 40.7% 13.3%
      Method used for testing 23.1% Real time ARMS PCR vs. 17.8% gene sequencing 9.0% D5F3 IHC vs. 4.9% Break Apart FISH


      Conclusion:
      Real time ARMS-PCR and D5F3 IHC are more sensitive methods for detecting EGFR-M and ALK-R respectively. Prevalence of a targetable driver in North Indian NSCLC patients ranges from 52.3% amongst female non-smokers to 17.4% of male smokers which are very encouraging results from both the patients and the treating oncologists perspectives. Higher percentage of EGFR-M patients receive targeted therapy as compared to ALK-R.