Virtual Library

Start Your Search

C. Merveilleux Du Vignaux



Author of

  • +

    ED15 - Thymic Malignancies: Update on Treatment (ID 285)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Education Session
    • Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      ED15.02 - Chemotherapy and Targeted Therapies of Thymic Malignancies (ID 6507)

      14:30 - 15:50  |  Author(s): C. Merveilleux Du Vignaux

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Abstract:
      Thymic malignancies represent a heterogeneous group of rare thoracic cancers. The histopathological classification distinguishes thymomas from thymic carcinomas. Thymomas are further subdivided into different types (so-called A, AB, B1, B2, and B3) based upon the atypia of tumor cells, the relative proportion of the associated non-tumoral lymphocytic component, and resemblance to the normal thymic architecture. Thymic carcinomas are similar to their extra-thymic counterpart, the most frequent subtype being squamous cell carcinoma. The management of thymic epithelial tumours is a paradigm of multidisciplinary collaboration. The treatment strategy is primarily based on the resectability of the tumour. If complete resection is deemed not to be achievable upfront based on imaging studies, what is the case in Masaoka-Koga stage III/IVA tumors (classified as stage IIIA/IIIB/IVA in the 2015 IASLC-ITMIG TNM proposed system), after a biopsy is performed, primary/induction chemotherapy is administered, part of curative-intent sequential strategy integrating subsequent surgery or radiotherapy. Cases not eligible for local treatment receive definitive chemotherapy. Primary/induction chemotherapy is then standardin non-resectable advanced thymic epithelial tumors. Cisplatin-based combination regimens should be administered; combinations of cisplatin, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide, and cisplatin and etoposide are the most usually used. Primary chemoradiotherapy with platin and etoposide is an option, especially for thymic carcinomas. Usually 2-4 cycles are administered before imaging is performed to reassess resectability of the tumor. Surgery should be offered to patients for whom complete resection is thought to be ultimately achievable; extended resection may be required. Hyperthermic intrapleural chemotherapy, as well as extra-pleural pneumonectomy may be discussed in case of stage IVA tumor. Postoperative radiotherapy is usually delivered. When the patient is not deemed to be a surgical candidate - either because R0 resection is not thought to be achievable, or because of poor performance status or co-existent medical condition, definitive radiotherapy is recommended part of a sequential chemoradiotherapy strategy. Combination with chemotherapy (including cisplatin, etoposide chemotherapy and a total dose of radiation of 60 Gy) may be considered as well. Chemotherapy should be offered as the single modality treatment in advanced, non-resectable, non-irradiable or metastatic (stage IVB) thymic epithelial tumor to improve tumor-related symptoms the aim is to improve tumor-related symptoms through obtention of tumor response, while prolonged survival is uncertain. Cisplatin-based combination regimen should be administered. No randomized studies have been conducted, and it is unclear which regimens are best; multi-agent combination regimens and anthracycline-based regimens appear to have improved response rates compared to others, especially the etoposide, ifosfamide and cisplatin combination. Combinations of cisplatin, adriamycin, and cyclophosphamide is preferred. Combination of carboplatin and paclitaxel is an option for thymic carcinoma. Surgery or radiotherapy is possible in rare and selected cases with unknown survival benefit. Recurrences of thymic epithelial tumors should be managed according to the same strategy as newly diagnosed tumors. Complete resection of recurrent lesions represents a major predictor of favorable outcome, and surgery is then recommended in case of resectable lesion. In non-resectable recurrences, several consecutive lines of chemotherapy may be administered when the patient presents with tumor progression. The re-administration of a previously effective regimen has to be considered, especially in case of previous response, late occurring recurrence, and for anthracyclins, a patient in a good medical condition and not having received cumulative doses precluding the safe delivery of at least 3 additional cycles. Preferred regimens for second-line treatment include carboplatin plus paclitaxel, and platin plus etoposide; capecitabine plus gemcitabine is an option. These regimens were evaluated in dedicated phase II trials. Options for subsequent lines include pemetrexed, oral etoposide. In patients with octreoscan-positive thymoma, not eligible to receive additional chemotherapy, octreotide alone or with prednisone may represent a valuable option. The use of targeted agents may be done in an off-label setting in advanced thymic malignancies. While KIT is overexpressed in 80% of thymic carcinomas, KIT gene mutations are found only in 9% of cases, consisting of mutations observed in other malignancies (V560del, L576P) or mutations unique to thymic carcinomas (H697Y, D820E). Responses and possibly prolonged survival was reported with the use KIT inhibitors - imatinib, sunitinib, or sorafenib - , mostly in single-case observations. Non-pretreated reported KIT mutants are not uniformly sensitive to imatinib, based on the clinical and/or the preclinical evidence in thymic carcinoma and/or other KIT-mutant malignancies. KIT sequencing (exons 9-17) is an option for refractory thymic carcinomas in the setting of possible access to off-label use of such inhibitors. KIT inhibitors also potently inhibiting other kinases, including Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptors and Platelet-Derived Growth Factor Receptors activated in thymic malignancies. A phase II trial recently demonstrated the efficacy of sunitinib in terms of response and disease control rate in thymic epithelial tumors, including thymic carcinomas (ORR 26%; DCR: 91%) and, to a lesser extent, thymomas (ORR:6%; DCR:81%). Sunitinib may then represent an option as second-line treatment for thymic carcinomas, independantly from KIT status. There is no clinical data reporting on antitumor efficacy of other antiangiogenic drugs. mTOR is emerging as a potential target in thymic epithelial tumors, following tumor responses observed in phase I trials. Everolimus (10 mg daily) was evaluated in thymic epithelial tumors in a recently reported phase II trial reporting on a 22% response rate, as well as a 93% disease control rate. Everolimus may then represent an option for refractory tumors. Several trials assessing the efficacy of PD-1 checkpoint inhibitors are currently ongoing. A phase II study of pembrolizumab, a fully humanized IgG4 Ab that targets the PD-1 receptor, was recently reported; the study has accrued 30 patients. Four serious autoimmune disorders developed. Out of 30 patients evaluable for response so far the response rate is 24%. The off-label use of checkpoint inhibitors is currently not recommended. Overall, a dramatic improvement in our knowledge of the management of thymic tumors has occurred in the last few years. This improvement has primarily resulted from an increased interest in these rare tumors at some dedicated centers, and from the development of international efforts that succeed in putting together large-volume, top-quality centers all over the world, for databases, translational research, and clinical trials.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P2.04 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 466)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
    • Presentations: 2
    • +

      P2.04-003 - Chemotherapy in Advanced Thymic Epithelial Tumors: Insights from the RYTHMIC Prospective Cohort (ID 4275)

      14:30 - 15:45  |  Author(s): C. Merveilleux Du Vignaux

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Thymic Epithelial Tumors (TET) are rare intrathoracic malignancies, which may be aggressive and difficult to treat. In the advanced setting, chemotherapy may be delivered as a primary/induction therapy before subsequent surgery or definitive radiotherapy, and/or as exclusive treatment in patients for whom no focal treatment is feasible, and/or in the setting of recurrences. As no randomized trial and a limited number of prospective studies are available, there is paucity of prospective, multicentre evidence regarding response rates and survival of patients. RYTHMIC is the nationwide network for TET in France. The RYTHMIC prospective database is hosted by the French Intergroup (IFCT), and collects data for all patients diagnosed with TET, for whom management is discussed at a national multidisciplinary tumor board (MTB) based on consensual recommendations. Primary, exclusive chemotherapy, and chemotherapy for recurrence accounted for 149 (11%), 37 (3%), and 67 (5%) questions of a total of 1401 questions raised at the MTB between 2012 and 2015.

      Methods:
      All consecutive patients for whom chemotherapy and/or systemic treatment was discussed at the RYTHMIC MTB from 2012 to 2015 were identified from the RYTHMIC prospective database. Main endpoints were response rates and progression-free and overall survival.

      Results:
      At the time of analysis, data were available for 156 patients (80 thymic carcinomas, and 76 thymomas), for whom the management led to raise 283 questions at the MTB: 67 (24%) for primary chemotherapy, 35 (11%) for exclusive chemotherapy, and 181 (64%) for recurrences. For primary and exclusive chemotherapy, the most frequently administered regimen was CAP, producing response rates of 70% and 60%, respectively. A total of 104 patients received at least one line of chemotherapy for recurrence; 53 patients received second-line treatment, and 13 and 7 patients received third- and fourth line treatment. In the setting of first recurrence, carboplatine-paclitaxel combination was the most preferred regimen, administered to 54% of patients; overall response and disease control rates to systemic treatments for recurrences were 13% and 42% in thymic carcinomas, and 19% and 43% in thymomas (p=0.38 and p=0.92, respectively). Median recurrence-free survival after primary chemotherapy was 16.6 months; median progression-free survival after exclusive chemotherapy, and first-, second-, and third-line chemotherapy for recurrence were 6.0 months, and 7.6 months, 6.2 months, and 6.0 months.

      Conclusion:
      Our data provide with a unique insight in the efficacy of chemotherapy for advanced thymic epithelial tumors in a real-life setting; our results help the decision-making to better define the optimal therapeutic strategies.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

    • +

      P2.04-005 - WHO Classification and IASLC/ITMIG Staging Proposal in Thymic Tumors: Real-Life Assessment (ID 4273)

      14:30 - 15:45  |  Author(s): C. Merveilleux Du Vignaux

      • Abstract
      • Slides

      Background:
      Thymic epithelial tumors (TETs) are rare intrathoracic malignancies which are categorized histologically according to the World Health Organization (WHO) classification, recently updated in 2015 based on a consensus statement of ITMIG (Marx et al. J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:596), and for which the standard Masaoka-Koga staging system is intended to be replaced by a TNM staging system based on an IASLC/ITMIG proposal (Detterbeck et al. J Thorac Oncol 2014;9:S65). Our objectives were 1/ to analyze the feasibility of assessing ITMIG consensus major and minor morphological and immunohistochemical (IHC) criteria in a routine practice setting, and their diagnostic performance for TETs histologic subtyping, and 2/ to assess the feasibility and the relevance of the proposed IASLC/ITMIG TNM staging system with regards to the Masaoka-Koga staging system.

      Methods:
      This is a monocenter study conducted at the Lyon University Hospital, one of the largest centers for TETs in France. Overall, 188 consecutive TETs diagnosed in 181 patients since 2000 at our center were analyzed. Systematic pathological review of cases was conducted.

      Results:
      There were 168 (89%) thymomas, including 9 (5%) type A, 67 (36%) type AB, 19 (10%) type B1, 46 (24%) type B2, and 27 (14%) type B3, and 20 (11%) thymic carcinomas (TC). After exclusion of necrotic and non-suitable specimens, 178 tumors were reviewed for ITMIG consensus major and minor criteria. Major criteria were identified in 100% of type A, AB, B1 and B2 thymomas. With regard to minor criteria, rosettes, glandular formations, subcapsular cysts, and pericytomatous vascular pattern were typical for type A thymomas, and were not identified in other subtypes. Perivascular spaces were more frequent in type B thymomas (48% of cases) than AB thymomas (7% of cases). For type B3 thymomas, pink appearance at low magnification, lobular growth, lack of intercellular bridges and lack of expression of CD117 were presents in all cases. Masaoka-Koga staging was assessable for 156 patients: there were 42 (27%) stage I, 55 (35%) stage IIa, 28 (18%) stage IIb, 22 (14%) stage III, 4 (3%) stage IVa, and 5 (3%) stage IVb tumors. After restaging according to the IASLC/ITMIG TNM classification, there were 127 (81%) stage I, 3 (2%) stage II, 17 (11%) stage IIIa, no stage IIIb, 5 (3%) stage IVa, and 4 (2%) stage IVb.

      Conclusion:
      Our results indicate the feasibility of the ITMIG consensus statement on the WHO histological classification, and highlights the switch in staging when applying the IASLC/ITMIG TNM classification proposal.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.