Virtual Library
Start Your Search
S. Andaz
Author of
-
+
MINI 20 - Surgery (ID 137)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Treatment of Locoregional Disease – NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:G. Veronesi, R. Flores
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, 201+203
-
+
MINI20.07 - Extended Cervical Mediastinoscopy (ECM) for Biopsy of AortoPulmonary Window (APW) Lymph Nodes and an APW Index (APWI) Useful in Patient Selection (ID 565)
16:45 - 18:15 | Author(s): S. Andaz
- Abstract
Background:
Biopsy of APW (levels 5/6) lymph nodes can be important for lung cancer staging, but the APW is not accessible by routine mediastinoscopy or EBUS. Although some consider ECM potentially dangerous, we reviewed our ECM experience to determine safety and accuracy and to define/validate parameters for patient selection.
Methods:
With IRB approval we reviewed two institutions' databases for patients undergoing ECM between 3/1/97 and 12/31/11. Physical parameters (PP) that were thought to impact on the difficulty and safety of ECM, ie., clavicular head (CH), thoracic inlet (TI), and anterior mediastinal (AM) dimensions, were measured using 55 CT scans available from the first 100 pts.
Results:
Of 190 patients, 128 (67.3%) were male and ages ranged 28-91 yrs. Indication for surgery was either cancer (>95% with lung cancer >80%) or adenopathy (<5%). All procedures were performed by a single surgeon during routine mediastinoscopy. There were no intraoperative complications and blood loss was <25 cc in all cases. Morbidity occurred in 15 (7.9%) with 1 (0.55%) major complication and no mortality. A pathologic diagnosis was obtained in 189 (99.5%). Postop pain was easily controlled with bupivicaine. PP were compared to those in an additional 12 control patients with failed procedures (Table). Although each PP alone was not useful, the APWI (TI X AM product) did predict degree of difficulty (p=0.015) and divided patients into 3 groups predictive of the degree of difficulty: Straightforward (APWI>17), Intermediate (APWI=6-17), and Prohibitive (APWI<6) (Figure). The APWI was then prospectively validated with excellent accuracy in the next 90 patients. The APWI can be helpful in the selection of patients for thoracic surgeons, particularly those learning ECM. A short video demonstrating the technique of ECM will be presented.Table: Physical Parameter Measurements (values were obtained from CT scans available on 55/100 initial patients comparing with a separate group of 12 patients with unsuccessful ECM
Figure 1Parameter Successful ECM (cms) UnSuccessful ECM (cms) Clavicular Head (CH) 2.3+0.36 2.28+0.36 Thoracic Inlet (TI) 6.32+1.07 5.99+0.62 Anterior Mediastinum (AM) 2.53+0.82 1.89+0.82 APWI (TI X AM) 16.2+6.77 11.1+4.4* *p=0.015
Conclusion:
ECM is straightforward, safe, and accurate in mediastinal staging. Our novel APWI helps to safely select patients for any thoracic surgeon's skill and comfort level.
-
+
ORAL 35 - Surgical Approaches in Localized Lung Cancer (ID 155)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Treatment of Localized Disease - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:M. de Perrot, J. Mitchell
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, 601+603
-
+
ORAL35.05 - The Role of Surgical Mediastinal Resection in CT Screen-Detected Lung Cancer Patients (ID 960)
16:45 - 18:15 | Author(s): S. Andaz
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Comparison of long-term survival of patients with clinical Stage I non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with and without mediastinal lymph node resection (MLNR) in the International Early Lung Cancer Action Program, a large prospective cohort in a low-dose CT screening program.
Methods:
All instances of thoracic surgery for first solitary primary non-small-cell lung cancer prompted by low-dose CT screening, performed under an IRB approved common protocol at each of the participating institutions since 1992 to 2014, are included. Follow-up time was calculated from diagnosis to death from lung cancer, last contact, or December 31, 2014, whichever came first. Univariate logistic regression analysis of the demographic, CT, and surgical findings for those with and without MLNR was performed. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival rates and Cox regression analysis was performed using all significant univariate variables.
Results:
The 10-year Kaplan-Meier (K-M) NSCLC-specific survival rate for the 225 patients manifesting as a subsolid nodule was 100%, regardless of whether they had MLNR (N = 169) or not (N = 56). For the 373 NSCLC patients manifesting as a solid nodule, for those who had MLNR (N = 285) and those who did not (N = 88), the K-M NSCLC-survival rate was not significantly different (86 % vs. 93%, P = 0.23). The rate was 95% vs. 96% (P = 0.86) for those whose pathologic tumor diameter was <= 10 mm; 83% vs. 94% (P = 0.19) for 11-20 mm, and 79% vs. 86% (P = 0.67) for 21-20 mm. Cox regression analysis comparing MLNR with no MLNR showed that survival rates were not significantly different (P = 0.33), but significantly survival decreased when the tumor diameter was above 20 mm (HR= 5.1, 95% CI: 1.6-15.7).
Conclusion:
Lymph node evaluation is not necessary for resection of subsolid nodules in patients with screen-detected lung cancer.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
