Virtual Library
Start Your Search
K. Nakagawa
Moderator of
-
+
MS 12 - NSCLC Stems Cells: Are They a Real Target? (ID 30)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Symposium
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 4
- Moderators:C. Dive, K. Nakagawa
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 14:15 - 15:45, Mile High Ballroom 2c-3c
-
+
MS12.01 - Biology of Cancer Stem Cells (ID 1900)
14:15 - 15:45 | Author(s): N. Watkins
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
There is general agreement amongst biomedical researchers that stem cells exist in multicellular organisms. The most well characterized model of adult somatic stem cells is the bone marrow, in which serial transplantation in both immunocompetent and immunodeficient mice have clearly identified the hematopoietic stem cell (HSC). Using the same models, it is now generally accepted, even amongst cancer stem cell (CSC) sceptics, that most forms of myeloid leukemia are maintained by a self-renewing, transplantable HSC-like cell, even though the initial transformation event may have occurred in a committed progenitor. Given that nature tends to conserve processes across evolution, it is logical to hypothesize that a similar functional hierarchy exists in solid tumors. Over two decades, numerous papers have reported the presence of a functionally distinct, rare population of cells within solid tumors with stem-like properties based on the same criteria used to define the HSC and leukemic CSC. However, the idea that CSCs exist solid tumors remains controversial at best. The difficulties in reproducing results in highly complex models systems, and questions over the validity of CSC surface markers in solid tumors, have clearly contributed to these, often heated, arguments. If we assume for a moment that CSCs do not exist in solid tumors, they would constitute the only multicellular entity in nature without a hierarchical organisation based on self-renewal and differentiation. If this were true, then solid tumors would behave like colonies of bacteria or yeast, in which all cells were identical, where the capacity to self-renew in the face of an environmental challenge would be entirely determined by random genetic variants. In the setting of acquired resistance to targeted therapies, there is convincing evidence for such a “rare clone” hypothesis. For example, the source of acquired resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy in EGRF-mutant adenocarcinoma seems to be pre-existing clones that already possess a point mutation that confers resistance. But, can this genetic model explain other stemness phenotypes in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)? In clinical terms, a pressing question is whether random genetic events can explain the rapid regeneration of NSCLC tumors after a long period of dormancy following curative surgery. Equally, can the “rare clone” hypothesis explain innate the innate chemoresistance of quiescent CSC-like NSCLC cells that have a greatly enhanced capacity for self-renewal. If the answer to either of questions is “not always”, then targeting CSCs based on function rather than genome remains a potential avenue for improving outcomes in NSCLC patients. The characterization of NSCLC CSCs is made difficult by the phenotypic and genomic heterogeneity of the disease, problems identifying robust surface markers, and in defining what experimental endpoints constitute CSC function. In addition, there is no general agreement on which markers are associated with CSC in NSCLC, although several studies suggest that the surface markers CD44 and CD133 can prospectively identify such cells. In therapeutic terms, elimination of CSCs in NSCLC would require such markers be reproducible and robust, but can also be therapeutically targeted in humans. An alternative approach is to target embryonic signaling pathways known to regulate self-renewal in development. This idea is the driving force behind clinical trials of Notch and Hedgehog inhibitors in several cancer types. Unfortunately, most of these clinical trials add the experimental agent along side standard-of-care chemotherapy rather than delivering the experimental agent following treatment in order to determine whether stem-cell targeting can “burn out” quiescent, undifferentiated residual disease. One promising candidate marker in NSCLC is ALDH1. In most published studies, expression of ALDH1 or ALDH1A correlates with reduced overall survival, consistent with the presence of enhanced regenerative capacity and innate chemoresistance in NSCLC. Moreover, experimental evidence supports the notion that expression of the ALDH1 protein, and its enzymatic activity, is associated with enhanced CSC functions in vitro and in vivo. Since secondary prevention studies in advanced NSCLC are impractical, it may be possible strengthen the case for targeting NSCLC, using ALDH1 as an example, using more practical preclinical and clinical approaches. Such an approach might be: 1. Concentrate on one subgroup of NSCLC- for example KRAS mutant lung adenocarcinoma. 2. Show that rare, single ALDH1+ cells give rise to tumors with the same ratio of ALDH1+ to ALDH1- cells as was seen in the parent tumor. 3. Using single cell genomics, determine whether ALDH1+ and ALDH1- cells share the same genotype. 4. In lung cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, show that the percentage of ALDH1+ cells increases in the residual tumor removed at surgery. 5. In lung cancer patients with recurrent disease following surgery, show that the recurrent tumor contains the same ratio of ALDH1+ to ALDH1- cells as was seen in the parent tumor. References: Jordan CT. Cancer stem cells: controversial or just misunderstood? Cell Stem Cell, 2009; 4:203-5. Alamgeer M, Peacock CD, Matsui W, Ganju V, Watkins DN. Cancer stem cells in lung cancer: Evidence and controversies. Respirology, 2013; 18:757-764 Sullivan JP, Spinola M, Dodge M, Raso MG, Behrens C, Gao B, Schuster K, Shao C, Larsen JE, Sullivan LA, Honorio S, Xie Y, Scaglioni PP, DiMaio JM, Gazdar AF, Shay J, Wistuba II, Minna JD. Aldehyde Dehydrogenase Activity Selects for Lung Adenocarcinoma Stem Cells Dependent on Notch Signaling. Cancer Res, 2010; 70:9937-48. Shao C, Sullivan JP, Girard L, Augustyn A, Yenerall P, Rodriguez-Canales J, Behrens C, Shay JW, Wistuba II, Minna JD. Essential Role of Aldehyde Dehydrogenase 1A3 for the Maintenance of Non–Small Cell Lung Cancer Stem Cells Is Associated with the STAT3 Pathway. Clin Cancer Res; 2014; 20:4154–66. Alamgeer M, Ganju V, Szczepny A, Russell PA, Prodanovic Z, Kumar B, Wainer Z, Brown T, Schneider-Kosky M, Conron M, Wright G, Watkins DN. The prognostic significance of ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE 1A1 (ALDH1A1) and CD133 expression in early-stage non-small cell lung cancer. Thorax, 2013; 68(12):1095-104. Alamgeer M, Ganju V, Kumar B, Fox J, Hart S, White M, Harris M, Stuckey J, Prodanovic Z, Schneider M, Watkins DN. Changes in ALDEHYDE DEHYDROGENASE-1 (ALDH1) expression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy predict outcome in locally advanced breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res, 2014; 16:R44.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS12.02 - Current Therapeutic Targets and Ongoing Trials (ID 1901)
14:15 - 15:45 | Author(s): M. Diehn
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS12.03 - Where to Go from Here? (ID 1902)
14:15 - 15:45 | Author(s): R. Rosell, J. Codony, I. Chaib, C. Codony, S. Pilotto, A. Verlicchi, J.L. Ramírez-Serrano, N. Karachaliou, M.A. Molina-Vila, T. Bivona, P.C. Ma
- Abstract
Abstract:
Lung cancer is a dismal disease, however, anticipated selective responses are observed in a subgroup of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients where the disease is driven by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. EGFR mutations occur in 15 – 40% of lung adenocarcinomas, according to gender, smoking history and geographical region. Two types of EGFR mutations account for 90% of all lung adenocarcinoma-associated EGFR mutations and are related to sensitivity to treatment with oral tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as gefitinib, afatinib or AZD9291: (i) small in-frame deletions in exon 19 that lead to elimination of an LREA motif in the protein (DEL) and (ii) a point mutation in exon 21 that substitutes an arginine for a leucine at position 858 in the protein (L858R). Lung cancer patients bearing EGFR mutations show radiographic responses to TKIs in 60 – 70% of cases. Although the majority of patients achieve a significant therapeutic benefit, almost all invariably progress in less than 1 year. Therefore there is an unmet medical need for novel therapies in order to avoid resistance to treatment. We have employed a wide array of approaches (MTT, western blot analysis, PCR, Aldefluor assay and mouse models) to demonstrate that the combination of gefitinib, afatinib or AZD9291 with compounds targeting signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) can suppress the mechanisms of early adaptive resistance. STAT3 is a member of a family of proteins responsible for transmission of peptide hormone signals from the extracellular surface of the cells to the nucleus. STAT3 is a master regulator of several key hallmarks and enablers of cancer cells, including cell proliferation, resistance to apoptosis, metastasis, immune evasion, tumor angiogenesis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition, response to DNA damage and the Warburg effect. In addition STAT3 promotes an increase in the cell renewal of tumor-initiating cells or cancer stem cell subpopulation, mainly aldehyde dehydrogenase (ALDH). EGFR mutations cause receptor oligomerization and activation of intrinsic or receptor-associated tyrosine kinases, respectively. These activated kinases phosphorylate receptor tyrosine residues creating docking sites for recruitment of cytoplasmic STAT3. STAT3 docks to receptor phosphotyrosyl (pY) peptide sites through its Src-homology (SH2) domain which leads to its phosphorylation on Y705 followed by STAT3 tail-to-tail homodimerization (SH2 domain of each monomer binds to the pY peptide domain of each partner). STAT3 homodimers accommodate in the nucleus, where they bind to specific STAT3 response elements in the promotor of target genes and regulate their transcription. EGFR mutations and tyrosine kinase-associated receptor interleukin-6 (IL-6) lead to the activation of STAT3 that is not obliterated by EGFR TKIs. Even more, 2 hours after starting gefitinib treatment there is an increase in STAT3 activation in EGFR mutant cell lines (P. Ma, Cancer Research, 2011). Moreover, following erlotinib treatment there is an enrichment of ALDH+ stem-like cells through EGFR-dependent activation of Notch3. We have tested several small molecules that target STAT3. The combination inhibits cell viability in several human EGFR mutant cells and blocks STAT3 activation. However, neither the combination of EGFR TKIs with TPCA1 (repurposed as a STAT3 inhibitor), nor the combination of gefitinib with AZD0530 (a Src inhibitor) prevent the increment in the ALDH + cancer stem cell subpopulation. Therefore, we are exploring more in depth the crosstalk between EGFR and IL-6. As a whole, human EGFR mutant cell lines have increased levels of IL-6 which leads to STAT3 hyper-activation. Nevertheless, recent evidence indicates that IL-6-Src can induce YAP activation and NOTCH signaling. The downstream effectors of YAP and NOTCH ligands CTGF and HES1, respectively, are being examined in clinical tumor samples. We have examined the combination of Src, YAP and NOTCH inhibitors in addition to the use of STAT3 inhibitors. The triple combination of gefitinib plus TPCA1 plus AZD0530 had great synergism with a very low combination index and also eliminated the ALDH+ population (Figure). Furthermore, the overexpression of ALDH1A1 was decreased with the triple combination, however with only gefitinib plus TPCA1 or gefitinib plus AZD0530, ALDH1A1 mRNA was substantially increased in comparison with gefitinib alone (Figure). The western blot for the triple combination shows the inhibition of STAT3 Y705 phosphorylation as well as the phosphorylation of YAP (Ser397) and also from BMI1. We plan to confirm some of the data in clinical tumor samples to understand the contribution of IL6 and well established effectors-the SHP2-ERK, PI(3)K-Akt-mTORC1 and JAK-STAT3 modules and the interaction with YAP. Figure 1
-
+
MS12.04 - Tumor-Propagating Cells in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (ID 1903)
14:15 - 15:45 | Author(s): C. Kim
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Our long-term goal is to elucidate the role of stem cells in lung homeostasis as a prerequisite to the development of therapeutic strategies that can be used to prevent or attenuate lung disease and lung cancer. Our previous experience isolating the first stem cell population from the adult murine lung, termedbronchioalveolar stem cells (BASCs), and our demonstration of a role for these cells in lung cancer serves as a platform to address these questions. We have recently developed three-dimensional co-culture and subcutaneous co-injection assays that allow us to quantitatively assess the identity and the differentiation potential of lung stem cells. This approach led us to uncover a cross-talk between lung endothelial cells and lung stem cells via a novel signaling axis involving Bmp4, NFATc1 and Tsp1;this pathway drives BASCs to differentiate into the alveolar epithelial cell lineage. Our work in the intersection of stem cell biology and lung disease has expanded into new insights for understanding metastasis and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We previously showed the adenocarcinoma Kras/p53 mutant mouse model contains Sca1+ tumor-propagating cells (TPCs), the cells that recapitulate the tumor by transplantation. We recently showed multiple lung tumor sub-populations can give rise to metastatic disease, and that the Sca1+ CD24+ TPCs have the highest metastatic potential. We also showed the Hippo pathway mediators Yap/Taz are necessary andsufficient for lung cancer progression. Finally, in a new mouse model of lung squamous cancer, the second most common type of NSCLC, we identified a TPC population defined by the markers Sca1 and NGFR. These studies illustrate the utility of stem cell biology approaches to provide new avenues for lung cancer therapeutic targeting.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
MINI 03 - PD1 Axis Inhibition and EGFR (ID 101)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:L. Gandhi, Y. Ohe
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, Four Seasons Ballroom F1+F2
-
+
MINI03.06 - Phase II Studies of Nivolumab in Patients with Advanced Squamous (SQ) or Non-Squamous (NSQ) Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (ID 1329)
16:45 - 18:15 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Nivolumab (anti-PD-1, ONO-4538, BMS-936558), a fully human IgG4, PD-1 immune-checkpoint inhibitor antibody, has shown durable clinical activity in previous[MS誠1] phase I and II trials in several tumor types. In March 2015, U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved Nivolumab for the treatment of patients with metastatic squamous (SQ) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with progression on or after platinum-based chemotherapy. Here, we report the results of two phase II studies to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nivolumab in previously treated advanced SQ (JapicCTI-No.132072) and NSQ (JapicCTI-No.132073) NSCLC pts.
Methods:
Both studies required pts aged ≥ 20 years with an ECOG performance status of 0 or 1, stage IIIB/IV, or recurrent NSCLC and at least one prior chemotherapy including platinum containing regimen. Pts received nivolumab 3 mg/kg IV Q2W until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint in both studies was the objective response rate (ORR) (RECIST v1.1). Planned sample size was 30 pts for SQ and 67 pts for NSQ, respectively (P~0~[MS誠1] =0.09 &[MS誠2] P~1~=0.26, P~0~=0.09 & P~1~=0.20 ; α=0.025 (one-side), 1-β=0.8).
Results:
From April 2013 to April 2014, a total of 111 NSCLC pts were enrolled in both studies (35 pts with SQ, 76 pts with NSQ, male/female: 81/30; PS 0/1: 46/55; aged 31 to 84 [median: 65.0] years; Stage IIIB/Stage IV/recurrence: 6/86/19). Objective response rates (ORRs) were 25.7% (9/35) [95% CI: 14.2, 42.1] in SQ and 19.7% (15/76) [95% CI: 12.3, 30.0] in NSQ, respectively. Complete Response was observed in 2.6% with NSQ. Median progression-free survival (mPFS) was 4.2 months (95% CI: 1.4, 7.1) for SQ and 2.8 months (95% CI: 1.4, 3.4) for NSQ, respectively. Median follow-up periods were 10.4 months and 8.4 months, respectively. Median duration of response was not reached in each study. Of 9 SQ pts and 15 NSQ pts who responded to nivolumab, durable and ongoing response was observed in 77.8% (7/9) and 80.0% (12/15), respectively. Median overall survival was not reached in either study. All Grade drug-related adverse events across both studies were 79.3% (88/111) and Grade 3-4 drug-related adverse events (G3-4 AEs) were observed in 16.2% (18/111) pts. Most common G3-4 AEs were lymphocyte count decreased 3.6% (4/111), hyponatremia 1.8% (2/111), interstitial lung disease 1.8% (2/111), pleural effusion 1.8% (2/111). Any grade of interstitial lung disease was observed in 4.5% (5/111) pts. No grade 5 AEs were observed.
Conclusion:
In these studies, nivolumab showed encouraging clinical efficacy in both SQ and NSQ NSCLC with a manageable safety profile.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MINI 07 - ChemoRT and Translational Science (ID 110)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Treatment of Locoregional Disease – NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:D. Raben, B. Kavanagh
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, 201+203
-
+
MINI07.01 - A Randomized Phase II Study of S-1 and Cisplatin vs Vinorelbine and Cisplatin with Concurrent Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced NSCLC: WJOG5008L (ID 544)
16:45 - 18:15 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Cisplatin-based chemotherapy and concurrent radiotherapy is the standard treatments for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer ( LA-NSCLC). This trial evaluated two experimental regimens of chemotherapy with concurrent radiotherapy.
Methods:
Eligible patients (pts) with unresectable stage III NSCLC, 20 to 74 years of age, and ECOG PS of 0–1 were randomized to either Arm SP, S-1 (40 mg/m[2]/dose per oral, b.i.d, on days 1-14) and cisplatin (60 mg/m[2] on day 1) repeated every 4 weeks or Arm VP, vinorelbine ( 20mg/m[2] on day 1, 8) and cisplatin (80 mg/m[2] on day) repeated every 4 weeks with early concurrent thoracic radiotherapy of 60Gy at 2 Gy per daily fraction. The primary endpoint was overall survival rate at 2-year (2yr-OS). A pick-the-winner design was used to identify the treatment regimen most likely to be superior. The planned sample size was 55 patients per arm, assuming in each arm that the null hypothesis for 2yr- OS was 50% versus an alternative hypothesis for 65% with one-sided alpha of 0.10 and power of 80%. All the radiation treatment plans were reviewed at quality assurance committee meetings. (Study ID: UMIN000002420)
Results:
One hundred eleven patients were registered between Sep 2009 and Sep 2012. Of 108 patients for efficacy analysis, the 2yr-OS was 76% (95% CI, 62-85%) for SP and 69% (95% CI, 54-79%) for VP. The hazard ratio (HR) of death between the two arms was 0.85 (0.48-1.49). The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.8 months for SP and 12.3 months for VP with a HR of 0.92 (0.58-1.44). 80% and 48% of pts completed the protocol treatment in SP and VP, respectively. Common grade 3-4 toxicities of both SP and VP were neutropenia 33%, 75%, platelets 9%, 4%, hemoglobin 26%, 28%, febrile neutropenia 9%, 17%, diarrhea 6%, 0% respectively. There were 4 and 5 treatment-related deaths in Arms SP and VP, respectively. The quality assurance committee judged that 74% of radiation treatment plans had no deviation and 24% had a minor deviation.
Conclusion:
Both arms rejected the null hypothesis for 2yr-OS. In this study Arm SP was declared the winner in terms of 2yr-OS, PFS, treatment completion, and toxicity.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MINI 15 - Chemotherapy Developments for Lung Cancer (ID 128)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:L. Crinò, C.P. Belani
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, Mile High Ballroom 1a-1f
-
+
MINI15.08 - A Phase II Study of Pemetrexed plus Carboplatin Followed by Maintenance Pemetrexed in Elderly Patients with Advanced Non-Squamous NSCLC (ID 2453)
16:45 - 18:15 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for >80% of all lung cancers, and the risk of lung cancer clearly increases with advancing age. Because of the progressive aging of population, the number of elderly patients with NSCLC is increasing and the desease is becoming an increasing public health problem worldwide. We previously reported a phase I study that recommended a dose of carboplatin (Cb, area under the curve = 5) plus pemetrexed (PEM, 500 mg/m[2]) for elderly (≥75-years-old) patients with non-squamous NSCLC. Furthermore, PEM maintenance therapy, following the combination therapy, was also found to be well tolerated. Therefore, we conducted a multicenter phase II trial to evaluated the efficacy and safety of Cb (area under the curve = 5) plus PEM (500 mg/m[2]) followed by maintenance PEM for elderly (≥75-years-old) patients with non-squamous NSCLC.
Methods:
Treated patients received 4 courses of Cb plus PEM, followed by maintenance PEM, without showing disease progression or severe toxicities. The primary endpoint was the 1-year overall survival (OS) rate, and the secondary endpoints were OS, progression free survival (PFS), response rate (RR), and safety.
Results:
Thirty four patients were enrolled between June 2012 and May 2013. All patients had an ECOG performance status 0 or 1, and adenocarcinoma. The median patient age was 77 years (75-84 years). Twenty four patients were male and ten patients were female. Three patients harbored activating epidermal growth factor recepter mutation (exon19 or 21). The median observation time was 22.7 months. In clinical outcome, the overall RR was 41.2%, and the disease control rate was 85.3%. No patient showed a complete response, 14 showed partial responses, 15 showed stable disease, 4 showed disease progression, and 1 was not evaluated. The maintenance therapy rate was 58.8%. The median PFS for all patients was 5.7 months (95% confidence interval, 3.3–8.5 months), whereas the median OS was 20.5 months (95% confidence interval, 7.8–25.4 months). The 1-year OS rate was 58.0%. In adverse events (total phase of this study), hematological adverse events ≥grade 3 were leucopenia (in 23.5% of patients), neutropenia (55.9%), anemia (35.3%), and thrombocytopenia (20.6%), and major non-hematological adverse events ≥grade 3 were febrile neutropenia (in 8.8% of patients), increased levels of aminotransferase (5.9%), infection (23.5%), and anorexia/fatigue (5.9%). There was 1 treatment-related death due to interstitial lung disease.
Conclusion:
The combination of Cb plus PEM followed by maintenance PEM was effective and reasonably well tolerated in chemotherapy-naïve elderly (≥75-years-old) patients with non-squamous NSCLC. This data was promising and valuable to conduct the phase III study compared with docetaxel (DOC) monotherapy in the first-line setting. Now, the phase III trial compared Cb plus PEM followed by maintenance PEM with DOC for chemotherapy-naïve elderly (≥75-years-old) patients with non-squamous NSCLC (JCOG1210/WJOG7813L: UMIN000011460) is ongoing and the result is warranted. Clinical trial information: UMIN000004810
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MINI 31 - ALK (ID 158)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:S. Malik, I. Ou
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 18:30 - 20:00, Mile High Ballroom 1a-1f
-
+
MINI31.04 - Intracranial Efficacy of First-Line Crizotinib vs. Chemotherapy in ALK-Positive NSCLC (ID 1238)
18:30 - 20:00 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
The ongoing multicenter, randomized, open-label phase III study PROFILE 1014 recently demonstrated superior efficacy of crizotinib compared with chemotherapy in patients with previously untreated advanced ALK-positive NSCLC (Solomon et al, N Engl J Med 2014). Intracranial efficacy of crizotinib vs. chemotherapy was compared prospectively in this trial.
Methods:
Patients with previously untreated advanced non-squamous ALK-positive NSCLC (N=343) were randomized 1:1 to receive crizotinib 250 mg orally BID (n=172) or intravenous chemotherapy (pemetrexed 500 mg/m[2 ]+ cisplatin 75 mg/m[2] or carboplatin at AUC 5–6; all q3w for ≤6 cycles; n=171). Patients with treated brain metastases that were stable for ≥2 weeks with no ongoing requirement for corticosteroids were eligible. Treatment was continued until PD. Continuation of, or crossover to, crizotinib after PD (per independent radiology review [IRR]) was allowed for patients randomized to crizotinib or chemotherapy, respectively. Brain scanning was performed every 6 weeks in patients with baseline brain metastases and every 12 weeks in those without baseline brain metastases. Protocol-specified efficacy endpoints included PFS (primary endpoint), ORR, OS, and 12- and 18-month OS, as well as intracranial TTP. Intracranial DCR at 12 and 24 weeks was also evaluated. Efficacy was evaluated in the ITT population and in two subgroups of patients: those with and without baseline brain metastases.
Results:
Of 343 patients in the ITT population, 79 had brain metastases at baseline identified by IRR (23%) and 263 did not (77%; data not reported for one patient). Baseline characteristics of patients randomized to receive crizotinib or chemotherapy were generally well balanced within these two patient subgroups. Among the patients with baseline brain metastases, a significantly higher proportion achieved intracranial disease control with crizotinib than with chemotherapy at 12 weeks (33/39 [85%] vs. 18/40 [45%], respectively; P=0.0003) and at 24 weeks (22/39 [56%] vs. 10/40 [25%]; P=0.006). There was a numerical improvement in prospectively measured intracranial TTP with crizotinib in the ITT population (HR 0.60, P=0.069), as well as in patients either with baseline brain metastases (HR 0.45, P=0.063) or without baseline brain metastases (HR 0.69, P=0.323). The frequency of progression in the brain was low in the ITT population (15%) and in patients with and without baseline brain metastases (27% and 11%, respectively). Overall PFS was significantly longer with crizotinib than with chemotherapy in both subgroups (brain metastases present: HR 0.40, P=0.0007, median 9.0 vs. 4.0 months; brain metastases absent: HR 0.51, P≤0.0001, median 11.1 vs. 7.2 months), as it was in the ITT population (HR 0.45, P<0.0001, median 10.9 vs. 7.0 months). Twenty-five patients in the crizotinib arm of the study experienced intracranial PD; 22 of these patients received crizotinib for ≥3 weeks beyond PD and 19 also received intracranial radiotherapy.
Conclusion:
In this prospective assessment of intracranial efficacy, crizotinib demonstrated significantly greater intracranial disease control and overall efficacy compared with chemotherapy in patients with baseline brain metastases. These findings provide further confirmation of crizotinib as the standard of care for patients with previously untreated advanced ALK-positive NSCLC, including those patients with brain metastases at baseline.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MS 18 - Advocacy Snapshots (ID 36)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Symposium
- Track: Advocacy
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:P. Mondragon, K. Norris
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 14:15 - 15:45, 703
-
+
MS18.02 - Advocates Making a Responsible Case for High-Risk Screening (ID 1927)
14:15 - 15:45 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Purpose: The purpose is to discuss how to advocate to make a Responsible Case for the Screening of lung cancer high risk group. Background and fact: Screening is looking for cancer at an early stage before a person has any symptoms. For the better screening, efficiency is determined as well as sensitivity and specificity. In these forty years, three screening tests have been studied to find if they decrease the risk of dying from lung cancer. Chest X-rays were evaluated at the earliest time in the lung cancer screening history while it is no longer recommended for screening.. Sputum cytology is a procedure in which a sample of sputum is viewed under a microscope to check for cancer cells, so it is required to good mucus that is coughed up from the lungs. Now, it is used as a non-invasive examination of a patient with a sputum symptoms rather than screening. Low-dose spiral CT (LDCT) scan is a special kind of x-ray that takes many pictures as you lie on a table that slides in and out of the machine. A computer then combines these pictures into a detailed picture of a slice of your body. In this procedure, low-dose radiation is used to make a series of very detailed pictures of areas inside the body with reduction of radiation exposure.. The National Lung Screening Trial (NLST) provided the first evidence that lung screening can reduce cancer deaths, when data from the study was published in 2011. The National Lung Screening Trial began in 2002 and enrolled more than 53,000 participants who were current or former heavy smokers, ages 55 to 74. The trial randomly assigned people to receive lung screening either by low-dose helical CT scans or chest X-rays. The trial was sponsored by the National Cancer Institute, and the University of Michigan was one of 33 places across the country to take part. U-M enrolled 850 participants. The study found that screening individuals with low-dose CT scans could reduce lung cancer mortality by 20 percent compared to chest x-ray. Now, it is concluded that the only recommended screening test for lung cancer is LD-CT, which result Medicare's decision to cover lung cancer screening in US. However, the evidence at the present time in LD-CT screening is only one report from US, the results of additional studies from Europe (NELSON) and Japan (Sagawa team) is awaited. Discussion: To raise up the efficiency of screening, It is important who is suitable as subjects. According to “ the Lung Cancer Screening Guidelines and Recommendations” by CDC, many organizations in US definite that lung cancer screening with LDCT is recommended for people of age 55 to 74 years with ≥ 30 pack year smoking history, who either currently smoke or have quit within the past 15 years while some difference of subjects who are in relatively good health or age 55 to 80 years across organizations. However, major obstacles are lying that smokers are lack of awareness or information for risks and benefits with attention to the specifics of each person making a decision about screening as well as the risk of lung cancer, in order to operate LD-CT screening effectively. GLCC poll in 2013 showed that in Australia and Great Britain current smokers are less aware of the symptoms of lung cancer than former smokers and people who have never smoked regularly. Even if screening system was developed, the risk of death due to lung cancer can not be reduced unless the people of high risk group do not visit to appropriate screening service that has been ensurring quality. In addition, Assessment of smoking and the provision of smoking cessation services must be part of any lung cancer screening program. Advocate movement based on research is urgently needed to develop approaches that will maximize cessation rates among smokers undergoing screening. Even more, it is required to enlightenment for smokers in cooperation with the international community by utilizing a variety of public relations means. In November 2014, lung cancer awareness month, Japan Lung Cancer Society approved the Kyoto Declaration. This declaration has been included that the tackle in the prevention of lung cancer and development of effective treatment by alliance with lung cancer Society, lung cancer patient, government, people, medical personnel, advocacy organizations, and healthcare industry. While the evidence from the NLST supports the implementation of lung cancer screening for high-risk individuals via LDCT, the experience to date also must validates the prior recommendations around institutional approaches to lung cancer screening, including the need for the availability of multidisciplinary clinical teams. In order to advocate making responsible case, several ways should be developed like a “Shared Decision-Making” toolkit(s) by the Lung Association that would act as a “consumers’ guide” for those considering lung cancer screening. After examine such a tool, it is also one of the ideas to take advantage according to the circumstances of each country.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL 01 - Chemotherapy Developments for Lung Cancer (ID 88)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:G. Blumenschein, S. Lee
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 10:45 - 12:15, 401-404
-
+
ORAL01.01 - Randomized Phase III Study of Nedaplatin plus Docetaxel versus Cisplatin plus Docetaxel for Advanced Squamous Cell Lung Cancer (WJOG5208L) (ID 621)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Nedaplatin (N) is a second-generation platinum compound with lower nausea/vomiting and nephrotoxicity than cisplatin (C). Nedaplatin plus docetaxel (ND) showed a promising efficacy with acceptable toxicity for advanced squamous cell lung cancer (SqLC) in the previous phase II study.
Methods:
Eligible patients (pts) were those with pathologically proven SqLC with stage IIIB/IV or postoperative recurrence, aged 20-74 years and ECOG PS 0-1. Pts were randomized 1:1 to ND (N 100 mg/m[2] and docetaxel (D) 60mg/m[2] iv, q3w, up to 6 cycles) or C plus D (CD) (C 80 mg/m[2] and D 60mg/m[2] iv, q3w, up to 6 cycles) according to stage, gender and institution. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), response rate (RR) and adverse events (AEs). Target sample size of 350 provided 90% statistical power to detect a hazard ratio of 0.71 with one-sided type I error of 0.05.
Results:
Between July 2009 and July 2012, 355 pts were randomized. Of 349 for efficacy analysis (ND 177; CD 172), baseline characteristics were well-balanced between two arms. ND had a significantly longer OS (p=0.037, one-sided stratified log-rank test). The OS HR was 0.81 (90%CI, 0.67-0.98) with a median OS of 13.6 months [m] for ND and 11.4 for CD. ND had a longer PFS (p=0.050) with a HR of 0.83 (0.69-1.00) and a median PFS of 4.9 m in ND and 4.5 in CD. RR was 54.5% in ND vs 52.9% in CD (p=0.829). Grade 3 or higher AEs of nausea (4.0% vs 14.3%), fatigue (3.4% vs 10.9%), hyponatremia (13.6% vs 30.3%) and hypokalemia (2.3% vs 8.6%) are more frequent in CD. Grade 3 or higher AEs of neutrophils (82.5% vs 70.3%) and platelets (9.0% vs 0.0%) are more frequent in ND, but there was no difference in grade 3 or higher febrile neutropenia (13.6% vs 15.4%). Treatment related deaths occurred in 4 and 3 pts in ND and CD, respectively.
Conclusion:
ND showed a significantly longer OS as compared to CD with different toxicity profile. ND will be considered as a new standard treatment for advanced or relapsed SqLC. Clinical trial information: UMIN000002015.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL 16 - Clinical Care of Lung Cancer and Advanced Biopsies (ID 115)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:J.W. Neal, Q. Zhou
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 10:45 - 12:15, Mile High Ballroom 2a-3b
-
+
ORAL16.05 - Retrospective Analysis of ctDNA EGFR Mutations in the Phase III, Randomized IMPRESS Study (ID 2106)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
The majority of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer respond to first-line EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs, e.g. gefitinib) but nearly all eventually acquire resistance. The most common mechanism of acquired resistance is a second-site mutation in the EGFR kinase domain, T790M. The phase III, double-blind IMPRESS study evaluated the efficacy and safety of continuing gefitinib plus pemetrexed/cisplatin versus placebo plus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with acquired resistance to first-line gefitinib. Study results did not support the continuation of gefitinib after disease progression (by RECIST criteria) when platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is used as second-line therapy. Here we report the results of a retrospective biomarker analysis of plasma circulating free, tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) from patients in IMPRESS, including T790M profiling, to help understand the IMPRESS clinical trial outcome.
Methods:
Plasma samples for ctDNA isolation were collected at baseline and discontinuation from 151 randomized, non-Chinese patients in IMPRESS (58% of overall IMPRESS population). ctDNA levels of T790M, L858R, and Exon19 deletions were detected using both a quantitative emulsion (BEAMing) digital PCR assay (Sysmex[®]) and a qualitative QIAGEN[®] Therascreen ARMS assay (baseline only). Local EGFR tumor tissue (diagnostic) results were available for 133/151 patients. Mutation concordance rates between tissue and baseline plasma results, and comparisons between the two plasma detection methods, were calculated.
Results:
Baseline ctDNA EGFR mutation results were obtained for >99% (150/151) of patients. Using BEAMing, sensitivity and specificity between baseline plasma EGFR sensitizing mutations and local EGFR tumor tests were 78% (69/89) and 98% (42/43), respectively, for Exon19 deletions, and 82% (31/38) and 97% (91/94) for L858R. The T790M detection rate in baseline plasma samples using BEAMing was 56% (84/150). The Therascreen ARMS assay demonstrated a significantly reduced T790M detection rate of 13% (20/150). Likewise, the sensitivity of the Therascreen ARMS assay with respect to tissue for EGFR sensitizing mutations was also reduced compared with BEAMing: Exon 19: 54% (48/89), L858R: 47% (18/38), though the specificity remained near 100%. In the 97 evaluable plasma samples collected at discontinuation, T790M was detected by BEAMing in 52% (50/97) of patients. When compared with matched baseline plasma, 11 patients had newly acquired T790M mutation at discontinuation while T790M reverted to undetectable in 14 patients. Full plasma profiling data from the complete IMPRESS clinical study population (including 108 patients from China) and correlative analyses of plasma EGFR mutation status with clinical outcome (progression-free survival, overall survival, objective response rate) will be presented.
Conclusion:
In IMPRESS, T790M was detectable with BEAMing digital PCR in the baseline ctDNA samples of 56% of evaluable patients, a rate comparable to similar mutation analyses in this same second-line, EGFR-TKI-failed setting. EGFR mutation detection in plasma using the Therascreen ARMS assay demonstrated comparable specificity to BEAMing but reduced sensitivity. The T790M detection rate afforded by the BEAMing technology will allow for a comprehensive assessment of correlations between clinical outcome in IMPRESS and EGFR mutational status.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL 17 - EGFR Mutant Lung Cancer (ID 116)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 3
- Moderators:P. Meldgaard, E. Felip
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 10:45 - 12:15, Four Seasons Ballroom F3+F4
-
+
ORAL17.02 - Randomized Trial of Gefitinib with and without Pemetrexed as First-Line Therapy in East-Asian Patients with Advanced NS NSCLC with EGFR Mutations (ID 1319)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Pemetrexed (P) is the standard of care for non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NS NSCLC), whereas epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), such as gefitinib (G), are the standard of care for advanced NSCLC with EGFR mutations. Clinical and nonclinical studies have demonstrated synergistic effects of EGFR TKIs and P. Based on these observations, the efficacy and safety of G+P was compared with G monotherapy in patients with NS NSCLC positive for activating EGFR mutations.
Methods:
The primary objective of this randomized, multicenter, open-label, parallel-arm, phase 2 East-Asian study was to assess whether G+P prolongs progression-free survival (PFS) versus G alone. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), overall response rate, disease control rate, time to progressive disease, duration of response, and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs). Eligible patients had stage IV NS NSCLC with activating EGFR mutations, were chemonaïve, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) of 0 or 1. Patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (G+P:G). Dosing schedule was concurrent G (250 mg/day) and P (500 mg/m[2] every 3 weeks) in the G+P arm and G monotherapy (250 mg/day) in the G arm. Treatment continued until progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was analyzed after 144 events, which provided 70% power at a 1-sided 20% significance level, assuming a true hazard ratio (HR) of 0.79.
Results:
Between February 2012 and August 2013, 191 patients were randomized and treated (G+P: N=126; G: N=65). Patients were mostly female (64.4%) with a mean age of 62 years; most were never-smokers (67.0%), had confirmed stage IV disease (84.8%), and ECOG PS of 1 (68.6%). Overall, 55.0% had exon 19 deletions, 39.3% had exon 21 L858R mutations, and 5.8% had other activating EGFR mutations. Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment arms. Patients in the G+P arm received 96.3% and 92.9% of the planned mean dose of G and P, respectively; patients in the G arm received 97.9% of the planned mean dose of G. Median PFS for G+P (15.8 months) was significantly longer than for G (10.9 months); HR=0.68; 95% confidence interval 0.48, 0.96; 1-sided P=0.014; 2-sided P=0.029. OS data are immature and will be reported at study completion. The incidence of grade 3/4 study drug-related TEAEs was significantly higher for G+P (42.1%) than for G (18.5%); P=0.001. The most common study drug-related TEAEs for G+P were diarrhea (44.4%), aspartate aminotransferase increased (41.3%), and dermatitis acneiform and alanine aminotransferase increased (38.1% for each), and for G were diarrhea (47.7%), dermatitis acneiform (43.1%), and dry skin (35.4%). The proportion of treatment discontinuations due to TEAEs was 16.7% in the G+P arm and 9.2% in the G arm; 2 patients (G+P arm) died due to study drug-related adverse events.
Conclusion:
The combination of G+P led to a significant improvement in PFS compared with G monotherapy for East-Asian patients with EGFR mutation-positive NS NSCLC, and met the primary study endpoint. The incidence of grade 3/4 study drug-related AEs was higher for G+P than for G. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01469000.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL17.03 - Biomarkers for Efficacy in JO25567 Study Evaluating Erlotinib plus Bevacizumab versus Erlotinib in Advanced NSCLC with EGFR Mutation (ID 306)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Bevacizumab (B), an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) monoclonal antibody has been proven to provide additional efficacy benefit in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for 1[st] line therapy of non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In JO25567 study, we observed that bevacizumab in combination with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor, erlotinib (E) also provided additional 6.3 months median progression free survival (PFS) in advanced EGFR mutation-positive non-squamous NSCLC. To try to understand this additional effect of bevacizumab, we investigated the predictive biomarkers related to angiogenesis comprehensively in JO25567 study. Clnical trials registry number: JapicCTI-111390
Methods:
We evaluated the biomarkers in blood and tissue samples. All samples were collected before E+B or E treatment in JO25567 study. Angiogenesis related ligands and soluble receptors in serum were analyzed by multiplex, bead-based suspension array. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) or variable number of tandem repeats (VNTR) of angiogenesis related genes were analyzed by direct sequencing or electrophoresis after PCR for blood sample. VEGF-A concentration in plasma were analyzed by Immunological Multi-Parametric Chip Technique (IMPACT) assay. Messenger RNA of genes related to angiogenesis in tumor tissue were quantitated by multiplex TOF-mass spectrometry (MassARRAY). Immunohistochemistry of neuropilin and exploratory proteomics analysis were planned for surgically resected tumor tissues. PFS were used as an efficacy variable of prediction. Multivariate Fractional Polynomial (MFP) and Subpopulation Treatment Effect Pattern Plot (STEPP) were used for biomarker screening.
Results:
One hundred fifty-two patients were treated with E+B or E in JO25567 study. We analyzed 26 ligands or soluble receptors in 134 serum samples. Follistatin and leptin were identified as potential biomarkers by MFP. The interaction p-value with adjustment of covariates for biomarker and efficacy was 0.0168 for follistatin and 0.0049 for leptin. STEPP suggested that high follistatin related to limited bevacizumab efficacy and low leptin related to higher bevacizumab efficacy. SNPs could be analyzed in 135 blood samples. In 12 SNPs and 1 VNTR of 8 genes, no gene related to bevacizumab efficacy. Plasma samples were collected from 105 patients. Median VEGF-A concentration of E+B group and E group were 18.0 pg/mL and 18.8 pg/mL respectively and was one sixth or more lower than previously reported breast and gastric cancers. Hazard ratio of E+B comparing with E for was 0.23 (95% CI: 0.09-0.60) for low plasma VEGF and was 0.56 (95% CI: 0.26-1.25) for high plasma VEGF. This trend was not consistent with previously reported studies. We analyzed mRNA expression from 24 surgical resected tumors and no predictive value was observed. Because of limited number of surgically resected tumors obtained, we couldn’t proceed exploratory proteomics analysis nor evaluate predictive value of neuropilin expression.
Conclusion:
In this comprehensive predictive biomarker analysis, follistatin and leptin in blood were identified as potential biomarker candidates for E+B therapy.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL17.08 - Gefitinib/Chemotherapy vs Chemotherapy in EGFR Mutation-Positive NSCLC Resistant to First-Line Gefitinib: IMPRESS T790M Subgroup Analysis (ID 3287)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Exon 20 T790M mutation is the most common cause of acquired resistance to first-line epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR TKIs). The IMPRESS study (NCT01544179; Phase III, double-blind IRESSA[TM ]Mutation Positive Multicentre Treatment Beyond ProgRESsion Study; Lancet Oncology: in press) reported no statistically significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint) between gefitinib plus cisplatin/pemetrexed (cis/pem) (G) vs placebo plus cis/pem (P) in patients with acquired resistance to first-line gefitinib (hazard ratio [HR] 0.86; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.65–1.13; p=0.273; median PFS 5.4 months in both arms) and other secondary endpoints. Among the subgroup analyses performed for IMPRESS, the most noticeable difference was observed by T790M status as tested via plasma circulating free tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA).
Methods:
Patients (age ≥18 years [Japan ≥20 years], chemotherapy-naïve, locally advanced/metastatic NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, prior disease progression on first-line gefitinib) from 71 centers (Europe/Asia Pacific) were randomized to G or P (gefitinib 250 mg/day or placebo, plus cis 75 mg/m[2]/pem 500 mg/m[2]). For biomarker analysis, consenting randomized patients provided 10-mL blood samples (at Visit 1 [baseline], 4, 6; then every 6 weeks and at discontinuation) from which to obtain ctDNA. ctDNA levels of EGFR mutations, including T790M, were detected using a quantitative emulsion (BEAMing) digital PCR assay (Sysmex[®]) conducted at a central laboratory (positivity defined as ≥0.02% mutant DNA fraction).
Results:
Data are reported for plasma samples from baseline visits (serial data will be available in the future). Blood samples were available for all 261 randomized patients, of whom T790M status was known for 247 (93.2%): T790M mutation-positive n=142 (57.5%; G=81, P=61) and T790M mutation negative n=105 (42.5%; G=46, P=59). Median PFS for the T790M mutation-positive subgroup was 4.6 vs 5.3 months for G and P, respectively (HR 0.97, 95% CI 0.67 to 1.42, p=0.8829). Median PFS for the T790M mutation-negative subgroup was 6.7 vs 5.4 months for G and P, respectively (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.43 to 1.03, p=0.0745). See Table for additional study endpoints.
Conclusion:
Following acquired resistance to first-line gefitinib, these data suggest there were two distinct patient populations defined by T790M genotype. For plasma T790M-positive, gefitinib should not be continued when platinum-based doublet chemotherapy is used as second-line therapy. For plasma T790M-negative, continuation of gefitinib in combination with platinum-based doublet chemotherapy may offer clinical benefit, which would require further confirmation in a prospective randomized study.IMPRESS subgroup populations (plasma) T790M mutation-positive N=142 T790M mutation-negative N=105 ORR, % (G vs P) 28.4 vs 39.3 p=0.282 37.0 vs 27.1 p=0.171 DCR, % (G vs P) 81.5 vs 77.0 p=0.5175 93.5 vs 83.1 p=0.0895 OS, HR (95% CI)* 2.16 (1.26, 3.82) p=0.0067 0.83 (0.36, 1.85) p=0.6644 Plasma BEAMing PCR (compared with tumor), % (n/N) Exon 19 Deletions L858R Sensitivity 73.8 (124/168) 81.6 (62/76) Specificity 96.7 (89/92) 95.3 (161/169) Concordance 81.9 (213/260) 91.0 (224/247) *OS immature, follow up ongoing G: gefitinib plus cisplatin/pemetrexed; P: placebo plus cisplatin/pemetrexed ORR, objective response rate; DCR, disease control rate; OS, overall survival
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P2.01 - Poster Session/ Treatment of Advanced Diseases – NSCLC (ID 207)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P2.01-091 - Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind Study of Erlotinib plus Ramucirumab or Placebo in Patients with EGFR Mutation-Positive Metastatic NSCLC (ID 1560)
09:30 - 17:00 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
Background:
Ramucirumab, a human IgG1 monoclonal antibody, binds to Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) Receptor 2, preventing binding of VEGF-A, C and D. Ramucirumab in combination with docetaxel has demonstrated improvement in overall survival, progression free survival (PFS), objective response rate and disease control rate in 2nd line treatment of NSCLC patients in the phase III REVEL study, which included non-squamous and squamous cell carcinoma patients. Although erlotinib is recognized as one of the standard of care options in the frontline treatment of patients whose tumors harbor an Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) mutation, it is hypothesized that the duration of disease control would be greater when an antiangiogenic agent such as ramucirumab is added to erlotinib. This global phase Ib/III trial will assess safety, tolerability and efficacy (phase III) of the combination of ramucirumab with erlotinib in previously untreated stage IV NSCLC patients harboring activating EGFR mutations. The trial is planned to be conducted in ~120 sites in the Americas, Europe, and Asia and is currently open for enrollment. (RELAY, NCT02411448)
Methods:
In part A (phase Ib) approximately 12 patients (6 Japan + 6 US/EU) will receive ramucirumab (10mg/kg on day 1) every two weeks + erlotinib (150 mg/day). DLT assessment will be performed after patients complete four weeks of treatment. In part B (phase III), approximately 450 patients will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive ramucirumab or placebo every two weeks with erlotinib until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or other withdrawal criteria are met. The primary endpoint is PFS. There are 3 planned interim analyses that will evaluate safety, futility and efficacy, respectively. Other secondary endpoints include overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response, safety and quality of life.
Results:
Not applicable
Conclusion:
Not applicable
-
+
P3.01 - Poster Session/ Treatment of Advanced Diseases – NSCLC (ID 208)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P3.01-020 - Updated Data from JP28927 Study of Alectinib in ALK+ NSCLC Patients with or without History of ALK Inhibitor Treatment (ID 346)
09:30 - 17:00 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
Background:
Alectinib, a next generation ALK inhibitor, was granted approval in Japan 2014, since it showed good efficacy and tolerability in ALK+ NSCLC patients without previous ALK inhibitor treatment in Phase I/II study (AF-001JP). We also reported its promising response and good tolerability for crizotinib pre-treated patients in JP28927 study (ESMO 2014). This report describes the update of efficacy and safety result in JP28927 study.
Methods:
Patients (with/without prior ALK inhibitor treatment) who had ALK+ NSCLC were enrolled in JP28927. Patients received alectinib (300mg) twice daily; treatment was continued until the investigator determined lack of clinical benefit.
Results:
Thirty-five patients were enrolled into JP28927 study. Median follow-up duration was 400 days (35-457 days). The median progression free survival (PFS) of 35 patients was 13.9 months (95%CI: 11.1- NR). Among 30 patients with the target lesions at base line, the overall response rate (ORR) was 70% (95%CI: 50.6-85.3) with rapid response (the median time to response was 1.2 months [95%CI: 1.1-2.1]). Twenty-three out of 35 patients had been confirmed the progressive disease with crizotinib treatment. Their median PFS was 12.9 months (95%CI: 3.9-NR). Twenty out of 23 patients had the target lesions at base line. ORR was 65% (95%CI: 40.8-84.6) and the median time to response was 1.2 months (95%CI: 1.1-1.3). The treatment-related adverse events (AEs) observed in more than 10% of the patients were constipation (31.4%), dysgeusia (25.7%), WBC count decreased (22.9%), neutrophil count decreased (22.9%), vomiting (14.3%), rash (14.3%), blood bilirubin increased (14.3%) and AST increase (14.3%). Treatment-related Grade 3 AEs, i.e. pulmonary thrombosis, lymphocyte count decrease, hypophosphatemia, were observed in 3 patients. No treatment-related Grade 4 or 5 AEs were observed.
Conclusion:
The updated results in JP28927 study once again endorsed our previous reports which had indicated alectinib’s promising response even for ALK+NSCLC patients who failed to crizotinib treatment.
-
+
P3.01-080 - An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1b/2 Study to Evaluate Necitumumab in Combination with Gemcitabine and Cisplatin in the First-Line Treatment of Patients with Advanced (Stage IV) Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) (ID 184)
09:30 - 17:00 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
Background:
Necitumumab (N) is a human IgG1 anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody. Squamous (SQ) histology accounts for 25-30% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and gemcitabine combined with cisplatin (GC) is a standard of care for advanced or metastatic SQ-NSCLC. In the previous global randomized, open-label, Phase 3 trial (SQUIRE), compared with GC, the addition of N to GC (GC+N) significantly improved overall survival (OS) (HR=0.84, p=0.012; median 11.5 vs 9.9 months) and progression-free survival (PFS) (HR=0.85, p=0.020; median 5.7 vs 5.5 months). The objective response rate (ORR) was 31% vs 29% (p=0.400), and the disease control rate (DCR) was 82% vs 77% (p=0.043), respectively. The SQUIRE results were an important advance in the search for a new treatment for patients with metastatic SQ-NSCLC, where limited progress has been made over the last two decades. However, only 8% of patients in SQUIRE Trial were Asian and no Japanese institutions participated. We have therefore conducted this Phase 1b/2 trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of GC+N in Japanese patients with advanced SQ-NSCLC.
Methods:
This trial consists of a Phase 1b and Phase 2 part. Patients with advanced (Stage IV) SQ-NSCLC are eligible for enrollment if they are aged³20 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) 0 or 1; measurable or nonmeasurable disease according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) Version 1.0; adequate organ function. GC+N or GC may continue for a maximum of 4 cycles; patients with at least stable disease in GC+N may continue to receive N until disease progression or emerging non-acceptable toxicity. The purpose of Phase 1b part is to determine the recommended dose of the combination of GC (G=1000 or 1250 mg/m[2] iv, Days 1 and 8; C=75 mg/m[2] iv, Day 1; 3-week cycle) and N (800 mg iv, Days 1 and 8; 3-week cycle). Patients are enrolled in 2 cohorts using a conventional 3+3 study design, with dose-escalation of gemcitabine permitted according to the incidence of dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). The Phase 2 part is an open-label, randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of addition of N to GC. Patients are randomly assigned on a 1:1 basis (Stratification factors: ECOG PS and gender) to GC+N (Arm A) or GC (Arm B). The primary endpoint is OS for which the final analysis will be performed when at least 137 events are observed. The sample size of 180 patients (137 events) has 68% power for a log-rank test at 0.2 one-sided alpha. The secondary endpoints include PFS, ORR, time to treatment failure, Pharmacokinetics, safety and patient-reported outcomes. The relationship between EGFR protein expression level by immunohistochemistry (IHC) and each of several efficacy measures will also be assessed. Translational research analyses will be performed to analyze relevant biomarkers for clinical outcomes. ClinicalTrial.gov Identifier: NCT01763788.
Results:
Not applicable
Conclusion:
Not applicable
-
+
P3.04 - Poster Session/ Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing (ID 235)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P3.04-032 - Clinical Applications of Next Generation Sequencing on Therapeutic Decision-Making in Lung Cancer (ID 1007)
09:30 - 17:00 | Author(s): K. Nakagawa
- Abstract
Background:
The identification of driver mutations, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), have already been successfully translated into clinical practice. The clinical implementation of genomic profiling for NSCLC with high-throughput and multiplex genotyping tests is thus warranted in order to prioritize appropriate therapies for individual patients.
Methods:
The present study has recruited lung cancer patients at Kinki University Hospital from June 2013. To screen patients with lung cancer for genetic alterations relevant to novel molecular-targeted therapeutics, we have applied a Ion AmpliSeq RNA Fusion Lung Cancer Research Panel to detect known fusion transcripts such as ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK1 rearrangements simultaneously in a RNA sample obtained from FFPE lung cancer tissues. Deep sequencing was also performed using the Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer Panel. There were two co-primary endpoints for this study. First, we assessed the percentage of patients with additional therapy options uncovered by detecting potentially actionable genetic alterations. Second, we evaluated the percentage of patients who actually received genotype-directed therapy.
Results:
From June 2013, one hundred ten patient tumor samples were sequenced with these assays, and 104 (95%) patients received the results of Ion AmpliSeq Colon and Lung Cancer Panel and 106 (96%) patients received the results of the Ion AmpliSeq RNA Fusion Lung Cancer Research Panel with a >90% success rate for genotyping. An actionable driver alteration was detected in 43 (39%) of tumors from patients, leading to use of a targeted therapy in 23 (21%).
Conclusion:
Multiplexed genomic testing can aid physicians in matching patients with targeted treatments and appropriate clinical trials.
