Virtual Library
Start Your Search
S. Kanda
Author of
-
+
MINI 15 - Chemotherapy Developments for Lung Cancer (ID 128)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:L. Crinò, C.P. Belani
- Coordinates: 9/08/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, Mile High Ballroom 1a-1f
-
+
MINI15.01 - A Phase I/II Study Evaluating the Combination of Resminostat and Docetaxel for Platinum-Pretreated NSCLC (ID 700)
16:45 - 18:15 | Author(s): S. Kanda
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Resminostat, an oral hydroxamate-type inhibitor of class I and II histone deacetylases, has shown a broad spectrum of anti-tumor activity against human cancer cell lines, and synergetic or additive effects in combination with docetaxel in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cell lines. We initiated a phase I/II study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining resminostat and docetaxel in patients (pts) with NSCLC pretreated with platinum-based therapy. The purpose of the phase I portion was to evaluate dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) in the first cycle, estimate the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of resminostat when administered in combination with docetaxel, and determine the recommended dose (RD) for the phase II portion. Here, we report the results of the phase I portion.
Methods:
NSCLC pts with failure of a platinum-based therapy were eligible for the study. Patients were treated with docetaxel on day 1 and resminostat on days 1 to 5 every 21 days. Phase I was an open-label, 3+3 cohort, dose-escalation study. While the docetaxel dose was fixed at 75 mg/m[2], the resminostat dose was escalated from 400mg (Dose Level 1: DL1) to 600 mg (DL2). DLT was defined as follows: grade 4 thrombocytopenia, grade 4 neutropenia lasting >7 days, febrile neutropenia lasting >3 days, and any other clinically significant grade 3/4 non-hematological toxicity.
Results:
A total of 9 pts (DL1: 3 pts, DL2: 6 pts) were enrolled in the phase I portion: male/female, 6/3; median age, 60 yr (50-71 yr); histologically proven adenocarcinoma/squamous cell carcinoma, 7/2; performance status, 0/1 in 7/2 pts. No DLTs were observed at DL1 or DL2. The most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events in any cycle were neutropenia (8 pts, 88.9%), leukocytopenia (8 pts, 88.9%), and febrile neutropenia (4 pts, 44.4%). These events were transient and resolved prior to the next cycle. No pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction between resminostat and docetaxel was observed. A partial response was observed in 1 pts (DL1) and stable disease in 3 pts (DL2).DL1 N=3 DL2 N=6 PK parameters (Geometric Mean) Resminostat Docetaxel Resminostat Docetaxel C~max ~(ng/mL) 3,010 2,840 5,610 3,140 T~max ~(h) 1.78 1.00 1.47 1.03 AUC~inf~(h∙ng/mL) 11,800 3,030 25,500 3,280 t~1/2~ (h) 2.98 8.21 3.02 8.73
Conclusion:
The combination of resminostat and docetaxel was tolerable up to DL2 (docetaxel 75 mg/m[2], resminostat 600 mg); the MTD was not reached. Dose Level 2 was determined as the RD for the phase II portion of this study, which is currently ongoing.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P1.08 - Poster Session/ Thymoma, Mesothelioma and Other Thoracic Malignancies (ID 224)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Thymoma, Mesothelioma and Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P1.08-026 - First Case of SMARCB1(INI1)- Deficient Squamous Cell Carcinoma of the Pleura (ID 978)
09:30 - 17:00 | Author(s): S. Kanda
- Abstract
Background:
SMARCB1(INI1) is a tumor-suppressor gene located at 22q11.2. It is considered an integral component of the chromatin remodeling complex SW1/SNF. Loss of SMARCB1 expression has been reported to be associated with atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and malignant rhabdoid tumors of the kidney and extrarenal tissues. In addition, sinonasal basaloid carcinomas and neoplasms arising from the gastrointestinal tract, pancreas and uterus with SMARCB1 deficiency have been reported.To date, however, SMARCB1-deficient carcinoma of the pleura has not been reported.
Methods:
We report the first case of SMARCB1-deficient squamous cell carcinoma of the pleura in a patient, and describe the clinical course from initial presentation to diagnosis with pathological findings.
Results:
The case was a 33-year-old female never smoker with no previous medical or family history of malignant disease. She visited a previous hospital with a one-month history of worsening cough and dyspnea. Chest X-ray and computed tomography (CT) showed left pleural tumors with a large amount of pleural effusion. She underwent the diagnostic thoracoscopy to obtain sufficient tumor tissue from the parietal pleura. Systemic work-up including CT identified no other lesions apart from those in the left thoracic cavity. Pathological diagnosis in the previous hospital was squamous cell carcinoma of the pleura. She received six cycles of cisplatin plus gemcitabine therapy and achieved stable disease an overall best response. After progression, she transferred to our institution for expected further treatment. Although she received TS-1 therapy as second-line treatment, her disease progressed rapidly with worsening chest pain and dyspnea, and she died at 10 months after diagnosis. On pathological review of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissues of parietal pleura obtained in the previous hospital, primary tumors were composed of morphologically poorly differentiated cancer cells with characteristics of squamous cell carcinoma. Tumor cells were completely negative for INI1 protein expression by immunohistochemistry. Malignant pleural mesothelioma, thymic carcinoma and NUT midline carcinoma were ruled out. Claudin4 and MOC31 were positive, and C-kit and NUT were negative by immunohistochemistry suggesting that the tumor was primary squamous cell carcinoma of the pleura with SMARCB1 deficiency. Genome analysis using next-generation sequence data revealed no oncogene mutations, such as EGFR mutation, ALK, RET or ROS1 rearrangement.
Conclusion:
To our knowledge, this is the first report of SMARCB1-deficient squamous cell carcinoma of pleura. The tumor was highly aggressive and carried a poor prognosis with short survival. The existence of other SMARCB1- deficient tumors is likely, such as atypical teratoid/rhabdoid tumors and malignant rhabdoid tumors of the kidney and extrarenal tissues. The clinical features and treatments of this tumor are not clear, and additional cases wiii assist the establishment of treatments and improve the poor prognosis.
-
+
P1.08-028 - PD-L1 Expression in Neuroendocrine Tumors of the Lung (ID 2217)
09:30 - 17:00 | Author(s): S. Kanda
- Abstract
Background:
The World Health Organization (WHO) classification recognizes four major types of neuroendocrine tumors of the lung: typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, small cell lung cancer (SCLC), and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC). These diagnostic categories have different prognostic implications and require distinct treatment strategies. The PD-1/PD-L1 pathway is a major target of anti-tumor immunotherapy. PD-L1 expression has been reported to cause local immune suppression and is considered as a predictive marker of immune checkpoint therapeutics. In order to clarify any differences in the expression of PD-L1 according to the type of neuroendocrine tumor in the lung, we investigated the expression levels of PD-L1 by immunohistochemistry in neuroendocrine tumors of the lung.
Methods:
The subjects of this study were patients who were diagnosed as having lung neuroendocrine tumors and were treated at the National Cancer Center Hospital from 1982 to 2010. A tissue microarray (TMA) made from the surgical specimens was analyzed. After the rabbit monoclonal PD-L1 antibody was validated (clone E1L3N, Cell Signaling Technology, Danvers, MA), the TMA was stained and the tumor PD-L1 expression score was calculated by a semiquantitative method (by multiplying the intensity [0–3] by the staining area [0–100%]). To determine the PD-L1 expression, 3 (1%) was used as the cutoff score.
Results:
A total of 227 patients were included in this study. The characteristics of the entire patient population were as follows; median age, 65 years (range: 19-84 years); gender, male 168 (74.0%) / female 59 (26.0%); smoking status, smokers 191 (84.1%)/non-smokers 36 (15.9%); pStage: IA 79 (34.8%)/IB 36 (15.9%)/IIA 25 (11.0%)/IIB 29 (12.8%)/IIIA 47 (20.7%)/IIIB 6 (2.6%)/IV 5 (2.2%); histology, typical carcinoid 46 (20.3%)/atypical carcinoid 6 (2.6%)/SCLC 69 (30.4%)/LCNEC 106 (46.7%). Of the 227, samples from 15 (6.6%) showed positive staining for PD-L1. The characteristics of the patients showing positive staining for PD-L1 were as follows; median age, 71 years (range: 37-84 years); gender, males 12 (7.1%)/females 3 (5.1%); smoking status, smokers 13 (6.8%)/non-smokers 2 (5.6%); pStage, IA 3 (3.8%)/IB 2 (5.6%)/IIA 2 (8.0%)/IIB 5 (17.2%)/IIIA 2 (4.3%)/IIIB 0 (0%)/IV 1 (20.0%); histology, typical carcinoid 0 (0%)/atypical carcinoid 0 (0%)/SCLC 4 (5.8%)/LCNEC 11 (10.4%). In 31 of the 69 cases of SCLC who were treated by surgery, the disease recurred; of these 31 patients who developed disease recurrence, positive expression for PD-L1 was noted in 2 patients (6.5%). Furthermore, the disease recurred in 33 of the 106 cases of LCNEC treated by surgery; of the 33, 2 (6.1%) showed expression of PD-L1.
Conclusion:
None of the tumors in the patients with typical or atypical carcinoid in our study showed expression of PD-L1. Only the tumors in 4 of the 69 patients (5.8%) with SCLC and 11 of the 106 patients (10.4%) with LCNEC showed positive staining results for PD-L1. The data suggest that drugs directed against PD-1/PD-L1 might be potentially useful in the immunotherapy of SCLC and LCNEC.
