Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

I. Bover



Author of

  • +

    MO25 - NSCLC - Combined Modality Therapy II (ID 112)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Mesothelioma
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO25.01 - Interim analysis of the Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) randomized phase II trial of thoracic radiotherapy (RT) concurrent with cisplatin (P) plus oral vinorelbine (OV) or etoposide (E) for unresectable locally advanced (LA) stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). (GECP10/02). (ID 2658)

      10:30 - 12:00  |  Author(s): I. Bover

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Chemoradiation is the standard of care for the treatment of unresectable LA-NSCLC. Cisplatin plus either etoposide or vinorelbine are two of the chemotherapy (CT) regimens widely used for the disease concurrently with radiotherapy. Oral vinorelbine is a formulation which has achieved comparable results to the IV vinorelbine. The purpose of the study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of cisplatin when combined with etoposide or oral vinorelbine with radical radiation for the management of stage III NSCLC.

      Methods
      Patients (pts) between 18 and 75 years, with histologically proven untreated and unresectable LA stage IIIA/IIIB NSCLC, adequate bone marrow, hepatic and renal function, ECOG PS 0-1, were randomized to: Arm OV-P: OV 60 mg/m[2] D1, D8 cycle 1 and 80 mg/m[2] cycle 2 (if no grade 3-4 toxicity) plus P 80 mg/m[2] D1 every 3 weeks for 2 cycles as induction; patients without progression received OV 40 mg/m[2] D1, D8, and P 80 mg/m[2] D1 every 3 weeks for 2 more cycles (4 cycles in total). Arm E-P: E 50 mg/m[2] intravenously D1 to D5 plus P 50 mg/m[2] D1, D8 every 4 weeks for 2 cycles. Both regimens administered with concurrent RT 66 Gy in 6.5 weeks. The primary endpoint was progression free survival using RECIST 1.1, and secondary endpoints were overall response rate, overall survival, and safety profile. To guarantee an overall type-1 α error (one side) no greater than 0.05 and a type II (β) error 0.1 for the primary endpoint of PFS, a sample size of 134 pts allocated in a 1:1 ratio is planned.

      Results
      Since August 2011 77 pts have been recruited. 46 pts have been included in the interim analysis, 23 pts have been randomly allocated to each treatment arm. Patient’s characteristics were: Male 91.3%; median age 64 (range 44-75); PS1 56.5%; smokers 46.8%; adenocarcinoma 40.4% / squamous 55.3%; stage IIIA 46.8% / IIIB 53.2%. Median of months between initial diagnosis and study start was 1 (range 0.3-15.7). Safety: 118 cycles (cy) were analysed, 79 in arm OV-P and 39 in arm E-P. Hematological toxicities arms OV-P/E-P (% cy): grade (g) 3/4 neutropenia 8.9%/13.1%; g3 thrombocytopenia 0%/5.3%; g3 anemia 0%/2.6%; febrile neutropenia 3 cases on OV-P arm (all during induction CT on cy 1) and 1 case on E-P arm (during concurrent chemoradiation). Non-hematological toxicities arms OV-P/E-P (% cy): g3 esophagitis/mucositis 1.3%/15.5%; g3 infection without neutropenia 1.3%/5.1%. No treatment-related deaths were reported. There was no remarkable difference in other toxicities between both arms. 39 pts completed the treatment as per protocol, 19 in arm OV-P and 20 in arm E-P. Overall response rates were 73.7% and 50% for the OV-P and the E-P arm, respectively.

      Conclusion
      This interim analysis shows that OV-P and E-P when administered concurrently with RT have a manageable safety profile with efficacy. Safety data is consistent with other studies reported for both chemoradiation regimens. Based on these positive results for safety, accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information EudraCT 2010-022927-31.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    O15 - NSCLC - Chemotherapy II (ID 109)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      O15.02 - The Spanish Lung Cancer Group (SLCG) BRCA1-RAP80 Expression Customization (BREC) randomized phase III trial of customized chemotherapy in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with wild-type epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) (NCT00617656/GECP-BREC) (ID 1157)

      10:30 - 12:00  |  Author(s): I. Bover

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      RAP80, a component of the BRCA1 complex, influenced outcome both in p with low BRCA1 expression treated with cisplatin (cis)/gemcitabine (gem) and in p with intermediate/high BRCA1 levels treated with cis/docetaxel (doc) or with doc alone in the SLCG phase II customized chemotherapy trial (NCT00883480). Based on these findings, the SLCG and the French Lung Cancer Group performed a prospective, randomized phase III trial in metastatic NSCLC patients to compare non-customized cis/doc with customized therapy customized according to BRCA1 and RAP80 mRNA expression levels.

      Methods
      From 2008 to 2013, patients with wild-type EGFR were randomized 1:1 to the control or experimental arm. Planned accrual was 391 patients. Treatment in the control arm was cis/doc, while patients in the experimental arm received treatment according to their BRCA1 and RAP80 levels: 1) those with low RAP80, regardless of BRCA1 levels, received cis/gem; 2) those with intermediate/high RAP80 and low/intermediate BRCA1 received cis/doc; and 3) those with intermediate/high RAP80 and high BRCA1 received doc alone. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).

      Results
      At 15 October 2012, 279 patients had been included and the planned interim analysis was performed. PFS was 5.49 months (m) in the control and 4.38 m in the experimental arm (P=0.07). Overall survival (OS) was 12.66 m in the control and 8.52 m in the experimental arm (P=0.006). Response rate (RR) was 37.3% in the control and 27% in the experimental arm (P=0.07). In the multivariate analysis including PS, treatment arm, BRCA1, RAP80, histology, smoking status and metastatic site, only extrathoracic metastases were associated with an increased risk of progression (HR, 1.78; P=0.02). In a post hoc analysis restricted to patients with ECOG PS 0, PFS was 3.91 m in the control and 7.47 m in the experimental arm (P=0.01) for those with low RAP80 levels (experimental group 1). PFS for patients in experimental groups 1, 2 and 3 was 7.47, 7.01 and 3.22 m, respectively (P=0.02). OS for patients in experimental groups 1, 2 and 3 was 28.88, 15.86 and 11.81 m, respectively (P=0.04).

      Conclusion
      Based on the negative results for PFS at the interim analysis, accrual was closed on this study. The negative results may be due to the poor predictive capacity of RAP80 and/or to the inclusion of doc alone as a treatment in the experimental arm. In addition, doc/cis may not have been the ideal combination for the control arm. Customized chemotherapy could be further encouraged in oncogene-driven pan-negative patients with PS 0.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.11 - Poster Session 1 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 208)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.11-046 - Women with lung cancer harboring epidermal growth factor (EGFR) mutations: prevalence, clinical characteristics and EGFR tyrosine kinase (TKI) treatment-related outcomes. Results from the Spanish WORLD07 database (ID 3078)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): I. Bover

      • Abstract

      Background
      EGFR mutations define a distinct molecular subset of non-small-cell lung cancer patients (p). Prevalence, baseline clinical characteristics and outcomes for women with lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations would be of interest.

      Methods
      We analyzed the clinical characteristics of women with lung cancer harboring EGFR mutations included in the WORLD07, a Spanish prospective, multicenter, epidemiologic female-specific e-database.

      Results
      A total of 2081 newly-diagnosed women with lung cancer from 38 Spanish centers were included in the WORLD07 e-database from October/2007 to October/2012. Overall 915 p were evaluated for EGFR mutation status, and 342 of them were found to have EGFR mutation (16% of all p in the e-database, 37% of p tested). EGFR-mutated p characteristics: median age 64.6 years; 86% had offspring; 8.2% had used oral contraceptives; smoking habit: 72% never smokers, 14% current smokers, 13% former smokers; for those never smokers, second-hand smokers 35%; histology: 91% adenocarcinoma, 1.5% squamous cell carcinoma, 2% large-cell carcinoma, 5% other; EGFR mutation type: 60% deletions in exon 19, 32.5% L858R mutations, 8% exon 20 mutations, 1% exon 18 mutations, 14% unknown. Sixty-nine percent of p had stage IV disease. A total of 184 EGFR mutated p received an oral EGFRTKI as 1[st] line (ECOG PS: 0 in 24%, 1 in 53%, 2 in 13%, 4 in 4%, unknown in 5%) achieving a 59% response rate (RR), 20% stable disease (SD), 10% progression (PD) and 11% not evaluable (NE); with a median follow-up of 12 months, median overall survival for these p was 21 months. A total of 72 p received an EGFRTKI as 2[nd] line with 37% RR, 34% SD, 19% PD and 10% NE. Only 16 p received an EGFRTKI as 3[rd] line, achieving a 38% RR, 19% SD, 31% PD and 12.5% NE. For those EGFR mutated women receiving an EGFRTKI as 1[st] line, RR to an EGFRTKI was 70% in those women harboring deletion in exon 19, and 45% in those with L858R mutation; median overall survival was 24 months in those with deletion in exon 19, and 17 months in those with L858R mutation. Response rate to an EGFRTKI as 1[st] line treatment was 59% in never-smoker p and 53% in current-smoker/former-smoker p with a median overall survival of 23 months and 21 months, respectively.

      Conclusion
      According to our prospective e-database of women with lung cancer, not selected for clinical trials and including all histologies, a high proportion harbor an EGFR mutation (16% of non-selected women, 37% of those tested). The vast majority of women with lung cancer harboring EGFR mutation are never smokers, have adenocarcinoma histology and outcomes similar to those previously reported in the literature. Additional epidemiologic and treatment data will be presented at the meeting.

  • +

    P2.22 - Poster Session 2 - Epidemiology, Etiology (ID 167)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Prevention & Epidemiology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.22-008 - Analysis of family history of cancer in women with lung cancer (WLC) from the Spanish WORLD07 database (ID 2430)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): I. Bover

      • Abstract

      Background
      Gender differences in lung cancer (LC) have been reported, but with many unresolved issues . Family history of cancer might play an important role in lung cancer, especially in never-smoker patients. The aim of this study was to analyze potential clinical, molecular and epidemiological differences between WLC with or without family history of cancer.

      Methods
      WORLD07 is a Spanish prospective, multicenter, epidemiologic female-specific LC database sponsored by ICAPEM, a professional association committed with WLC research. Clinicopathologic data, tumor genotype, family and personal history of cancer were collected and analyzed in order to detect differences between both groups.

      Results
      From October/2007 to November/2012, 2081 WLC were included in an e-database from 32 centers. Family history of cancer was common (49.4%, in first-degree was 77%), family history of lung cancer was present in 33%, of breast cancer in 25% and of colorectal cancer in 17%. No differences in median age of diagnosis of LC, previous hormonal therapy, number of children, menstrual status, tumor histology or stage at diagnosis were observed between WLC with or without family history of cancer. WLC with family history of cancer were ever smokers in a higher percentage (63% vs 56%, p=0.006), with no differences in passive smokers. The presence of EGFR mutations was similar in WLC with family history of cancer versus WLC without family history (38% vs 37%), although WLC patients with family history of cancer had a higher rate of exon 21 mutation (36% vs 28%), both in smokers WLC (32% vs 16%, p=0.220) and in never smokers WLC (43% vs 32%, p=0.094). The median overall survival was 25 months (CI95% 21.0-29.0) for WLC with family history of cancer and 22.0 months (CI95% 19.4-24.5) for patients without family history of cancer (p=0.027). Of note, the median overall survival was 34.8 months (CI95% 22.9-46.6) for WLC with family history of LC and 22.5 months (CI95% 20.5-24.5) for patients without family history of LC (p< 0.001).

      Conclusion
      The presence of familiar history of cancer in WLC patients included in the WORLD07 database was high (49.4%), being lung cancer the most common, followed by breast cancer. No clinical or pathologic characteristic differences were observed between patients with or without family history of cancer. The presence of EGFR mutations was similar, although WLC patients with family history of cancer had a higher rate of exon 21 mutation. The median overall survival was significantly higher in WLC patients with family history of cancer and LC. Family history of cancer, especially of LC, might have a role in LC development and deserves further studies focused in inherited genetic alterations related with an increased susceptibility to LC.

  • +

    P3.01 - Poster Session 3 - Cancer Biology (ID 147)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Biology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.01-015 - <b>Outcome in pemetrexed/cisplatin-treated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients according to mRNA expression levels of BRCA1, TS, AEG1 and REV3 </b> (ID 1170)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): I. Bover

      • Abstract

      Background
      REV3, the catalytic subunit of the translesion synthesis (TLS) polymerase x, can continue replication past DNA adducts. Depletion of REV3 sensitizes A549 lung cancer cells to cisplatin. REV3 expression is part of a gene signature that predicted pemetrexed sensitivity in 17 NSCLC cell lines. BRCA1, TS, AEG1 and RAP80 are involved in DNA damage repair through homologous recombination. The homologous recombination and TLS pathways have non-redundant functions in response to cisplatin. We hypothesized that low mRNA expression of these genes – either alone or in combination – could confer improved outcome to cisplatin/pemetrexed in NSCLC patients.

      Methods
      REV3, BRCA1, RAP80, TS and AEG1 mRNA expression was examined by quantitative RT-PCR and categorized by terciles. Expression of each gene was correlated with outcome in 47 cisplatin/pemetrexed-treated NSCLC patients.

      Results
      63.8% male; 47% smokers; 80.9% ECOG PS 1; 80.8% adenocarcinoma. Overall response rate was 51%, with no differences according to expression levels of any of the genes. Progression-free survival (PFS) for patients with low, intermediate and high BRCA1 levels was 13.4, 5.5 and 3.9 months (m), respectively (P=0.005). Similar differences in PFS were observed according to TS (P=0.003) and AEG1 (P<0.001) expression. The hazard ratio (HR) for PFS for patients with high BRCA1 levels was 4 (P=0.002). Overall survival (OS) for patients with low, intermediate and high BRCA1 levels was 29.7, 7.4 and 6.3 m, respectively (P=0.05). Similar differences in OS were observed according to TS (P=0.005) and AEG1 (P=0.001) expression. HR for OS for patients with high BRCA1 levels was 3.6 (P=0.004). There were no differences in PFS or OS according to REV3 or RAP80 levels. However, the joint effect of BRCA1 and REV3 was significant for predictive modeling. PFS for patients with low, intermediate and high levels of both genes was 14.9, 7.2 and 2.8 m, respectively (P=0.001). OS for patients with low, intermediate and high levels of both genes was 29.7, 7.8 and 6.3 m, respectively (P=0.04).

      Conclusion
      Low BRCA1 expression predicts longer PFS and OS in pemetrexed/cisplatin-treated NSCLC p. Low TS and AEG1 levels have similar predictive value. The combination of low BRCA1 and REV3 expression confers longer PFS and OS. Analysis of these genes could be useful for customizing pemetrexed/platinum chemotherapy.