Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

P.D. Hilden



Author of

  • +

    P1.06 - Poster Session 1 - Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers (ID 161)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Biology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.06-047 - Tumor expression of TTF1 is associated with a doubling of overall survival in patients with advanced lung adenocarcinomas (ID 2819)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): P.D. Hilden

      • Abstract

      Background
      Expression of thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) is commonly assessed to diagnose lung adenocarcinomas. TTF1 may also be an oncogenic driver. The prognostic impact of TTF1 expression in lung cancers has been evaluated. However, small sample sizes, population heterogeneity, and lack of control for genotype or targeted therapies have limited the interpretation and use of TTF1 as a prognostic variable.

      Methods
      We examined 638 consecutive patients with newly diagnosed (i.e. not recurrent disease) stage IV lung adenocarcinomas between 01/2009 and 09/2011. TTF1 was assessed by immunohistochemistry (8G7G3/1, DAKO, dilution 1:100); binary results were recorded (positive = any nuclear reactivity; negative = no reactivity). The association between TTF1 status and clinical variables (Chi-squared and t-tests), median survival (Kaplan-Meier methods, compared using logrank test), and outcomes with specific chemotherapies (Cox proportional hazard) and were assessed. Multivariate analysis of overall survival (Cox proportional hazard) was performed.

      Results
      TTF1 was assessed in 484 (76%) patients; 80% were TTF1+. TTF1 positivity associated with improved survival in all cohorts examined, although the EGFR cohort is limited by the small number of TTF1 negative tumors. TTF1+ was more common in EGFR (93%) than KRAS (76%) mutants (p<0.01). Figure 1 To reduce confounding from the effect of targeted therapy on survival, subsequent analyses excluded those with EGFR (n=129) mutations or ALK (n=12) rearrangements: In multivariate analysis, the HR for survival in TTF1+ patients was 0.42 (p<0.001), exceeding the prognostic impact of good performance status (KPS≥80, HR=0.54, p<0.001). There was no association between TTF1 and age (p=0.96), sex (p=0.41), smoking status (p=0.68), or performance status (p=0.07). TTF1 status did not predict improved outcomes with specific chemotherapies.

      Conclusion
      TTF1+ robustly and independently associates with improved survival in advanced lung adenocarcinomas. TTF1 exceeds the prognostic impact of clinical features (e.g. KPS) more commonly used to stratify patients. TTF1 should be assessed in all lung adenocarcinomas and should be used to stratify patients enrolled in clinical trials. Randomized trials are needed to conclusively assess if TTF1 predicts differential sensitivity to chemotherapies.

  • +

    P3.09 - Poster Session 3 - Combined Modality (ID 214)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Combined Modality
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.09-005 - "Intention-to-treat" outcomes of sequential patients with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinomas treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intent of surgical resection (ID 1199)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): P.D. Hilden

      • Abstract

      Background
      Neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgical resection is uniquely permits assessment of the in vivo response to therapy in patients with IIIA non-small cell lung cancer. Studies of neoadjuvant chemotherapy often focus only on those who are ultimately resected. We describe an “intention-to-treat” analysis of sequential patients with stage IIIA adenocarcinomas receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intent of surgical resection.

      Methods
      Using natural language processing software, we searched the electronic medical record at Memorial-Sloan Kettering Cancer Center for “neoadjuvant,” “preoperative,” or “induction” in physicians’ notes. Cases were limited to those with stage IIIA lung adenocarcinoma deemed resectable by a thoracic surgeon and treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (without radiation), including those enrolled in prospective clinical trials. Event-free survival (date of diagnosis to recurrence, relapse or death) and overall survival (date of diagnosis to death) were assessed using Kaplan-Meier methods.

      Results
      From 2007 until 08/2012, 129 patients were identified. Median follow up is 25 months (range 1-76). The patient details are described. 94/129 (73%) were treated with cisplatin-based therapy.Figure 1 The CONSORT diagram below describes the treatment patients ultimately received. Figure 2 The median EFS and OS were 16 (95% CI 13-22) and 44 (95% CI 36-NA) months. OS at 1, 2 and 3-years were 77%, 55%, and 32%. EFS plateaued at 23%, estimating the rate of cure. Overall survival strongly favored surgical resection over salvage radiation (HR=0.5, 95% CI 0.16-1.05).

      Conclusion
      These data provide unique perspective on the outcomes of patients with IIIA adenocarcinoma treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy with intent of surgical resection. EFS and OS compare favorably to historical outcomes in this stage of disease, demonstrating the value of the neoadjuvant approach. The inferior survival in patients treated with radiation as a “salvage” approach emphasizes the recommendation for definitive concurrent chemoradiation in those unlikely to be resectable.