Virtual Library

Start Your Search

E. Bria



Author of

  • +

    P1.06 - Poster Session 1 - Prognostic and Predictive Biomarkers (ID 161)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Biology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.06-041 - Prognostic impact of cytoskeleton regulatory protein human Mena (hMena) isoforms in resected, node-negative, non-small-cell lung cancer: validation of a clinic-molecular prognostic model. (ID 2609)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): E. Bria

      • Abstract

      Background
      Human Mena and the isoform hMena[+11a] are cytoskeleton regulatory proteins involved in adhesion, motility, regulated in the epithelio-mesenchimal transition. Here, we investigated their potential prognostic value in node-negative non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients.

      Methods
      Pan-hMena, hMena[+11a], E-cadherin, vimentin, ER-beta, EGFR, HER-2, pAKT, detected immunohystochemically on duplicate TMA and clinical factors (sex, age, histology, grading, T-size, number of resected nodes, RN) were correlated to 3-yr disease-free (DFS), cancer-specific (CSS), and overall survival (OS) using a Cox model. ROC analysis provided optimal cut-off values and model validation. A logistic equation including regression analysis coefficients was constructed to estimate individual patients’ probability (IPP) of relapse. Internal cross-validation (100 simulations with 80% of the dataset) and external validation was accomplished.

      Results
      In a training set of 248 patients (median follow-up: 36 months, range 1-96), Pan-hMmena and hMena+11a were the only biological variables displaying significant correlation with outcome(s), confirmed by the cross-validation (replication rate: 78%, 83%), with a prognostic model accuracy of 61% (standard error 0.04, p=0.0001). Patients with high pan-hMENA expression had a non-significant trend towards a worse outcome, while patients with high hMena+11a expression had a significant and borderline significant advantage in DFS (p=0.03) and OS (p=0.056), respectively, and a non-significant trend towards a better CSS. Univariate and multivariate 3-yr median individual patient probabilities of recurrence were 70.9 (range 40.3-94.4) and 41.2 (range 13.6-86.5), respectively (data not shown). The subgroup of patients with High Pan-hMena/Low hMena11a relative expression fared significantly better than any of the other 3 groups (p≤0.002 for all outcomes). On the basis of the combination between this molecular hybrid variable and T-size and RN, a 3-class risk stratification model was generated; the derived 3-risk class survival model strikingly discriminated between patients at different risk of relapse, cancer-related death, and death for any cause, with a prognostic accuracy of 61% (standard error 0.03, p=0.01), according to ROC analysis. The 3-risk class survival model was externally validated in an independent dataset of 133 patients, and significantly discriminated between patients at Intermediate- and High-Risk of relapse and cancer-related death.

      Conclusion
      The expression of the hMena and its isoform may represent a powerful prognostic factor in early NSCLC and usefully complements clinical parameters to accurately predict individual patient risk..

  • +

    P1.10 - Poster Session 1 - Chemotherapy (ID 204)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.10-032 - Sensitivity and meta-regression analysis exploring potential outcomes predictors in randomized trials (RCTs) evaluating the benefit of 1st-line tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma. (ID 1670)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): E. Bria

      • Abstract

      Background
      Patients affected by lung adenocarcinoma carrying a EGFR sensitizing mutation of significantly benefit from TKIs in terms of progression free survival (PFS), activity and symptoms control. The potential predictive role of clinico-pathological predictors should be investigated in order to optimize the benefit of the currently available drugs.

      Methods
      A literature-based meta-regression and sensitivity analyses to investigate the differential effect of TKIs according to demographic and molecular factors, was accomplished, analyzing all RCTs exploring TKIs versus chemotherapy for 1[st]-line treatment of patients affected by EGFR mutant NSCLC.

      Results
      9 trials (3,741 patients) were identified (EGFR mutant: 1,797). 9 RCTs were evaluable for PFS (1,790 patients) and response (1,733 patients); 7/9 for survival (1,075 patients). With regard to PFS and response, a significant interaction according to ethnicity (Asian versus Caucasian versus mixed, p=0.006 [Cochrane-Q 10.275] and p=0.047 [6.129], respectively), and trial design (retrospective versus prospective EGFR analysis, p=0.024 [5.067] and p<0.0001 [13.633]), was found. No difference was observed in term of survival. A significant interaction for response was found, with an Odds Ratio in favour of afatinib, erlotinib and gefitinib (versus chemotherapy) of 2.70 (95% CI 2.11-3.45), 2.67 (95% CI 1.81-3.93) and 1.81 (95% CI 1.46-4.78).

      Interaction [Cochrane-Q] P value Interaction [Cochrane-Q] P value
      PFS Response
      Overall (ERL vs GEF vs AFA) [4.266] p=0.188 [9.924] p=0.007
      ERL vs AFA [3.321] p=0.068 [0.056] p=0.813
      ERL vs GEF [9.714] p=0.054 [5.169] p=0.023
      AFA vs GEF [0.002] p=0.962 [7.351] p=0.007

      Conclusion
      Although limited by the retrospective nature and the heterogeneity, these data indicate a differential effect of TKIs according to the design and the ethnicity, and in response according to TKIs. These data may constitute the background to develop a clinical predictive model to better estimate the expected benefit when using EGFR TKIs in patients with EGFR mutant NSCLC

  • +

    P2.11 - Poster Session 2 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 209)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P2.11-023 - BE-Positive: Gefitinib in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations. A combined retrospective and prospective analysis from Italian patients. (ID 1881)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): E. Bria

      • Abstract

      Background
      Advanced NSCLC patients have an extremely poor prognosis with a 5-year survival rate of less than 5%. In 2009, the European Medicines Agency approved gefitinib, a reversible EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, at the dose of 250 mg daily for the treatment of adult patients with locally advanced or metastatic NSCLC with EGFR activating mutations. As the first-line EGFR mutation positive data at that time were mainly in Asian populations a prospective phase IV, open-label, single-arm study of first-line gefitinib in Caucasian patients was presented: this trial confirmed the activity and efficacy of gefitinib in 106 Caucasian patients (Douillard EMCTO 2013). In the same way, we initially collected retrospectively, continuing then prospectively, the data of NSCLC EGFR-mutation positive Italian patients treated with first-line gefitinib, with the aim to evaluate the therapeutic outcomes and the approaches beyond progression in a “real life population”.

      Methods
      We collected data of patients who started gefitinib from June 2009 until May 2013. Primary endpoint was the evaluation of first line outcomes, in terms of: objective response rate (ORR), duration of treatment, progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety. Secondary endpoint is the evaluation of the outcomes beyond progression to gefitinib. Here we report the results of first-line gefitinib of a large number of Caucasian patients.

      Results
      Data of 203 patients from 23 Italian Institutions were collected. The main patients characteristics were: median age 67 (range: 33-87), male/female 76/127, ECOG performance status (PS) 0/1/2/3/4 in 89/92/18/2/2 patients, 90.6% adenocarcinoma (in our study the percentage of carcinoma non otherwise specified was 1.5%), never/former/current smoker in 129/64/10, del19/L858R/uncommon in 128/57/18. In one case a T790M mutation ex novo was found in association with the deletion of the exon 19 (not all the patients were tested for this mutation at baseline). A median time for obtaining the EGFR test result was 8-15 days (more than 30% of the patients got the results in less than one week). Patients evaluable at the time of data lock were 168, of these 3 (1.8%) patients achieved a complete response, 72 (42.9%) a partial response for an ORR of 44.7%, 54 (32.1%) patients were stable. Median treatment with gefitinib was 38 weeks. Main toxicities were: grade 3-4 skin rash and diarrhea in 1.8% and 4.2%, respectively. Treatment was definitely stopped due toxicity in 4.2% of patients. After progression in 5 cases a re-biopsy was performed and 94 (56%) received a second-line treatment.

      Conclusion
      BE-Positive is the first study reporting results of first-line gefitinib in a large "real life population" of Caucasian patients. Data were firstly collected in a retrospective fashion, than in a prospective way. This study shows that Caucasian patients reported lower ORR when indirectly compared to Asian counterparts, but this is probably due to the partial analysis of the patients, excluding at this time those who are still on treatment. However, the tolerability profile was excellent and the median time of treatment is quite overlapping to literature data. The outcomes of PFS, OS and treatment beyond gefitinib progression will be reported when mature.