Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

M. Provencio



Author of

  • +

    MA06 - Locally Advanced NSCLC: Risk Groups, Biological Factors and Treatment Choices (ID 379)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Mini Oral Session
    • Track: Locally Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MA06.09 - Efficacy RENO Study Results of Oral Vinorelbine or Etoposide with Cisplatin & Chemo-Radiation in Stage III NSCLC. SLCG 10/02 (ID 4238)

      16:00 - 17:30  |  Author(s): M. Provencio

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background:
      This study aims to compare efficacy and safety of two widely used combinations of cisplatin (P) in this setting: as etoposide (E) and vinorelbine. This last, in its oral formulation (oV) which has achieved comparable results as the IV formulation and patients (pts) prefer it.

      Methods:
      Pts between 18-75years, with histologically proven untreated and unresectable locally-advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC), adequate respiratory function, V20≤35% and ECOG-PS 0-1, were randomized 1:1 to oV-P arm: 2 induction cycles (cy) of oV-P followed by 2 cy more with RT; or to E-P arm: 2 cy of E-P concomitants to RT. Both arms with a total radiation dose of 66Gy administered 2 Gys daily. Primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS) by RECIST 1.1. Secondary endpoints: overall response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. With α-error of 0.05 (one-tailed test) and 0.1 β-error, median PFS unacceptable for the oV-P arm of 10 months (m) (p0) and a very acceptable of 15 m (p1), 122 eligible pts were required.

      Results:
      140 pts from 23 institutions of SLCG were randomized between 08/2011-12/2014. 134 pts were treated (66 in oV-P and 68 in E-P arms). Results based on this 134 pts are presented. Median age 62 years [39-76]; PS 0/1, 45%/55%; current smoker 51%; squamous cell 51%; stage IIIB 54%. 244 and 131 cy were given in the oV-P and E-P arms, respectively. All irradiated pts in oV-P arm received at least 60Gy, 7 pts in the E-P arm received less than 60Gy (4 due to toxicity). 1 pt (1.5%) in oV-P arm and 12 pts (17.6%) in E-P arm presented esophagitis G3/4 (p=0.002). 121 confirmed eligibility for efficacy analysis. ORR were 39 (64%) and 40 pts (67%) in the oV-P and E-P arms, respectively (p=0.889). After 16 m [1-43] of follow-up, 66% pts progressed and 43% pts died. Median PFS is 11.4 m (IC95%; 6-17) in oV-P arm and 11.8 m (IC95%; 7-16) in E-P arm (p=0.374).

      Conclusion:
      Both regimens achieve similar efficacy however oV-P has less toxicity, especially esophagitis G3/4. Further follow-up is needed for the survival analysis.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P3.02b - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 494)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.02b-047 - Co-Activation of STAT3 and YAP1 Signaling Pathways Limits EGFR Inhibitor Response in Lung Cancer (ID 4168)

      14:30 - 15:45  |  Author(s): M. Provencio

      • Abstract

      Background:
      EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) induce early activation of several signaling pathways. Interleukin-6 (IL-6) and signal transducer and activator of transcription 3 (STAT3) hyper-activation occur following EGFR TKI therapy in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells. We explored the relevance of co-targeting EGFR, STAT3 and Src-YES-associated protein 1 (YAP1) signaling in EGFR-mutant NSCLC.

      Methods:
      We combined in vitro and in vivo approaches to explore whether concomitant activation of STAT3 and Src-YAP1 can limit the effectiveness of EGFR TKIs in EGFR-mutant NSCLC cells and xenograft models. In two cohorts of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, we examined messenger RNA (mRNA) gene expression within signaling pathways, leading to EGFR TKI resistance.

      Results:
      Gefitinib suppressed EGFR, ERK1/2 and AKT phosphorylation but increased STAT3 phosphorylation (pSTAT3-Tyr705). In EGFR mutant cells, gefitinib plus TPCA-1 (STAT3 inhibitor) abolished pSTAT3-Tyr705 but not the YAP1 phosphorylation on tyrosine 357 by Src family kinases (SFKs). The triple combination of gefitinib, TPCA-1 and AZD0530 (SFK inhibitor) ablated both STAT3 and YAP1 phosphorylation and was highly synergistic, according to the combination index. In two EGFR mutant xenograft mouse models, the triple combination of gefitinib, TPCA-1 and AZD0530 markedly and safely suppressed tumor growth. High levels of STAT3 or YAP1 mRNA expression were associated with worse outcome to EGFR TKI in 64 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 9.6 (95%CI, 5.9-14.1) and 18.4 months (95%CI, 8.8-30.2) for patients with high and low STAT3 mRNA, respectively (p<0.001), (HR for disease progression, 3.02; 95% CI, 1.54-5.93; p=0.0013). Median PFS was 9.6 (95%CI, 7.7-15.2) and 23.4 months (95%CI, 13.0-28.1) for patients with high and low YAP1 mRNA, respectively (p=0.005), (HR for disease progression, 2.57; 95%CI, 1.30-5.09; p=0.0067). The results were similar in the validation cohort of 55 EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients treated with first-line EGFR TKI in the Department of Oncology of Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital.

      Conclusion:
      Our study reveals that STAT3 and Src-YAP1 signaling activation occurs following single EGFR TKI in EGFR-mutant NSCLC. STAT3 and YAP1 mRNA levels were significantly predictive of progression-free survival in the original as well as in the validation cohort of EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients. Co-targeting STAT3 and Src in combination with EGFR TKI could substantially improve survival.

  • +

    P3.02c - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 472)

    • Event: WCLC 2016
    • Type: Poster Presenters Present
    • Track: Advanced NSCLC
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.02c-102 - Safety and Tolerability of Abemaciclib Combined with LY3023414 or with Pembrolizumab in Patients with Stage IV NSCLC (ID 4625)

      14:30 - 15:45  |  Author(s): M. Provencio

      • Abstract

      Background:
      Currently, treatment options are limited for patients with advanced and/or metastatic NSCLC particularly after initial treatment. In a prior phase 1 study, abemaciclib, a CDK4 & 6 inhibitor, demonstrated single-agent anti-tumor activity when dosed orally on a continuous schedule, with an acceptable safety profile in patients with previously treated metastatic NSCLC (NCT01394016). PI3kinase is an escape pathway after CDK inhibition in tumor models and aberrant immunity is a hallmark of cancer, providing the rationales to combine abemaciclib with PI3K and with checkpoint inhibitors. An ongoing Phase 1b multicenter, open-label, 3+3 dose-escalation trial with an expansion phase is investigating abemaciclib in combination with multiple single-agent options in metastatic NSCLC (NCT02079636). Here we report preliminary results for two arms of the study.

      Methods:
      In Part D, abemaciclib was administered orally on a continuous schedule every 12 hours (q12h) in combination with the PI3K/mTOR inhibitor, LY3023414, at 100, 150, or 200 mg q12h. In Part E, abemaciclib was administered in combination with the anti-PD-1 antibody, pembrolizumab (200 mg I.V. infusion q3 weeks). Patients with late stage NSCLC and 1-3 prior therapies without central nervous system metastasis were treated until disease progression or other discontinuation criteria were met. Primary endpoints for each cohort included safety/tolerability and identification of the recommended phase 2 dose. Safety assessments followed the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE v4.0). Parts D and E began enrolling patients on April 13, 2015 and April 29, 2016, respectively.

      Results:
      As of August 24, 2016, Parts D and E escalation included, respectively, 22 [male (64%)/Caucasian (77%)/stage IV (91%)/adenocarcinoma (91%)] and 6 patients [male (33%)/Caucasian (100%)/stage IV (67%)/adenocarcinoma (100%)]. ECOG PS was ≤1 in both cohorts. In Part D, 1 patient on dose level-2 (DL-2) experienced a dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (G4 thrombocytopenia). Evaluation of additional dose levels is ongoing. Seventeen patients (77%) experienced ≥1 treatment-related emergent adverse event (TRAE). Common TRAEs were nausea (50%), diarrhea (50%), vomiting (36%), fatigue (32%), and decreased appetite (27%). In Part E, no DLTs or deaths occurred in the two dosing cohorts evaluated. Four patients (67%) experienced ≥1 TRAE with 75% G1/2. Common TRAEs included fatigue (50%), diarrhea and proteinuria, (33%, each).

      Conclusion:
      The majority of previously treated advanced/metastatic NSCLC patients administered abemaciclib with LY3023414 or with pembrolizumab had manageable and tolerable adverse events, similar to those of the single agents.