Virtual Library
Start Your Search
N. Van Zandwijk
Moderator of
-
+
ED13 - Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 282)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Education Session
- Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 6
- Moderators:H. Lee Kindler, N. Van Zandwijk
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 11:00 - 12:30, Hall C1
-
+
ED13.01 - Biomarkers in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 6495)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): H. Pass
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ED13.02 - Tissue-Based Biomarkers (ID 6496)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): G. Reid, S. Kao, N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is difficult to diagnose and accurate prediction of patient outcomes still relies on a range of clinical scores. Despite extensive efforts in the last decade, there are few tumour-based molecular markers that can accurately contribute to diagnosis and prediction of disease course. Recent reports describing the mutational and transcriptional landscape of MPM tumours have revealed a number of changes that may yield clinically useful biomarkers following further development and validation studies. Diagnosis: The definitive MPM diagnosis relies on a tissue biopsy and demonstration of invasion. Diagnostic markers consist of a combination the expression of mesothelial-specific proteins and absence of markers of adenocarcinoma. Recent advances have shown that the mutation of the tumour suppressor BAP1 leads to loss of nuclear staining, and that this is highly specific for discriminating mesothelioma from benign conditions. As in some cases MPM has neither BAP1 mutation nor loss of nuclear staining, sensitivity is lacking, but this can be improved by incorporating detection of CDKN2A genomic loss using FISH. Assessment of additional mutations and fusion genes recently identified in MPM may represent useful markers for future development. Characteristic changes in microRNA expression are present in MPM, and these form the basis of a highly accurate molecular test for the differential diagnosis of MPM from other tumours affecting the pleura. Prognosis: Clinical and pathological parameters remain the best predictors of disease outcome, and although some molecular markers have demonstrated prognostic significance, these are yet to be validated. Histopathological subtype is an accurate prognostic indicator, with the epithelioid subtype associated with significantly better outcomes than the non-epithelioid biphasic and sarcomatoid types. The variation within epithelioid tumours is well recognised, and epithelioid tumours with a pleomorphic morphology have poor prognosis, similar to patients with non-epithelioid tumours. Recent results from transcriptomic analyses have revealed subsets within epithelioid and non-epithelioid tumours which more accurately describe prognosis. These include the two-cluster C1/C2 classification system based on a 3 gene predictor, and the 4 clusters (sarcomatoid, epithelioid, biphasic-epithelioid and biphasic-sarcomatoid) derived from RNA-seq analysis. MicroRNA expression has also been linked to outcome. Early studies revealed prognostic significance of miR-29c-3p, with higher levels corresponding to longer survival. More recently, microRNA expression profiles differing between long and short survivors yielded a 6-microRNA score that predicted outcome in two surgical series. Whether TCGA data confirm these observations remains to be determined. In addition to RNA and protein biomarkers, the cellular composition of tumours influences patient outcomes. It is likely that the mix of cell types within tumour samples also contributes to biomarker expression, especially for RNA extracted from whole tumours. For some proteins, differential expression in the stromal and tumour compartments is of prognostic value, for example in the case of SPARC expression. The importance of the immune cell infiltrate was recently investigated in a large number of epithelioid samples revealing that greater numbers of tumour-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes (TILs), as well as fewer tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) of the M2-type correlate with survival. In addition, the ratio of the TAMs/TILs was also shown to predict outcome in epithelioid MPM. Other cell populations associated with vascular and lymphatic invasion are also linked to survival. Prediction: Unlike lung cancer, few actionable mutations are present in MPM that predict sensitivity to targeted agents, and clinical trials with these drugs have yielded disappointing results. Markers for single agent chemotherapy and the standard cisplatin/pemetrexed doublet have also been investigated in retrospective studies attempting to link patient outcomes with gene (mRNA and protein) expression and polymorphisms. Multiple reports have linked levels of TS protein, but not mRNA, to outcomes with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. As expected from a multi-targeted agent, other levels of other proteins such as folypoly-glutamate synthase (FGPS) and the reuced folate carrier (RFC) were also associated with tumour response and patient outcomes. However, a subsequent study with a similar number of patients suggested that both TS and FPGS lack predictive value. With respect to DNA repair genes involved in cisplatin activity, ERCC1 and others have been evaluated, but results are again inconclusive. The picture is complicated by assessment of target genes in patients treated with two interacting agents (with or without subsequent surgery), and the true value of these genes awaits carefully controlled prospective analyses. The recent breakthrough success of immune checkpoint inhibiting antibodies targeting CTLA4 and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in melanoma and lung cancer has seen these agents applied to MPM patients. With response rates of around 25% for PD-1 targeting antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab in MPM, new predictive markers are needed to improve patient selection and for health economics reasons. Although the Keynote trial included patients based on positivity of PD-L1 staining, PD-L1 status appears to have little value in predicting response rate. Ongoing research into immune cell involvement may shed more light on this. Future directions: Continuing research in this area should learn from limitations of the biomarker studies of the last decades to improve the search for useful molecular markers. Large prospective trials are needed to carefully evaluate predictive markers. Alternative approaches such as the analysis of live cell populations taken from fine-needle aspirates and investigation of circulating tumour cells and tumour-derived markers in the circulation (DNA, exosomes) may yield novel markers. Conclusions: Extensive research into tumour-based markers for MPM is gradually making progress. New markers to assist in diagnosis and prognosis have been identified, but the selection of accurate predictive markers has so far remained elusive. Next-generation sequencing has identified multiple new candidate markers requiring further investigation, and may provide breakthroughs in the future.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ED13.03 - Surgery with Adjuvant or Induction Radiotherapy (ID 6497)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): M. De Perrot
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ED13.04 - Systemic Induction Therapy of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 6498)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): P. Baas
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Over the last 3 decades clinical researchers have focused on the optimal treatment of patients with mesothelioma (MPM). In the 80’s surgery had become a standard approach in some centers but it became clear that a complete resection (R0) was not achievable. The anatomical location of the mesothelioma simply does not allow a resection with save margins of normal tissue. Therefore additional therapies were looked for and a different number of approaches have been taken. To answer the question if any systemic induction therapy is considered the best, this can be answered with a clear No. reasons for this is the lack of randomized studies in this patient population and the fact that patients with MPM are grouped together despite differences in pathology, surgical approach (EPP vs Pleurectomy decortication) and biological behavior. There has been a number of preferential approaches with chemotherapy in this disease ranging from Induction chemotherapy; Intracavitary therapy and Adjuvant chemotherapy. (table) In the case of induction therapy it is clear that one aims at reducing the tumor bulk and to prevent metastases during surgery. The preferred treatment is cisplatin with pemetrexed since this is considered to be the standard of this disease.(1) Other regimens have been tested in small extend but usually involved. The use of intra-cavitary treatment has attracted attention since MPM cells show the tendency to stay localized in the thoracic cavity for a relative long period. The administration of a local cytotoxic drug would allow an improvement in local control and limited systemic effects. Cisplatin has been used frequently during surgery and were combined with heating of the lavage fluid to 40[0]Celsius. (2) Special precautions for this so-called Hyperthermic lavage approach have to be taken in the operating suite with protection of the staff to avoid exposure to the drugs. In general the lavage procedure adds another hour to the debulking surgery. Measurements of platin adducts in the blood during this procedure have shown that there is no important systemic levels measured. Unfortunately there has not been any comparison of these approaches. Most series only report the feasibility of the treatment with sometimes impressive survival figures. These are partly due to the strong selection of patients for the studies. A relative new approach is the use of a platin containing fibrin glue that can be applied to the thoracic wall after debulking using a spray system. The initial results indicate that the treatment is fast and serial biopsies show that the effect is sustained for many weeks.(3) Finally, adjuvant therapies can be applied. In this field, there are no data to support any specific treatment and the choices are generally defined based on the study protocol. No prospective trials have been reported Most of the studies are trimodality therapies where RT is an important part of the protocol. One typical example is the EORTC study where the feasibility of trimodality therapy in a phase II trial (EORTC 08031) with clearly defined timelines was tested(5). Patients with pathologically proven mesothelioma received induction chemotherapy (3 courses cisplatin and pemetrexed ) followed by EPP within 21–56 days after the last dose of chemotherapy in the absence of progressive disease and unacceptable toxicity. A ‘‘success of treatment’’ was defined as a patient who had received the full protocol and was alive after 90 days without progressive disease and without grade 3 or 4 toxicity. Of the 57 patients included, 42 had EPP (73.7%) after induction therapy. The 90-day mortality was 6.5% with an overall survival time of 18.4 months and progression-free median survival time of 13.9 months. Only 24 (42.1%) patients met the definition of success, thereby failing the primary endpoint. This study shown how difficult it is to complete a trimodality study in this patient group and only when a standard is defined, proper comparative studies can be performed. Other important studies addressing the neo-adjuvant approach are presented in the table. 1.Baas P, Fennel D, Kerr K, van Schil PE. Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Guidelines for Diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Annals Oncology 2015 2.Sugarbaker DJ, Gill RR, Yeap BY, Wolf AS, DaSilva MC, Baldini EH, Bueno R, Richards WG. Hyperthermic intraoperative pleural cisplatin chemotherapy extends interval to recurrence and survival among low-risk patients with malignant pleural Mesothelioma undergoing surgical macroscopic complete resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013 Apr;145(4):955-63. 3.Opitz I. Use of fibrin glue in malignan pleural mesothelioma, presented at the xxth IMIG conference Birmingham UK 4.Van Schil P, Baas P, Gafaar R, Maat AP, van der Pol M, Hassan B et al. Trimodality therapy for malignant pleural mesothelioma: results from an EORTC phase II multicentre trial. 5.Weder W, Stahel RA, Bernhard J, Bodis S, Vogt P, Ballabeni P, et al. Multicenter trial of neo-adjuvant chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy in malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Oncol 2007;18:1196-202 6.Cao C, Tian D, Manganas C, Matthews P, Yan TD. Systematic review of trimodality therapy for patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma. Ann Cardiothor Surg 2012;1:428-37 TableStudy type # pts drugs Completed Chemotherapy Completed Surgery Completed Radiotherapy Outcome (mOS) SAKK 17/04 Lancet Onc 2015;16;1651 Neo-adj 151 Cis/pem 145 125 23/27 in 2nd stage 7.6-9.4 Frederico BMC Cancer 2013;13;22 Neo-adj 54 Cis/pem 96% 83% 41% 15.5 Krug JCO 2009;27;3007 Neo-adj 77 Cis/pem 83% 74% 52% 16.8 Weder JCO 2004;22;3451 Neo-adj 20 Cis/gem 90% 80% n.a. 23 Van Schil ERJ 2010;36;1362 Neo-adjuvant 59 Cis/pem 93% 79% 65% 18.4 Richards JCO 2006;24;1561 intracavitary 61 Cispl 50-225 n.a. 72% n.a. 9.0 Tilleman JTCS 2009;138;405 intracavitary 121 Cispl 225 n.a 79% n.a. 12.8
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ED13.05 - Systemic Therapy of Inoperable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 6499)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): A. Scherpereel
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
To date, the treatment of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM), a rare and aggressive tumor usually induced by previous asbestos exposure, relies mostly on chemotherapy and best supportive care (BSC). But medical treatment has been so far quite deceptive with median overall survival (mOS) about one year at its best for the last 13 years with recommended first line chemotherapy by cisplatin (or carboplatin) and pemetrexed in patients fitted for it. The optimal duration of first line chemotherapy is unknown but a maximum of 6 cycles is recommended. There was no evidence supporting maintenance treatment by pemetrexed or other drug. Pathogenesis of MPM includes overexpression of growth factors, many genetic and epigenetic alterations and/or mutations of malignant cells responsible for cell proliferation and resistance to apoptosis, pleural inflammation and local immunosuppression induced by the tumor and favoring its growth. These elements provide the rationale for many targeted therapies and immunotherapy. But so far, very few drugs exhibited sufficient value to deserve further trials. Thus, first trials assessing anti-angiogenic drugs in MPM did not support their use in this cancer despite the key role of VEGF. A phase III testing thalidomide as maintenance treatment after cisplatin/pemetrexed (Cis/Pem) was negative, as well as phase II trial of bevacizumab (anti-VEGF antibodies) combined with first line cisplatin/gemcitabine. But other phase II trials evaluating bevacizumab with Cis or Carbo/Pem were promising with progression-free survival (PFS) of 6.9 months. Therefore, a phase III randomized (1:1) « MAPS » trial recruited 448 unresectable MPM patients to test Cis/Pem with (arm B) or without (arm A) bevacizumab. Arm B non-progressive patients received bevacizumab maintenance until progression or toxicity. Median overall survival (mOS) was significantly longer in the B arm: 18.8 [95%CI: 15.9-22.6] vs. 16.1 months [14.0-17.9] in the A arm, (adj.HR= 0.76, p=0.012). Thus, bevacizumab addition to Cis/Pem provided a significantly longer survival in MPM patients with acceptable toxicity, making this triplet a new treatment paradigm for this cancer. Moreover, there was no detrimental effect of bevacizumab on quality of life (QoL) despite its higher specific but manageable toxicity. There was no significant difference between arms for the percentages of drug delivery or of second line treatment to explain why adding bevacizumab to Cis/Pem significantly increased mOS, even if MAPS standard arm patients had a longer OS than patients from historical series or previous trials. Based on the same rationale than the MAPS trial, nintedanib, a drug targeting VEGF, FGF and PDGF receptors, is currently tested versus placebo in MPM patients treated by first line Cis/Pem chemotherapy in a large phase II/III randomized trial. Early I or II trials assessing drugs targeting mesothelin, a mesothelial cell surface molecule overexpressed in (mostly epithelioïd) MPM, showed promising results in combination with first-line Cis/Pem, justifying further, randomised and larger studies. Thus, very interesting trials are ongoing with anti-mesothelin monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) alone (amatuximab, a chimeric IgG1 antibody), or planned with immunotoxins (mAbs combined with anti-tubulin (anetumab ravsantine) or Listeria toxins (CRS-207) versus placebo combined with Cis/Pem too. For non-epithelioïd MPM patients, another hope might come from the dependence to arginin exhibited by argininosuccinate synthetase -1 (ASS-1) tumors such as mesothelioma, and the good results of Pegylated Arginine Deiminase (ADI-PEG 20) alone or in combination with Cis/Pem, assessed in the phase I « TRAP » trial recently presented by Szlosarek and al. A phase II/III trial (Polaris), comparing first line Cis/Pem with ADI-PEG 20 or placebo, will start in 2017 for biphasic (mixed) or sarcomatoïd MPM only because they exhibit ASS-1 defect twice more frequently than epithelioïd subtype. Finally, other innovative drugs also candidates for first line treatment in combination with Cis/Pem, after preliminary positive clinical trials, include gene therapy, cell therapy using chimeric antigen receptors (CARs) or dendritic cells (DC), or oncovirotherapy, and will be assessed as first line treatment in MPM very soon or later. For example, the European “DENIM” phase III trial will test DC based immunotherapy with allogenic tumor cell lysate as maintenance treatment after Cis/Pem chemotherapy in MPM patients. But, as in lung cancers, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) seem to represent presently the most exciting tool for MPM patients. In fact, even if a recent, large phase II trial (n=564; “Determine”) with anti-CTLA-4 mAb (tremelimumab) versus placebo in 2[nd]/3[rd] line treatment did not meet its first endpoint (mOS) (21), early data of a phase Ib basket trial with anti-PD-1 mAb (pembrolizumab) showed promising response rate (RR) of 28% and DCR of 76% in PD-L1 positive MPM (22). Other trials with checkpoint inhibitors are ongoing with anti-PD-1 alone (nivolumab, pembrolizumab), or a combination of anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) or anti-PD-L1 (durvalumab) and anti-CTLA-4 (tremelimumab or ipilimumab) as first or 2[nd]/3[rd] lines treatment. Interestingly, new clinical trials are already underway to assess value of ICI, such as nivolumab + ipilimumab combo, versus Cis/Pem as first line treatment. In conclusion, the triplet cisplatin/pemetrexed/bevacizumab may be a new first line standard of care for patients eligible for bevacizumab, and not candidate to multimodal treatment trials. Second line and further lines treatments are very limited with no validated options except pemetrexed in case of late relapse after platinum/pemetrexed. But exciting drugs and strategies were tested in this testing, in particular ICI. But remaining key questions include which predictive biomarkers for these innovative, thrilling but expensive treatments to target the best patients for each drug? And how to potentially combine these drugs versus, or in combination with, standard chemotherapy? Thus real hopes seem closer for our MPM patients with new systemic treatments.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ED13.06 - Mesothelioma in a Setting of Germline BAP1 Mutations (ID 6500)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): M. Carbone, H. Pass, H. Yang
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Individuals that are born with germline BAP1 mutations are affected by the BAP1 cancer syndrome. All individuals affected by this cancer syndrome have developed one or more malignancies in the course of their life. Mesothelioma, uveal and cutaneous melanomas –tumors often associated with exposure to environmental carcinogens-, are the most common malignancies, although almost any tumor type has been detected in carriers of this cancer syndrome. In addition, BAP1 mutant carriers develop multiple benign melanocytic tumors –histologically different from other SPITZ-like tumors- that we have called melanocytic BAP1 associated intradermal tumors (MBAITs) that can alert the physician that the patients is a carrier of the BAP1 cancer syndrome. Most malignancies develop after the 4[th] decade of life, although cancers in individuals as young as 19 years old have been detected. Because many of these malignancies, for example melanomas, can be cured by early detection, it is important to identify BAP1 mutant carriers that can be screened for early detection and curative resection. Moreover, carriers of germline BAP1 mutation may be at increased risk of developing mesothelioma and melanoma following exposure to low doses of asbestos, sunlight and X-Rays, thus cancer preventive measures can be implemented. When cancer develops in a setting of BAP1 germline mutations, these patients have a much better prognosis compared to patients with the same malignancies when they occur sporadically (i.e., not in carriers of BAP1 mutations). Familial mesotheliomas in these individuals occur in either the pleura or peritoneum (frequency ratio 1:1) at a median age of 56.3 years, have a male-to-female ratio of 0.73:1, and are associated with prolonged survival of 5 to 10 or more years, compared with a median age at diagnosis of 72, a pleural-to-peritoneal ratio of 86:14, a male-to-female ratio of 4:1, and a median survival of less than 1 year in sporadic mesothelioma. About 100 families with this mutated BAP1 cancer syndrome have been described in the United States, Europe, and New Zealand. Genetic studies demonstrated that these mutations are transmitted across multiple generations over the course of several centuries, and some US families carrying BAP1 mutations descend from a Swiss family that immigrated in the US in the early 1700s. An International Consensus Meeting sponsored by the IASLC supported medical screening for at-risk people who are carriers of BAP1 germline mutations as follows: (1) annual dermatological screening for early detection of melanoma at age 18 or younger; (2) annual eye examination/ophthalmoscopy for uveal melanoma at age 18 or younger; and (3) skin and eye examinations every 6 months after age of 30, when the frequency of cancer among carriers of germline BAP1 mutations starts to increase. It was also recommended that genetic counseling should be offered to all individuals tested for BAP1. Moreover, those with BAP1 germline mutations should be ncouraged to participate in studies to improve early detection of mesothelioma (Carbone M. et al., Journal of Thoracic Oncology 11, 1246-1262, 2016).
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22 - Novel Trials and Biomarkers in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 403)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 8
- Moderators:H. Pass, N. Van Zandwijk
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:20 - 15:50, Strauss 3
-
+
OA22.01 - STELLAR - Interim Results of a Phase 2 Trial of TTFields with Chemotherapy for First Line Treatment of Malignant Mesothelioma (ID 6034)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): F. Grosso, J. Mądrzak, R. Ramlau, S. Cedres Perez, L. Crinò, A. Chella, M. Mencoboni, B.I. Hiddinga, G.L. Ceresoli
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Tumor Treating Fields (TTFields) are an anti-mitotic, regional treatment modality, based on low intensity alternating electric fields delivered non-invasively using a portable, home use, medical device. In-vitro, human mesothelioma cells were found to be highly susceptible to TTFields. TTFields have been shown to extend survival of patients with glioblastoma when added to standard of care chemotherapy.
Methods:
The trial will accrue a total of 80 patients with unresectable, previously untreated mesothelioma. Patients are treated with TTFields in combination with pemetrexed and cisplatin or carboplatin. Continuous TTFields at 150 kHz for a minimum of 18 hours/day are applied to the thorax together with standard dosing of chemotherapy. Inclusion criteria include ECOG 0-1, pathological evidence mesothelioma and at least one measurable lesion according to modified RECIST criteria. Patients are followed q3 weeks (CT scan q6 weeks) until disease progression. The primary endpoint is overall survival (OS) and secondary endpoints are response rate, progression free survival (PFS) and treatment-emergent toxicity. This prospective, single arm study assumes that historical control has an exponential survival distribution and a median survival of 12.1 Months (Vogelzang et al.). The sample size provides 80% power with a two sided alpha of 0.05 to detect a Hazard Ratio of 0.67 for OS, compared to the historical data.
Results:
To date, 42 patients have been enrolled in the trial with an average follow up time of 11.5 months. Median age is 67±9 (range 43-78), 79% are male and 48% smokers. 14% (6 patients) have metastatic disease and 33% (14 patients) have an ECOG score of 1. Median survival has not been reached at this time. The 12-month survival rate is 79.7% (95% CI 57.2-91.2) and median PFS is 7.3 months (95% CI 5.6-NA). No device-related serious adverse events (AEs) have been reported to date. Expected TTFields-related dermatitis was reported in 55% (23 patients). Only 2 patients had grade 3 dermatitis. The following severe (grade 3-4) systemic AEs were reported: hematological (26%), hepatobiliary (2%), respiratory (2%).
Conclusion:
These interim results of the ongoing STELLAR study demonstrated no safety concerns for the combination of TTFields to the thorax together with standard chemotherapy for previously untreated mesothelioma patients. The 12-month survival rate was significantly higher, and PFS longer, than that of historical controls reported by Vogelzang et al. Final analysis of the study will be performed after enrollment and follow up of all 80 patients in the study are completed.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22.02 - Nintedanib plus Pemetrexed/Cisplatin in Patients with MPM: Phase II Findings from the Placebo-Controlled LUME-Meso Trial (ID 4191)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): F. Grosso, N. Steele, S. Novello, A. Nowak, S. Popat, L. Greillier, T. John, N. Leighl, M. Reck, P. Taylor, N. Pavlakis, J.B. Sørensen, D. Planchard, G.L. Ceresoli, B. Hughes, J. Mazieres, M.A. Socinski, M. Mueller, U. Von Wangenheim, A.B. Loembe, N. Morsli, J. Barrueco, G.V. Scagliotti
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Standard first-line treatment for patients with unresectable malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is pemetrexed/cisplatin, yielding a median overall survival (OS) of only ~1 year, thus new approaches are required. As demonstrated by the bevacizumab MAPS study, inhibition of the VEGF pathway is of interest as a treatment approach for MPM. Nintedanib is an oral, triple angiokinase inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR and FGFR. This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of nintedanib plus pemetrexed/cisplatin in patients with advanced MPM.
Methods:
Patients with unresectable MPM (chemo-naïve, ECOG PS 0–1) were stratified by histology (epithelioid/biphasic) and randomised (1:1) to receive up to 6 cycles of pemetrexed (500 mg/m[2])/cisplatin (75 mg/m[2]) on Day 1 plus nintedanib (200 mg bid)/placebo on Days 2–21. Patients without disease progression received maintenance treatment with nintedanib/placebo. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Results:
87 patients were randomised to receive pemetrexed/cisplatin, plus nintedanib/placebo. Patient characteristics were comparable between the groups. PFS was longer in the nintedanib vs the placebo arm, in both the overall study population and in epithelioid patients (Table 1). Preliminary OS data also favour nintedanib. All patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE, any grade), with 7% of patients in the nintedanib arm discontinuing due to AEs, vs 15% with placebo. Serious AEs occurred in 36% vs 42% of patients in the nintedanib and placebo arms, respectively. The most common ≥grade 3 AEs occurring in nintedanib vs placebo patients were neutropenia (34% vs 10%), ALT increase (14% vs 2%) and gamma glutamyltransferase increase (14% vs 0%).
Conclusion:
Nintedanib plus pemetrexed/cisplatin demonstrated clinical efficacy with improved PFS and a tolerable safety profile in patients with unresectable MPM. Based on these promising findings, this Phase II study was extended to a confirmatory Phase III trial, which is currently enrolling patients. Clinical trial identifier: NCT01907100.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22.03 - HMGB1, a Target for Mesothelioma Therapy and a Biomarker to Detect Asbestos Exposure and to Identify Mesothelioma Patients (ID 5211)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): H. Yang, H. Pass, M. Carbone
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Millions of people have been potentially exposed to asbestos, the primary cause of malignant mesothelioma (MM). Presently, no reliable biomarkers are available to identify among potentially exposed people, those individuals who have actually been exposed and who are at high risk of MM. High Mobility Group Box Protein-1 (HMGB1) is a key mediator of asbestos-induced inflammation and MM pathogenesis. Recently, HMGB1 hyper-acetylation has been functionally associated to its active release by inflammatory cells. Here, we compared the serum levels of total and hyper-acetylated HMGB1 in individuals professionally exposed to asbestos, MM patients and healthy unexposed controls.
Methods:
We compared the serum levels of total and hyper-acetylated HMGB1 in individuals professionally exposed to asbestos, MM patients and healthy unexposed controls. Previously proposed MM biomarkers fibulin-3, osteopontin, and mesothelin were also blindly measured in blood collected from participants to the study.
Results:
HMGB1 serum levels reliably distinguished asbestos-exposed individuals and MM patients from unexposed controls. Moreover, the levels of total and hyper-acetylated HMGB1 were significantly higher in MM patients compared to asbestos-exposed individuals, and did not vary with tumor stage, suggesting that early lesions are also associated to increased HMGB1 levels. At a cutoff value of 2.00 ng/mL, the sensitivity and specificity of hyper-acetylated serum HMGB1 in differentiating MM patients from asbestos-exposed individuals was 100%, outperforming, in parallel experiments, other previously proposed biomarkers: osteopontin, fibulin-3, and mesothelin. When comparing MM patients to patients with other non-MM cytologically benign or malignant pleural effusion, the combination of two biomarkers, HMGB1 and fibulin-3, provided the highest sensitivity and specificity in differentiating these two groups. Moreover, we found that HMGB1 drives MM development and sustains MM progression, and we demonstrated that targeting HMGB1 inhibits MM cell growth and motility in vitro, reduced tumor growth in vivo and prolonged survival.
Conclusion:
Despite the relatively small size of our cohorts, our results are of exceptional significance and clinical relevance as they provide the first biomarker of asbestos exposure and indicate that hyper-acetylated HMGB1 is a very sensitive and specific biomarker to differentiate MM patients from individuals occupationally exposed to asbestos and unexposed controls. Moreover, our results on HMGB1 inhibitors indicate that HMGB1 targeting hampers the malignant phenotype of MM, offering a novel potential therapeutic approach to patients afflicted with this dismal disease.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22.04 - Discussant for OA22.01, OA22.02, OA22.03 (ID 6979)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): C. Rolfo
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22.05 - Breath Analysis by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry Can Be Used to Screen for Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 4845)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): K. Lamote, L. Vandermeersch, H. Van Langenhove, J. Van Cleemput, K. Nackaerts, J.P. Van Meerbeeck
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an asbestos-related tumour with poor prognosis. Since MPM is diagnosed at advanced stage due to non-specific symptoms and investigations, it is thought that only an early diagnosis will improve patient’s outcome. Breathomics allows to detect volatile organic compounds (VOCs) in breath which can be used as non-invasive biomarkers. Although we were able to discriminate MPM patients from controls using ion mobility spectrometry breathomics, we were not able to identify specific VOCs. Therefore, we aimed to identify VOCs in the breath of MPM persons and persons at risk with gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS).
Methods:
Fourteen MPM patients, eighteen asymptomatic asbestos-exposed individuals, 16 individuals with benign asbestos-related diseases and fourteen healthy non-exposed persons were included. After 2 hours of fasting, participants breathed tidally for 5 minutes through a mouthpiece connected to a VOC filter. Subsequently, a full vital capacity was captured in a Tedlar bag of which 500 ml was immediately transferred on a Tenax[GR]-column. Samples were thermally desorbed followed by GC-MS analysis (Agilent 6890A–Thermo Focus DSQII). VOCs were manually selected in the chromatogram and standardised to an internal standard (toluene-d8). Only VOCs with a S/N-ratio>10 were used. Using SPSSv23, significant differences were searched and ROC-curves for discriminating MPM from all control groups were constructed. VOCs which had an AUC~ROC~>0.80 are reported.
Results:
114 VOCs were selected of which 17 were significantly different between MPM patients and controls. Of these, 7 had AUC~ROC~>0.80 and are possible markers for MPM diagnosis.Figure 1
Conclusion:
The large discriminative power and good sensitivity and specificity imply the possibility to use breath analysis for MPM screening. Therefore, persons exposed to asbestos with a positive test should be considered for follow-up in a cost-effective way, decreasing the need for CT-scans and radiation exposure in low-risk persons. Further work includes combining models for discrimination and validating these findings.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22.06 - Refinement of the Prognostic miR-Score for Use in Diagnostic Specimens from Chemo-Naïve Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients (ID 5045)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): M.B. Kirschner, B. Vrugt, M. Friess, M. Meerang, P. Wild, N. Van Zandwijk, G. Reid, W. Weder, I. Opitz
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
A 6-microRNA signature (miR-Score, Kirschner et al 2015) was previously demonstrated to show high prognostic accuracy in a series of surgical specimens (with and without induction chemotherapy). In the present study we investigated these microRNAs in an independent cohort of MPM patients all treated with induction chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). The main focus of the study was to evaluate the possible effects of induction chemotherapy on microRNA expression and to refine and validate the miR-Score for use in chemo-naïve diagnostic specimens.
Methods:
We identified a cohort of 120 MPM patients who received chemotherapy followed by EPP between 1999 and 2014 at University Hospital Zurich. At present microRNA analysis (RT-qPCR) has been carried out in 34 pairs of chemo-naïve (diagnostic biopsy) and chemo-treated (EPP) specimens. Paired-samples t-test was employed to determine differences in microRNA expression pre- and post-chemotherapy. Accuracy of the miR-Score in predicting a good prognosis (>20 months survival post-surgery) was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. In addition, binary logistic regression modelling was used to build a refined miR-Score.
Results:
Applying the miR-Score to chemo-naïve diagnostic specimens revealed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46-0.84), and the same analysis on the EPP specimens gave an AUC of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.37-0.77). Therefore, the accuracy of the miR-Score was lower than observed in the previous study. However, pairwise comparison of microRNA expression before and after chemotherapy showed that although not reaching statistical significance, the levels of several microRNAs were lower following induction chemotherapy. We next employed binary logistic regression modelling on microRNA levels in chemo-naïve tissue to determine whether a refined microRNA signature less susceptible to chemotherapy-induced changes could be created. A refined miR-Score consisting of miR-221 and miR-30e, the two microRNAs least affected by chemotherapy, achieved AUCs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.61-0.94) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.96) in diagnostic and EPP specimens, respectively. When applied to samples from the previous study, the refined score resulted in an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54-0.90).
Conclusion:
This validation and refinement study has shown that the expression of several miR-Score microRNAs appears to be affected by standard chemotherapy. A refined miR-Score was generated which is less susceptible to the effect of chemotherapy and may have prognostic value when applied to diagnostic specimens. Further validation in additional paired samples and investigation of the effect of cisplatin, pemetrexed and gemcitabine on microRNA expression are ongoing.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22.07 - Correlation of CT Scan Based Tumor Volume Measurement to Actual Resected Tumor Volume - A New T-Factor? (ID 5958)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): O. Lauk, M. Friess, T.D.L. Nguyen-Kim, T. Frauenfelder, S. Hillinger, B. Seifert, I. Inci, W. Weder, I. Opitz
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Tumor volume has been reported to be a valuable prognosticator for malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) survival. We wanted to assess the precision of CT scan based preoperatively measured tumor volume when correlated to the actual resected tumor weight and tumor volume after pleurectomy/decortication.
Methods:
From 10/2012 – 06/2016 the tumor weight of surgery specimens was measured in 32 patients undergoing macroscopic complete resection by (extended) pleurectomy/decortication ((e)P/D). The median tumor weight of all patients was (n=32) 443g (95-783g). In all patients tumor volume was measured in the CT or PET-CT scans performed before surgery as described previously (Frauenfelder 2011). Tumor volume of the resected specimen was additionally measured in 21 patients. Relations between tumor weight, tumor volume at surgery, CT-volume, cT stage and pT stage were analyzed using Spearman rank correlation.
Results:
Median time between CT scan and surgery was 18 days (range 1-48). The analysis revealed a moderate correlation between CT tumor volume and weight (p=0.001, correlation coefficient 0.58, CT volume and tumor volume at surgery showed strong correlation (p=0.001, correlation coefficient 0.65). No significant correlation was observed between cT stage and tumor weight (p=0.1, correlation coefficient 0.31), but a moderate correlation between cT stage and CT volume (p=0.001, correlation coefficient 0.58) as well as specimen volume (p=0.008, correlation coefficient 0.58). There was a moderate correlation of tumor weight with pT stage (p=0.02, correlation coefficient 0.42), but no correlation of CT volume (p=0.1, correlation coefficient 0.31) as well as specimen volume with the pT stage (p=0.2, correlation coefficient 0.32). Figure 1
Conclusion:
The correlation between preoperatively assessed CT tumor volume and volume of the resected specimen showed a strong correlation. To assess the prognostic role of CT measured tumor volume a correlation to prognosis has to be performed before implementation as a new T-factor.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22.08 - Discussant for OA22.05, OA22.06, OA22.07 (ID 7002)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): V. Laszlo
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
ED13 - Treatment of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 282)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Education Session
- Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:H. Lee Kindler, N. Van Zandwijk
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 11:00 - 12:30, Hall C1
-
+
ED13.02 - Tissue-Based Biomarkers (ID 6496)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Introduction: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is difficult to diagnose and accurate prediction of patient outcomes still relies on a range of clinical scores. Despite extensive efforts in the last decade, there are few tumour-based molecular markers that can accurately contribute to diagnosis and prediction of disease course. Recent reports describing the mutational and transcriptional landscape of MPM tumours have revealed a number of changes that may yield clinically useful biomarkers following further development and validation studies. Diagnosis: The definitive MPM diagnosis relies on a tissue biopsy and demonstration of invasion. Diagnostic markers consist of a combination the expression of mesothelial-specific proteins and absence of markers of adenocarcinoma. Recent advances have shown that the mutation of the tumour suppressor BAP1 leads to loss of nuclear staining, and that this is highly specific for discriminating mesothelioma from benign conditions. As in some cases MPM has neither BAP1 mutation nor loss of nuclear staining, sensitivity is lacking, but this can be improved by incorporating detection of CDKN2A genomic loss using FISH. Assessment of additional mutations and fusion genes recently identified in MPM may represent useful markers for future development. Characteristic changes in microRNA expression are present in MPM, and these form the basis of a highly accurate molecular test for the differential diagnosis of MPM from other tumours affecting the pleura. Prognosis: Clinical and pathological parameters remain the best predictors of disease outcome, and although some molecular markers have demonstrated prognostic significance, these are yet to be validated. Histopathological subtype is an accurate prognostic indicator, with the epithelioid subtype associated with significantly better outcomes than the non-epithelioid biphasic and sarcomatoid types. The variation within epithelioid tumours is well recognised, and epithelioid tumours with a pleomorphic morphology have poor prognosis, similar to patients with non-epithelioid tumours. Recent results from transcriptomic analyses have revealed subsets within epithelioid and non-epithelioid tumours which more accurately describe prognosis. These include the two-cluster C1/C2 classification system based on a 3 gene predictor, and the 4 clusters (sarcomatoid, epithelioid, biphasic-epithelioid and biphasic-sarcomatoid) derived from RNA-seq analysis. MicroRNA expression has also been linked to outcome. Early studies revealed prognostic significance of miR-29c-3p, with higher levels corresponding to longer survival. More recently, microRNA expression profiles differing between long and short survivors yielded a 6-microRNA score that predicted outcome in two surgical series. Whether TCGA data confirm these observations remains to be determined. In addition to RNA and protein biomarkers, the cellular composition of tumours influences patient outcomes. It is likely that the mix of cell types within tumour samples also contributes to biomarker expression, especially for RNA extracted from whole tumours. For some proteins, differential expression in the stromal and tumour compartments is of prognostic value, for example in the case of SPARC expression. The importance of the immune cell infiltrate was recently investigated in a large number of epithelioid samples revealing that greater numbers of tumour-infiltrating CD4+ and CD8+ T lymphocytes (TILs), as well as fewer tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) of the M2-type correlate with survival. In addition, the ratio of the TAMs/TILs was also shown to predict outcome in epithelioid MPM. Other cell populations associated with vascular and lymphatic invasion are also linked to survival. Prediction: Unlike lung cancer, few actionable mutations are present in MPM that predict sensitivity to targeted agents, and clinical trials with these drugs have yielded disappointing results. Markers for single agent chemotherapy and the standard cisplatin/pemetrexed doublet have also been investigated in retrospective studies attempting to link patient outcomes with gene (mRNA and protein) expression and polymorphisms. Multiple reports have linked levels of TS protein, but not mRNA, to outcomes with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy. As expected from a multi-targeted agent, other levels of other proteins such as folypoly-glutamate synthase (FGPS) and the reuced folate carrier (RFC) were also associated with tumour response and patient outcomes. However, a subsequent study with a similar number of patients suggested that both TS and FPGS lack predictive value. With respect to DNA repair genes involved in cisplatin activity, ERCC1 and others have been evaluated, but results are again inconclusive. The picture is complicated by assessment of target genes in patients treated with two interacting agents (with or without subsequent surgery), and the true value of these genes awaits carefully controlled prospective analyses. The recent breakthrough success of immune checkpoint inhibiting antibodies targeting CTLA4 and the PD-1/PD-L1 axis in melanoma and lung cancer has seen these agents applied to MPM patients. With response rates of around 25% for PD-1 targeting antibodies pembrolizumab and nivolumab in MPM, new predictive markers are needed to improve patient selection and for health economics reasons. Although the Keynote trial included patients based on positivity of PD-L1 staining, PD-L1 status appears to have little value in predicting response rate. Ongoing research into immune cell involvement may shed more light on this. Future directions: Continuing research in this area should learn from limitations of the biomarker studies of the last decades to improve the search for useful molecular markers. Large prospective trials are needed to carefully evaluate predictive markers. Alternative approaches such as the analysis of live cell populations taken from fine-needle aspirates and investigation of circulating tumour cells and tumour-derived markers in the circulation (DNA, exosomes) may yield novel markers. Conclusions: Extensive research into tumour-based markers for MPM is gradually making progress. New markers to assist in diagnosis and prognosis have been identified, but the selection of accurate predictive markers has so far remained elusive. Next-generation sequencing has identified multiple new candidate markers requiring further investigation, and may provide breakthroughs in the future.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MTE29 - Advances in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (Ticketed Session) (ID 322)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Meet the Expert Session (Ticketed Session)
- Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 07:30 - 08:30, Stolz 1
-
+
MTE29.02 - Advances in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 6593)
07:30 - 08:30 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract:
Epidemiology: MPM, representing around 90% of all mesothelioma cases diagnosed, is an aggressive tumour with a poor prognosis, and relatively few treatment options. The association of mesothelioma with asbestos exposure is well established. The latency period, the interval between first asbestos exposure to the diagnosis is long (around 40 years), and explains why in many instances the effect of banning asbestos from the workplace has yet to be seen. At the same time there is evidence accumulating that non-occupational asbestos exposure may significantly contribute to mesothelioma incidence [1] and it is most worrying that unrestricted use of this carcinogen is allowed in Russia and most Asian, African and South American countries. Unfortunately the multilateral treaty to promote shared responsibilities in relation hazardous chemicals (Rotterdam convention) has become paralyzed by the veto of asbestos producers and considering the rapid surge of asbestos consumption in developing countries the end of the mesothelioma epidemic is not in sight [2]. Molecular biology: Major efforts have been undertaken to explore the genomic alterations responsible for the development of malignant pleural mesothelioma. Recent next-generation sequencing efforts have confirmed the frequent loss of tumour suppressor genes identified in earlier studies. Deletion and loss of function mutation of CDKN2A, NF2 and BAP1 are common molecular events in MPM, but the overall mutational load tends to be lower in MPM than in lung cancer. Mutation, aberrant splicing, and gene fusions occur in additional genes such as SF3B1, TRAF7 and SETD2, but at lower frequency [3]. Expression analyses suggest that there are subgroups of tumours both within and between the traditional histopathological subtypes of MPM [3, 4], and this has potential implication for prognosis. Although still to be published, the results from a TCGA mesothelioma study paint a similar picture of the mutational and transcriptional landscape. Investigation of microRNA expression reveals a general downregulation of microRNAs with tumour suppressor activities. In addition to miR-31, frequently co-deleted with CDKN2A, the miR-15/16 family is consistently downregulated in MPM tumours. This family controls expression of targets such Bcl-2, CCND1 and VEGF, and thus plays a role in the regulation of proliferation, apoptosis and angiogenesis. Recent data suggest that these microRNAs also play role in controlling the levels of PD-L1 expression in MPM cells [5], targeted by immune checkpoint inhibitors. Treatment Options: MPM is notoriously refractory to localized and systemic treatment. Meta-analyses (multivariate analyses) of large series of patients confirm that the prognosis of the select group of patients able to undergo radical surgery is significantly better than without surgery [6]The debate about the extent of radical surgery has for some time been governed by the significant risks associated with radical surgery as noted in the MARS trial. Therefore, when radical multimodality treatment approaches are considered, it seems prudent to involve an experienced team at a high volume centre. While the important palliative role of radiotherapy in MPM has been accepted by the oncological community, consolidation radiotherapy after radical surgery [7] has not been shown to provide major benefits in terms of local control. To define the role of (intensity modulated) accelerated radiotherapy in MPM comparative studies are needed. The impressive data (median overall survival of 51 months) from the SMART study [8] combining pre-operative intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) immediately followed by extra-pleural pneumonectomy in 62 patients MPM patients with epithelial histology suggests that such an approach may have the potential to become an alternative for induction chemotherapy followed by radical surgery. Almost every chemotherapy agent has been tested in MPM. Cisplatin, methotrexate, pemetrexed and the anthracyclines doxorubicin and daunorubiucin were most active, but single agent activity seldomly exceeded a 20% response rate. A systematic review of the chemotherapy literature carried out in the early 2000s concluded that combination therapy was likely to be more effective than single agent therapy [9]and shortly thereafter Vogelzang’s randomized comparison between cisplatin and cisplatin/pemetrexed confirmed cisplatin/pemetrexed as the new therapy standard. Thirteen years later this standard has been augmented by a large comparative French intergroup study revealing that the addition of bevacizumab to the cisplatin/pemetrexed standard is associated with a 2.7 months advantage in median overall survival [10]. However, it important to note that a not insignificant number of negative phase II and III studies with a range of inhibitors of growth factors including EGFR, VEGF and PDGF had preceded this positive result. Other targeted agents investigated in phase II and III studies including bortezomib, vorinostat, everolimus, and defactinib, the inhibitor of the NF2/mTOR/FAK pathway, have also failed to show notable activity in pre-treated MPM patients [11]. It has become clear that MPM is an immunogenic tumour type and the preliminary data showing responses after immune checkpoint (PD-L1) inhibition [12] seem to indicate that reversing the immunosuppression induced by advancing disease is likely to represent a major step forward. However, monotherapy with Tremelimumab, inhibitor of CTLA-4 and considered active in phase II studies, failed to produce a survival benefit over placebo in 2[nd] and 3[rd] line, underlining the importance of comparative studies [13]. Independent research groups have reported ‘spontaneous’ regression of MPM, revealed a relation between infiltrating lymphocytes and plasma cells and prognosis and presented promising early clinical results with mesothelin-targeting antibodies [11]. Most recently dendritic cell vaccination combined with pulsed (metronomic) cyclophosphamide to deplete regulatory T cells resulted in prolonged tumour control in a limited group of MPM patients [14]. It is not excluded that targeting multiple compartments involved in immune surveillance will lead to increased efficacy. Early signs of efficacy of experimental treatment with tumour suppressive microRNAs packaged in minicells [15, 16] and the interaction between the microRNA 15/16 family and PD-L1 expression point to the complexity of immune checkpoint regulation and underlines the need for additional translational studies to unravel the resilient drug resistance mechanisms operable in MPM. 1. Marinaccio, A., et al., Malignant mesothelioma due to non-occupational asbestos exposure from the Italian national surveillance system (ReNaM): epidemiology and public health issues. Occup Environ Med, 2015. 72(9): p. 648-55. 2. Takahashi, K., P.J. Landrigan, and R. Collegium, The Global Health Dimensions of Asbestos and Asbestos-Related Diseases. Ann Glob Health, 2016. 82(1): p. 209-13. 3. Bueno, R., et al., Comprehensive genomic analysis of malignant pleural mesothelioma identifies recurrent mutations, gene fusions and splicing alterations. Nat Genet, 2016. 48(4): p. 407-16. 4. de Reynies, A., et al., Molecular classification of malignant pleural mesothelioma: identification of a poor prognosis subgroup linked to the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition. Clin Cancer Res, 2014. 20(5): p. 1323-34. 5. Williams, M., et al., Tumour suppressor microRNAs regulate PD-L1 expression in malignant pleural mesothelioma., in International Mesothelioma Interest Group (iMig) 2016. 2016: Birmingham 6. Linton, A., et al., Factors associated with survival in a large series of patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma in New South Wales. Br J Cancer, 2014. 111(9): p. 1860-9. 7. Stahel, R.A., et al., Neoadjuvant chemotherapy and extrapleural pneumonectomy of malignant pleural mesothelioma with or without hemithoracic radiotherapy (SAKK 17/04): a randomised, international, multicentre phase 2 trial. Lancet Oncol, 2015. 16(16): p. 1651-8. 8. de Perrot, M., et al., Accelerated hemithoracic radiation followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy for malignant pleural mesothelioma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg, 2016. 151(2): p. 468-73. 9. Berghmans, T., et al., Activity of chemotherapy and immunotherapy on malignant mesothelioma: a systematic review of the literature with meta-analysis. Lung Cancer, 2002. 38(2): p. 111-121. 10. Zalcman, G., et al., Bevacizumab for newly diagnosed pleural mesothelioma in the Mesothelioma Avastin Cisplatin Pemetrexed Study (MAPS): a randomised, controlled, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet, 2016. 387(10026): p. 1405-14. 11. Schunselaar, L.M., et al., A catalogue of treatment and technologies for malignant pleural mesothelioma. Expert Rev Anticancer Ther, 2016. 16(4): p. 455-63. 12. Alley, E.W., et al., Clinical safety and efficacy of pembrolizumab (MK-3475) in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma: Preliminary results from KEYNOTE-028. Cancer Research, 2015. 76(18): p. CT 103. 13. Kindler, H.L., et al., Tremelimumab as second- or third-line treatment of unresectable malignant mesothelioma (MM): Results from the global, double-blind, placebo-controlled DETERMINE study. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 2016. 34(15 (May Suppl)): p. #8502. 14. Cornelissen, R., et al., Extended Tumor Control after Dendritic Cell Vaccination with Low-Dose Cyclophosphamide as Adjuvant Treatment in Patients with Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2016. 193(9): p. 1023-31. 15. Reid, G., et al., Clinical development of TargomiRs, a miRNA mimic-based treatment for patients with recurrent thoracic cancer. Epigenomics, 2016. 8(8): p. 1079-85. 16. Kao, S.C., et al., A Significant Metabolic and Radiological Response after a Novel Targeted MicroRNA-based Treatment Approach in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2015. 191(12): p. 1467-9.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA02 - Novel Targets and Biomarkers in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 369)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 3
- Moderators:L.E. Raez, M. Jakopovic
- Coordinates: 12/05/2016, 11:00 - 12:30, Stolz 2
-
+
OA02.01 - The microRNA-15/16 Family Regulates Tumour Cell Growth via Fibroblast Growth Factor Signals in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 5395)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a highly aggressive, asbestos-related malignancy characterized by poor outcome and limited therapeutic options. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signals play important roles in mesothelioma cell growth and malignant behavior and their inhibition leads to reduced tumor growth. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are conserved noncoding RNAs controlling gene expression via translational repression of target mRNAs. The miR-15/16 family is downregulated in MPM and has tumor suppressor functions. Several FGFs/FGFRs are predicted miR-15/16 targets. The aim of this study was to explore the link between the miR-15/16 and the FGF/R family in MPM.
Methods:
Gene and microRNA expression was determined by RT-qPCR or Taqman Low Density Arrays (TLDAs). Mimics were used for restoring microRNA expression. Stimulation or inhibition of FGF signals or bcl-2 was achieved by recombinant FGF2, siRNAs, or small-molecule inhibitors, respectively. A SYBR green-based proliferation assay and colony formation assays were used to monitor effects on cell growth.
Results:
Expression analysis showed a consistent downregulation of target FGF/FGFR genes after transfection with miRNA mimics. Restoration of miR-15/16 led to dose-dependent growth inhibition, which significantly correlated with sensitivity to the specific FGFR1 inhibitor PD166866. Re-expression of microRNAs in combination with FGFR knock-down or pharmacological inhibition resulted in reduced activity, indicating target competition. Combined inhibition of the FGF-axis and bcl-2, another established target of miR-15/16, resulted in enhanced activity. Treatment with recombinant FGF2 further reduced mature as well as pri-microRNA levels and also could prevent/reduce growth inhibition by mimics, but only when added within 24 hours after transfection. TLDA screens after stimulation/inhibition of FGF signals identified regulation of several other miRNAs involved in pathways relevant for tumour growth and aggressiveness.
Conclusion:
Our data shows that the post-transcriptional repression of FGF-mediated signals contributes to the tumour-suppressor function of the microRNA-15/16 family. Impairing hyperactivated FGF signals as well as the anti-apoptotic protein bcl-2 through the restoration of this miRNA family might serve as a novel therapeutic strategy in mesothelioma.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA02.03 - Circulating Fibroblast Growth Factor 18 is Elevated in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients - A Multi-Institutional Study (ID 5988)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a rare but devastating malignancy. Despite the search for new promising treatment approaches, the outcome for most MPM patients remains dismal. Therefore, the identification of novel biomarkers is urgently needed in order to identify patients with a better prognosis and to support personalized therapeutic decisions. In our previously published study, we were able to show that fibroblast growth factor 18 (FGF18) is overexpressed in MPM tissue specimens and cell models. The objective of this study was the evaluation of FGF18 as a circulating biomarker in MPM.
Methods:
Plasma was collected from 107 MPM patients at the time of diagnosis or before surgical resection. Samples were included from the Medical University of Vienna, University Hospital Center in Zagreb and from The Concord Repatriation General Hospital and Strathfield Private Hospital in Sydney. Samples from 49 healthy volunteers and from 8 patients with non-malignant pleural diseases served as controls. Circulating FGF18 was measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and correlated to clinical, pathologic and radiologic parameters.
Results:
Plasma FGF18 level was significantly elevated in MPM patients vs. healthy controls (P<0.0001). A slight increase of circulating FGF18 level was also detected in patients with pleuritis or fibrosis (vs. control, P=0.0067). Sarcomatoid (n=7) morphology was associated with high FGF18 levels when compared to the epithelioid (n=77) histology (P=0.0064). Importantly, MPM patients presenting with FGF18 levels below the median had a significantly longer overall survival when compared to those with high FGF18 levels (median survival 625 versus 382 d, P=0.0038). Data on multivariate analysis, disease-free survival, correlation with other biomarkers and tumor volume will be presented at the conference.
Conclusion:
Our findings reveal that FGF18 is a promising blood-derived candidate biomarker in MPM. Furthermore FGF18 may support the histological classification of MPM and the identification of MPM patients with poor prognosis. .
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA02.05 - Expression of miR-223 in Mesothelioma Xenografts Originates from Stromal Cells in the Tumour Microenvironment (ID 5875)
11:00 - 12:30 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive cancer caused by asbestos exposure with limited therapeutic options. Dysregulated microRNAs play an important role in MPM biology and candidate microRNAs have been investigated as diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers or as a potential treatment targets. The role of miR-223 has previously been investigated in MPM tumour cells and was shown to act as a tumour suppressor by regulating cell mobility. Previous research indicated miR-223 to be primarily expressed by myeloid progenitor derived cells during differentiation of granulocytes and monocytes. This suggests miR-223 might have a more significant role in the inflammatory response during tumourigenesis. In this study we aimed to investigate the origin of miR-223 using mesothelioma xenograft and syngraft models.
Methods:
Human and mouse mesothelioma cell line-derived xenograft (MSTO-H211 and H226) and syngraft (AB1) models were established. MicroRNA profiles of xenografts were compared against profiles of their corresponding in vitro cultured cells to determine candidates. RT-qPCR using TaqMan MicroRNA assays was used to validate expression levels of miR-143-3p, miR-214-3p and miR-223-3p in tumour xenografts and syngrafts with those in corresponding cell lines in vitro. Species-specific ddPCR analysis was performed on RNA from xenograft tumours to determine the expression of human and mouse pri-miR-223.
Results:
MicroRNA profiles of xenograft tumours showed significant upregulation (p < 0.05) of miR-143-3p, miR-214-3p and miR-223-3p compared to corresponding in vitro mesothelioma cell lines. Only miR-223 showed significant upregulation in both xenograft and syngraft tumours compared to corresponding in vitro mesothelioma cell lines (>10000-fold increase). Other microRNAs were not significantly different between cell lines and tumours. RNA isolated from xenograft tumours contained significantly more mouse pri-miR-223 than human pri-miR-223 (p < 0.001), with only minimal expression levels of human tumour pri-miR-223 within xenograft tumours.
Conclusion:
Mature miR-223 is significantly overexpressed in xenograft tumours compared to corresponding in vitro mesothelioma cell lines suggesting stromal contribution. Species-specific pri-miRNA confirmed miR-223 is almost exclusively expressed by the mouse stromal cells in xenograft tumours. Ultimately, localising the expression of miR-223 to specific cell types (such as myeloid derived cells) through in situ hybridisation should help identify a more biologically relevant role for miR-223 in the tumour microenvironment.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
OA22 - Novel Trials and Biomarkers in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 403)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:H. Pass, N. Van Zandwijk
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:20 - 15:50, Strauss 3
-
+
OA22.06 - Refinement of the Prognostic miR-Score for Use in Diagnostic Specimens from Chemo-Naïve Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma Patients (ID 5045)
14:20 - 15:50 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
A 6-microRNA signature (miR-Score, Kirschner et al 2015) was previously demonstrated to show high prognostic accuracy in a series of surgical specimens (with and without induction chemotherapy). In the present study we investigated these microRNAs in an independent cohort of MPM patients all treated with induction chemotherapy followed by extrapleural pneumonectomy (EPP). The main focus of the study was to evaluate the possible effects of induction chemotherapy on microRNA expression and to refine and validate the miR-Score for use in chemo-naïve diagnostic specimens.
Methods:
We identified a cohort of 120 MPM patients who received chemotherapy followed by EPP between 1999 and 2014 at University Hospital Zurich. At present microRNA analysis (RT-qPCR) has been carried out in 34 pairs of chemo-naïve (diagnostic biopsy) and chemo-treated (EPP) specimens. Paired-samples t-test was employed to determine differences in microRNA expression pre- and post-chemotherapy. Accuracy of the miR-Score in predicting a good prognosis (>20 months survival post-surgery) was evaluated by ROC curve analysis. In addition, binary logistic regression modelling was used to build a refined miR-Score.
Results:
Applying the miR-Score to chemo-naïve diagnostic specimens revealed an area under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.65 (95% CI: 0.46-0.84), and the same analysis on the EPP specimens gave an AUC of 0.57 (95% CI: 0.37-0.77). Therefore, the accuracy of the miR-Score was lower than observed in the previous study. However, pairwise comparison of microRNA expression before and after chemotherapy showed that although not reaching statistical significance, the levels of several microRNAs were lower following induction chemotherapy. We next employed binary logistic regression modelling on microRNA levels in chemo-naïve tissue to determine whether a refined microRNA signature less susceptible to chemotherapy-induced changes could be created. A refined miR-Score consisting of miR-221 and miR-30e, the two microRNAs least affected by chemotherapy, achieved AUCs of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.61-0.94) and 0.80 (95% CI: 0.64-0.96) in diagnostic and EPP specimens, respectively. When applied to samples from the previous study, the refined score resulted in an AUC of 0.72 (95% CI: 0.54-0.90).
Conclusion:
This validation and refinement study has shown that the expression of several miR-Score microRNAs appears to be affected by standard chemotherapy. A refined miR-Score was generated which is less susceptible to the effect of chemotherapy and may have prognostic value when applied to diagnostic specimens. Further validation in additional paired samples and investigation of the effect of cisplatin, pemetrexed and gemcitabine on microRNA expression are ongoing.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P3.03 - Poster Session with Presenters Present (ID 473)
- Event: WCLC 2016
- Type: Poster Presenters Present
- Track: Mesothelioma/Thymic Malignancies/Esophageal Cancer/Other Thoracic Malignancies
- Presentations: 4
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 12/07/2016, 14:30 - 15:45, Hall B (Poster Area)
-
+
P3.03-002 - Inducible Changes in Cell Morphology and Gene Expression Reflecting the Histological Subtypes of Mesothelioma (ID 5405)
14:30 - 15:45 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) represents an aggressive malignancy with dismal prognosis and limited therapeutic options. MPM occurs in three main histological subtypes: epithelioid, sarcomatoid and biphasic, which are characterized by differences in morphological growth pattern, aggressiveness and patient prognosis. However, the mechanisms and causes responsible for the different cell morphologies are poorly understood. Epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) has been implicated in cancer progression and chemoresistance, but its role in MPM is not well understood. Fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signals promote cell growth, survival and aggressiveness in several tumors including mesothelioma. Aim of this study was to characterize growth factor-induced, EMT-like changes with respect to the MPM histological subtypes.
Methods:
Morphological and behavioral changes of treated cell models were analyzed by morphometry, immunoblotting and functional assays. Alterations in gene or microRNA expression were evaluated via qPCR and array hybridization. Pathway enrichment analysis was based on KEGG.
Results:
In several cell lines established from biphasic MPM, treatment with FGF2 and EGF induced morphological changes reminiscent of EMT and aggressive behavior such as scattering, increased migration, proliferation and invasiveness. Inhibition of the fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) or the MAPK axis via small-molecule inhibitors could prevent these changes and, in cell lines with sarcomatoid-like shape, reverse scattering and induce a more epithelioid morphology. Comparable results were obtained using an engineered FGFR1 enabling contactless activation via blue light. Analyses of genes and microRNAs regulated by FGF2 or EGF showed an overlap with previously established EMT markers but also identified several novel potential markers such as MMP1, ESM1, ETV4, PDL1, ITGA6 or BDKRB2. Blocking the FGFR or MAPK pathways resulted in the opposite regulation of these genes. Inhibition of MMP1 via siRNAs or pharmacological inhibitors prevented FGF2-induced scattering and invasiveness. In unsupervised clustering, the gene expression profiles of solvent- or cytokine-treated cells were associated with those of epithelioid and sarcomatoid MPM, respectively. Immunohistochemistry showed an association of MMP1 as well as phospho-ERK with the sarcomatoid part of tissue specimens from biphasic tumors. Pathway enrichment analysis of differentially expressed genes as well as the targets of altered microRNAs after FGF2 treatment showed that the regulated genes are assigned to categories important for cell growth and aggressive behavior.
Conclusion:
Our data characterize FGFR-mediated signals as important players in MPM aggressiveness and the morphological and behavioral plasticity of mesothelioma cells, leading to a better understanding of the link between the MPM histological subtypes and their influence on patient outcome.
-
+
P3.03-007 - miR-137 Acts as a Tumour Suppressor via the Down-Regulation of YB-1 in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 5579)
14:30 - 15:45 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) continues to increase in incidence worldwide and has limited therapeutic options. MPM displays characteristic changes in gene expression, including noncoding RNAs such as microRNAs, which have potential therapeutic relevance. One such miRNA is miR-137, a tumour suppressor whose promoter region is frequently methylated in other cancers and lies in in a commonly deleted chromosomal region in MPM (1p21-23). A potential role for miR-137 has yet to be investigated in MPM. One known target of miR-137 is YB-1, a multifunctional protein often up-regulated in other aggressive cancers, where elevated YB-1 levels are linked to poor clinical outcomes. This study investigates the causes of miR-137 suppression, the relationship between miR-137 and YB-1, one of its targets, as well as their roles in MPM cell growth and malignant behaviour.
Methods:
Basal expression of miR-137 and YB-1 was determined in 13 MPM cell lines by RT-qPCR and immunoblotting. Cells were treated with 5’Aza-cytidine and RT-qPCR was conducted to link methylation with miR-137 suppression. Copy number variation (CNV) was investigated by ddPCR. Cells were transfected with miR-137 mimic and subsequent YB-1 expression was investigated using RT-qPCR. Proliferation, colony formation and wound-healing assays were conducted after transfection with miR-137 mimics or YB-1-specific siRNAs.
Results:
miR-137 was absent in 4 MPM cell lines (p<0.01) and was up-regulated in response to 5’Aza-cytidine treatment in these lines, as well as other lines with low basal expression. Copy-number loss was evident in 5 cell lines and gain was present in 2. Increasing levels of miR-137 generally inhibited MPM cell migration, proliferation and colony formation. miR-137 mimics significantly down-regulated YB-1 expression, while YB-1 protein was overexpressed in the majority of MPM cell lines, compared to MeT-5A. YB-1 knock-down resulted in dose-dependent growth inhibition over 120 hours, reduced colony formation and also decreased cell migration. Effects were more pronounced in those cell lines showing high YB-1 protein levels.
Conclusion:
Our results show that methylation and CNV are likely to play a role in miR-137 down-regulation in MPM and that miR-137 acts as a tumour suppressor in MPM through at least in part the down-regulation of YB-1. We also demonstrated that YB-1 is commonly overexpressed and plays a role in proliferation and migration. These results imply a direct relationship between miR-137 and YB-1 expression, a biological interaction that may prove a useful target in developing future therapeutic approaches in MPM.
-
+
P3.03-008 - Hypoxia-Induced Changes in microRNA Levels Contribute to Drug Resistance in a 3D Model of Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 5867)
14:30 - 15:45 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
Background:
Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive asbestos-related thoracic cancer. Chemotherapy is the most frequent treatment option but almost every patient will be confronted with recurrence of disease and drug resistance. Previous studies have used 3D spheroid cultures to investigate drug response in MPM. We showed that microRNAs are important players in MPM biology and that they contribute to the response of MPM cells to some chemotherapy drugs. In the current study we aimed to investigate the role of microRNAs in the drug resistance of a 3D spheroid model of MPM.
Methods:
MPM cells were grown in standard 2D culture or as 3D spheroids in low adherence round bottom multi-well plates. The structure of the spheroids was confirmed by conventional and scanning electron microscopy. MicroRNA expression was profiled using TaqMan Low Density Arrays. RT-qPCR and droplet digital PCR were used to validate candidate microRNAs. HIF1a expression was examined in MPM spheroids using immunofluorescence staining. Drug cytotoxicity was investigated in both 2D and 3D cultures using standard proliferation assays, and the effect of drugs on gene expression was analysed. MicroRNA mimics and siRNAs were used to determine the influence of microRNA and HIF1a expression on drug resistance.
Results:
In our adapted model of 3D cell growth, MPM cell lines formed spherical 3D structures, in contrast to the donut shapes reported with other models. MPM cells in these spheroids were more resistant to cisplatin and gemcitabine when compared to cells grown in 2D cultures. Immunofluorescence revealed a hypoxic gradient with high HIF1a expression observed in the centre of the spheroids. Spheroids also exhibited a significant up-regulation of miR-210, miR-21, miR-378a, miR-195 and miR-146b, and down-regulation of miR-320b and miR-1225b. Transfecting MPM cells in 2D culture with miR-210 or miR-21 mimics resulted in increased drug resistance, whereas HIF1a knockdown inhibited spheroid formation and decreased drug resistance. Spheroids displayed higher expression of the ABCG2 drug pump, and ABCG2 was also up-regulated in cisplatin and gemcitabine treated MPM cells.
Conclusion:
Our spheroid model revealed a clear impact of hypoxia on gene expression in MPM cells. Hif1a was highly expressed in the hypoxic centre of the spheroids and is an upstream regulator of the microRNAs we found to be differentially expressed. Pharmacologic and genetic modulation of microRNA and HIF1a levels altered drug resistance in MPM cells, suggesting a link between hypoxia, microRNAs and drug resistance in MPM.
-
+
P3.03-033 - The Influence of Geographic and Socioeconomic Factors on Prognosis and Treatment Provision in Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma (ID 5941)
14:30 - 15:45 | Author(s): N. Van Zandwijk
- Abstract
Background:
Whilst the impact of clinico-pathological factors on the prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is well understood, socio-economic and geographic factors have received less attention. Although the majority of Australians reside in major cities, a dispersed population lives in regional and remote areas, where access to clinical services may be limited. We investigated the association between geographic and socio-economic factors and treatment provision and survival in a large series of patients from New South Wales.
Methods:
All patients awarded compensation by the NSW Dust Diseases Board (2002-2009) following diagnosis with MPM were assessed. Geographic remoteness, distance from oncological multidisciplinary teams (MDT) and socioeconomic status according to the index of relative socio-economic advantage and disadvantage (IRSAD), were assessed with known prognostic factors using Kaplan Meir and Cox-regression analysis. Chi-square testing compared categorical variables to analyse the impact of these factors upon clinical features and treatment received. Cancer Registry incidence data was assessed to allow comparison of the compensated DDB cohort to all NSW MPM cases.
Results:
We assessed 910 patients: Geographic remoteness (major city 67%; regional/remote 33%), distance to MDT (<10km 65%, <50km 92%). Geographic distribution was comparable to cancer registry data. Median overall survival was 10.0 months. On multivariate analysis, non-epithelioid histological subtype (HR.2.19); male gender (HR=1.37); age >70 (HR=1.39) and IRSAD status by decreasing quintile (HR=1.07) were independent prognostic factors, with a pronounced survival difference between highest and lowest IRSAD quintiles (8.4 vs 12.8 months). A trend to improved survival when residing in major cities (10.6 vs 8.8 months; p=0.162) and within 50km of MDT (10.3 vs 7.8 months;p=0.539) was noted. Patients geographic location and distance to MDT affected the use of palliative radiotherapy (p<0.05) however did not impact chemotherapy, adjuvant radiotherapy or extrapleural pneumonectomy provision. Socioeconomically disadvantaged patients were less likely to receive chemotherapy (40.3% vs 47.7%; p=0.032), with pronounced disparity between the most socioeconomically advantaged and disadvantaged quintiles (54.2% vs 37.6%;p=0.001).
Conclusion:
Despite ‘universal’ health care and the support of a compensation scheme, socioeconomic disadvantage was an independent prognostic factor for MPM in NSW Australia. A significant reduction in chemotherapy utilisation was noted, particularly in highly socioeconomically deprived areas. Furthermore, a trend to improved survival was noted in patients residing in major cities within closer proximity to oncology units, though treatment provision did not differ. Prospective research analysing specific factors including comorbidity, income, and individual preference will be required to better understand these findings in both compensated and non-compensated individuals.
