Virtual Library
Start Your Search
V. Miller
Moderator of
-
+
ORAL 06 - Next Generation Sequencing and Testing Implications (ID 90)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 8
- Moderators:G. De Lima Lopes, V. Miller
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 10:45 - 12:15, Mile High Ballroom 1a-1f
-
+
ORAL06.01 - Genomic Characterization of Large-Cell Neuroendocrine Lung Tumors (ID 1667)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): L. Fernandez-Cuesta, M. Peifer, J. George, A. De Reyniès, R. Sun, J. Altmueller, P. Nuernberg, M. Olivier, M. Ardin, Y. Blum, J. Laffaire, N. Elarouci, F. Petel, J. McKay, G. Byrnes, H. Nagy-Mignotte, D. Moro-Sibilot, C. Brambilla, S. Lantuejoul, A. McLeer, A. Soltermann, O.T. Brustugun, Å. Helland, S. Solberg, M. Lund-Iversen, S. Ansén, G. Wright, P.A. Russell, B.J. Solomon, L. Roz, U. Pastorino, I. Petersen, J.H. Clement, J. Saenger, T. Zander, R. Buettner, S. Haas, E. Brambilla, R.K. Thomas
- Abstract
Background:
Neuroendocrine lung tumours account for 25% of all lung cancer cases, and they range from low-aggressive pulmonary carcinoids (PCA) to highly malignant small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) and large-cell neuroendocrine lung carcinoma (LCNEC). The last two are strongly associated with heavy smoking and are typically detected at a clinically advanced stage, having a poor survival. Comprehensive genomic analyses in lung neuroendocrine tumours are difficult because of limited availability of tissue. While more effort has been done in the context of SCLC, the detailed molecular features of LCNEC remain largely unknown.
Methods:
We conducted 6.0 SNP array analyses of 60 LCNEC tumours, exome sequencing of 55 tumor-normal pairs, genome sequencing of 11 tumour-normal pairs, transcriptome sequencing of 69 tumours, and expression arrays on 60 tumors. Data analyses were performed using in house developed and published pipelines.
Results:
Analyses of chromosomal gene copy number revealed amplifications of MYCL1, FGFR1, MYC, IRS2 and TTF1. We also observed deletions of CDKN2A and PTPRD. TTF1 amplifications are characteristic of lung adenocarcinoma (AD); CDKN2A deletions are frequent alterations in both AD and squamous-cell lung carcinoma (SQ); FGFR1 amplifications are found in SQ and, less frequently, in SCLC; and MYCL1 and IRS2 amplifications are frequent events in SCLC. Similar to the copy number data, we found patterns of mutations characteristic of other lung cancer subtypes: TP53 was the most frequently mutated gene (75%) followed by RB1 (27%), and inactivation of both TP53 and RB1, which is the hallmark of SCLC, occurred in 20% of the cases. Mutations in STK11 and KEAP1-NFE2L2 (frequently seen in AD and SQ) were found in 23% and 22% of the specimens, respectively. Interestingly, mutations in RB1 and STK11/KEAP1 occurred in a mutually exclusive fashion (p-value=0.016). Despite the heterogeneity observed at the mutation level, analysis of the pattern of expression of LCNEC in comparison with the other lung cancer subtypes (AD, SQ, SCLC, and PCA) points to LCNEC as being an independent entity. An average mutation rate of 10.7 mutations per megabase was detected in LCNEC, which is in line with the rate observed in other lung tumours associated with smoking. We found that, similar to SCLC, the mutation signatures associated with APOBEC family of cytidine deaminases, smoking, and age (based on Alexandrov et al 2013) were the predominant ones in LCNEC. However, the contribution of the individual SCLC and LCNEC samples to these three signatures was quite different, and we are currently exploring it.
Conclusion:
Taking into account somatic copy number and mutation data, we distinguished two well-defined groups of LCNEC: an SCLC-like group, carrying alterations in MYCL1, ISR2, and in both RB1 and TP53; and a group resembling AD and SQ, with alterations in CDKN2A, TTF1, KEAP1-NFE2L2, and STK11. Although these results suggest that LCNEC might be a mix of different lung cancer subtypes, mutation clonality and expression analyses show that they are likely to be a separate entity, sharing molecular characteristics with the other lung cancer subtypes. Their heterogeneity suggests that LCNEC might represent an evolutionary trunk that can branch to SCLC or AD/SQ.
-
+
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Identification of clinically relevant molecular drivers in patient tumors is essential in selecting appropriate targeted therapy. Using next-generation sequencing (NGS) -based clinical cancer gene test, we performed genomic profiling of lung adenocarcinoma tumors.
Methods:
We collected formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tumors from 41 lung adenocarcinoma patients whose tumors previously tested negative for EGFR/KRAS/ALK by conventional methods in an ongoing trial (NCT01964157). We performed hybridization capture of 4,557 exons from 287 cancer-related genes and 47 introns from 19 genes frequently rearranged in cancer (FoundationOne). Illumina HiSeq2000 platform was used to sequence to high uniform depth.
Results:
Figure 1Tumors were sequenced to a median coverage of 529x. Overall, we identified a total of 170 known and 492 unknown individual genomic alterations. The number of known alterations per sample was average of 3.8 alterations (range 0-10). Cancer genomes are characterized by 45% (77/170) non-synonymous base substitutions, 17% (29/170) insertions or deletions, 2% (4/170) splice site mutations, 20% (34/170) gene amplifications, 5% (8/170) homozygous loss and 5% (8/170) gene fusions. TP53 was the most commonly mutated gene (13%, n=10/77) among non-synonymous base substitutions, followed by KRAS (10%, n=8/77) and PIK3CA (8%, 6/77). Insertions or deletions commonly occurred TP53 (17%, 5/29) and ERBB2 (14%, 4/29), and splice site mutations occurred in TP53, INPP4B, ATR, and MAP2K4 (n=1 each). Among gene amplification, MDM2 amplification was the most frequent (12%, 4/34), followed by ERBB2 (8%, 3/34) and CDK4 (8%, 3/34) amplification. All 8 cases of homozygous loss were observed with CDKN2A and CDKN2B. Fusion genes were most commonly observed with RET (50%, n=4/8). Based on NCCN guidelines, actionable genomic alterations with a targeted agent were identified in 16 patients (39%) (BRAF mutation [n=1], EGFR mutation [n=7], ERBB2 mutation [n=4], MET amplification [n=1], KIF5B-RET rearrangement [n=2], CCDC6-RET rearrangement [n=1], and CD74-ROS1 rearrangement [n=1]). Nine out of all patients (22%) showed discordance in targetable alterations when compared between NGS and conventional non-NGS methods.
Conclusion:
Thirty-nine percent of lung adenocarcinoma wild type for EGFR/KRAS/ALK may harbor a genomic alteration revealed by NGS approach. These results highlight the importance of profiling lung adenocarcinomas using NGS in the clinic.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL06.03 - Genome-Wide Gene Copy Number Analysis by OncoScan<sup>TM</sup> FFPE Assay in 976 Resected NSCLC From LACE-Bio2 (ID 1561)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): M.S. Tsao, F. Rotolo, E. Brambilla, S.L. Graziano, K. Olaussen, T. Le-Chevalier, J. Pignon, R. Kratzke, J. Soria, F. Shepherd, L. Seymour, S. Michiels
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Genome wide SNP array studies have identified systematic gene copy number aberrations (CNA) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but their prognostic implication is unknown. This study aimed to investigate associations between CNAs and survival using the LACE-Bio bio-bank. The LACE-Bio consortium includes large clinical trials comparing adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy to observation after complete resection of stage I-III NSCLC.
Methods:
DNA was extracted from FFPE tumor samples from 3 pivotal adjuvant chemotherapy trials (CALGB 9633, IALT, JBR.10); 1013 samples were profiled using Affymetrix OncoScan[TM] arrays with over 300,000 probes and normalized relative to a pool of normal tissues. Segmentation was performed using the CBS algorithm and minimally recurrent regions (MCR) across the series identified by CGHregions. All analyses were performed on the level of MCRs. CNAs were correlated with clinicopathological factors and adjusted for the False Discovery Rate (FDR). The primary endpoint, disease-free survival (DFS), was assessed via univariate Cox models stratified by trial and adjusted for treatment, age, sex, PS, histology, T, and N stage.
Results:
Among 976 successfully profiled samples, 414 (42%) were adenocarcinoma (ADC), 430 (44%) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) and 132 (14%) other NSCLC; 710 (73%) were male. Across the 431 MCRs identified, patients had on average 94 (SD 69) CNAs: 51 gains and 43 losses. A gain or loss was observed in at least 10% of patients for 177 and 166 regions respectively. The most common gains (up to 48%) were on chromosomes 1p, 3q, 5p, 6p, and 22q. The most common losses (up to 40%) were on chromosomes 3p, 8p and 9p. The size of 253 of the 431 MCRs (59%) was smaller or equal to 3Mb (and 79% ≤10 Mb). Sensitivity analyses on the subset of samples with optimal quality (n=777, defined by MAPD<0.3) gave consistent results. The CNA frequency of 195 regions was significantly different with FDR≤0.05 between ADC and SCC (of which 49% regions of size ≤3Mb and 71% ≤10Mb); the most significant were more gains in 3q, 22q and 12 in SCC and more losses in 3p, 4, 5q in SCC. With a median follow-up of 5.3 years, 510 DFS events and 451 deaths were recorded. In univariate analyses for DFS, 13 regions in loci 19p11–13, 7p12, 9p21, 15q14 had a raw p-value <0.005 (FDR<0.13, the top 8 corresponded to FDR≤0.05); 9 of those 13 regions were of size ≤3Mb (12 regions ≤10Mb). In adjusted analyses, 10 of the 13 regions retained raw adjusted p-values ≤0.005 (FDR≤0.15). Losses of focal regions including CDKN2A/B and STK11 (≤3Mb) were associated with poorer DFS: the hazard ratio (HR) for a 2-fold copy number decrease in region 9p21.3 (including CDKN2A/B) was 1.50 (95% CI: 1.2–1.9, P<0.001, FDR=0.02), and the HR for a 2-fold copy number decrease in 19p13 (including STK11) was 2.4 (1.3–4.3, P=0.005, FDR=0.15). Similar results were obtained for overall survival and lung-cancer specific survival. Results of histology-specific analyses will be presented.
Conclusion:
These large-scale genome-wide analyses of gene CNA provide new candidate prognostic markers for stage I-III NSCLC.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL06.04 - Discussant for ORAL06.01, ORAL06.02, ORAL06.03 (ID 3302)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): R. Govindan
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL06.05 - Molecular Tumor Board (MTB) in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancers (NSCLC) to Optimize Targeted Therapies: 4 Years' Experience at Gustave Roussy (ID 2563)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): D. Planchard, L. Faivre, I. Sullivan, V. Kahn-Charpy, L. Lacroix, N. Auger, J. Adam, V. De Montpreville, P. Dorfmuller, C. Le Pechoux, T. Le-Chevalier, A. Gazzah, J. Remon, G. Bescher, J. Soria, J. Pignon, B. Besse
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Molecular biology has changed the treatment of advanced NSCLC, leading to many small subgroups of patients (pts) eligible for targeted therapies, many of them being not approved. Since 2010 we created a monthly MTB dedicated to NSCLC pts with potential driving molecular abnormalitie(s). MTB includes expert physicians from the lung tumor board and phase I unit, radiation therapists, researchers, geneticists, pathologists and biologists. A medical report summarizes the findings and treatment recommendations for each pts. We report 4 years of activity of MTB at Gustave-Roussy.
Methods:
All consecutive files discussed in MTB for a NSCLC were reviewed. MTB included pts with at least one molecular alteration based on a 75 gene panel (NGS analysis and FISH for ALK, HER2, MET, FGFR1, ROS1 and RET). Tumor and pts characteristics were collected as well as treatments. Pts outcome was calculated from the MTB date. Kaplan-Meier methods, and Cox proportional hazards models were used for survival analysis, adjusting for sex, histology, smoking status, metastasis at diagnosis, number of line(s) before MTB.
Results:
502 files were discussed between 02/2010 and 09/2014. Median age was 60 yrs (25–88 yrs), 53% were male, 86% Caucasian, 26% never-smokers, and 93% had PS ≤1. Initial clinical stage was III-IV in 417 pts (84%) and 79%/10%/11% were adenocarcinomas/squamous cell carcinomas/others NSCLC. Median number of treatment-lines before MTB was 1 (0-10), 86% were previously treated by a platinum-based chemotherapy regimen, 17% in a therapeutic trial, and median time from diagnosis to MTB was 5 months. Biopsy for Molecular Analysis (MoA) mostly came from CT guided biopsies (62%), surgery (21%) or endoscopy (16%). Biopsy was repeated in 19% of pts to get enough material for MoA. The MoA results were ALK rearrangement in 11%, exon 18/19/20/21 EGFR mutation (mut) in 2/14/4/7% respectively, KRAS mut in 32%, PI3KCA mut in 3%, BRAF mut in 5%, HER2 mut (Exon 20) in 2%, HER2 amplification in 2%, FGFR1 amplification in 3%, MET amplification in 3% and other rare mutations in 27%. MTB recommended a targeted therapy in 344 pts (68%) either within clinical trials (57%), EMA approved therapy (23%), an off label drug (9%), or an expanded access program (11%). 162pts (47%) actually received the recommended therapy, 141 (41%) did not and 41 (12%) might receive it at the time of progression. Median follow-up was 24 months (1-24; follow-up censored after 24 months). Median OS was 13.1 months [95%CI: 8.8; 18.2] for non-oriented pts, and 14.3 months [11.5; 16.7] for oriented pts (p=0.39). We observed a significant difference between EGFR/ALK/ROS1 mutated/rearranged pts (median 23.8 months) vs. pts with KRAS (8.6 months) or others mutations (11.1 months) or non-oriented pts (13.1 m; p=0.0008, HR=0.56, 1.15 and 0.97 respectively compared to non-oriented).
Conclusion:
MTB is feasible in daily practice with treatment recommendations in a majority of NSCLC pts (68%), enrichment in clinical trials or expanded access programs, and limitation of off-label drugs use. Benefit on survival for all oriented pts has to be clarified based on the type of molecular abnormality. Update results will be presented at the meeting.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL06.06 - Impact of Reflex EGFR/ALK Testing on Time-To-Treatment and Integration of Personalized Medicine in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients (ID 2290)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): P.K. Cheema, I.B. Menjak, S. Raphael, S.Y. Cheng, A. Muinuddin, S. Verma, S.Y. Chang, R. Freedman, N. Toor, Z. Winterton-Perks, M. Anaka, J. Perera
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Testing for biomarkers including EGFR mutations and ALK rearrangements is standard of care in the management of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), as it determines optimal systemic therapy (ST). Our centre began EGFR testing March 2010 and ALK April 2012. Initially, EGFR/ALK were requested by medical oncologists (MO) when patients were deemed eligible for EGFR or ALK targeted therapy. To expedite biomarker information to MO for rapid initiation of ST in patients with advanced stage or earlier stage disease that developed recurrence, June 2013 we implemented a multidisciplinary approach termed “reflex testing”. This was defined as our pathologists requesting EGFR/ALK at time of diagnosis of non-squamous NSCLC irrespective of a patient’s clinical stage. If tissue was at an outside centre, clerical staff requested EGFR/ALK at time of referral to MO. The objective of this study was to determine if reflex testing improved time-to-treatment (TTT) and the integration of personalized medicine in patients with advanced NSCLC.
Methods:
This was a retrospective chart review of patients with non-squamous NSCLC seen by MO at the Sunnybrook Odette Cancer Centre from March 18, 2010 to April 30, 2014. Patient and EGFR/ALK test characteristics were compared before and after reflex testing was implemented using Chi-square tests of association. Time outcomes were compared using Mann-Whitney U non-parametric tests. TTT was defined as the interval between first MO visit with advanced NSCLC to initiation of ST.
Results:
Of the 301 patients included, median age was 68, 43% female, 65% Caucasian, 75% smokers, 93% adenocarcinoma, 22% EGFR positive and 1% ALK positive. The majority presented with stage IV (65%) and 82% either presented with or developed advanced NSCLC. In advanced NSCLC patients (n=247), reflex testing significantly reduced median TTT compared to routine testing [(24 days (IQR: 7 to 42) vs. 36 days (IQR: 16 to 72), p=0.04)], reduced the rate of EGFR unknown (4% vs. 26%, p=0.002) and ALK unknown (10% vs. 50%, p<0.001). There was minimal impact on advanced NSCLC patients receiving any first-line ST (58% vs. 63%, p=0.48). However, among these patients, with reflex testing, fewer were initiated on first-line ST without biomarker results known by MO (EGFR 23% vs. 39%, p=0.12, ALK 17% vs. 42%, p=0.02), and at last follow up significantly fewer had EGFR unknown (0% vs. 13%, p=0.004) and ALK unknown (7% vs. 38%, p=0.003). Across all stages, rates of EGFR results available to MO at first consultation increased (34% vs. 4%, p<0.001). Reflex testing also impacted the quality of biomarker testing with a decrease in unsuccessful EGFR tests due to inconclusive results, insufficient or inappropriate tissue, or tissue not sent from holding lab to testing lab (4% vs. 15%, p=0.03).
Conclusion:
A multidisciplinary approach to earlier biomarker testing in NSCLC is feasible. Reflex testing for EGFR/ALK improved TTT and the integration of personalized medicine for patients with advanced NSCLC by improving biomarker testing rates, the quality of testing and fewer patients given ST without biomarkers known. These outcomes provide support for reflex EGFR/ALK testing by pathologists at time of diagnosis of non-squamous NSCLC.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL06.07 - An Integrated Cost-Effectiveness and Outcome Analysis Based on Multiplex Lung Cancer Genotyping in the Network Genomic Medicine (ID 2800)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): A. Kostenko, F. Kron, M. Scheffler, S. Michels, J. Sueptitz, R.N. Fischer, S. Merkelbach-Bruse, P. De-Mary, J.P. Glossmann, R. Buettner, J. Wolf
- Abstract
Background:
The Network Genomic Medicine (NGM) Lung Cancer is an interdisciplinary and intersectoral network offering comprehensive and centralized next generation sequencing (NGS)-based multiplex genotyping for all inoperable lung cancer patients in Germany. In 2014 NGM and the AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, one of the largest German public health insurances, have successfully contracted and established the first "flat rate" cost reimbursement model for NGS-based comprehensive lung cancer genotyping in Europe. After a year the first joint health-economic evaluation of NGM patients was initiated.
Methods:
The AOK Rheinland/Hamburg cooperates with NGM within the integrated care contract (ICC) according to § 140 German Social Insurance Code. Besides the cost reimbursement model for the NGS-based diagnostics the ICC comprises optional second opinion consultation hours and a joint evaluation program. The NGS panel used for all patients currently consists of 14 genes and 102 amplicons to cover potentially targetable aberrations. Other German public and private health insurances are currently negotiating to join the ICC. In April 2015 we elaborated a model to analyze molecularly guided therapy cost and outcome of inoperable lung cancer patients integrating health insurance cost data (diagnostic, therapy and drug-related costs). This model includes NGS-based molecular diagnostic results, treatment strategies and cost-effectiveness. Additionally, time-points of molecular genotyping and their influence on patient-related outcome and quality of life will be examined.
Results:
In 2014 about 4500 lung cancer NGM patients were centrally genotyped on the central NGS platform in Cologne. Since April 2014 167 patients, insured by the AOK Rheinland/Hamburg, consented for ICC. 149 patients received NGS-based molecular diagnostic of their tumors. 18 samples were not suitable for testing. ICC patients were stratified according to their molecular diagnostic results and molecular guided therapy options (targeted drugs including off-label use, participating in clinical trials or standard chemotherapy). Clinical outcome data were collected within NGM (by over 200 clinical partners) and reimbursement data are provided by the AOK Rheinland/Hamburg. This model will be extended to all NGM patients independent of their insurance status. Final cost-effectiveness and outcome data will be presented.
Conclusion:
NGM stands for the implementation of personalized cancer therapy into clinical routine in Germany. Now we systematically evaluate NGS-based molecular results, clinical outcome and cost-effectiveness data besides of clinical trials. First-time in Europe data evaluation is provided in a close cooperation between health care providers and health insurance companies and even matching the patient’s data. Furthermore, in 2015 a joint database (NGM Cancer Information System) for retrospective evaluation of personalized cancer treatment in Germany will be launched. Our model of implementing personalized cancer care in broad clinical routine is currently transferred to other tumor entities.
-
+
ORAL06.08 - Discussant for ORAL06.05, ORAL06.06, ORAL06.07 (ID 3303)
10:45 - 12:15 | Author(s): P. Yang
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
Author of
-
+
ED 02 - Molecular Testing Around the World (Genomics in Clinic (Timelines/Bioinformatics), Testing Platforms & Algorithms (NGS, Targeted Panels, FISH, IHC), Cost Considerations, Strategies for Identifying Rare Genomic Subsets in Clinical Trials) (ID 2)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Education Session
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:M. Ladanyi, G. De Lima Lopes
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 14:15 - 15:45, Four Seasons Ballroom F1+F2
-
+
ED02.01 - North America (ID 1774)
14:15 - 15:45 | Author(s): V. Miller
- Abstract
- Presentation
Abstract not provided
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MINI 10 - ALK and EGFR (ID 105)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Mini Oral
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:T. Yap, T. Li
- Coordinates: 9/07/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, Mile High Ballroom 1a-1f
-
+
MINI10.09 - Comprehensive Genomic Profiling Identifies EGFR Exon 19 Deletions in NSCLC Not Identified by Standard of Care Testing (ID 3042)
16:45 - 18:15 | Author(s): V. Miller
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Non-small cell carcinoma (NSCLC) cases harboring deletions in exon 19 of EGFR typically respond to treatment with small molecule inhibitors of EGFR. Detection of EGFR deletions in routine clinical practice is performed using a large variety of assays and testing platforms, with varying performance characteristics that are often not readily available. Using a hybrid capture based comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) assay we identified 250 consecutive NSCLC cases, obtained from a range of clinical institutions, harboring deletions in EGFR exon 19 and compared data from these cases with available prior EGFR testing results.
Methods:
DNA was extracted from 40 microns of FFPE sections and CGP was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation based libraries to a mean coverage depth of 678X for 3,769 exons of 236 cancer-related genes plus 47 introns from 19 genes frequently rearranged in cancer. The results were evaluated for all classes of genomic alterations (GA). Clinically relevant genomic alterations (CRGA) were defined as GA linked to drugs on the market or under evaluation in mechanism driven clinical trials.
Results:
Of the 250 cases with exon 19 deletions excluding the C-Helix, consisting primarily of 746-750, 71 (28%) had previous EGFR testing results obtained through standard of care testing at multiple different institutions available for review. Of these 71 cases, 12 (17%) were negative for EGFR alterations, but were identified by CGP as harboring an exon 19 deletion. Of 14 cases with deletions affecting the C-Helix (753-761), 6 had previous EGFR testing results available for review, with 5 (83%) cases having a prior negative result. For select cases clinical histories were reviewed, and the clinical benefit from treatment with small molecule inhibitors of EGFR was observed, consistent with historic norms, including EGFR 746-750 deleted patients responding to erlotinib and afatinib, a patient with EGFR T751_I759>N responding to afatinib, and a patient with EGFR S752_I759del having an ongoing 18 month response to erlotinib.
Conclusion:
CGP in the course of clinical care can identify EGFR exon 19 deletions in NSCLC that may be missed by standard of care testing, including both the canonical 746-750 deletion as well as the less characterized C- Helix deletions. Tumors with either of these alterations that go undetected by standard testing but are identified by CGP can respond to anti-EGFR therapy. Given the proven improved extent and duration of tumor response and patient survival benefit conferred by anti-EGFR targeted therapy in patients whose NSCLC harbor EGFR exon 19 deletions, the 17% false negative rate in patients tested by standard hot spot assays is a concern. Further evaluation of the impact of the increased range and sensitivity of CGP to uncover EGFR alterations in NSCLC that have been missed by non-hybrid capture assays appears warranted.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL 37 - Novel Targets (ID 146)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:S.S. Ramalingam, E. Thunnissen
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 16:45 - 18:15, Mile High Ballroom 4a-4f
-
+
ORAL37.04 - Comprehensive Genomic Profiling (CGP) of Advanced Cancers Identifies MET Exon 14 Alterations That Are Sensitive to MET Inhibitors (ID 3156)
16:45 - 18:15 | Author(s): V. Miller
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Amplifications and activating mutations in the c-MET proto-oncogene are known oncogenic drivers that have proven responsive to targeted therapy. Mutations causing skipping of MET exon 14 are also oncogenic, but less well characterized. We undertook comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of a large series of advanced cancers to further characterize MET exon 14 alterations.
Methods:
DNA was extracted from 40 microns of FFPE sections from 38,028 advanced cancer cases. CGP was performed on hybridization-captured, adaptor ligation based libraries to a mean coverage depth of >500x using three versions of the FoundationOne test. Hybridization capture baits for the MET gene were identical for all three versions of the test. Base substitution, indel, copy number alteration, and rearrangement variant calls were examined to identify those nearby to the splice junctions of MET exon 14. These genomic alterations were then manually inspected to identify those likely to affect splicing of exon 14, or delete the exon entirely.
Results:
221 cases harboring MET ex14 alterations were identified. These patients had a median age of 70.5 years (range 15-88), with 97 males and 124 females. The cases were lung carcinoma (193), carcinomas of unknown primary (15), brain glioma (6), and one each of adrenal cortical carcinoma, hepatocellular carcinoma, histiocytic sarcoma, renal cell carcinoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, skin merkel cell carcinoma, and synovial sarcoma. The majority were stage IV. Identification of this alteration has lead to treatment with MET inhibitors such as crizotinib, and to durable partial responses or better exceeding 3 months in histiocytic sarcoma (1), sarcomatoid lung carcinoma (1), and nsclc (1+). Multiple patients (5+) have initiated treatment on either crizotinib or MET inhibitors in clinical development, and additional outcome data will be reported. One patient with locally advanced unresectable disease harbored a MET exon 14 skipping alteration. On initiation with treatment with an MET inhibitor, symptomatic relief was observed in 3 days, radiographic response was observed at two weeks, and resection was performed 8 weeks after initiation of the MET inhibitor.
Conclusion:
MET exon 14 alterations define a hereto unrecognized population of advanced cancer cases, particularly in NSCLC. Multiple case reports demonstrate that these alterations confer sensitivity to multiple small molecule MET inhibitors. This finding expands the population of advanced NSCLC patients who can derive benefit from MET-targeted therapies.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
ORAL 42 - Drug Resistance (ID 160)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Oral Session
- Track: Biology, Pathology, and Molecular Testing
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:R.C. Doebele, J.V. DeGregori
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 18:30 - 20:00, Mile High Ballroom 4a-4f
-
+
ORAL42.04 - Rictor Alterations Elicit Mechanisms of Survival Advantage and Resistance to Targeted Therapy in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NCSLC) (ID 2991)
18:30 - 20:00 | Author(s): V. Miller
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background:
Rictor (RPTOR independent companion of MTOR, complex 2) is a highly conserved protein and is a critical component for assembly and functionality of the mTORC2 complex. Alterations of the PI3K/mTOR/AKT pathway are hallmark of many cancer types, underscoring the potential important role of Rictor. The goal of our current study was to characterize the functional consequences of genomic alterations of Rictor in advanced refractory NSCLC. Our preliminary data suggest that Rictor alterations have the potential to, not only signal canonically (via activation of AKT), but also provide cancer cells with alternate, more advantageous oncogenic signaling via non-canonical mechanisms.
Methods:
We correlated genomic data (DNA next generation sequencing (NGS), Foundation Medicine, Inc) gene expression profiling, and clinical outcome in the context of the ongoing BATTLE-2 clinical trial of targeted therapies in chemo-refractory NSCLC(198 cases). We further (1) surveyed early stage NSCLC cases(230 cases) in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database to perform two-way hierarchical clustering comparing gene expression profiling in amplified vs diploid cases; (2) utilized a single-nucleotide polymorphism array to select Rictor amplified and diploid NSCLC cell lines; (3) assessed Rictor protein and RNA expression by Western blot and qRT-PCR, respectively; (4) performed Rictor knockdown (siRNA), and (5) performed drug sensitivity to targeted therapies by MTS assay.
Results:
In the Battle-2 cases, we identified 15% of Rictor alterations (9% gene amplifications, 6.6% mutations, non-concomitant). Among the mutations, 1 was mapped to an N-terminal phosphorylation site, while all others are of unknown significance to date. Rictor alterations were significantly associated with lack of 8-week disease control in the AKTi+MEKi therapeutic arm. In the TCGA we found: (1) 10% Rictor amplifications and 3% mutations; (2) significant correlation between amplification and elevated Rictor gene expression; (3) a putative functional gene expression signature associated with Rictor amplification. In diploid cell lines we found concordance between AKT phosphorylation and activation of other downstream mTORC2 targets (i.e. SGK1 and PKCα), but in Rictor amplified cell lines we witnessed a discordant activation of these pathways. Furthermore, following Rictor knockdown in our amplified cell lines, a significant reduction of colony formation, migratory, and invasive potential was seen in a pathway-differential manner. Thus, suggesting that Rictor amplifications may provide survival advantage in select cancer cells by tipping the signaling balance toward a non-canonical oncogenic pathway (AKT-independent[I1] ).Also in a differential pathway manner, Rictor gene amplification and overexpression contributed to resistance to a number of targeted therapies
Conclusion:
Rictor alterations may constitute a potential novel mechanism of targeted therapy resistance via the activation of non-canonical signaling pathways. These alterations could define new molecular NSCLC subtypes with distinct biology that expose unique avenues for therapeutic implication. Ongoing studies are exploring therapeutic vulnerabilities, non-canonical signaling and Rictor mutations.
Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
P3.01 - Poster Session/ Treatment of Advanced Diseases – NSCLC (ID 208)
- Event: WCLC 2015
- Type: Poster
- Track: Treatment of Advanced Diseases - NSCLC
- Presentations: 1
- Moderators:
- Coordinates: 9/09/2015, 09:30 - 17:00, Exhibit Hall (Hall B+C)
-
+
P3.01-075 - Phase 2 Trial of Bortezomib in KRAS G12D Mutant Lung Cancers (ID 2943)
09:30 - 17:00 | Author(s): V. Miller
- Abstract
Background:
KRAS mutations are the most common oncogenic drivers in lung cancers without any approved targeted therapy. Preclinical evidence suggests that KRAS mutations are highly dependent on the NF-kB pathway. Bortezomib, a small molecule proteasome inhibitor, has been shown to downregulate the NF-kB pathway and lead to objective responses in patients with KRAS G12D in early phase clinical trials. In this single-institution, open label, phase II study we assessed the efficacy and safety of subcutaneous bortezomib in KRAS mutant lung cancers.
Methods:
Patients with advanced KRAS G12D mutant lung cancers were eligible. Bortezomib was administered at 1.3mg/m2/dose subcutaneously on days 1, 4, 8, and 11 of a 21 day cycle until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary objective was radiographic response rate (RECIST version 1.1). The secondary endpoints were progression free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) determined from the time of first bortezomib treatment. Simon two-stage minimax design was used (H0=10%, H1=30%, power=90%).
Results:
Sixteen patients with KRAS G12D mutant lung adenocarcinomas were treated on study: 44% women, 38% never smokers, 31% former smokers ≤15 pack years, and 69% with invasive mucinous adenocarcinomas. Patients received treatment for a median of 2 months (range 1-12months). One patient had a partial response with a 66% reduction in disease burden (6% observed rate, 95% CI 0.2 to 30.2%). Of the 6 patients (40%) with stable disease, 2 remained on study for over 5 months. The median PFS was 1 month (95% CI 1-6). The median OS was 13 months (95% CI 6-NA). The median OS from date of diagnosis of metastatic disease was 39 months (95% CI 35-NA). The most common treatment-related toxicities of any grade were fatigue (50%), diarrhea (38%), nausea (31%), and papulopustular rash (31%). Treatment-related peripheral neuropathy occurred in 25% of patients (3 patients with grade 1, 1 patient with grade 2).
Conclusion:
In patients with G12D KRAS mutant lung cancers, bortezomib was well tolerated and associated with modest anti-tumor activity and durable disease control in a small subset of patients. Further investigation into predictive biomarkers for the efficacy of bortezomib should be pursued. Without a clear biomarker, no further study of bortezomib in KRAS- mutant lung cancers is warranted.
