Virtual Library
Start Your Search
S. Katz
Author of
-
+
MO09 - Mesothelioma I (ID 120)
- Event: WCLC 2013
- Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
- Track:
- Presentations: 2
- Moderators:K. Suzuki, S.G. Armato III
- Coordinates: 10/28/2013, 16:15 - 17:45, Bayside 204 A+B, Level 2
-
+
MO09.03 - A pilot and feasibility trial evaluating two different chemotherapy regimens in combination with intrapleural adenoviral-mediated interferon-alpha (SCH 721015, Ad.hIFN-alpha2b) gene transfer for malignant pleural mesothelioma (ID 3374)
16:15 - 17:45 | Author(s): S. Katz
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Malignant pleural mesothelioma is an incurable thoracic neoplasm for which combination chemotherapy offers limited improvement in survival. Novel agents that offer synergy with standard systemic cytotoxic therapy are under investigation. Among these agents are a variety of immunotherapeutics which can be administered either locally or in a systemic fashion.Methods
We conducted a Phase I/II “in situ vaccination” clinical trial commencing in March2011 involving repeated intrapleural administration of a replication-defective recombinant adenoviral vector containing the human interferon-alpha (hIFN-α2b) gene at a dose of 3x10[11 ]viral particles concomitant with a 14-day course of high-dose cyclo-oxygenase-2 (COX-2) inhibitor (Celecoxib). This was followed by standard first-line or second-line chemotherapy agents. Primary outcome measures were safety, overall best response rate, and survival.Results
We completed accrual (n=25) in the first-line chemotherapy arm, in which all patients received pemetrexed-based chemotherapy regimens. This group included patients who previously received pemetrexed chemotherapy but did not subsequently receive this agent for >6 months. In the second-line chemotherapy arm, 13of a planned 15 subjects have enrolled (with 12 evaluable), all of whom received gemcitabine-based chemotherapy (Table 1). In both arms, the combination of intrapleural Ad.IFN-α2b vector, high-dose celecoxib, and systemic chemotherapy proved safe. Adverse events during the chemotherapy portion of the study were comparable to historical controls.Most patients experienced expected mild toxicities from vector (cytokine release syndrome, interferon production), including nausea, fatigue, anemia, lymphopenia (grade 3-4) and hypoalbuminemia. Serious adverse events included: pleural catheter infection (n=2); hypoxia (n=2); supraventricular tachycardia (n=1); and esophagitis (n=1), none directly attributable to the vector or vector administration. Serial chest CT and PET/CT scans demonstrated an overall response rate of 31% by Modified RECIST criteria and disease control rate (DCR) of 78% (partial and complete responses plus stable disease) at initial follow-up scan after the first two cycles of chemotherapy. Partial responses were seen in 9/25 evaluable patients with pemetrexed-based chemotherapy and 1/12 with gemcitabine. Patients who received first-line pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (n=14) had a median survival of 10.5 months, 95% ci=(5.5,inf), whereas second-line patients (n=21; 12 gemcitabine)had a median survival of 15.0 months, 95% ci=(9.0,inf).
TABLE 1Pem/Platin (N=25) Gemcitabine (N=13) Male % 64% (16/25) 84.6% (11/13) Median Age 67 (51-86) 65 (43-81) Histologic Subtype % Epithelioid - 17 (68%) Biphasic - 4 (17%) Sarcomatoid - 4 (17%) Epithelioid - 11 (84.6%) Biphasic - 2 (15.4%) Sarcomatoid - 0 Stage I - 2 (8%) II - 6 (24%) III - 13 (52%) IV - 4 (16%) III - 4 (30%) IV - 9 (70%) Prior Treatment Chemotherapy - 4 (16%) RP/PDT - 4 (16%) XRT - 5 (20%) Chemotherapy - 13 (100%) RP/PDT - 7 (53%) XRT - 2 (15%) Platin Agent Cisplatin - 12 Carboplatin - 10 Cis-Carbo - 1 None - 2 Cisplatin - 0 Carboplatin - 2 None - 8 Median Cycles of Chemo 6 (1-6) 3 (0-6) Conclusion
The combination of intrapleural Ad.IFN-α2b vector, Celecoxib, and systemic chemotherapy proved safe. Disease control rates observed in this study compare favorably with historical data andthe especially encouraging OS in the second-line chemotherapy group argue strongly for proceeding with a multi-center randomized clinical trial of chemo-immunogene therapy versus chemotherapy alone.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
-
+
MO09.13 - Comparison of Three Radiographic Tumor Volume Estimation Techniques for Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma: Their Correlation with Each Other, Actual Measured Intraoperative Tumor Volumes, and Survival (ID 1689)
16:15 - 17:45 | Author(s): S. Katz
- Abstract
- Presentation
Background
Studies have assessed correlation between radiographically estimated tumor volume (TV) and outcomes for malignant pleural mesothelioma, no standard radiographic model exists for estimating TV. Although radical pleurectomy yields a surgical specimen essentially all cancer, thereby allowing accurate determination of TV, empirically-derived intraoperative TVs have never been reported. We compare multiple radiographic estimates of TV with TVs determined at resection to determine which radiographic approach most accurately predicts intraoperative TV, and we correlate TV with survival.Methods
Actual TVs were measured for 41 consecutive radical pleurectomy specimens by volume displacement. Radiographic TV estimates were performed by radiologists/radiation oncologists blinded to intraoperative TVs. Radiographic estimates were obtained with: Live Wire algorithm (automated tumor delineation after manual algorithm training), radiology TeraRecon (tumor automatically circumscribed with subsequent manual tracing corrections), and radiation oncology Eclipse (non-automated tumor delineation).Results
Median age was 63yrs, with 80% male and 83% having epithelial histology. Stage distribution was: 3-Stage I (7%), 4-Stage II (10%), 29-Stage III (71%), and 5-Stage IV (12%). Median (interquartile range) intraoperative TV was 600(400,800)cm[3]. Median TV of 800(575,1100)cm[3] among nonepithelial compared to 500(350,838)cm[3] for epithelial was not significantly difference (p=0.099). TVs were largest for stage III (p=0.01). Median TVs for Live Wire, TerraRecon, and Eclipse were 260(147-452), 293(161-465), and 447(247-559)cm[3], respectively. Pearson correlation coefficients were 0.60, 0.75, and 0.78, with all models underestimating intraoperative TVs (Figure 1A). Among 34 epithelial patients (mean/median follow-up 9.8/8.0mo), median survival was not reached (only 9 recurrences). Epithelial patients with large (>500cm[3]) intraoperative TVs had numerically worse progression-free (p=0.148) and overall (p=0.161) survival than patients with TVs ≤500cm[3](Figure 1B), but limited events precluded statistical significance. Larger radiologic TVs similarly correlated with shorter survivals. Figure 1Conclusion
This is the first study to compare radiographic estimates of TV to actual TV determined by volume displacement of radical pleurectomy specimens, arguably the TV measurement gold standard. This study is also the first to compare estimated TVs using multiple established and previously reported radiographic techniques. Our results demonstrate a clear trend toward greater overall and progression-free survival for actual TVs <500cm[3]. All radiographic techniques underestimated actual TV, with estimates progressively closer to the actual volume with each technique as they became less automated and more manual. Further analysis is ongoing to determine if any radiographic method can serve as an accurate surrogate for actual TV and if models correlate as closely with outcomes as actual TVs.Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.
