Virtual Library

 x 
My Library Virtual Library FAQ

Start Your Search

M. Nishikawa



Author of

  • +

    MO06 - NSCLC - Chemotherapy I (ID 108)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Mini Oral Abstract Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      MO06.10 - Phase II study of bevacizumab, cisplatin and docetaxel plus maintenance bevacizumab as first line treatment for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (n-Sq NSCLC) combined with exploratory analysis of circulating cells (CEC): Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG)1016 (ID 1211)

      16:15 - 17:45  |  Author(s): M. Nishikawa

      • Abstract
      • Presentation
      • Slides

      Background
      Bevacizumab has been shown to amplify efficacy against n-Sq NSCLC in combination with platinum doublet, especially taxane including regimens. Docetaxel is one of best taxane composition combined with cisplatin for first line treatment for NSCLC, and known to have anti-angiogenic effect and may act synergistically with VEGF inhibiting agent. The object of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of bevacizumab, cisplatin and docetaxel combination treatment in patients with chemonaive n-Sq NSCLC patients. (Trial Registry: UMIN 000004368)

      Methods
      Eligible patients had advanced or recurrent n-Sq NSCLC with no prior chemotherapy. Patients having brain metastasis or history of hemoptysis were ineligible. Patients received 4 cycles of docetaxel (60mg/m[2]), cisplatin (80mg/m[2]) and bevacizumab (15mg/kg) on day1 every 3 weeks followed by Bev alone as maintenance every 3 weeks until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was response rate (RR) and planned sample size of this phase II study was 47 patients (Simon's two-stage minimax design). We measured circulating endothelial cells (CEC) count day1 and 8 of first cycle for exploratory analysis of efficacy and safety prediction.

      Results
      From Oct 2010 to Apr 2012, 47 patients (28 males/ 19 females, median age, 61 years, 39-73) were enrolled. Stage IIIB/IV/recurrent: 5/39/3, ECOG PS 0/1: 31/16. All patients were adenocarcinoma, EGFR status: mutated/wild/unknown: 13/31/3. Bevacizumab maintenance were administered in 87% (41/47) of the patients and 9 was median number of delivered course, 4 course of induction and 5 course of maintenance. Dose reduction was required in 28% (13/47) of the patients. Thirty-five partial responses and 11 stable diseases were observed among 47 patients, yielding a RR of 74.5% (95% confidence interval: 59.7-86.1%) and disease control rate of 97.9% (88.7-99.9%), respectively. The median progression free survival duration in the patients was 9.0 (7.0-11.3) months. Grade 3/4 leukopenia, neutropenia, hypertension, nausea and febrile neutropenia were observed in 60, 96, 47, 13 and 9% of the patients, respectively. Alveolar hemorrhage (Grade 5) after 4 cycle occurred in one patient.

      Conclusion
      Bevacizumab, cisplatin and docetaxel combination followed by bevacizumab maintenance treatment was highly effective in patients with n-Sq NSCLC, with acceptable toxicity. Exploratory analysis of CEC is ongoing and will be presented.

      Only Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login, select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout. If you would like to become a member of IASLC, please click here.

      Only Active Members that have purchased this event or have registered via an access code will be able to view this content. To view this presentation, please login or select "Add to Cart" and proceed to checkout.

  • +

    P1.11 - Poster Session 1 - NSCLC Novel Therapies (ID 208)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Medical Oncology
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P1.11-016 - A Prospective, Multi-center Phase II Trial on the Efficacy and Safety of Low-dose Erlotinib Monotherapy for Patients with EGFR Mutation-positive, Previously Treated Non-small Cell Lung Cancer: Results of Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) Trial 0911. (ID 1385)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): M. Nishikawa

      • Abstract

      Background
      Several studies of erlotinib and gefitinib have shown similar benefit in terms of response and progression-free survival (PFS) for EGFR mutation-positive (EGFRm+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, the steady-state plasma trough concentration of erlotinib was approximately 3.5 times higher than that of gefitinib when administered at the respective approved dose. Hence, low-dose treatment of erlotinib may be as effective as gefitinib or erlotinib given at full dose, with reduced toxicity and treatment cost.

      Methods
      Eligible patients were adults (over 20 years), with advanced or recurrent EGFRm+ NSCLC who had received one to three prior chemotherapy regimens, ECOG PS of 0-2, measurable lesion, and adequate organ function. Erlotinib 50 mg was administered daily until disease progression or unacceptable toxicities. Dose was escalated to 150 mg/day in case of not achieving CR or PR classified by RECIST criteria (i.e., not responded, NR) at the first 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR); SWOG two-stage design with an early stopping rule based on response rate was used. Response was initially judged by the investigators and confirmed by the independent review committee (IRC). Finally, 26 or more responses among 40 eligible patients were to be considered as evidence of sufficient efficacy of this treatment.

      Results
      Thirty-four patients were enrolled between April 2010 and November 2012: males/females 20/14; median age 67 (range 31-81); PS 0/1/2 16/18/0; Ad/Sq 33/1. EGFR mutation types were: exon 18 and 19/19/21/other 1/21/11/1. One patient was excluded for evaluation because of not having a measurable lesion, therefore, efficacy and safety were evaluated among 33 patients. The study was closed early according to the protocol definition at the time that NR was confirmed in 15 of 33 patients, because it was determined impossible to meet the primary endpoint even if the study was continued. The IRC-judged best responses to the 50 mg/day erlotinib were: PR 18 (54.5%), SD 10 (30.3%) and PD 5 (15.2%). ORR and disease control rate were 54.5% (95%CI: 36.4-71.9%) and 84.8 % (95%CI 68.1-94.9%), respectively. In addition, 4 out of the 10 patients with SD to the initial dose yielded PR after dose escalation to 150 mg/day. At data cut-off (April, 2013), median PFS was 8.6 months (95%CI: 6.7-15.0 months). Toxicities were generally mild, with a few grade 3 or more toxicities. The only grade 3 toxicities were 2 cases with neutropenia and 1 with AST/ALT elevation. No grade 4 toxicity or treatment-related death was observed. There was no treatment-related interstitial lung disease.

      Conclusion
      Although low-dose erlotinib appeared to have a certain efficacy in this population, this study could not meet the primary endpoint. Because of its relatively lower toxicity and cost, it may be worth further evaluation for elderly or frail patients.

  • +

    P3.24 - Poster Session 3 - Supportive Care (ID 160)

    • Event: WCLC 2013
    • Type: Poster Session
    • Track: Supportive Care
    • Presentations: 1
    • +

      P3.24-014 - Multicenter study of zoledronic acid in lung cancer patients with bone metastasis. Thoracic Oncology Research Group (TORG) 1017. (ID 1043)

      09:30 - 16:30  |  Author(s): M. Nishikawa

      • Abstract

      Background
      Bone is the most frequent site of metastasis for lung cancer, and metastatic bone disease causes pain. Furthermore, bone metastasis may produce skeletal-related events (SREs) that greatly reduce quality of life and may even lead to death. Several guidelines have recommended use of bone-modifying agents (BMA) such as zoledronic acid (ZA) at the first diagnosis of bone metastases in patients with solid tumors, continued every 3-4 weeks as long as the patient is able to tolerate therapy or until evidence of a substantial decline in performance status. However, due to the risk of osteonecrosis of the jaw (ONJ) and a perceived lack of evidence for reduced SRE in lung cancer, some physicians have hesitated to administer ZA in lung cancer patients with bone metastasis. Therefore, the main objective of the present study was both to describe real world data of ZA and to compare SREs among previous reports.

      Methods
      All patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accompanied by metastatic bone disease (MBD) who were administered ZA at least twice from 12 hospitals in the TORG in Japan between January 2008 and December 2009 were eligible for inclusion in the study.

      Results
      A total of 198 consecutive patients (126 men, 72 women; median age, 64 years; range, 44-89 years) were identified. Histological type was as follows: adenocarcinoma (n=131, 66%); squamous cell carcinoma (n=30, 15%); and others (n=37, 19%). About two-thirds of patients experienced SRE before starting anti-cancer therapy. Median duration of ZA administration was 106 days (range, 28-1126 days), and median number of ZA administrations was four (range, 2-41). Median time to first SRE in patients who experienced SRE after treatment was 202 days (range, 156-264 days). No ONJ was reported from the 198 patients.

      Conclusion
      We found that ZA was not used sufficiently in clinical practice in Japan. Our data suggest that ONJ during the treatment of lung cancer patients is very rare, and ZA is potentially useful in lung patients with bone metastasis.